Assuntos
Maus-Tratos Infantis , Defesa da Criança e do Adolescente/legislação & jurisprudência , Proteção da Criança/legislação & jurisprudência , Tocologia/normas , Avaliação em Enfermagem , Criança , Maus-Tratos Infantis/legislação & jurisprudência , Maus-Tratos Infantis/prevenção & controle , Humanos , Avaliação em Enfermagem/normas , Pesquisa Metodológica em Enfermagem , Guias de Prática Clínica como Assunto , Garantia da Qualidade dos Cuidados de Saúde , Medicina Estatal/legislação & jurisprudência , Reino UnidoRESUMO
This article outlines the findings from three RCN discussion groups, which aimed to gain an understanding of how nurses were responding to clinical governance and to what extent they were involved in its implementation. The article focuses mainly on the third round with clinical nursing staff, senior managers and clinical governance facilitators. Three key issues were reported by nurses taking part in all three rounds of discussion groups. First, there is the need to raise awareness among frontline clinical staff to ensure that clinical governance becomes recognised as an integral part of their clinical workload rather than being seen as an optional extra. The second issue is the need to change organisational culture to make it more receptive to clinical governance. Third is the requirement to establish greater levels of partnerships between clinicians and managers, patients and professionals, and professional groups. However, the authors caution that the organisational cultural change necessary for the successful implementation of clinical governance is not as straightforward as the literature appears to suggest, and argue that this remains a key challenge for organisational leaders, managers and clinical staff.
Assuntos
Atitude do Pessoal de Saúde , Competência Clínica/normas , Tomada de Decisões Gerenciais , Recursos Humanos de Enfermagem/psicologia , Supervisão de Enfermagem/organização & administração , Grupos Focais , Humanos , Avaliação das Necessidades , Pesquisa Metodológica em Enfermagem , Recursos Humanos de Enfermagem/organização & administração , Cultura Organizacional , Inovação Organizacional , Medicina Estatal/organização & administração , Reino UnidoRESUMO
AIM OF PAPER: This paper presents the findings of a concept analysis of facilitation in relation to successful implementation of evidence into practice. BACKGROUND: In 1998, we presented a conceptual framework that represented the interplay and interdependence of the many factors influencing the uptake of evidence into practice. One of the three elements of the framework was facilitation, alongside the nature of evidence and context. It was proposed that facilitators had a key role in helping individuals and teams understand what they needed to change and how they needed to change it. As part of the on-going development and refinement of the framework, the elements within it have undergone a concept analysis in order to provide theoretical and conceptual clarity. METHODS: The concept analysis approach was used as a framework to review critically the research literature and seminal texts in order to establish the conceptual clarity and maturity of facilitation in relation to its role in the implementation of evidence-based practice. FINDINGS: The concept of facilitation is partially developed and in need of delineation and comparison. Here, the purpose, role and skills and attributes of facilitators are explored in order to try and make distinctions between this role and other change agent roles such as educational outreach workers, academic detailers and opinion leaders. CONCLUSIONS: We propose that facilitation can be represented as a set of continua, with the purpose of facilitation ranging from a discrete task-focused activity to a more holistic process of enabling individuals, teams and organizations to change. A number of defining characteristics of facilitation are proposed. However, further research to clarify and evaluate different models of facilitation is required.