A Comparison of the Enamel Remineralisation Potential of Self-Assembling Peptides.

BACKGROUND: The aim of this research was to compare the efficacy of the remineralising potential of self-assembling peptides (SAPs): Curodont Repair (P11-4), P26, and leucine-rich amelogenin peptides (LRAP) with the standard 5% NaF varnish (Duraphat) on early enamel caries lesions (EECLs). METHODS: A demineralising solution (DS) was used to create artificial EECLs in human dental enamel specimens, which were randomly allocated to treatment groups: P11-4; P26 solution; LRAP solution; 5% NaF varnish; and deionised water (DIW). Each specimen was subjected to 8 days of pH cycling. Specimens from each test group were subjected to microcomputed tomography (micro-CT) and nanomechanical testing to assess mineral density (MD), hardness (H), and elastic modulus (EM) properties of sound, demineralised, and treated enamel. RESULTS: The mean MD percentage gain was highest in the P26 and P11-4 groups, followed by the LRAP, 5% NaF varnish, and DIW groups. There were statistically significant differences amongst groups. In the outer layer of EECLs, the EM and H were highest in P26 and P11-4 groups, followed by the LRAP and 5% NaF varnish. In the inner layer of EECLs, the EM and H were highest in P11-4 and P26 groups, indicative of enhanced penetration and remineralisation of the deeper parts of the artificial EECLs. CONCLUSIONS: P26 and P11-4 SAPs are more effective than 5% NaF varnish in remineralising the depth of EECLs.

Variation in enamel mechanical properties throughout the crown in catarrhine primates.

Enamel mechanical properties vary across molar crowns, but the relationship among mechanical properties, tooth function, and phylogeny are not well understood. Fifteen primate lower molars representing fourteen taxa (catarrhine, n = 13; platyrrhine, n = 1) were sectioned in the lingual-buccal plane through the mesial cusps. Gradients of enamel mechanical properties, specifically hardness and elastic modulus, were quantified using nanoindentation from inner (near the enamel-dentine junction), through middle, to outer enamel (near the outer enamel surface) at five positions (buccal lateral, buccal cuspal, occlusal middle, lingual cuspal, lingual lateral). Cuspal positions had higher mechanical property values than lateral positions. Middle enamel had higher mean hardness and elastic modulus values than inner and outer locations in all five crown positions. Functionally, the thicker-enameled buccal cusps of lower molars did not show evidence of increased resistance to failure; instead, lingual cusps-which show higher rates of fracture-had higher average mechanical property values, with no significant differences observed between sides. Preliminary phylogenetic results suggest there is relatively little phylogenetic signal in gradients of mechanical properties through the enamel or across the crown. There appears to be common mechanical property patterns across molar crowns in Catarrhini and potentially among primates more broadly. These results may allow more precise interpretations of dental biomechanics and processes resulting in mechanical failure of enamel in primates, such as wear and fracture.

Correction: Cytocompatible, soft and thick brush-modified scaffolds with prolonged antibacterial effect to mitigate wound infections.

Correction for 'Cytocompatible, soft and thick brush-modified scaffolds with prolonged antibacterial effect to mitigate wound infections' by Shaifali Dhingra et al., Biomater. Sci., 2022, 10, 3856-3877, https://doi.org/10.1039/d2bm00245k.

Cytocompatible, soft and thick brush-modified scaffolds with prolonged antibacterial effect to mitigate wound infections.

Biomedical device or implant-associated infections caused by pathogenic bacteria are a major clinical issue, and their prevention and/or treatment remains a challenging task. Infection-resistant antimicrobial coatings with impressive cytocompatibility offer a step towards addressing this problem. Herein, we report a new strategy for constructing highly antibacterial as well as cytocompatible mixed polymer brushes onto the surface of 3D printed scaffold made of biodegradable tartaric acid-based aliphatic polyester blends. The mixed brushes were nothing but a combination of poly(3-dimethyl-(methacryloyloxyethyl) ammonium propane sulfonate) (polyDMAPS) and poly((oligo ethylene glycol) methyl ether methacrylate) (polyPEGMA) with varying chain length (n) of the ethylene glycol unit (n = 1, 6, 11, and 21). Both homo and copolymeric brushes of polyDMAPS with polyPEGMA exhibited antibacterial efficacy against both Gram positive and Gram negative pathogens such as E. coli (Escherichia coli) and S. aureus (Staphylococcus aureus) because of the combined action of bacteriostatic effects originating from strongly hydrated layers present in zwitterionic (polyDMAPS) and hydrophilic (polyPEGMA) copolymer brushes. Interestingly, a mixed polymer brush comprising polyDMAPS and polyPEGMA (ethylene glycol chain unit of 21) at 50/50 ratio provided zero bacterial growth and almost 100% cytocompatibility (tested using L929 mouse fibroblast cells), making the brush-modified biodegradable substrate an excellent choice for an infection-resistant and cytocompatible surface. An attempt was made to understand their extraordinary performance with the help of contact angle, surface charge analysis and nanoindentation study, which revealed the formation of a hydrophilic, almost neutral, very soft surface (99.99% reduction in hardness and modulus) after modification with the mixed brushes. This may completely suppress bacterial adhesion. Animal studies demonstrated that these brush-modified scaffolds are biocompatible and can mitigate wound infections. Overall, this study shows that the fascinating combination of an infection-resistant and cytocompatible surface can be generated on biodegradable polymeric surfaces by modulating the surface hardness, flexibility and hydrophilicity by selecting appropriate functionality of the copolymeric brushes grafted onto them, making them ideal non-leaching, anti-infective, hemocompatible and cytocompatible coatings for biodegradable implants.