Nurse-assisted arterio-venous fistula cannulation during home hemodialysis: first results of the DIADIDEAL study / La ponction de fistule assistée par infirmier libéral en hémodialyse à domicile : premiers résultats de l'étude DIADIDEAL.

Introduction: We have launched a pilot study, called DIADIDEAL, to propose nurse-assistance at home for arterio-venous fistula (AVF) cannulation in home hemodialysis (HHD) patients. The aim of the present study was to describe enrollment of the patients and their nurses. Materials: All prevalent HD patients on 30th November 2018 with no medical contraindication to HDD treatment and all incident patients on dialysis from the 30th November 2018 to the 21st April 2023 were eligible. Results: Among 155 prevalent HD patients, 4 patients were included. Among the 276 incident patients on dialysis during the study period, 6 were included. We have phoned 23 nurse centers during the recruitment period. Eight of them agreed to learn in our unit how to cannulate AVF; 27 private nurses were enrolled. Discussion: The results of the DIADIDEAL study will be available in 2024; we hope it will lead to a reimbursement of nurse-AVF cannulation at home in HDD.

Introduction: L'étude DIADIDEAL est une étude pilote sur la ponction de fistule artério-veineuse (FAV) assistée par infirmier libéral en hémodialyse à domicile (HDD). L'objectif de l'étude actuelle est de rapporter le recrutement des patients et de leurs infirmiers diplômés d'État libéraux (IDEL). Matériels et méthodes: Tous les patients prévalents en HD au 30 novembre 2018 n'ayant pas de contre-indication médicale à un traitement par HDD ainsi que tous les patients incidents en dialyse du 30 novembre 2018 au 21 avril 2023 étaient éligibles. Résultats: Parmi les 155 patients prévalents en hémodialyse, 4 ont été inclus. Parmi les 276 patients incidents en dialyse sur la période, 6 ont été inclus dans l'étude. Parmi les 23 cabinets IDEL contactés pour l'étude, 8 ont accepté et 27 IDEL ont été formés à la ponction de FAV. Discussion: Les résultats de l'étude DIADIDEAL seront disponibles en 2024 et viseront à obtenir une nomenclature pour l'acte de ponction de FAV par les IDEL.

Nurse-assisted arterio-venous fistula cannulation during home hemodialysis: first results of the DIADIDEAL study / La ponction de fistule assistée par infirmier libéral en hémodialyse à domicile : premiers résultats de l'étude DIADIDEAL.

Introduction: We have launched a pilot study, called DIADIDEAL, to propose nurse-assistance at home for arterio-venous fistula (AVF) cannulation in home hemodialysis (HHD) patients. The aim of the present study was to describe enrollment of the patients and their nurses. Materials: All prevalent HD patients on 30th November 2018 with no medical contraindication to HDD treatment and all incident patients on dialysis from the 30th November 2018 to the 21st April 2023 were eligible. Results: Among 155 prevalent HD patients, 4 patients were included. Among the 276 incident patients on dialysis during the study period, 6 were included. We have phoned 23 nurse centers during the recruitment period. Eight of them agreed to learn in our unit how to cannulate AVF; 27 private nurses were enrolled. Discussion: The results of the DIADIDEAL study will be available in 2024; we hope it will lead to a reimbursement of nurse-AVF cannulation at home in HDD.

Introduction: L'étude DIADIDEAL est une étude pilote sur la ponction de fistule artério-veineuse (FAV) assistée par infirmier libéral en hémodialyse à domicile (HDD). L'objectif de l'étude actuelle est de rapporter le recrutement des patients et de leurs infirmiers diplômés d'État libéraux (IDEL). Matériels et méthodes: Tous les patients prévalents en HD au 30 novembre 2018 n'ayant pas de contre-indication médicale à un traitement par HDD ainsi que tous les patients incidents en dialyse du 30 novembre 2018 au 21 avril 2023 étaient éligibles. Résultats: Parmi les 155 patients prévalents en hémodialyse, 4 ont été inclus. Parmi les 276 patients incidents en dialyse sur la période, 6 ont été inclus dans l'étude. Parmi les 23 cabinets IDEL contactés pour l'étude, 8 ont accepté et 27 IDEL ont été formés à la ponction de FAV. Discussion: Les résultats de l'étude DIADIDEAL seront disponibles en 2024 et viseront à obtenir une nomenclature pour l'acte de ponction de FAV par les IDEL.

Why is health literacy an essential component of health of individuals with chronic kidney disease / Pourquoi la littératie en santé est une composante essentielle de la santé des individus ayant une maladie rénale chronique.

Health literacy (HL) is the ability of individuals to access, understand and use health information to improve their health. It is a multidimensional and contextual concept, whose definition has been enriched over time. Considered both as a health risk factor and a skill to be developed by individuals, HL also depends on the healthcare system in which patients have to navigate, and on healthcare professionals' awareness of this concept. In order to promote shared decision-making and thus individual empowerment in the healthcare, HL should be at the core of the concerns of nephrology care teams.

La littératie en santé (LS) est la capacité d'un individu à accéder à des informations en santé, à les comprendre et à les utiliser pour améliorer son état de santé. Il s'agit d'un concept pluridimensionnel et contextuel dont la définition s'est enrichie au fil du temps. Considérée à la fois comme un facteur de risque pour la santé et une aptitude à développer chez les individus, la LS dépend également du système de santé dans lequel les patients doivent naviguer et de la sensibilisation des professionnels de santé à ce concept. Afin de favoriser la décision partagée et ainsi l'émancipation des individus en matière de santé, la LS devrait être au cœur des préoccupations des équipes de néphrologie.

Why is health literacy an essential component of health of individuals with chronic kidney disease / Pourquoi la littératie en santé est une composante essentielle de la santé des individus ayant une maladie rénale chronique.

Health literacy (HL) is the ability of individuals to access, understand and use health information to improve their health. It is a multidimensional and contextual concept, whose definition has been enriched over time. Considered both as a health risk factor and a skill to be developed by individuals, HL also depends on the healthcare system in which patients have to navigate, and on healthcare professionals' awareness of this concept. In order to promote shared decision-making and thus individual empowerment in the healthcare, HL should be at the core of the concerns of nephrology care teams.

La littératie en santé (LS) est la capacité d'un individu à accéder à des informations en santé, à les comprendre et à les utiliser pour améliorer son état de santé. Il s'agit d'un concept pluridimensionnel et contextuel dont la définition s'est enrichie au fil du temps. Considérée à la fois comme un facteur de risque pour la santé et une aptitude à développer chez les individus, la LS dépend également du système de santé dans lequel les patients doivent naviguer et de la sensibilisation des professionnels de santé à ce concept. Afin de favoriser la décision partagée et ainsi l'émancipation des individus en matière de santé, la LS devrait être au cœur des préoccupations des équipes de néphrologie.

Is social deprivation associated with the peritoneal dialysis outcomes? A cohort study with REIN registry data.

BACKGROUND: Social deprivation is associated with lower peritoneal dialysis (PD) uptake. This study was carried out to evaluate the role of social deprivation on the outcome of PD. METHODS: This was a retrospective study of data extracted from the Renal Epidemiology and Information Network registry for patients older than 18 years who started PD in metropolitan France between 1 January 2017 and 30 June 2018. The end of the observation period was 31 December 2020. The exposure was the European Deprivation Index calculated using the patient's address. The events of interest were death, transfer to haemodialysis (HD), transplantation and the composite event of death or transfer to HD. A Cox model and Fine and Gray model were used for the analysis. RESULTS: A total of 1581 patients were included, of whom 418 (26.5%) belonged to Quintile 5 of the European Deprivation Index (the most deprived patients). In the Cox model, the most deprived subjects did not have a greater risk of death (cause-specific hazard ratio (cs-HR): 0.76 [95% confidence interval (CI): 0.53-1.10], transfer to HD (cs-HR 1.37 [95% CI: 0.95-1.98]) or the composite event of death or transfer to HD (cs-HR: 1.08 [95% CI: 0.84-1.38]) or a lower risk of kidney transplantation (cs-HR: 0.73 [95% CI: 0.48-1.10]). In the competing risk analysis, the most deprived subjects had a higher risk of transfer to HD (subdistribution hazard ratio (sd-HR): 1.54 [95% CI: 1.08-2.19]) and lower access to kidney transplantation (sd-HR: 0.68 [0.46-0.99]). CONCLUSION: In PD patients, social deprivation was not associated with death or the composite event of death or transfer to HD. Socially deprived individuals had a greater risk of transfer to HD and lower access to kidney transplantation in the competing risk analysis.

Lower access to kidney transplantation for women in France is not explained by comorbidities and social deprivation.

BACKGROUND: Access to kidney transplantation (KT) remains challenging for patients with end-stage kidney disease. This study assessed women's access to KT in France by considering comorbidities and neighborhood social deprivation. METHODS: All incident 18-85-year-old patients starting dialysis in France between January 1, 2017 and December 31, 2019 were included. Three outcomes were assessed: (i) access to the KT waiting list after dialysis start, (ii) KT access after waitlisting, and (iii) KT access after dialysis start. Cox and Fine and Gray models were used. Gender-EDI and gender-age interactions were tested and analyses were performed among strata if required. RESULTS: 29,395 patients were included (35% of women). After adjusting for social deprivation and comorbidities, women were less likely to be waitlisted at 1 (adjHR: 0.91 [0.87-0.96]) and 3 years (adjHR: 0.87 [0.84-0.91]) post-dialysis initiation. This disparity concerned mainly ≥60-year-old women (adjHR: 0.76 [0.71-0.82] at 1 year and 0.75 [0.71-0.81] at 3 years). Access to KT, after 2 years of waitlisting was similar between genders. Access to KT was similar between genders at 3 years after dialysis start, but decreased for women after 4 years (adjHR: 0.93 [0.88-0.99]) and longer follow-up (adjHR: 0.90 [0.85-0.96]). CONCLUSIONS: In France, women are less likely to be waitlisted and undergo kidney transplantation. This is driven by the ≥60-year-old group and is not explained by comorbidities or social deprivation level.

Sex disparities in the utilization of nurse-assisted peritoneal dialysis: a mediation analysis using data from the REIN registry.

Background: This study was carried out to evaluate the association between patient sex and the proportion of nurse-assisted peritoneal dialysis (PD) at dialysis initiation and to explore whether sex disparities in nurse-assisted PD utilization was explained by predialysis care and/or by social deprivation using mediation analysis. Methods: This was a retrospective study using data from the Renal Epidemiology and Information Network (REIN) registry linked to the French National Healthcare Database (SNDS) of incident patients between 1 January 2017 and 30 June 2018. A regression logistic was used for statistical analysis. A mediation analysis explored the direct effect of sex on nurse-assisted PD proportion and the indirect effect through the European Deprivation Index (EDI), and the number of general practitioner (GP) and nephrologist visits before dialysis initiation. Results: Among 1706 patients on PD, there were 637 women (37.3%) and 1069 men (62.7%). Nurse-assisted PD proportion was 332/610 (54.4%) for women vs 464/1036 (44.8%) for men. In the multivariable analysis women were more likely to be treated by nurse-assisted PD {odds ratio (OR) 1.92 [95% confidence interval (CI) 1.46-2.52]}. Nurse-assisted PD was associated with the median number of GP visits [OR 1.44 (95% CI 1.11-1.86)] and with the median number of nephrologist visits [OR 0.59 (95% CI 0.46-0.76)]. The mediation analysis showed a direct effect of sex on nurse-assisted PD [OR 1.90 (95% CI 1.80-2.01)] and an indirect effect through the median number of GP visits [OR 1.05 (95% CI 1.04-1.06], the median number of nephrologist visits [OR 1.02 (95% CI 1.02-1.03)] and quintile 5 of the EDI [OR 1.03 (95% CI 1.02-1.03)]. Conclusion: Women were more frequently treated by nurse-assisted PD than men. Differences between women and men in predialysis care and social deprivation could explain the greater utilization of nurse-assisted PD among women.

The impact of cat-related peritonitis on peritoneal dialysis outcomes: Results from the RDPLF.

BACKGROUND: Cat ownership is common in peritoneal dialysis (PD) patients, even with recent guidelines recommending avoiding domestic animals during PD exchanges to limit the risk of peritonitis due to pet contamination. We analysed the outcomes of patients who experienced cat-related peritonitis compared with those who experienced peritonitis due to other causes. METHODS: This retrospective study based on the Registre de Dialyse Peritoneale de Langue Française data analysed the outcomes of 52 patients experiencing cat-related peritonitis from the beginning of the database (1986) until 21 June 2022 compared with those of 208 matched patients experiencing peritonitis due to other causes. A Cox regression model examined the association between cat-related peritonitis and the composite end point of death in PD or transfer to haemodialysis (HD), death in PD and transfer to HD. RESULTS: Among patients with an episode of cat-related peritonitis, 11 (21.1%) died, 19 (36.5%) were transferred to HD and 11 (21.1%) were transplanted. In the group with other causes of peritonitis, these numbers were 67 (32%), 81 (39%) and 26 (12.5%), respectively. In multivariate survival analysis, age (hazard ratio (HR): 1.39; 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.13-1.70) and use of assisted PD (HR: 4.07; 95% CI: 2.11-7.86) were associated with the risk of death. Having experienced cat-related peritonitis was not significantly associated with any of the three outcomes (death, transfer to HD or PD cessation). CONCLUSIONS: Patients on PD should be aware that cats may cause a peritoneal infection, which results in similar consequences to those of other causes of peritonitis. However, pets at home should not be considered a contraindication to PD.

Assisted PD throughout Europe: advantages, inequities, and solution proposals.

BACKGROUND: Peritoneal dialysis provides several benefits for patients and should be offered as first line kidney replacement therapy, particularly for fragile patients. Limitation to self-care drove assisted peritoneal dialysis to evolve from family-based care to institutional programs, with specialized care givers. Some European countries have mastered this, while others are still bound by the availability of a volunteer to become responsible for treatment. METHODS: A group of leading nephrologists from 13 European countries integrated real-life application of such therapy, highlighting barriers, lessons learned and practical solutions. The objective of this work is to share and summarize several different approaches, with their intrinsic difficulties and solutions, which might helpperitoneal dialysis units to develop and offer assisted peritoneal dialysis. RESULTS: Assisted peritoneal dialysis does not mean 4 continuous ambulatory peritoneal dialysis exchanges, 7 days/week, nor does it exclude cycler. Many different prescriptions might work for our patients. Tailoring PD prescription to residual kidney function, thereby maintaining small solute clearance, reduces dialysis burden and is associated with higher technique survival. Assisted peritoneal dialysis does not mean assistance will be needed permanently, it can be a transitional stage towards individual or caregiver autonomy. Private care agencies can be used to provide assistance; other options may involve implementing PD training programs for the staff of nursing homes or convalescence units. Social partners may be interested in participating in smaller initiatives or for limited time periods. CONCLUSION: Assisted peritoneal dialysis is a valid technique, which should be expanded. In countries without structural models of assisted peritoneal dialysis, active involvement by the nephrologist is needed in order for it to become a reality.

Health care provision / Offre de soins

On the occasion of the 20th anniversary of the REIN (French Renal Epidemiology and Information Network), a summary work on the contributions of the French national ESKD register was carried out. On the issue of healthcare provision, the following key messages were retained. France offers diversified, local healthcare that adapts to the patients' needs with several additional players (public, university, lucrative private, solidarity private). However, the spatial distribution of this offer shows differences between territories as regards the distribution of the different treatment modalities. For several years now, the REIN proposes a new way of representing the provision of care using groups of establishments working together, a granularity that seems more suited to the evaluation of practices than isolated dialysis units.

À l'occasion des 20 ans du REIN (Réseau Épidémiologie et Information en Néphrologie), un travail de synthèse sur les apports du registre a été mené. Sur la question de l'offre de soins, les messages clés suivants ont été retenus. La France dispose d'une offre de soins diversifiée, de proximité, qui s'adapte aux besoins des patients avec plusieurs acteurs complémentaires (public, universitaire, privé lucratif, privé solidaire). La répartition spatiale de l'offre montre cependant des différences entre les territoires en ce qui concerne la répartition des différentes modalités de traitement. Depuis plusieurs années, le REIN propose un nouveau mode de représentation de l'offre de soins à partir de regroupements d'établissements travaillant en filière, granularité qui semble plus adaptée à l'évaluation des pratiques que l'échelon unité de dialyse.

Incidence of End Stage Kidney Disease and context of dialysis initiation / Incidence de la maladie rénale chronique stade 5 traitée par suppléance et contexte d'initiation de la dialyse

On the occasion of the 20th anniversary of the REIN (French Renal Epidemiology and Information Network), a summary work on the contributions of the national French ESKD register was carried out. On the issue of ESKD incidence, the following key messages were retained. Thanks to several studies conducted using data from the REIN registry, the spatial variations of incidence of stage 5 chronic kidney disease in the replacement stage could be explained, in part, by the health condition of the general population as well as by the socio-economic context and differences in practices. Just like what is observed in other countries, the incidence is stabilising, or even decreasing, especially among people who do not have diabetes. Thanks to the registry having provided an indicator on the initiation of the dialysis, a decrease in the rate of initiation of emergency dialysis (i.e., initiated less than 24 hours after a nephrology evaluation considering a vital risk for the patient) has been observed, resulting from an effort to understand and better anticipate the starting of the replacement.

À l'occasion des 20 ans du REIN (Réseau Epidémiologie et Information en Néphrologie), un travail de synthèse sur les apports du registre a été mené. Sur la question de l'incidence de la maladie rénale chronique stade 5, les messages clés suivants ont été retenus. Grâce à plusieurs études menées à partir des données du registre REIN, les variations spatiales d'incidence de la maladie rénale chronique stade 5 au stade de la suppléance ont pu être expliquées, en partie, par l'état de santé de la population générale mais aussi par le contexte socioéconomique et des différences de pratiques. À l'image de ce qui est observé dans d'autres pays, l'incidence est en voie de stabilisation, voire à la baisse, en particulier chez les personnes non diabétiques. Grâce à la mise à disposition par le registre d'un indicateur sur l'initiation de la dialyse, on observe une diminution du taux d'initiation de la dialyse en urgence (c'est-à-dire initiée moins de 24 heures après une évaluation néphrologique considérant un risque vital pour le patient) résultant d'un effort pour comprendre et mieux anticiper le démarrage de la suppléance. L'initiation de la dialyse sur cathéter, autre indicateur de la prise en charge, n'a pour l'instant pas diminué mais avec la mise en place du forfait MRC en octobre 2019 et à distance de la pandémie, la préparation à l'épuration extrarénale devrait être mieux anticipée.

Prevalence of End Stage Kidney Disease and distribution of treatment modalities / Prévalence de l'IRCT et part des différentes modalités de traitement

On the occasion of the 20th anniversary of the REIN (French Renal Epidemiology and Information Network), a summary work on the contributions of the national French ESKD register was carried out. On the issue of ESKD prevalence, the following key messages were retained. While chronic kidney disease affects all age groups, there always are more patients to treat in the older age groups, with a median age of 71.1 years (IIQ 60.3-80.0) under dialysis and 58.7 years (IIQ 47.4-68.3) under renal transplant. Despite an increase in transplant activity and improved survival of grafts, the gap between the number of dialysis patients and transplant patients at the end of each year is only moderately reduced. There has been a moderate decrease in the proportion of in-centre haemodialysis that is explained by a significant increase in medicalised dialysis units (out-centre haemodialysis) and a decrease in self-care haemodialysis. Finally, a stable home-based care has been observed despite the ministerial incentives and the recommendations of the French-speaking scientific society (SFNDT-white paper).

À l'occasion des 20 ans du REIN (Réseau Epidémiologie et Information en Néphrologie), un travail de synthèse sur les apports du registre a été mené. Sur la question de la prévalence de la maladie rénale stade 5, les messages clés suivants ont été retenus. Si la maladie rénale chronique touche toutes les tranches d'âge, il y a toujours plus de patients à prendre en charge dans les tranches d'âge les plus élevées, avec un âge médian de 71,1 ans (Intervalle Inter Quartile (IIQ) 60,3-80,0) en dialyse et 58,7 ans (IIQ 47,4-68,3) en transplantation rénale. Malgré une augmentation de l'activité de greffe et une meilleure survie des greffons, l'écart entre le nombre de patients dialysés et greffés à la fin de chaque année ne diminue que de façon modérée. On observe une baisse modérée de la part de l'hémodialyse en centre expliquée par une hausse importante des unités de dialyse médicalisée (UDM) et une baisse de l'autodialyse. Enfin, on note une prise en charge à domicile stable malgré les incitations ministérielles et les recommandations de la société savante (SFNDT-livre blanc).

Survival of patients with End Stage Kidney Disease / Mortalité des patients avec une maladie rénale chronique stade 5 traités par suppléance

On the occasion of the 20th anniversary of the REIN (French Renal Epidemiology and Information Network), a summary work on the contributions of the national French ESKD register was carried out. On the issue of survival of ESKD patients, the following key messages were retained. The annual mortality rates of ESKD patients are relatively stable even though patients are ageing and increasingly have diabetes or obesity. These changes are probably linked to improved practices. Cardiovascular diseases and infections are the main causes of death. The year 2020 was marked by an increase in mortality due to the SARS-CoV-19 infection that was particularly severe in these patients.

À l'occasion des 20 ans du REIN (Réseau Epidémiologie et Information en Néphrologie), un travail de synthèse sur les apports du registre a été mené. Sur la question de la survie des patients avec une maladie rénale stade 5, les messages clés suivants ont été retenus. Les taux de mortalité annuels des patients en IRCT sont relativement stables alors même que les patients vieillissent et qu'ils sont de plus en plus souvent porteurs d'un diabète ou d'une obésité. Ces évolutions sont probablement en lien avec une amélioration des pratiques. Les maladies cardiovasculaires et les infections représentent les causes principales de décès. L'année 2020 a été marquée par une augmentation de la mortalité en raison de l'infection à SARS-CoV-19 particulièrement sévère chez ces patients.

REIN: a tool for the benefit of renal transplantation / REIN : un outil au service de l'accès à la greffe

On the occasion of the 20th anniversary of the REIN (French Renal Epidemiology and Information Network), a summary work on the contributions of the national French ESKD register was carried out. On the issue of access to renal transplantation for ESKD patients, the following key messages were retained. The registry of the REIN includes data about kidney transplant and dialysis. It thus allows evaluating the access to kidney transplant in France based on the needs of the population with stage 5 CKD treated by renal replacement therapy. The data produced by the registry is complementary to the data in the report of the Agence de la biomédecine (Agency of Biomedicine) based on the activity of the transplant centres and the population of registered patients waiting for a transplant. The proportion of preemptive transplant (transplant without prior recourse to dialysis) as well as that of preemptive registration (before starting dialysis) have increased since 2012 but remain low. The proportion of preemptive transplant as the first replacement therapy remains low and stable over time at around 3 to 4%. The access to the waiting list and the transplant varies depending on the age and co-morbidities of the patients (diabetes, obesity) as well as on the region. The rates of registration on the kidney transplant waiting list at the time of initiation of dialysis and at 1 year from the start have been increasing since 2012, irrespective of the patients' characteristics, though it remains low in elderly, diabetic and severely obese patients. This is partly the result related to the publication of the HAS (French National Authority for Health) recommendations in 2015 and the publications on the disparities in access to transplants established thanks to the REIN registry. The causes of non-registration at the time of initiation of dialysis have changed over time with some patients not registering for contraindication steadily decreasing since 2012. Thanks to several studies conducted using data from the registry, the variations in access to the list could be explained, partly, by the health condition of the dialysis population as well as by the socio-economic context and differences in practices according to dialysis networks. The median waiting time for a kidney transplant has been gradually increasing since 2012, with a delta of about 8 months between 2012 and 2020. However, the waiting time between the initiation of dialysis and the transplant has increased less significantly. The probability of receiving a first kidney transplant depends on the age, diabetic status and obesity of the patient, and has remained stable over time.

À l'occasion des 20 ans du REIN (Réseau Épidémiologie et Information en Néphrologie), un travail de synthèse sur les apports du registre a été mené. Sur la question de l'accès à la greffe rénale des patients avec une maladie rénale stade 5, les messages clés suivants ont été retenus. Le registre du REIN intègre les données de la greffe rénale et de la dialyse. Il permet ainsi d'évaluer l'accès à la greffe rénale en France à partir des besoins de la population MRC au stade 5 traitée par suppléance. Les données produites par le registre sont complémentaires des données du rapport de l'Agence de la biomédecine basées sur l'activité des centres de greffe et la population des patients inscrits en attente de greffe. La part de la greffe préemptive (greffe sans recours préalable à la dialyse) ainsi que celle de l'inscription préemptive (avant le démarrage de la dialyse) ont augmenté depuis 2012 mais restent faibles. La proportion de greffe préemptive comme premier traitement de suppléance reste faible et stable dans le temps aux alentours de 3 à 4 %. L'accès à la liste d'attente et à la greffe varie selon l'âge et les comorbidités des patients (diabète, obésité) mais aussi selon la région. Les taux d'inscription sur liste d'attente de greffe rénale au moment de l'initiation de la dialyse et à 1 an du début augmentent depuis 2012, quelles que soient les caractéristiques des patients même si elle reste faible chez les patients âgés, diabétiques et présentant une obésité sévère. Ceci est en partie le résultat lié à la publication des recommandations HAS en 2015 et aux publications sur les disparités d'accès à la greffe établies grâce au registre REIN. Les causes de non-inscription au moment de l'initiation de la dialyse ont évolué dans le temps avec une proportion de patients non inscrits pour contre-indication en baisse constante depuis 2012. Grâce à plusieurs études menées à partir des données du registre, les variations d'accès à la liste ont pu être expliquées, en partie, par l'état de santé de la population dialysée mais aussi par le contexte socioéconomique et des différences de pratiques selon les filières de prise en charge. Le temps d'attente médian avant une greffe rénale augmente progressivement depuis 2012 avec un delta d'environ 8 mois entre 2012 et 2020 ; cependant, le temps d'attente entre l'initiation de la dialyse et la greffe a augmenté de façon moins importante. La probabilité de recevoir une première greffe rénale dépend de l'âge, du statut diabétique et de l'obésité du patient et est restée stable au cours du temps.

Social deprivation and kidney failure due to an undiagnosed nephropathy.

BACKGROUND: In France, kidney diseases of undetermined origin account for 5%-20% of all causes of end-stage kidney disease. We investigated the impact of social disadvantage on the lack of aetiological diagnosis of nephropathies. METHODS: Data from patients who started dialysis in France between 1 January 2017 and 30 June 2018 were extracted from the French Renal Epidemiology and Information Network registry. The social deprivation of each individual was estimated by the European Deprivation Index (EDI) defined by the patient's address. Logistic regression was used to perform mediation analysis to study the potential association between social deprivation and unknown nephropathy. RESULTS: Of the 7218 patients included, 1263 (17.5%) had unknown kidney disease. A total of 394 (31.4%) patients in the unknown kidney disease belonged to the most deprived quintile of the EDI [fifth quintile (Q5)], vs 1636 (27.5%) patients in the known kidney disease group. In the multivariate analysis, unknown kidney disease was associated with Q5 (odds ratio 1.40, 95% confidence interval 1.12-1.74, P = .003). Mediation analysis did not identify any variables (e.g. obesity, initiation of dialysis in emergency, number of visits to the general practitioner and nephrologist before initiation of dialysis, date of first nephrology consultation) that mediated the association between social deprivation and nephropathy of unknown origin. CONCLUSIONS: Our results show that, compared with nondeprived subjects, individuals experiencing social deprivation have a higher risk of unknown nephropathy at dialysis initiation. However, mediation analysis did not identify any variables that explained the association between social deprivation and nephropathy of unknown origin.