Comparison and evaluation of biomechanical, electrical, and biological methods for assessment of damage to tissue collagen.

In regard to evaluating tissue banking methods used to preserve or otherwise treat (process) soft allograft tissue, current tests may not be sufficiently sensitive to detect potential damage inflicted before, during, and after processing. Using controlled parameters, we aim to examine the sensitivity of specific biomechanical, electrical, and biological tests in detecting mild damage to collagen. Fresh porcine pulmonary heart valves were treated with an enzyme, collagenase, and incubated using various times. Controls received no incubation. All valves were cryopreserved and stored at -135 °C until being rewarmed for evaluation using biomechanical, permeability, and cell viability tests. Statistically significant time dependent changes in leaflet ultimate stress, (p = 0.006), permeability (p = 0.01), and viability (p ≤ 0.02, four different days of culture) were found between heart valves subjected to 0-15 min of collagenase treatment (ANOVA). However, no statistical significance was found between the tensile modulus of treated and untreated valves (p = 0.07). Furthermore, the trends of decreasing and increasing ultimate stress and viability, respectively, were somewhat inconsistent across treatment times. These results suggest that permeability tests may offer a sensitive, quantitative assay to complement traditional biomechanical and viability tests in evaluating processing methods used for soft tissue allografts, or when making changes to current validated methods. Multiple test evaluation may also offer insight into the mechanism of potential tissue damage such as, as is the case here, reduced collagen content and increased tissue porosity.

Ovine panel reactive antibody assay of HLA responsivity to allograft bioengineered vascular scaffolds.

BACKGROUND: Increasing evidence implicates immune response as a contributing factor in the failure of allograft valve transplants. Increases in panel reactive antibodies have been identified in human subjects. To correlate these responses with novel preimplantation processing methods to reduce cellularity, both a relevant panel reactive antibody assay and a chronic implantation animal model are necessary. We modified a human flow cytometric panel reactive antibody assay for ovine model use to detect antibody responses to residual antigen-loading decellularized scaffolds engineered from pulmonary artery tissue. METHODS: A clinical panel reactive antibody assay was modified with anti-sheep antibodies. Dimethyl sulfoxide cryopreserved (n = 4) and decellularized scaffolds (n = 8) fashioned as patches from pulmonary arteries were implanted for study. Fresh (nonprocessed) tissue implants were used as positive controls (n = 2), and sham-treated animals were used as negative controls (n = 2). Baseline, 10-week, and 20-week blood samples were assayed for panel reactive antibody levels. Immunohistochemistry with anti-major histocompatibility complex antibodies were performed on preimplantation scaffolds. RESULTS: Chronic implants of fresh tissue stimulated strong panel reactive antibody responses. Classically cryopreserved tissues provoked modest panel reactive antibody responses to major histocompatibility complex I antigen and no response to major histocompatibility complex II antigen. Decellularized tissue scaffolds provoked minimal to no panel reactive antibody responses to either major histocompatibility complex I or II antigen. Immunohistochemistry correlated with the panel reactive antibody results by identifying significant amounts of major histocompatibility complex I and II in fresh tissue, reduced antigen staining in cryopreserved control tissues, and minimal amounts in decellularized tissues. CONCLUSIONS: These studies with an ovine modified panel reactive antibody assay confirmed minimal immune allosensitization to transplanted decellularized tissue patches. Qualifying criteria for putative tissue-engineered scaffolds should include minimal recipient panel reactive antibody response.