Most total pancreatectomies for ductal adenocarcinoma potentially can Be replaced by whipple over the splenic artery: a before and after study.

INTRODUCTION: Recently, more and more total pancreatectomy (TP) has been performed for central-located pancreatic ductal cell adenocarcinoma (PDCA) which abuts or involves both gastroduodenal and splenic arteries and demands transaction of both of them for a complete resection. Spiked by Warshaw's procedure (spleen-preserving distal pancreatectomy with excision of splenic vessels), we developed a new procedure "Whipple over the splenic artery (WOTSA)" to replace TP by leftward extension of pancreatic parenchyma transaction line and preservation of pancreatic tail and spleen after excision of splenic artery. This uncontrolled before and after study assesses the safety and efficacy of a new technique "Whipple over the splenic artery (WOTSA)" as a treatment for PDAC which traditionally requires total pancreatectomy (TP) for a complete excision. METHODS: The study group comprised 40 consecutive patients who underwent WOTSA for PDAC between August 2019 and September 2022. Their clinicopathological characteristics and survival were compared with those of a historical control group comprising 30 consecutive patients who underwent TP between January 2016 and July 2019. RESULTS: None of the 40 patients in the WOTSA group required reoperation due to infarction of the pancreas and/or spleen remnant. DM medication after WOTSA were none in 19, oral hypoglycemic agents in 19, and insulin preparations in 2 patients. Compared with TP, patients who underwent WOTSA exhibited similar rates of major operative complications, clear pancreatic parenchyma transaction margin, and number of harvested positive lymph nodes, but higher rate of adjuvant chemotherapy completion and a trend toward better median disease free survival (14 vs. 7.5 mo, P=0.023). CONCLUSIONS: Compared to TP, WOTSA can be safely performed and have much better postoperative glycemic status without cost of higher operative risk or impaired surgical radicality. These findings indicate that most TPs for PDAC potentially can be replaced by WOTSAs.

Novel Non-duct-to-Mucosa Pancreaticojejunostomy Reconstruction After Pancreaticoduodenectomy: Focus on the Occurrence of Post-pancreatectomy Hemorrhage and Intra-abdominal Abscess.

BACKGROUND: Postoperative pancreatic fistulas (POPFs) are considered inevitable in some patients after pancreaticoduodenectomy (PD), and measures to minimize their clinical impact are needed. Postpancreatectomy hemorrhage (PPH) and intra-abdominal abscess (IAA) are the most severe POPF-related complications, and concomitant leakage of contaminated intestinal content is considered the main cause. An innovative method, modified non-duct-to-mucosa pancreaticojejunostomy (TPJ), was created to prevent concomitant leakage of intestinal content, and its effectiveness was compared between two periods. METHODS: All PD patients undergoing pancreaticojejunostomy from 2012 to 2021 were included. The TPJ group consisted of 529 patients recruited from January 2018 to December 2021. A total of 535 patients receiving the conventional method (CPJ) from January 2012 to June 2017 were used as a control group. PPH and POPF were defined according to the International Study Group of Pancreatic Surgery definition, but only PPH grade C was included for analysis. An IAA was defined as a collection of postoperative fluid managed by CT-guided drainage with documental culture. RESULTS: There were no significant differences in the rate of POPF between the two groups (46.0% vs. 44.8%; p = 0.700). Furthermore, the percentages of bile in the drainage fluid in the TPJ and CPJ groups were 2.3% and 9.2%, respectively (p < 0.001). Lower proportions of PPH (0.9% vs. 6.5%; p < 0.001) and IAA (5.7% vs. 10.8%; p < 0.001) were observed for TPJ than for CPJ. On adjusted models, TPJ was significantly associated with a lower rate of PPH (odds ratio [OR] 0.132, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.051-0.343; p < 0.001) and IAA (OR 0.514, 95% CI 0.349-0.758; p = 0.001) than CPJ. CONCLUSIONS: TPJ is feasible to be performed and is associated with a similar rate of POPF but a lower percentage of concomitant bile in the drainage fluid and subsequent rates of PPH and IAA than CPJ.

Solid Pseudopapillary Neoplasms of the Pancreas Across Races Demonstrate Disparities with Comparably Good Prognosis.

BACKGROUND: Solid pseudopapillary neoplasms (SPNs) of the pancreas are rare with low-grade malignancy and unclarified clinicopathological features. This study aimed to examine their characteristics and re-evaluate current treatments. METHODS: Databases from three sources were screened for patients with SPNs. We compared the perioperative variables, clinical data, overall survival (OS), and prognostic factors for recurrence among the three corresponding cohorts. RESULTS: We identified 286 patients diagnosed with SPNs between 1988 and 2020. Patients were mostly women (81%; median age: 38 years), and peak incidence was observed in women of 20-29 years of age. SPNs had a peak incidence in Asian men at 50-59 years of age (p = 0.002) and a delayed peak incidence in Asian women at 30-39 years of age (p < 0.001). Treatment strategies differed significantly across the institutions and included variations in the number of harvested lymph nodes and rates of vascular resection. Lymph node positivity was the only predictor of postoperative recurrence (odds ratio, 2.2; 95% confidence interval, 1.38-2.99; p = 0.007). Higher rates of lymphovascular invasion (p = 0.02), perineural invasion (p < 0.001), and R1 margin involvement (p < 0.001), as seen in one institution, did not result in poorer long-term survival in terms of the overall (p = 0.43), SPN-specific (p = 0.69), and recurrence-free survivals (p = 0.067). CONCLUSIONS: In contrast to previous findings that SPNs are prevalent in young women, a racial predilection for middle-aged Asian men and a delayed female peak incidence were noted. Parenchyma-preserving pancreatectomy may be an acceptable treatment. Non-radical surgery may be appropriate in patients with multiple comorbidities.

Is the Rationale of Anatomical Liver Resection for Hepatocellular Carcinoma Universally Adoptable? A Hypothesis-Driven Review.

Surgical resection is the first-line curative treatment modality for resectable hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). Anatomical resection (AR), described as systematic removal of a liver segment confined by tumor-bearing portal tributaries, may improve survival by reducing the risk of tumor recurrence compared with non-AR. In this article, we propose the rationale for AR and its universal adoption by providing supporting evidence from the advanced understanding of a tumor microenvironment and accumulating clinical experiences of locoregional tumor ablation therapeutics. AR may be advantageous because it completely removes the en-bloc by interrupting tumor vascular supply and thus extirpates the spreading of tumor microthrombi, if they ever exist, within the supplying portal vein. However, HCC is a hypervascular tumor that can promote neoangiogenesis in the local tumor microenvironment, which in itself can break through the anatomical boundary within the liver and even retrieve nourishment from extrahepatic vessels, such as inferior phrenic or omental arteries. Additionally, increasing clinical evidence for locoregional tumor ablation therapies, such as radiofrequency ablation, predominantly performed as a non-anatomical approach, suggests comparable outcomes for surgical resection, particularly in small HCC and colorectal, hepatic metastases. Moreover, liver transplantation for HCC, which can be considered as AR of the whole liver followed by implantation of a new graft, is not universally free from post-transplant tumor recurrence. Overall, AR should not be considered the gold standard among all surgical resection methods. Surgical resection is fundamentally reliant on choosing the optimal margin width to achieve en-bloc tumor niche removal while balancing between oncological radicality and the preservation of postoperative liver function. The importance of this is to liberate surgical resilience in hepatocellular carcinoma. The overall success of HCC treatment is determined by the clearance of the theoretical niche. Developing biomolecular-guided navigation device/technologies may provide surgical guidance toward the total removal of microscopic tumor niche to achieve superior oncological outcomes.

Specific Bile Microorganisms Caused by Intra-Abdominal Abscess on Pancreaticoduodenectomy Patients: A Retrospective Cohort Study.

We retrospectively collected PD patients with a performance of bile culture between 2007 and 2019 in our institute. As to bile culture, we used a swab to do intraoperative bile cultures after transection of the CBD. IAA was defined as the documental bacteriological culture from either a turbid discharge from the intraoperatively placed drain in patients with a clinical picture consistent with infection or a postoperative fluid collection managed by CT-guided placement of drains. A total of 1244 PD patients were identified, and 539 (43.3%) subjects with bile sampling were included for analysis. Among these study patients, 433 (80.3%) developed bile contamination (positive bile culture). Bile contamination showed a significantly higher rate of IAA compared to non-bile contamination (17.1% vs. 0.9%, p < 0.001). The rate of co-shared microorganisms in both bile and abscess was 64.1%. On the multivariate analysis, age and specific bile microorganisms (Enterococcus species, Escherichia Coli, Streptococcus species, Citrobacter species, and Candida) are significantly associated with development of IAA. Specific bile microorganisms are the highly significant factors associated with development of IAA. The strategy to prevent bile spillage during PD should be considered to minimize afterward contamination of the abdominal cavity and prevent IAA.

Thoracoscopic Lobectomy Versus Sublobar Resection for pStage I Geriatric Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer.

OBJECTIVES: The choice of resection method for geriatric patients with early-stage non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) remains contentious. This study aimed to evaluate survival and perioperative outcomes after thoracoscopic lobectomy resection (LR) or sublobar resection (SR) in patients aged ≥75 years with pathologic stage (pStage) I NSCLC. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We retrospectively examined 258 consecutive patients aged ≥75 years with pStage I NSCLC who underwent thoracoscopic tumor resection at our institute from 2011 to 2018. Propensity score matching (PSM) analysis identified 60 patients in each group for comparison of survival-related parameters, including disease-free survival (DFS), lung cancer-specific overall survival (OS), and non-lung cancer-specific OS, using the Kaplan-Meier analysis. RESULTS: LR and SR were performed in 84 (32.6%) and 174 (67.4%) patients aged ≥75 years, respectively. The LR group had younger patients, better performance status, larger tumor sizes, and deeper tumor location than the SR group. Multivariate studies showed that the resection method was not a prognostic factor for OS. The two PSM-matched groups were not significantly different with respect to lung cancer-specific OS (p = 0.116), non-lung cancer-specific OS (p = 0.408), and DFS (p = 0.597). SR helped achieve better perioperative outcomes than LR, including fewer postoperative complications (10.0% vs. 28.3%, p = 0.011), shorter operative times (p < 0.001), decreased blood loss (p = 0.026), and shorter chest tube duration (p = 0.010) and hospital stays (p = 0.035). CONCLUSIONS: Thoracoscopic SR may provide similar oncological outcomes to LR, but may be a safer and more feasible surgical method for geriatric patients with pStage I NSCLC.