Health-related quality of life in pre-pubertal children with pediatric growth hormone deficiency: 12-month results from a phase 3 clinical trial of once-weekly somatrogon versus once-daily somatropin.

OBJECTIVE: Treatment of pediatric growth hormone deficiency (pGHD) with daily injection of recombinant human growth hormone (somatropin) aims to increase height velocity and improve health-related quality of life (HRQoL). The Quality of Life in Short Stature Youth (QoLISSY) questionnaire was administered in a phase 3 clinical trial that evaluated efficacy and safety of once-weekly somatrogon versus once-daily somatropin in children with pGHD (ClinicalTrials.gov no NCT02968004). METHODS: Treatment-naïve prepubertal children with pGHD received once-weekly somatrogon or once-daily somatropin for 12 months. The QoLISSY core module (physical/social/emotional subscales) was administered at baseline and 12 months after treatment initiation. QoLISSY-Parent was completed by parents/caregivers of children <7 years old and some parents/caregivers of children ≥7 years old; children ≥7 years old self-completed QoLISSY-Child. RESULTS: Baseline characteristics were similar between treatment groups (N = 117). Among children <7 years old, QoLISSY-Parent total and subscale scores showed similarly improved HRQoL at 12 months relative to baseline in both treatment groups. Self-reported QoLISSY-Child total and subscale scores in children ≥7 years old indicated HRQoL improvements at 12 months that were numerically better with somatrogon than somatropin (similar results with QoLISSY-Parent in this age group). At both time points, children reported better HRQoL than perceived by their parents/caregivers. CONCLUSION: Treatment for 12 months with once-weekly somatrogon or once-daily somatropin resulted in comparable improvements in HRQoL among children with pGHD. Lower HRQoL perceived by parents/caregivers possibly reflect children's tendency to emphasize adaptation. These results suggest that evaluation of HRQoL could help support treatment decisions in children with pGHD treated with growth hormone.

Pediatric growth hormone deficiency is a condition that causes slow growth. Children with this condition have height that is lower than normal unless the condition is treated. The slow growth and short height may have bad effects on the emotional and social well-being of these children. Treatment usually consists of a growth hormone that is administered by daily injection under the skin over a period of years. However, children and their parents may not like these daily injections and often stop treatment. A newer treatment is available that can be injected once weekly. This newer treatment increases growth the same as daily injections. We looked at whether 12 months of treatment given once a week has the same positive effects on the physical, social, and emotional health of children as the daily treatment. Children and their parents answered questions that asked how being short affects the physical, social, and emotional parts of their life. These questions were asked before starting treatment and 12 months after starting treatment. In children younger than 7 years old, improvements at 12 months in their physical, social, and emotional health were similar between the treatments. In children 7 years old or older, those who received the once-weekly injections had slightly better improvements than those who received the daily injections. These results can help parents and doctors make decisions about treating children with pediatric growth hormone deficiency.

Physician experience with once-weekly somatrogon versus once-daily rhGH regimen in pediatric patients with growth hormone deficiency: a cross-sectional survey of physicians from the global phase 3 study.

Introduction: The standard of care for pediatric growth hormone deficiency (pGHD) is once-daily recombinant human growth hormone (rhGH). Somatrogon, a long-acting rhGH, requires less frequent, once-weekly, dosing. We describe physicians' preference for, experiences, and satisfaction with once-weekly somatrogon vs once-daily rhGH. Methods: English-speaking investigators from somatrogon's global phase III study (NCT02968004) with prior experience using once-daily rhGH were included. Participants answered an online survey containing 14 closed- and open-ended items. Results: Twenty-four pediatric endocrinologists (41.7% men; 79.2% practiced at public/private hospitals) from 12 countries with 25.8 ± 12.0 years' experience treating pGHD completed the survey. In terms of the time and effort required to explain device instructions, injection regimen, procedure for missed injection, and address patients'/caregivers' concerns, a similar proportion of physicians chose once-weekly somatrogon and once-daily rhGH; 62.5% physicians indicated that once-daily rhGH required greater effort to monitor adherence. Overall, 75% preferred once-weekly somatrogon over once-daily rhGH, 79.2% considered once-weekly somatrogon to be more convenient and less burdensome, and 83.3% were likely to prescribe somatrogon in the future. Overall, 50% felt that once-weekly somatrogon was more beneficial to patients, while 50% chose "No difference". Most physicians (62.5%) felt both regimens were equally likely to support positive long-term growth outcomes and reduce healthcare utilization. More physicians were "very satisfied" with once-weekly somatrogon (62.5%) than with once-daily rhGH (16.7%). Reduced injection frequency, patient and caregiver burden, increased convenience, and improved adherence were reasons for these choices. Conclusion: Physicians had a positive experience with, and perception of, treating pGHD with once-weekly somatrogon.

Cost-effectiveness and cost-utility analysis of somatrogon once-weekly injections vs. daily growth hormone injection for treating paediatric growth hormone deficiency in Ireland.

OBJECTIVES: Paediatric growth hormone deficiency (pGHD) manifests as growth failure associated with inadequate growth hormone (GH) production. Daily injections of recombinant human GH (dGH) [somatropin] is the current standard of care, which has been shown to be well tolerated and effective, but associated with suboptimal adherence, leading to reduced effectiveness. Somatrogon, a once-weekly injectable long-acting human GH, has demonstrated clinical non-inferiority and significantly lower life interference (i.e. treatment burden) vs. somatropin in two Phase 3 studies. This work evaluated cost-effectiveness and cost-utility of somatrogon vs dGHs from an Irish payer perspective. METHODS: A Markov model was developed for patients starting somatrogon or dGHs treatment at 3-12 years and continuing up to achievement of near adult height (NAH), with growth driven by trial-based height velocity (HV) and treatment-specific adherence. Patients could discontinue treatment at the end of Year 1 (4%). DGH adherence (95.3%-65% over treatment duration) and adherence-growth relationship were based on published evidence. Higher Year 1 adherence of 4%, tapering over time, for somatrogon vs. dGHs was based on clinical consultation. Treatment costs, monitoring costs and costs due to different wastage types (device setting and adherence) were sourced from local data. Health utilities based on height and injection frequency were derived from published literature. Scenario analysis, deterministic and probabilistic sensitivity analysis were performed. RESULTS: Somatrogon treatment led to 1.87-3.66 cm greater NAH gain and 0.21-0.50 higher quality adjusted life years (QALYs) vs. dGHs, across the base case and scenarios evaluated. Somatrogon treatment was associated with cost savings of €5,699-€21,974 and lower cost per cm gained vs. dGHs (€197-€527), per patient. Somatrogon was cost-effective vs. dGHs, with the result consistent across the sensitivity analyses conducted. CONCLUSION: Somatrogon weekly injections were estimated to result in higher NAH, higher QALYs, lower overall costs and lower costs per cm gained than dGHs, in pGHD.

Experience of switching from a daily to a less frequent administration of injection treatments.

BACKGROUND: Daily injections of recombinant human growth hormone are the standard of care to treat growth failure due to pediatric growth hormone deficiency (GHD). While effective, daily injections are burdensome and can compromise adherence. In recent years, novel injection treatments requiring less frequent administration for growth hormone deficiency (GHD) have been developed. A targeted, pragmatic literature review was conducted to summarize and document the patient experience of moving from daily to less frequent injections, with a specific focus on changing from daily to weekly injection treatments in pediatric GHD (pGHD). OBJECTIVE: Explore and describe the patient experience when switching from a daily to a less frequent injection schedule for GHD. METHODS: Targeted literature searches were conducted to identify literature describing the patient experience of moving from a daily to weekly injection in GHD. Supplementary searches were conducted to identify literature describing the patient experience of moving from daily to less frequent injection regimens in other medical conditions. RESULTS: Across searches, 1,691 abstracts were reviewed and 13 articles were included in the final analysis. These publications reported that patients moving to less frequent injections across a variety of conditions, including GHD, experienced increased convenience and satisfaction, higher adherence rates, fewer adverse events, and improved quality of life. Less frequent injections were also reported to be at least as efficacious as daily treatments. CONCLUSIONS: Less frequent injections in GHD and as other conditions are less burdensome, positively benefit patients, and result in improved adherence that may lead to improved clinical outcomes. Clinicians may consider weekly regimens as an effective alternative for patients, in particular in pGHD, especially when missed injections can negatively impact treatment outcomes. More research is needed to better understand the real-world benefits of injectable therapies that require less frequent administration (e.g., weekly versus daily).

Persistence with daily growth hormone among children and adolescents with growth hormone deficiency in the UK.

Background: Children with growth hormone deficiency (GHD) are treated with daily somatropin injections; however, poor treatment persistence and adherence have been recognized previously and have been shown to negatively impact growth outcomes. A recent real-world study of a US pediatric GHD population found that a substantial proportion of children discontinued somatropin therapy, but similar data for a real-world UK population are lacking. Objectives: To describe the discontinuation of, and persistence with, daily somatropin treatment among children with GHD in the UK. Methods: This was a retrospective cohort study of children (≥3 and <16 years old) with ≥1 medication prescription for daily injectable somatropin from 1 July 2000 to 31 December 2020 in the IQVIA Medical Research DATA (IMRD) database. Early persistence was defined as the proportion of children prescribed ≥1 somatropin refill (≥2 prescriptions). Discontinuation was defined as the first date at which a medication gap for somatropin (of >60 or >90 days between prescriptions) occurred. Kaplan-Meier methods were used to evaluate persistence (non-discontinuation) over time to assess time to first discontinuation event. Cox proportional hazards models were used to evaluate the relationship between patient characteristics and time to medication discontinuation. Results: Among the cohort identified in this study (n = 117), the majority (n = 84, 71.8%) had 48 months of available follow-up; 56.4% were boys and the mean (median) age was 8.6 (8.0) years. About 98% exhibited early persistence, but persistence over the follow-up period decreased with follow-up duration. Using the conservative 90-day gap definition of persistence, an estimated 72.4%, 52.8%, and 43.3% were persistent at 12, 36, and 48 months. Lower persistence rates were observed using the 60-day definition. No significant patient predictors of time to discontinuation were identified. Conclusions: Despite high early persistence with somatropin, a high percentage of children with GHD were increasingly non-persistent over time. More than 1 in 4 were non-persistent at 12 months and more than 1 in 2 were non-persistent at 48 months of follow-up. These results suggest that strategies to support improved medication-taking behavior among children with GHD in the UK are warranted.

Treatment Burden of Weekly Somatrogon vs Daily Somatropin in Children With Growth Hormone Deficiency: A Randomized Study.

Context: Somatrogon is a long-acting recombinant human growth hormone treatment developed as a once-weekly treatment for pediatric patients with growth hormone deficiency (GHD). Objective: Evaluate patient and caregiver perceptions of the treatment burden associated with the once-weekly somatrogon injection regimen vs a once-daily Somatropin injection regimen. Methods: Pediatric patients (≥3 to <18 years) with GHD receiving once-daily somatropin at enrollment were randomized 1:1 to Sequence 1 (12 weeks of once-daily Somatropin, then 12 weeks of once-weekly somatrogon) or Sequence 2 (12 weeks of once-weekly somatrogon, then 12 weeks of once-daily Somatropin). Treatment burden was assessed using validated questionnaires completed by patients and caregivers. The primary endpoint was the difference in mean overall life interference (LI) total scores after each 12-week treatment period (somatrogon vs Somatropin), as assessed by questionnaires. Results: Of 87 patients randomized to Sequence 1 (n = 43) or 2 (n = 44), 85 completed the study. Once-weekly somatrogon had a significantly lower treatment burden than once-daily Somatropin, based on mean overall LI total scores after somatrogon (8.63) vs Somatropin (24.13) treatment (mean difference -15.49; 2-sided 95% CI -19.71, -11.27; P < .0001). Once-weekly somatrogon was associated with greater convenience, higher satisfaction with treatment experience, and less LI. The incidence of treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) for Somatropin and somatrogon was 44.2% and 54.0%, respectively. No severe or serious AEs were reported. Conclusion: In pediatric patients with GHD, once-weekly somatrogon had a lower treatment burden and was associated with a more favorable treatment experience than once-daily Somatropin.

Suboptimal adherence to prescribed daily growth hormone regimen among medicaid beneficiaries in the United States.

OBJECTIVE: The objective of this retrospective cohort study was to describe the adherence and discontinuation patterns of somatropin over 3 years among children with pGHD insured by Medicaid across the United States. METHODS: Eligible children were aged ≥3 and <16 years with Medicaid coverage, diagnosed with pGHD, and had ≥2 new prescriptions for somatropin between 1 July 2014 and 31 December 2018. Four non-exclusive patient cohorts were constructed (≥3, 12, 24, and 36 months of continuous enrollment after initial prescription). Suboptimal adherence was defined as medication possession ratio <0.80, and discontinuation as a gap of >60 days between somatropin fills. Logistic and proportional hazards regression methods were used to estimate odds of suboptimal adherence and time to discontinuation, respectively. RESULTS: In the 12-month cohort (n = 3623), mean age was 10.5 ± 3.2 years, 70.8% were male, 44.4% White, 29.1% Hispanic, 7.1% Black, and 1.7% Asian. At months 12, 24, and 36, the proportion with suboptimal adherence was 40.9, 50.4, 54.4%, respectively, and 49.2% of patients with ≥3 months of follow-up discontinued therapy. At 12 months, lower age and race/ethnicity (Black vs. White referent) had greater odds of suboptimal adherence. Discontinuation was associated with Black (vs. White referent) race and geographic region. CONCLUSIONS: Sociodemographic characteristics may be risk factors for suboptimal adherence and/or discontinuation of prescribed somatropin therapy. Improving GH regimen adherence among this at-risk population, and specifically among subgroups at highest risk, is warranted to improve clinical outcomes.

Association of Daily Growth Hormone Injection Adherence and Height Among Children With Growth Hormone Deficiency.

OBJECTIVE: Recombinant human growth hormone (somatropin) is recommended for children with growth hormone deficiency (GHD) to normalize adult height. Prior research has indicated an association between adherence to somatropin and height velocity. Further research is needed using real-world data to quantify this relationship; hence the objective of this study was to investigate the association between adherence to somatropin and change in height among children with GHD. METHODS: This retrospective cohort study included patients in the IQVIA PharMetrics Plus and Ambulatory Electronic Medical Records databases aged 3 to 15 years, with ≥1 GHD diagnosis code claim and newly initiated on somatropin between January 1, 2007 and November 30, 2019. Adherence was measured over the follow-up using the medication possession ratio (MPR); patients were classified as adherent (MPR ≥ 0.8) or nonadherent (MPR < 0.8). RESULTS: Among 201 patients initiated on somatropin, 74.6% were male, mean age was 11.4 years, and the mean follow-up was 343.3 days. Approximately 76.6% of patients were adherent to somatropin over the follow-up period. Adjusted growth trajectories were similar between adherent and nonadherent patients pre-treatment initiation (P = .15). Growth trajectories post-initiation were significantly different (P = .001). On average, adherent patients gained an additional 1.8 cm over 1 year compared with nonadherent patients, adjusted for covariates. CONCLUSION: Greater adherence to somatropin therapy is associated with improved height velocity. As suboptimal adherence to daily somatropin therapy is an issue for children with GHD, novel strategies to improve adherence may improve growth outcomes.

Patient-reported outcomes in patients with acromegaly treated with pegvisomant in the ACROSTUDY extension: A real-world experience.

PURPOSE: To report the effects of pegvisomant (PEGV) treatment on patient-reported outcomes in acromegaly patients. METHODS: We conducted an extension study of an open-label, multinational, non-interventional study (ACROSTUDY) evaluating the long-term safety and efficacy of PEGV for acromegaly in routine clinical practice. Enrolled patients were rollover patients from ACROSTUDY, or treatment naïve/semi-naïve (NSN; no PEGV within 6 months of enrollment). Exploratory efficacy endpoints were changes in symptoms with the Patient-Assessed Acromegaly Symptom Questionnaire (PASQ) and quality of life with the Acromegaly Quality of Life questionnaire (AcroQoL) analyzed by controlled or uncontrolled IGF-I levels. Results were analyzed in all patients, in NSN patient subgroup, and by diabetes status. RESULTS: A total of 544 patients with acromegaly were enrolled, including 434 rollover subjects from ACROSTUDY and 110 NSN patients. Mean PEGV treatment duration was 7.8 years (range, 0-19.6 years). Overall, the majority of PASQ scores improved over time, but there was no significant difference between IGF-I controlled or uncontrolled groups. In the NSN subgroup, most PASQ and AcroQoL scores remained similar to baseline up to 1 year, regardless of IGF-I control. Patients with diabetes reported better PASQ scores over time with PEGV treatment, regardless of IGF-I control. IGF-I normalization increased from 10% of patients at baseline to more than 78% at year 10, with a mean daily PEGV dose of 18.7 mg. CONCLUSIONS: Overall, patients treated with PEGV had small improvements in PASQ. While IGF-I normalization increased with PEGV treatment, IGF-I control had no effects on PASQ and AcroQoL scores.

Suboptimal adherence to daily growth hormone in a US real-world study: an unmet need in the treatment of pediatric growth hormone deficiency.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate adherence to, and discontinuation of, somatropin treatment over 4 years in a US population-based study of children with pediatric growth hormone deficiency (pGHD). METHODS: A retrospective cohort analysis of commercially insured patients ≥3 and <16 years, diagnosed with pGHD, newly treated with somatropin was conducted using Optum De-identified Clinformatics Data Mart. Index date was defined as the first prescription for somatropin between 01 July 2002 and 30 September 2019. Five non-exclusive patient cohorts were identified (>3, 12, 24, 36, and 48 months of post-index continuous enrollment). Suboptimal adherence was defined as medication possession ratio <80%. Discontinuation was defined as the date at which a gap of >60 days between somatropin fills first occurred. Cox proportional hazards regression was used to evaluate time to discontinuation. RESULTS: In the 12-month cohort (n = 3091), mean age was 11.3 ± 2.9 years, 75.9% were male, 70.9% white, 9.4% Hispanic, 3.6% Asian, and 3.1% black. The proportion with suboptimal adherence at months 12 and 48 was 19.6% and 35.9%, respectively. Discontinuation occurred in 42.2% of patients. The rate of discontinuation (HR [95% CI]) was higher for age ≥10 (1.74 [1.53-1.98]), females (1.35 [1.21-1.50]), black and Hispanic race/ethnicity (1.50 [1.18-1.90] and 1.27 [1.09-1.49] compared to White) and obesity (1.69 [1.19-2.40]). CONCLUSION: Suboptimal adherence increases with treatment duration, and risk of discontinuation is associated with age, female gender, black or Hispanic race/ethnicity, and obesity. Strategies that facilitate adherence among children at risk of discontinuation may improve clinical outcomes.

Factors Driving Patient Preferences for Growth Hormone Deficiency (GHD) Injection Regimen and Injection Device Features: A Discrete Choice Experiment.

INTRODUCTION: The daily injection burden of recombinant human growth hormone (r-hGH) replacement therapy to treat growth hormone deficiency (GHD) may reduce compliance and limit treatment benefit. Research is needed to evaluate patient preferences for GHD injection regimen and device features. OBJECTIVE: Quantitatively evaluate factors driving preferences for r-hGH injection regimen and device features among pediatric (3-17 years, and caregivers) and adult (≥25 years) patients with GHD using a discrete choice experiment (DCE) approach. METHODS: The DCE was part of a broader, cross-sectional observational field study to develop clinical outcome assessments (COAs) that assess the experience of patients taking r-hGH injections. Following ethics approval, discrete choice data were collected through an online questionnaire from consented participants recruited from eight sites in the United States. Participants were presented with 20 choice tasks, each comprising different combinations of two profiles. Participants were then shown the same set of three hypothetical device and injection profiles (ie, storage, preparation, injection type device, maintenance, dose setting, injection schedule) and asked whether they would choose each profile over their current device and schedule. Choice-based conjoint analyses were used to estimate the marginal utilities and values for treatment attributes. Subject preferences were estimated at individual and aggregate levels. RESULTS: Two hundred and twenty-four participants completed the DCE (n=75 adults, n=79 adolescent/caregiver dyads, n=70 child/caregiver dyads). Injection schedule was the strongest predictor of choice for the total sample and each patient group. Less frequent injection schedules were more likely to be chosen by participants. A "ready to use" injection was preferred, with no preference for auto-injector versus needle-free device. Most participants would choose the hypothetical injection devices and less frequent dosing over their current daily administered device schedule. CONCLUSION: Patients prefer a less frequent injection regimen for treating GHD. Addressing patient preferences may improve compliance, adherence, and ultimately, clinical outcomes.

Development and Psychometric Evaluation of the Life Interference Questionnaire for Growth Hormone Deficiency (LIQ-GHD) to Assess Growth Hormone Injection Burden in Children and Adults.

BACKGROUND: Current recombinant human growth hormone (r-hGH) replacement therapy involves long-term daily subcutaneous injections to treat growth hormone deficiency (GHD) in children and adults. Daily r-hGH injections can be burdensome, often resulting in poor treatment compliance. Clinical outcome assessments (COAs) can capture the burden of these injections from the patient (and caregiver) perspective and may demonstrate the benefit of a less-frequent r-hGH injection regimen, which may ultimately improve treatment compliance and long-term outcomes. OBJECTIVE: To address this knowledge gap, qualitative research was conducted to inform the development of a new Life Interference Questionnaire for Growth Hormone Deficiency (LIQ-GHD), designed to measure the experiences of patients taking r-hGH GHD injections. A second objective was to evaluate the hypothesized factor structure and preliminary performance of the LIQ-GHD in a cross-sectional observational study. METHODS: An empirical literature review and expert advice meetings were conducted to inform development of the draft LIQ-GHD (pediatric and adult versions). In-person concept elicitation and cognitive debriefing interviews were conducted with GHD patients (and patient dyads including caregivers) to explore and confirm concept coverage and evaluate respondents' ability to understand the questionnaire. The draft LIQ-GHD was then tested in a cross-sectional field study involving pediatric and adult patients receiving daily r-hGH injections for GHD. The factor structure, reliability, and validity were analyzed for the overall sample and for pediatric, adolescent, and adult subgroups. RESULTS: Results from the literature review and input from six experts were used to develop and refine the LIQ-GHD, with content covering pen ease of use; regimen convenience; life interference due to regimen; benefit/satisfaction/willingness to continue treatment; regimen choice/preference; intent to comply with regimen; injection-related signs/symptoms; and reasons for missed injections. Twenty-one patient interviews confirmed comprehensive concept coverage and patient/caregiver comprehension of the LIQ-GHD. A total of 224 patients (n = 70 children/caregiver dyads, n = 79 adolescents/caregiver dyads, n = 75 adults) participated in the field study. While most items showed floor effects, confirmatory factor analysis fit statistics were good for the overall sample (root mean square error of approximation = 0.07, comparative fit index = 0.98) and for the full pediatric sample after dropping co-dependent questions from the model. Cronbach's alpha (α) ranged from 0.746 to 0.905 and intra-class correlation coefficients ranged from 0.761 to 0.918 for the overall sample on LIQ-GHD domains. Scores correlated as predicted with an existing criterion measure in the overall sample and LIQ-GHD domain scores distinguished known groups as expected. CONCLUSIONS: The LIQ-GHD is a new COA for the measurement of r-hGH injection treatment burden. This research provides evidence supporting its content validity, hypothesized factor structure, score reliability, and construct validity in pediatric and adult populations.

The evolving role of patient preference studies in health-care decision-making, from clinical drug development to clinical care management.

Introduction: There is a growing trend of using patient preference studies to help incorporate the patient perspective into clinical drug development, care management, and health-care decision-making. Collecting and interpreting patient preference data is integral to multi-stakeholder engagement, patient-centric drug development, and clinical care management. Operationally, challenges exist in understanding 'when' and 'how' to embark on patient preference studies. This review will provide a brief overview of stated-preference methods, discuss applications throughout the clinical drug development and care management, and highlight how preference studies serve as a powerful tool for quantifying patient experiences for better outcomes. Areas covered: We present case studies to complement the different applications of stated-preference methods in clinical drug development and care management. We discuss the applications of preference data to help inform evidence-based patient advocacy, clinical development strategy, operational feasibility, regulator benefit-risk assessments, health technology assessments, and clinical decision-making. Expert commentary: Patient preference studies can serve as a powerful tool to engage patients and their communities as well as quantify the patient voice across different stages of clinical drug development and care management to support patient-centric health-care decision-making. It is expected that the application of these strategies will quickly advance in the coming years.

Targeted literature review of the humanistic and economic burden of adult growth hormone deficiency.

BACKGROUND: Quality of life (QoL) and health economic data are becoming increasingly important factors in healthcare decision making. While there is a wealth of information establishing the benefit of growth hormone (GH) replacement therapy in adults with growth hormone deficiency (aGHD), recent reviews on the QoL and health economic impact of aGHD and the effect of treatment on these factors is limited. OBJECTIVE: The aim of this article is to summarize the impact of early and sustained treatment on the QoL and economic burden of aGHD by conducting a targeted literature review. METHODS: Standard electronic databases, including PubMed and the Cochrane collaboration website, were searched for publications between January 2006 and July 2016 for evidence of the humanistic and economic burden of aGHD. Search terms included growth hormone deficiency, health-related quality of life, HRQoL, patient-reported outcomes, outcome assessment, well-being and adherence. RESULTS: The literature search identified 732 initial hits and a final 14 publications were included. The analysis showed that the economic burden of aGHD is largely driven by the productivity losses associated with the disease. This is because most patients with aGHD are of working age and the QoL domains (memory & concentration and energy & vitality) most commonly affected by aGHD severely impair a person's ability to work and may limit their contribution to society. CONCLUSION: Untreated aGHD can seriously affect patients' functioning. Early and continued treatment with GH replacement therapy could potentially improve the QoL and reduce the economic burden associated with aGHD. This review has limitations: only English language articles published since January 2006 were included and many of the studies were conducted in the Nordic countries; it is unclear how representative these studies are of the population as a whole. This was a literature review and not a systematic review, as it was thought to be unlikely that, in this rare disease, any additional publications would have been identified. Overall, this review reveals a paucity of data in this underserved population and points to research gaps which could be addressed with new studies.

Characterizing the High Disease Burden of Transthyretin Amyloidosis for Patients and Caregivers.

INTRODUCTION: Transthyretin amyloidosis (ATTR amyloidosis), whether manifesting as familial amyloid polyneuropathy (ATTR-PN) or cardiomyopathy (ATTR-CM), is a progressive, debilitating, and often fatal, rare disease requiring significant caregiver support. This study aims to better characterize the burden of disease for ATTR amyloidosis patients and caregivers. METHODS: Patients and caregivers in the USA and Spain were recruited through patient advocacy groups to complete a cross-sectional survey. Assessments included the 12-Item Short Form Health Survey, the Work Productivity and Activity Impairment Questionnaire, the Zarit Burden Interview, pain and symptom measures, health care resource use measures, and caregiving burden measures. RESULTS: Respondents included 60 ATTR amyloidosis patients and 32 caregivers. Patients registered scores up to two standard deviations below normal for physical health, impairment in quality of life, and reduced work productivity. Patients with liver transplant versus without liver transplant reported better overall outcomes, and those without liver transplant reported a greater impact on physical versus mental health. A high rate of health care utilization in the 3 months prior to the survey was reported by patients. Caregivers reported substantial burden, including poor mental health, work impairment, and much time spent providing care (mean 45.9 h/week). Work productivity was impacted for employed patients and caregivers. CONCLUSION: ATTR amyloidosis was associated with high levels of impairment in many domains, including physical health, quality of life, and reduced productivity. Providing care for ATTR amyloidosis patients is associated with a negative impact on the mental health of caregivers. These results highlight the substantial burden of ATTR amyloidosis for patients and caregivers. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT01604122. FUNDING: Pfizer.

Individualised growth response optimisation (iGRO) tool: an accessible and easy-to-use growth prediction system to enable treatment optimisation for children treated with growth hormone.

BACKGROUND: Growth prediction models (GPMs) exist to support clinical management of children treated with growth hormone (GH) for growth hormone deficiency (GHD), Turner syndrome (TS) and for short children born small for gestational age (SGA). Currently, no prediction system has been widely adopted. CONTENT: The objective was to develop a stand-alone web-based system to enable the widespread use of an 'individualised growth response optimisation' (iGRO) tool across European endocrinology clinics. A modern platform was developed to ensure compatibility with IT systems and web browsers. Seventeen GPMs derived from the KIGS database were included and tested for accuracy. SUMMARY: The iGRO system demonstrated prediction accuracy and IT compatibility. The observed discrepancies between actual and predicted height may support clinicians in investigating the reasons for deviations around the expected growth and optimise treatment. CONCLUSIONS: This system has the potential for wide access in endocrinology clinics to support the clinical management of children treated with GH for these three indications.

The cost-effectiveness of growth hormone replacement therapy (Genotropin®) in hypopituitary adults in Sweden.

BACKGROUND: To evaluate the cost-effectiveness of growth hormone (GH) treatment (Genotropin®) compared with no GH treatment in adults with GH deficiency in a Swedish societal setting. METHODS: A Markov-type cost-utility simulation model was constructed and used to simulate, for men and women, morbidity and mortality for GH-treated and -untreated individuals over a 20-year period. The calculations were performed using current available prices concerning morbidity-related healthcare costs and costs for Genotropin®. All costs and treatment effects were discounted at 3%. Costs were expressed in Euro (1€ = 9.03 SEK). GH-treated Swedish patients (n = 434) were identified from the KIMS database (Pfizer International Metabolic Database) and untreated patients (n = 2135) from the Swedish Cancer Registry and the Hospital Discharge Registry. RESULTS: The results are reported as incremental cost per quality-adjusted life year (QALY) gained, including both direct and indirect costs for GH-treated versus untreated patients. The weighted sum of all subgroup incremental cost per QALY was €15,975 and €20,241 for men and women, respectively. Including indirect cost resulted in lower cost per QALY gained: €11,173 and €10,753 for men and women, respectively. Key drivers of the results were improvement in quality of life, increased survival, and intervention cost. CONCLUSIONS: The incremental cost per QALY gained is moderate when compared with informal thresholds applied in Sweden. The simulations suggest that GH-treatment is cost-effective for both men and women at the €55,371 (SEK 500,000 - the informal Swedish cost-effectiveness threshold) per QALY threshold.

Implications of a data-driven approach to treatment with growth hormone in children with growth hormone deficiency and Turner syndrome.

BACKGROUND: Response to growth hormone (GH) therapy may vary between individual patients. Therefore the use of GH in children should be closely monitored to avoid over, under, or ineffective treatment regimens. The treatment response can be evaluated using growth prediction models. In an effort to improve the accuracy of these prediction models, Ranke et al. (J Clin Endocrinol Metab 95(3):1229-37) proposed a novel 'data-driven' approach based on a quantitative analysis of a large cohort of patients from the Pfizer International Growth Database (KIGS) treated with Genotropin (human growth hormone). This model allows physicians to predict and evaluate the level of growth response and responsiveness for their patients so they can adapt treatment accordingly. By comparing the actually observed and the predicted growth response the ability of an individual to respond to GH (responsiveness) can be estimated and further treatment can be adapted accordingly OBJECTIVE: To determine the potential population level reduction in the amount of GH used and impact on height outcome of using this data-driven approach to guide treatment decisions, compared to conventional, 'experience-based' GH treatment in prepubertal patients with growth hormone deficiency (GHD) or Turner syndrome (TS). METHODS: A model was developed to study the height outcome and the total amount of GH used in the presence or absence of data-driven treatment decisions. The proportion of patients for whom height outcome could be improved or GH use could be reduced (i.e. for low compliance, high or low responder) was estimated using the KIGS cohort. The analysis assumed that this segmentation allows physicians to tailor dosage to the individual patient's needs or even to discontinue therapy when it is not effective. The analysis used a 4-year time horizon, with Germany as an example country, but results are extendable to other countries. Only the total amount of GH used was included, and effects were defined as the height outcome after 4 years. RESULTS: The analysis estimated that an evidence-driven approach may reduce the total amount of GH utilized by 7.0 % over 4 years for the treatment of short stature in prepubertal patients with GHD and TS in Germany. Despite the reduction in drug use the average growth outcomes remained unaffected with the new treatment approach. Univariate and probabilistic sensitivity analyses showed that the results are robust. CONCLUSIONS: Our analysis showed that using a data-driven approach to guide treatment decisions for children with GHD or TS is estimated to result in efficiencies in the amount of GH used, without reducing the average growth in the population.

Psychometric validation of the Visual Function Questionnaire-25 in patients with diabetic macular edema.

BACKGROUND: Diabetic Macular Edema (DME) is a common cause of impaired vision and blindness amongst diabetics. If not detected and treated early, the resulting vision loss can lead to considerable health costs and decreased health-related quality of life (HRQoL). The aim of this study was to provide evidence of the psychometric properties of the National Eye Institute - Visual Functioning Questionnaire (VFQ-25) for use in a cohort of DME patients who participated in a clinical efficacy and safety trial of pegaptinib sodium (Macugen). METHODS: A phase 2/3 randomised, double masked trial evaluated pegaptanib injection versus sham injection in patients with DME. The analysis was conducted using baseline HRQoL data of the VFQ-25 and the EQ-5D, on a modified intent-to-treat sample of 235 patients. These measures were administered by a trained interviewer by telephone in all but one of the study countries, where face-to-face interviews were conducted in the clinic. The measures were completed in the week prior to baseline, and after 54 weeks of treatment. Distance visual acuity, measured according to the Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study (ETDRS), was assessed at all time points. Psychometric properties of the VFQ-25 assessed included domain structure, reliability, concurrent and construct validity, responsiveness. RESULTS: The VFQ-25 was found to consist of 11 domains slightly different than those proposed. Nevertheless, none of the eight established multi-item scales met the criterion for further splitting and the VFQ-25 was scored as in the developers' instructions. Internal consistency reliability was demonstrated for six out of the eight original multi-item scales, with Cronbach's alpha ranging from 0.58 (Distance Activities) to 0.85 (Vision Specific: Dependency). The VFQ-25 domains generally showed a low to moderate correlation with EQ-5D visual analogue scale (range 0.16-0.43) and with the visual acuity score (range 0.10-0.41). Construct validity was upheld with higher VFQ-25 scores for patients who saw more letters according to the ETDRS. Almost all scales were shown to be responsive with Guyatt's statistic ranging from 0.10 to 0.56 at 54 weeks. CONCLUSIONS: The VFQ-25 has evidence to support its validity and reliability for measuring HRQoL in DME. However, some operating characteristics of the instrument need further consideration and discussion in the case of DME patients. Further research is therefore warranted in this indication.

Accurate long-term prediction of height during the first four years of growth hormone treatment in prepubertal children with growth hormone deficiency or Turner Syndrome.

BACKGROUND/AIMS: The study aim was to develop and validate models for long-term prediction of growth in prepubertal children with idiopathic growth hormone deficiency (GHD) or Turner syndrome (TS) for optimal, cost-effective growth hormone (GH) therapy. METHODS: Height was predicted by sequential application of annual prediction algorithms for height velocity in cohorts of GHD (n = 664) and TS (n = 607) as documented within KIGS (Pfizer International Growth Database). As height prediction models also require an estimate of weight, new algorithms for weight increase during the first to fourth prepubertal years on GH were developed. RESULTS: When height was predicted from the start of GH treatment, the predicted and observed mean (SD) gain over 4 years was 30.4 (3.4) cm and 30.1 (4.9) cm, respectively, in GHD patients, and 27.2 (2.2) cm and 26.6 (3.5) cm, respectively, in TS patients. For all 4 years, gains of weight SD scores (SDS) were accurately described as a function of weight SDS and observed gain in height SDS (R(2) > 0.89). CONCLUSION: In GHD and TS patients treated with GH, an accurate prepubertal long-term prediction of height development in groups is possible. Based on this, an optimal individual height outcome could be simulated.