Axillary lymph node dose with tangential breast irradiation.

PURPOSE: The advent of sentinel lymph node mapping and biopsy in the staging of breast cancer has resulted in a significant decrease in the extent of axillary nodal surgery. As the extent of axillary surgery decreases, the radiation dose and distribution within the axilla becomes increasingly important for current therapy planning and future analysis of results. This analysis examined the radiation dose distribution delivered to the anatomically defined axillary level I and II lymph node volume and surgically placed axillary clips with conventional tangential breast fields and CT-based three-dimensional (3D) planning. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Fifty consecutive patients with early-stage breast cancer undergoing breast conservation therapy were evaluated. All patients underwent 3D CT-based planning with conventional breast tangential fields designed to encompass the entire breast parenchyma. Using CT-based 3D planning, the dose distribution of the standard tangential breast irradiation fields was examined in relationship to the axillary level I and II lymph node volumes. Axillary level I and II lymph node anatomic volumes were defined by CT and surgical clips placed during complete level I-II lymph node dissection. Axillary level I-II lymph node volume doses were examined on the basis of the prescribed breast radiation dose and 3D dose distribution. RESULTS: All defined breast volumes received > or =95% of the prescribed dose. By contrast, the 95% isodose line encompassed only an average of 55% (range, 23-87%) of the axillary level I-II lymph node anatomic volume. No patient had complete coverage of the axillary level I-II lymph node region by the 95% isodose line. The mean anatomic axillary level I-II volume was 146.3 cm(3) (range, 83.1-313.0 cm(3)). The mean anatomic axillary level I-II volume encompassed by the 95% isodose line was 84.9 cm(3) (range, 25.1-219.0 cm(3)). The mean 95% isodose coverage of the surgical clip volume was 80%, and the median value was 81% (range, 58-98%). The mean volume deficit between the axillary level I-II volume and the surgical clip volume was 41.7 cm(3) (median, 30.0 cc). CONCLUSION: In this study, standard tangential breast radiation fields failed to deliver a therapeutic dose adequately to the axillary level I-II lymph node anatomic volume. No patient received complete coverage of the axillary level I-II lymph node volume. Surgically placed axillary clips also failed to delineate the level I-II axilla adequately. Definitive irradiation of the level I and II axillary lymph node region requires significant modification of standard tangential fields, best accomplished with 3D treatment planning, with specific targeting of anatomically defined axillary lymph node volumes as described, in addition to the breast parenchymal volumes.

Impact of FDG PET on defining the extent of disease and on the treatment of patients with recurrent or metastatic breast cancer.

OBJECTIVE: Our aim was to evaluate the impact of FDG PET on defining the extent of disease and on the treatment of patients with advanced breast cancer. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The medical records of 125 consecutive patients with recurrent or metastatic breast cancer referred for FDG PET from January 1998 through May 2002 were retrospectively reviewed. The rationale for FDG PET referral and the impact of FDG PET on subsequent treatment decisions for patients were determined by chart review. The impact of FDG PET on defining the extent of disease was determined by comparing the FDG PET interpretation at the time of the examination with findings from conventional imaging (CI) performed before FDG PET. FDG PET results were confirmed in nearly half (n = 61) of the patients by histopathology (n = 23) or follow-up imaging (n = 38; mean follow-up interval, 21.3 months). RESULTS: Patients were referred for FDG PET for the following reasons: evaluation of disease response or viability after therapy (n = 43 [35%]), local recurrence, with intent of aggressive local treatment (n = 39 [31%]), equivocal findings on CI (n = 25 [20%]), evaluation of disease extent in patients with known metastases (n = 13 [10%]), and elevated tumor markers with unknown disease site (n = 5 [4%]). Compared with CI findings, the extent of disease increased in 54 (43%), did not change in 41 (33%), and decreased in 30 (24%) of 125 patients using FDG PET. Results of FDG PET altered the therapeutic plan in 40 (32%), directly helped to support the therapeutic plan in 34 (27%), and did not change the plan devised before FDG PET in 51 (41%) of 125 patients. FDG PET altered therapy most frequently in the patients suspected of having locoregional recurrence and in those being evaluated for treatment response versus other referral categories (p = 0.04). For patients with confirmation of FDG PET findings, the sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy of FDG PET were 94%, 91%, and 92%, respectively. CONCLUSION: FDG PET contributes significantly to defining the extent of disease and deciding on treatment of patients with advanced breast cancer.

Intensive induction chemotherapy and delayed irradiation in the management of parameningeal rhabdomyosarcoma.

PURPOSE: To evaluate local control, event-free survival, and overall survival for patients with parameningeal (PM) rhabdomyosarcoma (RMS) treated with intensive chemotherapy and delayed irradiation. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Thirteen consecutive patients with PM RMS were treated with an institutional protocol from 1992 to 1998 at the University of Washington/Children's Hospital and Regional Medical Center and Deaconess Medical Center. Patients received intensive chemotherapy consisting of vincristine, doxorubicin, cyclophosphamide, ifosfamide, and etoposide prior to radiotherapy. Irradiation was delayed, in contrast to current Intergroup Rhabdomyosarcoma Study Group (IRSG) recommendations. RESULTS: Median follow-up was 39 months. Eleven patients had high-risk features, including five with intracranial extension. All patients responded to the intensive chemotherapy, with 38% exhibiting a complete response and the remaining 62% a partial response. Radiation was administered a median of 21 weeks from initiation of chemotherapy. The Kaplan-Meier estimate of 5-year local control was 92%, with event-free survival and overall survival rates of 83%. CONCLUSIONS: With intensive induction chemotherapy, delayed irradiation for PM RMS does not compromise local control. Event-free survival and overall survival rates compare favorably with recently IRSG trials employing early irradiation. Delaying irradiation allows for intensification of chemotherapy and could permit response-based radiation volume and/or dose modifications, which could decrease treatment-related morbidity.

Thyroid neoplasms after therapeutic radiation for malignancies during childhood or adolescence.

BACKGROUND: Recent data indicate that the risk of developing a thyroid neoplasm clearly is increased after high-dose, therapeutic radiation therapy during childhood. To better understand the time course, natural history, and histopathology of thyroid lesions that develop after high-dose irradiation, the authors undertook a retrospective study of all survivors of childhood and adolescent malignancies who were treated at Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center and who developed a clinically apparent thyroid neoplasm. METHODS: The authors searched the data base of the Department of Pediatrics, the hospital-based tumor registry, and the hospital medical records database for patients with thyroid neoplasms. RESULTS: Thirty-three patients were identified who developed a thyroid neoplasm after therapeutic radiation. Primary diagnoses were Hodgkin disease (n = 18 patients), non-Hodgkin lymphoma (n = 10 patients), acute lymphoblastic leukemia (n = 2 patients), acute myeloid leukemia (n = 1 patient), Wilms tumor (n = 1 patient), and neuroblastoma (n = 1 patient). The median age at the time of diagnosis of the primary malignancy was 12.0 years (range, 3.7-18.3 years), the median radiation dose to the thyroid gland was 2400 centigrays (cGy; range, 1000-4200 cGy), and the median interval from the time of radiation therapy until the recognition of thyroid disease was 13.0 years (range, 6.2-30.1 years). Thirteen of 33 thyroid lesions (39%) were malignant (11 papillary carcinomas and 2 follicular carcinomas). Age at diagnosis, gender ratio, and time elapsed since initial treatment did not differ between patients with malignant and benign lesions, but the median radiation dose to the thyroid was lower in patients who had malignant disease compared with patients who had benign disease (2000 cGy vs. 2950 cGy; P = 0.03). Disease was confined to the neck in all patients who had malignant thyroid lesions; after a median follow-up of 6.5 years (range, 0.9-12 years), none of the patients developed progressive or recurrent disease. CONCLUSIONS: Data from this study suggest that a high proportion of clinically apparent thyroid neoplasms that develop after therapeutic radiation for a childhood malignancy are malignant. However, most of these thyroid malignancies do not appear to behave in an aggressive fashion. Because thyroid neoplasms may not become evident for decades after radiation therapy, all individuals who are at risk require life-long follow-up.

Detection of locoregional and distant recurrences in breast cancer patients by using FDG PET.

Cases of recurrence of breast cancer can pose considerable diagnostic and therapeutic challenges for the oncologic team. The prognosis and management decisions are based on knowledge of the true extent of disease. Conventional staging methods, including physical examination, assessment of levels of tumor markers, cross-sectional imaging, and bone scintigraphy, may not reliably demonstrate the extent of disease in all cases. Physical examination and cross-sectional imaging (computed tomography [CT] or magnetic resonance imaging) can be problematic because (a) the sequelae of previous surgery and radiation therapy can be difficult to distinguish from recurrent neoplasms and (b) early metastatic disease (small lesions) can be difficult to distinguish from benign lesions that are too small to characterize. Positron emission tomography (PET) with 2-[fluorine-18]fluoro-2-deoxy-D-glucose (FDG) can help clarify inconclusive findings from physical examination and cross-sectional imaging. FDG PET is more sensitive than CT in detection of lymphatic spread of disease to locoregional and mediastinal nodes. Metastases at distant sites including the lung, bone, and the liver are also readily detected at FDG PET. FDG PET has been proved accurate in restaging cases of recurrent breast cancer and will likely aid in directing therapy in these cases.