RESUMO
PURPOSE: An increase in fungal and particularly filamentous keratitis has been observed in many geographic areas, mostly in contact lens wearers. This study seeks to characterize long-term trends in fungal keratitis in a continental climate area to provide guidance for diagnosis and treatment. DESIGN: Retrospective multicentric case series. METHODS: Cases of microbiology-confirmed fungal keratitis from 2003 to 2022 presenting to tertiary care centers across Canada were included. Charts were reviewed for patient demographics, risk factors, visual acuity, and treatments undertaken. RESULTS: A total of 138 patients were identified: 75 had yeast keratitis while 63 had filamentous keratitis. Patients with yeast keratitis had more ocular surface disease (79% vs 28%) while patients with filamentous keratitis wore more refractive contact lenses (78% vs 19%). Candida species accounted for 96% of all yeast identified, while Aspergillus (32%) and Fusarium (26%) were the most common filamentous fungi species. The mean duration of treatment was 81 ± 96 days. Patients with yeast keratitis did not have significantly improved visual acuity with medical treatment (1.8 ± 1 LogMAR to 1.9 ± 1.5 LogMAR, P = .9980), in contrast to patients with filamentous keratitis (1.4 ± 1.2 LogMAR to 1.1 ± 1.3 LogMAR, P = .0093). CONCLUSIONS: Fungal keratitis is increasing in incidence, with contact lenses emerging as one of the leading risk factors. Significant differences in the risk factors and visual outcomes exist between yeast keratitis and filamentous keratitis which may guide diagnosis and treatment.
RESUMO
PURPOSE: To compare the accuracy and outcomes of different intraocular lens (IOL) power calculation formulas in eyes with keratoconus undergoing cataract surgery with toric and non-toric IOLs. METHODS: This was a consecutive retrospective case series study including patients from the Cornea Service at the Department of Ophthalmology and Visual Sciences at the University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada, from 2000 to 2020. Keratoconus was diagnosed based on corneal topography and clinician opinion. Patients who underwent topography-guided photorefractive keratectomy, intracorneal ring segments implantation, or corneal transplant were excluded. The manifest spherical equivalent, prediction errors, and median absolute errors were calculated. Descriptive statistics were expressed as mean ± standard deviation. RESULTS: There were 160 eyes from 101 patients; 136 eyes received non-toric lenses and 24 eyes received toric lenses. Most patients had mild disease (< 48.00 diopters [D]) when stratified by steep keratometry values. Patients with severe disease (> 53.00 D) were significantly more hyperopic following surgery (P < .05). The Barrett Universal II (0.26 D, inter-quartile range [IQR] = 0.4), Holladay 2 (0.31, IQR = 1.2), and SRK/T (0.42, IQR = 0.86) formulas had the lowest median absolute error. The postoperative prediction error following toric lens insertion was not significantly different than following non-toric lens insertion, and the mean absolute astigmatism was significantly reduced with toric lenses. CONCLUSIONS: The Barrett Universal II, Holladay 2, and SRK/T were the most accurate IOL power calculation formulas in patients with keratoconus undergoing cataract surgery. Hyperopic surprise was increased in severe keratoconus. Toric IOLs may be considered in patients with mild keratoconus. [J Refract Surg. 2023;39(5):319-325.].