Moving forward through consensus: a national Delphi approach to determine the top research priorities in prostate cancer in Uganda.

OBJECTIVE: To identify key areas for research in prostate cancer (PC) in the Ugandan context by establishing the major health system, socioeconomic and clinical barriers to seeking, reaching and receiving high-quality cancer care. DESIGN: Modified Delphi Technique. SETTING: Government and private-not-for-profit hospitals. METHODS: We applied a two-stage modified Delphi technique to identify the consensus view across cancer experts. In round 1, experts received a questionnaire containing 21 statements drawn from a systematic review identifying the reason for the delay in accessing cancer care. Each statement was scored out of 20. Statements scoring ≥15 from over 70% of participants were prioritised for inclusion while statements for which <30% of participants gave a score of ≥15 were excluded. Sixteen statements were included in round 2 as they did not receive consensus for inclusion or exclusion. RESULTS: We found that the top six research priority areas arise from challenges including: (1) lack of diagnostic services-ultrasound, laboratory tests and biopsy facilities; (2) high costs of services, for example, surgery, radiotherapy, hormone therapy are unaffordable to most patients, (3) lack of essential medicines, (4) limited radiotherapy capacity, (5) lack of awareness of cancer as a disease and low recognition of symptoms, (6) low healthcare literacy. The lack of critical surgical supplies, high diagnostic and treatment costs were ranked highest in order of importance in round 1. Round 2 also revealed lack of diagnostic services, unavailability of critical medicines, lack of radiotherapy options, high costs of treatments and lack of critical surgical supplies as the top priorities. CONCLUSION: These research priority areas ought to be addressed in future research to improve prompt PC diagnosis and care in Uganda. There is need to improve the supply of high-quality affordable anticancer medicines for PC patients so as to improve the survivorship from the cancer.

Delays in seeking, reaching and access to quality cancer care in sub-Saharan Africa: a systematic review.

OBJECTIVES: Late presentation and delays in diagnosis and treatment consistently translate into poor outcomes in sub-Saharan Africa (SSA). The aim of this study was to collate and appraise the factors influencing diagnostic and treatment delays of adult solid tumours in SSA. DESIGN: Systematic review with assessment of bias using Risk of Bias in Non-randomised Studies of Exposures (ROBINS-E) tool. DATA SOURCES: PubMed and Embase, for publications from January 1995 to March 2021. ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA: Inclusion criteria: quantitative or mixed-method research, publications in English, on solid cancers in SSA countries. EXCLUSION CRITERIA: paediatric populations, haematologic malignancies, and assessments of public perceptions and awareness of cancer (since the focus was on patients with a cancer diagnosis and treatment pathways). DATA EXTRACTION AND SYNTHESIS: Two reviewers extracted and validated the studies. Data included year of publication; country; demographic characteristics; country-level setting; disease subsite; study design; type of delay, reasons for delay and primary outcomes. RESULTS: 57 out of 193 full-text reviews were included. 40% were from Nigeria or Ethiopia. 70% focused on breast or cervical cancer. 43 studies had a high risk of bias at preliminary stages of quality assessment. 14 studies met the criteria for full assessment and all totaled to either high or very high risk of bias across seven domains. Reasons for delays included high costs of diagnostic and treatment services; lack of coordination between primary, secondary and tertiary healthcare sectors; inadequate staffing; and continued reliance on traditional healers and complimentary medicines. CONCLUSIONS: Robust research to inform policy on the barriers to quality cancer care in SSA is absent. The focus of most research is on breast and cervical cancers. Research outputs are from few countries. It is imperative that we investigate the complex interaction of these factors to build resilient and effective cancer control programmes.