Autonomic biosignals, seizure detection, and forecasting.

Wearable devices have attracted significant attention in epilepsy research in recent years for their potential to enhance patient care through improved seizure monitoring and forecasting. This narrative review presents a detailed overview of the current clinical state of the art while addressing how devices that assess autonomic nervous system (ANS) function reflect seizures and central nervous system (CNS) state changes. This includes a description of the interactions between the CNS and the ANS, including physiological and epilepsy-related changes affecting their dynamics. We first discuss technical aspects of measuring autonomic biosignals and considerations for using ANS sensors in clinical practice. We then review recent seizure detection and seizure forecasting studies, highlighting their performance and capability for seizure detection and forecasting using devices measuring ANS biomarkers. Finally, we address the field's challenges and provide an outlook for future developments.

Ultradian rhythms in accelerometric and autonomic data vary based on seizure occurrence in paediatric epilepsy patients.

Ultradian rhythms are physiological oscillations that resonate with period lengths shorter than 24 hours. This study examined the expression of ultradian rhythms in patients with epilepsy, a disease defined by an enduring seizure risk that may vary cyclically. Using a wearable device, we recorded heart rate, body temperature, electrodermal activity and limb accelerometry in patients admitted to the paediatric epilepsy monitoring unit. In our case-control design, we included recordings from 29 patients with tonic-clonic seizures and 29 non-seizing controls. We spectrally decomposed each signal to identify cycle lengths of interest and compared average spectral power- and period-related markers between groups. Additionally, we related seizure occurrence to the phase of ultradian rhythm in patients with recorded seizures. We observed prominent 2- and 4-hour-long ultradian rhythms of accelerometry, as well as 4-hour-long oscillations in heart rate. Patients with seizures displayed a higher peak power in the 2-hour accelerometry rhythm (U = 287, P = 0.038) and a period-lengthened 4-hour heart rate rhythm (U = 291.5, P = 0.037). Those that seized also displayed greater mean rhythmic electrodermal activity (U = 261; P = 0.013). Most seizures occurred during the falling-to-trough quarter phase of accelerometric rhythms (13 out of 27, χ2 = 8.41, P = 0.038). Fluctuations in seizure risk or the occurrence of seizures may interrelate with ultradian rhythms of movement and autonomic function. Longitudinal assessments of ultradian patterns in larger patient samples may enable us to understand how such rhythms may improve the temporal precision of seizure forecasting models.

Minimum clinical utility standards for wearable seizure detectors: A simulation study.

OBJECTIVE: Epilepsy management employs self-reported seizure diaries, despite evidence of seizure underreporting. Wearable and implantable seizure detection devices are now becoming more widely available. There are no clear guidelines about what levels of accuracy are sufficient. This study aimed to simulate clinical use cases and identify the necessary level of accuracy for each. METHODS: Using a realistic seizure simulator (CHOCOLATES), a ground truth was produced, which was then sampled to generate signals from simulated seizure detectors of various capabilities. Five use cases were evaluated: (1) randomized clinical trials (RCTs), (2) medication adjustment in clinic, (3) injury prevention, (4) sudden unexpected death in epilepsy (SUDEP) prevention, and (5) treatment of seizure clusters. We considered sensitivity (0%-100%), false alarm rate (FAR; 0-2/day), and device type (external wearable vs. implant) in each scenario. RESULTS: The RCT case was efficient for a wide range of wearable parameters, though implantable devices were preferred. Lower accuracy wearables resulted in subtle changes in the distribution of patients enrolled in RCTs, and therefore higher sensitivity and lower FAR values were preferred. In the clinic case, a wide range of sensitivity, FAR, and device type yielded similar results. For injury prevention, SUDEP prevention, and seizure cluster treatment, each scenario required high sensitivity and yet was minimally influenced by FAR. SIGNIFICANCE: The choice of use case is paramount in determining acceptable accuracy levels for a wearable seizure detection device. We offer simulation results for determining and verifying utility for specific use case and specific wearable parameters.

Biases in Electronic Health Records Data for Generating Real-World Evidence: An Overview.

Electronic Health Records (EHR) are increasingly being perceived as a unique source of data for clinical research as they provide unprecedentedly large volumes of real-time data from real-world settings. In this review of the secondary uses of EHR, we identify the anticipated breadth of opportunities, pointing out the data deficiencies and potential biases that are likely to limit the search for true causal relationships. This paper provides a comprehensive overview of the types of biases that arise along the pathways that generate real-world evidence and the sources of these biases. We distinguish between two levels in the production of EHR data where biases are likely to arise: (i) at the healthcare system level, where the principal source of bias resides in access to, and provision of, medical care, and in the acquisition and documentation of medical and administrative data; and (ii) at the research level, where biases arise from the processes of extracting, analyzing, and interpreting these data. Due to the plethora of biases, mainly in the form of selection and information bias, we conclude with advising extreme caution about making causal inferences based on secondary uses of EHRs.