Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 7 de 7
Filtrar
Mais filtros

Base de dados
Tipo de documento
Intervalo de ano de publicação
4.
Respir Med ; 188: 106619, 2021 11.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34555702

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Invasive fungal infections (IFI) are increasing in prevalence in recent years. In the last few months, the rise of COVID-19 patients has generated a new escalation in patients presenting opportunistic mycoses, mainly by Aspergillus. Candida infections are not being reported yet. OBJECTIVES: We aimed to determine the prevalence of systemic candidiasis in patients admitted to ICUs due to severe pneumonia secondary to SARS-CoV-2 infection and the existence of possible associated risk factors that led these patients to develop candidiasis. PATIENTS/METHODS: We designed a study including patients with a confirmed diagnosis of COVID-19. RESULTS: The prevalence of systemic candidiasis was 14.4%, and the main isolated species were C. albicans and C. parapsilosis. All patients that were tested positive for Candida spp. stayed longer in the ICU in comparison to patients who tested negative. Patients with candidiasis had higher MuLBSTA score and mortality rates and a worse radiological involvement. In our study, Candida spp. isolates were found in patients that were submitted to: tocilizumab, tocilizumab plus systemic steroids, interferon type 1ß and Lopinavir-Ritonavir. CONCLUSIONS: Results suggested a high prevalence of systemic candidiasis in severe COVID-19-associated pneumonia patients. Patients with Candidiasis had the worst clinical outcomes. Treatment with tocilizumab could potentialize the risk to develop systemic candidiasis.


Assuntos
COVID-19/complicações , Candidíase/epidemiologia , Coinfecção/epidemiologia , Pneumonia/epidemiologia , Idoso , COVID-19/diagnóstico , Candida albicans , Candida parapsilosis , Candidíase/complicações , Candidíase/diagnóstico , Coinfecção/diagnóstico , Cuidados Críticos , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Pneumonia/microbiologia , Pneumonia/virologia , Prevalência , Estudos Prospectivos , Fatores de Risco
5.
Mycoses ; 64(2): 144-151, 2021 Feb.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33217071

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: As the global coronavirus pandemic (COVID-19) spreads across the world, new clinical challenges emerge in the hospital landscape. Among these challenges, the increased risk of coinfections is a major threat to the patients. Although still in a low number, due to the short time of the pandemic, studies that identified a significant number of hospitalised patients with COVID-19 who developed secondary fungal infections that led to serious complications and even death have been published. OBJECTIVES: In this scenario, we aim to determine the prevalence of invasive fungal infections (IFIs) and describe possible associated risk factors in patients admitted due to severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) infection. PATIENTS/METHODS: We designed an open prospective observational study at the Rey Juan Carlos University Hospital (Mostoles, Spain), during the period from February 1 to April 30, 2020. RESULTS: In this article, we reported seven patients with COVID-19-associated pulmonary aspergillosis (CAPA) who had a poor prognosis. Severely ill patients represent a high-risk group; therefore, we must actively investigate the possibility of aspergillosis in all of these patients. Larger cohort studies are needed to unravel the role of COVID-19 immunosuppressive therapy as a risk factor for aspergillosis. CONCLUSIONS: As the pandemic continues to spread across the world, further reports are needed to assess the frequency of emergent and highly resistant reemergent fungal infections during severe COVID-19. These coinfections are leading a significant number of patients with COVID-19 to death due to complications following the primary viral disease.


Assuntos
COVID-19/complicações , Aspergilose Pulmonar Invasiva/etiologia , Infecções Oportunistas/microbiologia , Adulto , Idoso , Aspergillus/genética , Aspergillus/isolamento & purificação , Aspergillus/fisiologia , COVID-19/virologia , Feminino , Hospitalização , Humanos , Instituições para Cuidados Intermediários/estatística & dados numéricos , Aspergilose Pulmonar Invasiva/microbiologia , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Infecções Oportunistas/etiologia , Prevalência , Estudos Prospectivos , SARS-CoV-2/fisiologia , Espanha
6.
Arch Bronconeumol ; 51(10): 515-9, 2015 Oct.
Artigo em Inglês, Espanhol | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25910550

RESUMO

The quality of care received by patients is a basic element of modern medicine. Medical residents or interns are essential within the healthcare system, but their lack of experience can raise concerns about the quality of care given. A registrar or specialist has greater knowledge and skills, while a resident has greater motivation and enthusiasm. The aim of training programs is to prepare residents to provide high quality care. This requires close supervision that seems to be lacking, with the consequent impact on both healthcare quality and academic results. The so-called "July effect" refers to the diminished quality of care during the summer months when resident physicians switch over. The results of studies analysing this effect vary widely, but the loss of efficacy during these months does seem to be real. Pulmonology is one of medical specialties that generates the least demand for internships and residencies, but it is impossible to determine if this affects the quality of care. The high prevalence of respiratory diseases and the latest diagnostic and therapeutic advances may mean that this situation will change in coming years.


Assuntos
Internato e Residência , Corpo Clínico Hospitalar , Pneumologia/organização & administração , Qualidade da Assistência à Saúde , Atitude do Pessoal de Saúde , Educação de Pós-Graduação em Medicina/organização & administração , Mortalidade Hospitalar , Humanos , Corpo Clínico Hospitalar/educação , Corpo Clínico Hospitalar/organização & administração , Corpo Clínico Hospitalar/psicologia , Medicina , Motivação , Avaliação de Resultados em Cuidados de Saúde , Preferência do Paciente , Segurança do Paciente , Pneumologia/educação , Espanha , Fatores de Tempo
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA