Neoadjuvant FOLFIRINOX versus upfront surgery for resectable pancreatic head cancer (NORPACT-1): a multicentre, randomised, phase 2 trial.

BACKGROUND: In patients undergoing resection for pancreatic cancer, adjuvant modified fluorouracil, leucovorin, irinotecan, and oxaliplatin (FOLFIRINOX) improves overall survival compared with alternative chemotherapy regimens. We aimed to compare the efficacy and safety of neoadjuvant FOLFIRINOX with the standard strategy of upfront surgery in patients with resectable pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma. METHODS: NORPACT-1 was a multicentre, randomised, phase 2 trial done in 12 hospitals in Denmark, Finland, Norway, and Sweden. Eligible patients were aged 18 years or older, with a WHO performance status of 0 or 1, and had a resectable tumour of the pancreatic head radiologically strongly suspected to be pancreatic adenocarcinoma. Participants were randomly assigned (3:2 before October, 2018, and 1:1 after) to the neoadjuvant FOLFIRINOX group or upfront surgery group. Patients in the neoadjuvant FOLFIRINOX group received four neoadjuvant cycles of FOLFIRINOX (oxaliplatin 85 mg/m2, irinotecan 180 mg/m2, leucovorin 400 mg/m2, and fluorouracil 400 mg/m2 bolus then 2400 mg/m2 over 46 h on day 1 of each 14-day cycle), followed by surgery and adjuvant chemotherapy. Patients in the upfront surgery group underwent surgery and then received adjuvant chemotherapy. Initially, adjuvant chemotherapy was gemcitabine plus capecitabine (gemcitabine 1000 mg/m2 over 30 min on days 1, 8, and 15 of each 28-day cycle and capecitabine 830 mg/m2 twice daily for 3 weeks with 1 week of rest in each 28-day cycle; four cycles in the neoadjuvant FOLFIRINOX group, six cycles in the upfront surgery group). A protocol amendment was subsequently made to permit use of adjuvant modified FOLFIRINOX (oxaliplatin 85 mg/m2, irinotecan 150 mg/m2, leucovorin 400 mg/m2, and fluorouracil 2400 mg/m2 over 46 h on day 1 of each 14-day cycle; eight cycles in the neoadjuvant FOLFIRINOX group, 12 cycles in the upfront surgery group). Randomisation was performed with a computerised algorithm that stratified for each participating centre and used a concealed block size of two to six. Patients, investigators, and study team members were not masked to treatment allocation. The primary endpoint was overall survival at 18 months. Analyses were done in the intention-to-treat (ITT) and per-protocol populations. Safety was assessed in all patients who were randomly assigned and received at least one cycle of neoadjuvant or adjuvant therapy. This trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT02919787, and EudraCT, 2015-001635-21, and is ongoing. FINDINGS: Between Feb 8, 2017, and April 21, 2021, 77 patients were randomly assigned to receive neoadjuvant FOLFIRINOX and 63 to undergo upfront surgery. All patients were included in the ITT analysis. For the per-protocol analysis, 17 (22%) patients were excluded from the neoadjuvant FOLFIRINOX group (ten did not receive neoadjuvant therapy, four did not have pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma, and three received another neoadjuvant regimen), and eight (13%) were excluded from the upfront surgery group (seven did not have pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma and one did not undergo surgical exploration). 61 (79%) of 77 patients in the neoadjuvant FOLFIRINOX group received neoadjuvant therapy. The proportion of patients alive at 18 months by ITT was 60% (95% CI 49-71) in the neoadjuvant FOLFIRINOX group versus 73% (62-84) in the upfront surgery group (p=0·032), and median overall survival by ITT was 25·1 months (95% CI 17·2-34·9) versus 38·5 months (27·6-not reached; hazard ratio [HR] 1·52 [95% CI 1·00-2·33], log-rank p=0·050). The proportion of patients alive at 18 months in per-protocol analysis was 57% (95% CI 46-67) in the neoadjuvant FOLFIRINOX group versus 70% (55-83) in the upfront surgery group (p=0·14), and median overall survival in per-protocol population was 23·0 months (95% CI 16·2-34·9) versus 34·4 months (19·4-not reached; HR 1·46 [95% CI 0·99-2·17], log-rank p=0·058). In the safety population, 42 (58%) of 73 patients in the neoadjuvant FOLFIRINOX group and 19 (40%) of 47 patients in the upfront surgery group had at least one grade 3 or worse adverse event. 63 (82%) of 77 patients in the neoadjuvant group and 56 (89%) of 63 patients in the upfront surgery group had resection (p=0·24). One sudden death of unknown cause and one COVID-19-related death occurred after the first cycle of neoadjuvant FOLFIRINOX. Adjuvant chemotherapy was initiated in 51 (86%) of 59 patients with resected pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma in the neoadjuvant FOLFIRINOX group and 44 (90%) of 49 patients with resected pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma in the upfront surgery group (p=0·56). Adjuvant modified FOLFIRINOX was given to 13 (25%) patients in the neoadjuvant FOLFIRINOX group and 19 (43%) patients in the upfront surgery group. During adjuvant chemotherapy, neutropenia (11 [22%] patients in the neoadjuvant FOLFIRINOX group and five [11%] in the upfront surgery group) was the most common grade 3 or worse adverse event. INTERPRETATION: This phase 2 trial did not show a survival benefit from neoadjuvant FOLFIRINOX in resectable pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma compared with upfront surgery. Implementation of neoadjuvant FOLFIRINOX was challenging. Future trials on treatment sequencing in resectable pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma should be biomarker driven. FUNDING: Norwegian Cancer Society, South Eastern Norwegian Health Authority, The Sjöberg Foundation, and Helsinki University Hospital Research Grants.

Levels of type XVII collagen (BP180) ectodomain are elevated in circulation from patients with multiple cancer types and is prognostic for patients with metastatic colorectal cancer.

BACKGROUND: Collagens are the major components of the extracellular matrix (ECM) and are known to contribute to tumor progression and metastasis. There are 28 different types of collagens each with unique functions in maintaining tissue structure and function. Type XVII collagen (BP180) is a type II transmembrane protein that provides stable adhesion between epithelial cells and the underlying basement membrane. Aberrant expression and ectodomain shedding of type XVII collagen have been associated with epithelial damage, tumor invasiveness, and metastasis in multiple tumor types and may consequently be used as a potential (non-invasive) biomarker in cancer and treatment target. METHOD: An ELISA targeting the type XVII collagen ectodomain (PRO-C17) was developed for use in serum. PRO-C17 was measured in a cohort of patients with 11 different cancer types (n = 214) and compared to healthy controls (n = 23) (cohort 1). Based on the findings from cohort 1, PRO-C17 and its association with survival was explored in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) treated with bevacizumab in combination with chemotherapy (n = 212) (cohort 2). RESULTS: PRO-C17 was robust and specific towards the ectodomain of type XVII collagen. In cohort 1, PRO-C17 levels were elevated (p < 0.05) in serum from patients with CRC, kidney, ovarian, bladder, breast, and head and neck cancer compared to healthy controls. PRO-C17 was especially good at discriminating between CRC patients and healthy controls with an AUROC of 0.904. In cohort 2, patients with mCRC and high levels (tertile 3) of PRO-C17 had shorter overall survival (OS) with a median OS of 390 days compared to 539 days for patients with low levels of PRO-C17. When evaluated by multivariate Cox regression analysis, high PRO-C17 was predictive for poor OS independent of risk factors and the tumor fibrosis biomarker PRO-C3. CONCLUSION: PRO-C17 measures the ectodomain of type XVII collagen in serum and is a promising non-invasive biomarker that can aid in understanding tumor heterogeneity as well as elaborate on the role of collagen XVII in tumor progression. Moreover, the findings in the study proposes PRO-C17 as novel biomarker of epithelial damage in specific cancer types including CRC.

Gallbladder cancer mimicking perihilar cholangiocarcinoma-considerable rate of postoperative reclassification with implications for prognosis.

BACKGROUND: For some patients undergoing resection under the suspicion of a perihilar cholangiocarcinoma (pCCA), postoperative diagnosis may differ from the preoperative diagnosis. While a postoperative finding of benign bile duct stricture is known to affect 3-15% of patients, less has been described about the consequences of finding other biliary tract cancers postoperatively. This study compared pre- and postoperative diagnoses, risk characteristics, and outcomes after surgery for suspected pCCA. METHODS: Retrospective single-center study, Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden (January 2009-May 2017). The primary postoperative outcome was overall survival. Secondary outcomes were disease-free survival and postoperative complications. Survival analysis was performed by the Kaplan-Meier method. RESULTS: Seventy-one patients underwent resection for suspected pCCA. pCCA was confirmed in 48 patients (68%). Ten patients had benign lesions (14%), 2 (3%) were diagnosed with other types of cholangiocarcinoma (CCA, distal n = 1, intrahepatic n = 1), while 11 (15%) were diagnosed with gallbladder cancer (GBC). GBC patients were older than patients with pCCA (median age 71 versus 58 years, p = 0.015), with a large proportion of patients with a high tumor extension stage (≥ T3, 91%). Median overall survival was 20 months (95% CI 15-25 months) for patients with pCCA and 17 months (95% CI 11-23 months) for patients with GBC (p = 0.135). Patients with GBC had significantly shorter median disease-free survival (DFS), 10 months (95% CI 3-17 months) compared 17 months (95% CI 15-19 months) for patients with pCCA (p = 0.010). CONCLUSIONS: At a large tertiary referral center, 15% of patients resected for suspected pCCA were postoperatively diagnosed with GBC. Compared to patients with pCCA, GBC patients were older, with advanced tumors and shorter DFS. The considerable rate of re-classification stresses the need for improved preoperative staging, as these prognostic differences could have implications for treatment strategies.

Impact of Laparoscopic Gastrectomy on the Completion Rate of the Perioperative Chemotherapy Regimen in Gastric Cancer: A Swedish Nationwide Study.

BACKGROUND: Omission of prescheduled chemotherapy following surgery for gastric cancer is a frequent clinical problem. This study examined whether laparoscopic gastrectomy (LG) had a positive impact on compliance with adjuvant chemotherapy compared with open (OG). METHODS: Patients with cT2-4aN0-3M0 adenocarcinoma treated with gastrectomy and perioperative chemotherapy between 2015 and 2020 were identified in the Swedish national register. Additional information regarding chemotherapy was retrieved from medical records. Regression models were used to investigate the association between surgical approach and the following outcomes: initiation of adjuvant chemotherapy, modification, and time interval from surgery to start of treatment. RESULTS: A total of 247 patients were included (121 OG and 126 LG, conversion rate 11%), of which 71.3% had performance status ECOG 0 and 77.7% clinical stage II/III. In total, 86.2% of patients started adjuvant chemotherapy, with no significant difference between the groups (LG 88.1% vs OG 84.3%, p = 0.5). Reduction of chemotherapy occurred in 37.4% of patients and was similar between groups (LG 39.4% vs OG 35.1%, p = 0.6), as was the time interval from surgery. In multivariable analysis, LG was not associated with the probability of starting adjuvant chemotherapy (OR 1.36, p = 0.4) or the need for reduction (OR 1.29, p = 0.4). Conversely, major complications had a significant, negative impact on both outcomes. CONCLUSIONS: This nationwide study demonstrated a high rate of adjuvant chemotherapy initiation after curative intended surgery for gastric cancer. A beneficial effect of LG compared with OG on the completion rate was not evident.

Impact of spatio-temporal recurrence pattern on overall survival for invasive intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasia - A comparison with pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma.

BACKGROUND: Resections for intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasia (IPMN) have increased dramatically during the last decade. Recurrence pattern and impact of adjuvant chemotherapy for solid pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) is well known, but not for invasive IPMN (inv-IPMN). OBJECTIVES: To elucidate the impact of spatio-temporal recurrence pattern and adjuvant chemotherapy on overall survival for inv-IPMN compared with PDAC. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective single-center observational study of consecutive patients ≥18 years of age who underwent resection for inv-IPMN or PDAC at Karolinska University Hospital, between 2009 and 2018. Different initial recurrence sites and time frames as well as predictors for death were assessed with multivariable Cox and logistic regressions. Survival analyses were performed using the Kaplan-Meier model and log rank test. RESULTS: Of 396 resected patients, 92 were inv-IPMN and 304 PDAC. Both recurrence rate and death rate within three-years were lower for inv-IPMN compared to PDAC (p = 0.006 and p = 0.007 respectively). Across the whole cohort, the most common recurrence patterns were multi-site (25%), single-site liver (21%) and single-site locoregional (10%) recurrence. The most prominent predictors for death in multivariable Cox regression, especially if occurred within the first year, were multi-site (HR 17.0), single-site peritoneal (HR 13.6) and single-site liver (HR 13.1) recurrence. These predictors were less common in inv-IPMN compared to PDAC (p = 0.007). The effect of adjuvant chemotherapy was similar in the two groups. CONCLUSION: Resected inv-IPMN exhibits a less aggressive recurrence pattern than PDAC that translates into a more favorable overall survival.

Prognostic value of blood-based fibrosis biomarkers in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer receiving chemotherapy and bevacizumab.

A desmoplastic colorectal cancer stroma, characterized by excess turnover of the cancer-associated fibroblast derived collagens type III and VI, can lead to reduced drug-uptake and poor treatment response. We investigated the association between biomarkers of collagen type III and VI and overall survival (OS) in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC). Serum samples were collected from 252 patients with mCRC prior to treatment with bevacizumab and chemotherapy. Serum concentrations of biomarkers reflecting formation of collagen type III (PRO-C3) and VI (PRO-C6) and degradation of collagen type VI (C6M and C6Mα3) were determined by ELISA. The biomarkers were evaluated for associations with OS, individually, combined, and after adjusting for carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA), lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) and performance status (PS). High baseline levels (> median) of each collagen biomarker were significantly associated with shorter OS (PRO-C3: HR = 2.0, 95%CI = 1.54-2.63; PRO-C6: HR = 1.6, 95%CI = 1.24-2.11; C6M: HR = 1.4, 95%CI = 1.05-1.78; C6Mα3: HR = 1.6, 95%CI = 1.16-2.07). PRO-C3 and PRO-C6 remained significant after adjustment for CEA, LDH and PS. Weak correlations were seen between the collagen biomarkers (r = 0.03-0.59) and combining all improved prognostic capacity (HR = 3.6, 95%CI = 2.30-5.76). Collagen biomarkers were predictive of shorter OS in patients with mCRC. This supports that collagen- and CAF biology is important in CRC.

Survival Benefits of Chemotherapy for Patients with Advanced Pancreatic Cancer in A Clinical Real-World Cohort.

Clinical outcomes of chemotherapy for patients with advanced pancreatic adenocarcinoma in a real-world setting might differ from outcomes in randomized clinical trials (RCTs). Here we show in a single-institution cohort of 595 patients that median overall survival (OS) of patients who received gemcitabine alone (n = 185; 6.6 months (95% CI; 5.5-7.7)) was the same as in pivotal RCTs. Gemcitabine/capecitabine (n = 60; 10.6 months (95% CI; 7.8-13.3)) and gemcitabine/nab-paclitaxel (n = 66; 9.8 months (95% CI; 7.9-11.8)) resulted in a longer median OS and fluorouracil/oxaliplatin/irinotecan (n = 31, 9.9 months (95% CI; 8.1-11.7)) resulted in a shorter median OS than previously reported. Fluorouracil/oxaliplatin (n = 35, 5.8 months (95% CI; 4.5-7)) and best supportive care (n = 206, 1.8 months (95% CI; 1.5-2.1)) could not be benchmarked against any RCTs. The degree of protocol adherence explained differences between real-world outcomes and the respective RCTs, while exposure to second-line treatments did not.

Bioinformatory-assisted analysis of next-generation sequencing data for precision medicine in pancreatic cancer.

Pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) is a tumor with an extremely poor prognosis, predominantly as a result of chemotherapy resistance and numerous somatic mutations. Consequently, PDAC is a prime candidate for the use of sequencing to identify causative mutations, facilitating subsequent administration of targeted therapy. In a feasibility study, we retrospectively assessed the therapeutic recommendations of a novel, evidence-based software that analyzes next-generation sequencing (NGS) data using a large panel of pharmacogenomic biomarkers for efficacy and toxicity. Tissue from 14 patients with PDAC was sequenced using NGS with a 620 gene panel. FASTQ files were fed into treatmentmap. The results were compared with chemotherapy in the patients, including all side effects. No changes in therapy were made. Known driver mutations for PDAC were confirmed (e.g. KRAS, TP53). Software analysis revealed positive biomarkers for predicted effective and ineffective treatments in all patients. At least one biomarker associated with increased toxicity could be detected in all patients. Patients had been receiving one of the currently approved chemotherapy agents. In two patients, toxicity could have been correctly predicted by the software analysis. The results suggest that NGS, in combination with an evidence-based software, could be conducted within a 2-week period, thus being feasible for clinical routine. Therapy recommendations were principally off-label use. Based on the predominant KRAS mutations, other drugs were predicted to be ineffective. The pharmacogenomic biomarkers indicative of increased toxicity could be retrospectively linked to reported negative side effects in the respective patients. Finally, the occurrence of somatic and germline mutations in cancer syndrome-associated genes is noteworthy, despite a high frequency of these particular variants in the background population. These results suggest software-analysis of NGS data provides evidence-based information on effective, ineffective and toxic drugs, potentially forming the basis for precision cancer medicine in PDAC.

Clinical and Immune Effects of Lenalidomide in Combination with Gemcitabine in Patients with Advanced Pancreatic Cancer.

PURPOSE: To assess the immunomodulatory and clinical effects of lenalidomide with standard treatment of gemcitabine in patients with advanced pancreatic cancer. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients with advanced pancreatic cancer were treated in first line with lenalidomide orally for 21 days of a 28 days cycle and the standard regimen for gemcitabine. In Part I, which we previously have reported, the dose of lenalidomide was defined (n = 12). In Part II, every other consecutive patient was treated with either lenalidomide (Group A, n = 11) or gemcitabine (Group B, n = 10) during cycle 1. From cycle 2 on, all Part II patients received the combination. RESULTS: A significant decrease in the proliferative response of peripheral blood mononuclear cells and the frequency of DCs were noted in patients at baseline compared to healthy control donors while the frequencies of CD4+ and CD8+ T cells, NK-cells and MDSCs were significantly higher in patients compared to controls. In Group A, a significant increase in the absolute numbers of activated (HLA-DR+) CD4 and CD8 T cells and CD8 effector memory T cells (p<0.01) was noted during treatment. A statistical increment in the absolute numbers of Tregs were seen after cycle 1 (p<0.05). The addition of gemcitabine, reduced most lymphocyte subsets (p<0.05). In Group B, the proportion of lymphocytes remained unchanged during the study period. There was no difference in overall survival, progression free survival and survival rate at one year comparing the two groups. DISCUSSION: Patients with advanced pancreatic carcinoma had impaired immune functions. Lenalidomide augmented T cell reactivities, which were abrogated by gemcitabine. However, addition of lenalidomide to gemcitabine seemed to have no therapeutic impact compared to gemcitabine alone in this non-randomized study. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT01547260.

A phase I dose-escalation study of lenalidomide in combination with gemcitabine in patients with advanced pancreatic cancer.

PURPOSE: Lenalidomide have both immunomodulatory and anti-angiogenic properties which could confer anti-cancer effects. The aim of this study was to assess the feasibility of combining lenalidomide with the standard treatment gemcitabine in pancreatic cancer patients with advanced disease. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Eligible patients had locally advanced or metastatic adenocarcinoma of the pancreas. Patients received lenalidomide days 1-21 orally and gemcitabine 1000 mg/m2 intravenously (days 1, 8 and 15), each 28 day cycle. Three cohorts of lenalidomide were examined (Cohort I = 15 mg, Cohort II = 20 mg and Cohort III = 25 mg daily). The maximum tolerated dose (MTD) of lenalidomide given in combination with gemcitabine was defined as the highest dose level at which no more than one out of four (25%) subjects experiences a dose-limiting toxicity (DLT). Patients should also be able to receive daily low molecular weight heparin (LMWH) (e.g. dalteparin 5000 IU s.c. daily) as a prophylactic anticoagulant for venous thromboembolic events (VTEs). Twelve patients (n = 4, n = 3 and n = 5 in cohort I, II and III, respectively) were enrolled in this study. RESULTS: Median duration of treatment was 11 weeks (range 1-66), and median number of treatment cycles were three (range 1-14). The only DLT was a cardiac failure grade 3 in cohort III. Frequent treatment-related adverse events (AEs) (all grades) included neutropenia, leucopenia and fatigue (83% each, but there was no febrile neutropenia); thrombocytopenia (75%); dermatological toxicity (75%); diarrhea and nausea (42% each); and neuropathy (42%). DISCUSSION: This phase I study demonstrates the feasibility of the combination of lenalidomide and gemcitabine as first-line treatment in patients with advanced pancreatic cancer. The tolerability profile demonstrated in the dose escalation schedule of lenalidomide suggests the dosing of lenalidomide to be 25 mg daily on days 1-21 with standard dosing of gemcitabine and merits further evaluation in a phase II trial. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT01547260.

Telomerase (GV1001) vaccination together with gemcitabine in advanced pancreatic cancer patients.

Telomerase is expressed in 85-90 % of pancreatic adenocarcinomas and might be a target for active cancer immunotherapy. A study was conducted to investigate safety and immunogenicity in non-resectable pancreatic carcinoma patients using a 16-amino acid telomerase peptide (GV1001) for vaccination in combination with GM-CSF and gemcitabine as first line treatment. Three different vaccine treatment schedules were used; [A (n=6), B (n=6) and C (n=5)]. Groups A/B received GV1001, GM-CSF and gemcitabine concurrently. Group C received initially GV1001 and GM-CSF while gemcitabine was added at disease progression. Group D (n=4) was treated with gemcitabine alone. Adverse events (AE) related to vaccination were mild (grades I-II). Grade III AEs were few and transient. An induced GV 1001­specific immune response was defined as an increase ≥2 above the baseline value in one of the assays (DTH, proliferation, ELISPOT and cytokine secretion assays, respectively). A telomerase­specific immune response was noted in 4/6 patients in group A, 4/6 patients in group B and 2/5 patients in group C. An induced ras­specific immune response (antigenic spreading) was seen in 5 of the 17 patients. The cytokine pattern was that of a Th1-like profile. A treatment induced telomerase or ras response was also noted in group D. All responses were weak and transient. A significant decrease in regulatory T-cells over time was noted in patients in groups A and B (p<0.05). Telomerase vaccination (GV1001) in combination with chemotherapy appeared to be safe but the immune responses were weak and transient. Measures have to be taken to optimize immune responses of GV1001 for it to be considered of clinical interest.

Induction of IgM, IgA and IgE antibodies in colorectal cancer patients vaccinated with a recombinant CEA protein.

PURPOSE: Previous clinical studies have indicated that natural IgM antibodies have the ability to induce apoptosis of tumor cells but IgE and IgA may also mediate tumor cell killing (in addition to IgG). The aim of the study was to analyse induction of IgM, IgA and IgE antibodies in patients vaccinated with the tumor associated antigen CEA. METHODS: Twenty-four resected CRC patients without macroscopic disease were immunized seven times with CEA ± GM-CSF. Four different dose schedules were used over a 12-month period. IgM, IgA and IgE antibody responses against recombinant CEA were determined by ELISA. Patients were monitored immunologically for 36 months and clinically for 147 months. RESULTS: GM-CSF significantly augmented the anti-CEA response for all three antibody classes. Low dose of CEA tended to induce a higher IgM, IgA or IgE anti-CEA antibody response than higher. Anti-CEA IgA antibodies could lyse CEA positive tumor cells in antibody dependent cellular cytotoxicity (ADCC) as well as in complement dependent cytotoxicity (CDC). A significant correlation between survival and high IgA anti-CEA titers was noted (p = 0.02) irrespective of GM-CSF treatment. CONCLUSIONS: The observation that IgA anti-CEA antibodies were cytotoxic and associated with improved survival might indicate that also these antibodies may exert a clinical anti-tumor effect.

A Phase I safety study of plasmid DNA immunization targeting carcinoembryonic antigen in colorectal cancer patients.

A plasmid DNA vaccine, encoding a truncated form of human CEA fused to a T-helper epitope (CEA66 DNA) was delivered three times intradermally at 2 mg or intramuscularly at 8 mg by Biojector® to patients with colorectal cancer. Prior to the first vaccination, all patients received cyclophosphamide (300 mg/m²) intravenously. Granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor (GM-CSF) was administered subcutaneously with each vaccination. All patients completed the vaccine schedule. There were no grade 3 or 4 adverse events (AE). The most frequently reported AE grades 1 and 2 were injection site reactions, fatigue, headache, arthralgia, chest tightness and myalgia. Vaccination with CEA66 DNA in combination with GM-CSF was well tolerated and no signs of autoimmunity have been detected.

FcγR polymorphisms and clinical outcome in colorectal cancer patients receiving passive or active antibody treatment.

Fcγ receptors (FcγRs) on effector cells are of importance for mediating antibody-dependent cellular cytotoxicity (ADCC). FcγRIIIa158valine (V)/phenylalanine (F) and FcγRIIa131histidine (H)/arginine(R) polymorphisms have been shown to relate to prognosis in antibody-treated patients. The aim of the present study was to analyze the polymorphisms of both FcγRIIIa and FcγRIIa in colorectal carcinoma (CRC) patients receiving either passively administered monoclonal antibodies (MAbs) or antibodies induced by carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) vaccination. One hundred and thirty CRC patients were included. Thirty-eight patients received adjuvant treatment with an anti-EpCAM monoclonal antibody (edrecolomab) (n=17) or rCEA vaccination therapeutic cancer vaccine (TCV) (n=21) inducing anti-CEA IgG antibodies. Ninety-two patients had metastatic disease and received anti-EpCAM MAb based therapies. FcγR genotypes were analysed using genomic DNA and PCR. ADCC was tested in a standard 18 h Cr51 release assay. In all adjuvant-treated patients, FcγRIIIa158V carriers (V/V and V/F) had a significantly better overall survival compared to F/F homozygous patients (p<0.05), FcγRIIa R carriers vs. H/H (p=0.05) as well as V and R carriers combined compared to the others (p<0.05). Similar findings were obtained when antibody and TCV-treated patients were analysed separately. No impact on the prognosis of FcγR polymorphisms was noted in advanced disease. FcγRIIIa V carriers had a significantly higher ADCC activity compared to F/F patients (p=0.001). Our model study might support the notion that FcγRIIIa V carriers as well as FcγRIIa R carriers receiving adjuvant, passively or actively (TCV)-induced antibody treatment might have a better prognosis than the others. Prospective extended clinical trials are warranted to study the predictive/prognostic impact of FcγR polymorphisms in antibody-treated patients and might be a valuable biomarker to optimize antibody-based treatment strategies.

Influence of varying doses of granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor on pharmacokinetics and antibody-dependent cellular cytotoxicity.

Recombinant granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor (GM-CSF) is used in immunotherapy for correction of neutropoenia. The optimal dose for activation of immune functions and the pharmacokinetics following repeated administrations is less analysed in depth. In this study, the pharmacokinetics and the effects on haematological functions and antibody-dependent cellular cytotoxicity (ADCC) were analysed in 50 patients with metastatic colorectal carcinoma receiving monoclonal antibody based therapy in combination with Escherichia coli-derived GM-CSF (molgramostim) administered s.c. once daily for 10 days every month over a period of 4 months. Thirty-three patients received a GM-CSF dose of 200-250 microg/m(2)/day. Seventeen patients received GM-CSF doses varying between 65 and 325 microg/m(2)/day in the different treatment cycles. Serum GM-CSF concentration was measured (ELISA) before and 3-4 h after (peak serum concentration) GM-CSF administration days 1, 5 and 10. Prior to therapy, GM-CSF was not detectable in serum. Following repeated daily administrations, the peak serum concentration of GM-CSF gradually decreased on days 5 and 10 compared to day 1 (P < 0.05). During a 10-day treatment cycle, the total number of leukocytes, neutrophils, eosinophils, monocytes and lymphocytes increased. A dose-dependent increment in total white blood cell count and neutrophils was observed. The total numbers of GM-CSF receptor (alpha-subunit) expressing cells (granulocytes and monocytes) increased significantly during treatment while a transient decline in expression intensity was observed at day 5, suggesting a receptor-mediated removal of GM-CSF as a mechanism for the elimination of GM-CSF from circulation. ADCC of peripheral mononuclear cells was decreased at day 10 compared to baseline. An inverse correlation between the dose and ADCC was noted. The data might indicate that high doses of GM-CSF may have a negative impact on ADCC.

Clinical effects of a chimeric anti-EpCAM monoclonal antibody in combination with granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor in patients with metastatic colorectal carcinoma.

The EpCAM antigen is highly expressed on colorectal carcinoma (CRC) cells. Murine anti-EpCAM MAb (anti-EpCAM mMAb) alone or in combination with cytokines may induce clinical responses including long-lasting complete remissions (CR) in patients with metastatic disease. The chimeric variant of anti-EpCAM MAb (anti-EpCAM cMAb) interacts more efficiently with human effector cells (ADCC) than the murine counterpart in the killing of colorectal carcinoma cells in vitro, an important mechanism of action for antibody in vivo. Granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor (GM-CSF) augments immune effector cell functions in vivo and may enhance the therapeutic effect of MAbs. In this study, the therapeutic efficacy of the combination of anti-EpCAM cMAb and GM-CSF was evaluated in 24 patients with metastatic CRC. GM-CSF was given s.c. once daily for 10 consecutive days and on day 3, anti-EpCAM cMAb was given i.v. A treatment cycle was repeated every 4th week. Five patients achieved stable disease > 3 months (overall response rate 21%). Responding patients survived significantly longer than non-responding patients (p = 0.030). The frequency of patients with an immediate-type allergic reaction (ITAR) against anti-EpCAM cMAb at the 1st, 2nd, 3rd and 4th treatment cycles was as 13%, 29%, 25% and 19% respectively. Compared to a previous study where anti-EpCAM mMAb was used in a similar treatment regimen, the present protocol did not augment the overall or progression-free survival. The overall response rate was also similar to anti-EpCAM mMAb treated patients (6/22, 27%), but the anti-EpCAM mMAb treatment protocol induced two CR, one MR and three SD. Further studies are warranted to establish the role of EpCAM as a target for antibody therapy, specifically the significance of chimeric or humanized anti-EpCAM MAbs.

Spectrum of cytokeratin-positive cells in the bone marrows of colorectal carcinoma patients.

BACKGROUND: Bone marrow micrometastases (BMM) is considered to be of interest as a prognostic marker in solid tumors. The use of density-gradient separated bone marrow (BM) aspirates does not allow proper morphological characterization of the cells. An alternative approach, using routinely processed clots of BM aspirates, is presented. MATERIALS AND METHODS: BM clots from 56 colorectal carcinoma patients were stained for cytokeratin (CK), p53 and Ki67 by double immunohistochemistry. Cytokeratin-positive (CK+) cells were immunohistochemically divided into three groups, viz. Group A (CK+ probably malignant epithelial cells), Group B (CK+ morphologically non-epithelial cells) and Group C (CK+ contaminating cells). RESULTS: Thirty-three patients (59%) had CK+ cells, of which 19 (58%) had Group A cells and 14 (42%) had Group B cells. Fourteen of the 56 patients had reactive BM, eight of these had Group A cells and 3 had Group B cells. Group B cells and Group C cells did not express p53. Group A cells were noted in 35% of patients with carcinomas of Dukes' stage C and in 41% of patients with metastatic disease. CONCLUSION: Double immunohistochemical staining of routinely processed BM clot, for p53 and Ki67 along with CK allows the sub-classification of CK+ cells.