Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
Mais filtros

Base de dados
Ano de publicação
Tipo de documento
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Br J Ophthalmol ; 100(3): 405-10, 2016 Mar.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26198280

RESUMO

PURPOSE: Scleral buckling is currently used in addition to vitrectomy for the treatment of pseudophakic retinal detachment (PRD) to better support the vitreous base and better visualisation of the periphery. AIMS: The aims of this study are to evaluate (1) whether the combination of 20 G vitrectomy and scleral buckling is superior to 20 G vitrectomy alone (control) (confirmatory), and (2) whether transconjunctival 23/25 G vitrectomy is non-inferior to 20 G vitrectomy (both without scleral buckling) regarding operation success (exploratory). METHODS: The VIPER (Vitrectomy Plus Encircling Band Vs. Vitrectomy Alone For The Treatment Of Pseudophakic Retinal Detachment) study is an unmasked, multi-centre, three-arm randomised trial. Patients with PRD were eligible, excluding complicated retinal detachment or otherwise severe ophthalmologic impairment. Patients were randomised to one of three interventions: 20 G vitrectomy alone (control C), combination of 20 G vitrectomy and circumferential scleral buckling (experimental treatment E1) or 23/25 G vitrectomy alone (experimental treatment E2). The primary endpoint is the absence of any indication for a retina re-attaching procedure during 6 months of follow-up. Secondary endpoints include best corrected visual acuity, retina re-attaching procedures, complications and adverse events. RESULTS: From June 2011 to August 2013, 257 patients were enrolled in the study. The internet randomisation service assigned 100 patients each to the treatment arms C and E1, and 57 patients to treatment E2. The imbalance is due to the fact that several retinal surgeons did not qualify for performing E2. The random assignment was stratified and balanced (ie, 1:1 or 1:1:1 ratio) by surgeon. CONCLUSIONS: The described study represents a methodologically rigorous protocol evaluating the benefits of three different vitrectomy approaches to PRD. The projected results will help to establish their overall efficacy and will permit conclusions regarding their relative value. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: DRKS00003158 (German Clinical Trials Register, DRKS).


Assuntos
Seleção de Pacientes , Pseudofacia/cirurgia , Projetos de Pesquisa , Descolamento Retiniano/cirurgia , Recurvamento da Esclera , Vitrectomia , Adulto , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Estudos Prospectivos , Pseudofacia/fisiopatologia , Retina/fisiologia , Descolamento Retiniano/fisiopatologia , Acuidade Visual/fisiologia
2.
Antimicrob Agents Chemother ; 48(2): 619-22, 2004 Feb.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-14742220

RESUMO

TAN 1057-resistant Staphylococcus aureus and Escherichia coli strains were selected to elucidate the mechanism of resistance and the mode of action of this dipeptide antibiotic. Cell-free translation with isolated ribosomes and S150 fractions from sensitive and resistant S. aureus strains demonstrated that alterations in the ribosomes contribute to the resistance of the bacteria.


Assuntos
Antibacterianos/farmacologia , Dipeptídeos/farmacologia , Escherichia coli/efeitos dos fármacos , Escherichia coli/genética , Ribossomos/efeitos dos fármacos , Ribossomos/genética , Staphylococcus aureus/efeitos dos fármacos , Staphylococcus aureus/genética , Farmacorresistência Bacteriana , Eritromicina/farmacologia , Testes de Sensibilidade Microbiana , Biossíntese de Proteínas
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA