Indication Criteria for Total Knee Arthroplasty in Patients with Osteoarthritis - A Multi-perspective Consensus Study.

Background and Objectives Knee osteoarthritis (OA) is a significant public health burden. Rates of total knee arthroplasty (TKA) in OA vary substantially between geographical regions, most likely due to the lack of standardised indication criteria. We set out to define indication criteria for the German healthcare system for TKA in patients with knee OA, on the basis of best evidence and transparent multi-stakeholder consensus. Methods We undertook a complex mixed methods study, including an iterative process of systematic appraisal of existing evidence, Delphi consensus methods and stakeholder conferences. We established a consensus panel representing key German national societies of healthcare providers (orthopaedic surgeons, rheumatologists, pain physicians, psychologists, physiotherapists), payers, and patient representatives. A priori defined consensus criteria were at least 70% agreement and less than 20% disagreement among the consensus panel. Agreement was sought for (1) core indication criteria defined as criteria that must be met to consider TKA in a normal patient with knee OA, (2) additional (not obligatory) indication criteria, (3) absolute contraindication criteria that generally prohibit TKA, and (4) risk factors that do not prohibit TKA, but usually do not lead to a recommendation for TKA. Results The following 5 core indication criteria were agreed within the panel: 1. intermittent (several times per week) or constant knee pain for at least 3 - 6 months; 2. radiological confirmation of structural knee damage (osteoarthritis, osteonecrosis); 3. inadequate response to conservative treatment, including pharmacological and non-pharmacological treatment for at least 3 - 6 months; 4. adverse impact of knee disease on patient's quality of life for at least 3 - 6 months; 5. patient-reported suffering/impairment due to knee disease. Additional indication criteria, contraindication criteria, and risk factors for adverse outcome were also agreed by a large majority within the multi-perspective stakeholder panel. Conclusion The defined indication criteria constitute a prerequisite for appropriate provision of TKA in patients with knee OA in Germany. In eligible patients, shared-decision making should eventually determine if TKA is performed or not. The next important steps are the implementation of the defined indication criteria, and the prospective investigation of predictors of success or failure of TKA in the context of routine care provision in Germany.

The influence of optimism on functionality after total hip replacement surgery.

Among other factors, optimism has been shown to significantly influence the course of some diseases (cancer, HIV, coronary heart disease). This study investigated whether optimism of a patient before a total hip replacement can predict the functionality of the lower limbs 3 and 6 months after surgery. A total of 325 patients took part in the study (age: 58.7 years; w: 55%). The functionality was measured with the Western Ontario and McMaster Universities arthrosis index, and optimism with the Life Orientation Test. To analyse the influences of age, gender and optimism, general linear models were calculated. In optimistic patients, functionality improved significantly over time. The study showed a clear influence of dispositional optimism on the recovery after total hip replacement in the first 3 months after surgery.

[Change of illness representations and quality of life during the course of a psychotherapeutic-psychosomatic treatment]. / Veränderungen der Krankheitsrepräsentationen und der Lebensqualität bei Patienten im Verlauf einer stationären psychosomatischen Behandlung.

OBJECTIVES: This article concerns the change of illness representations during the course of psychotherapeutic-psychosomatic treatment. It studies the predictive value of pretreatment illness representations and how they change with respect to quality of life. METHODS: In a pre-post measurement design, data were collected from 199 patients at pretreatment and from 172 patients at posttreatment. The instruments used were the Illness Perception Questionnaire and the World Health Organisation Quality of Life Questionnaire. Patients were on average 41 years old and had spent on average 44 days in the hospital. 76 % of them were women. RESULTS: Patients reported a significant enhancement of their symptoms and a reduction of perceived consequences. The illness representations of timeline and perceived control predicted altogether 11 % of the increase in quality of life. This increase also corresponds to a reduction of perceived consequences and an increase of control. CONCLUSIONS: Results point toward the importance of illness representations for patients regarding psychosomatic treatment. Therefore, consideration of illness representations during therapeutic interventions could increase quality of life.