Right heart failure with left ventricular assist devices: Preoperative, perioperative and postoperative management strategies. A clinical consensus statement of the Heart Failure Association (HFA) of the ESC.

Right heart failure (RHF) following implantation of a left ventricular assist device (LVAD) is a common and potentially serious condition with a wide spectrum of clinical presentations with an unfavourable effect on patient outcomes. Clinical scores that predict the occurrence of right ventricular (RV) failure have included multiple clinical, biochemical, imaging and haemodynamic parameters. However, unless the right ventricle is overtly dysfunctional with end-organ involvement, prediction of RHF post-LVAD implantation is, in most cases, difficult and inaccurate. For these reasons optimization of RV function in every patient is a reasonable practice aiming at preparing the right ventricle for a new and challenging haemodynamic environment after LVAD implantation. To this end, the institution of diuretics, inotropes and even temporary mechanical circulatory support may improve RV function, thereby preparing it for a better adaptation post-LVAD implantation. Furthermore, meticulous management of patients during the perioperative and immediate postoperative period should facilitate identification of RV failure refractory to medication. When RHF occurs late during chronic LVAD support, this is associated with worse long-term outcomes. Careful monitoring of RV function and characterization of the origination deficit should therefore continue throughout the patient's entire follow-up. Despite the useful information provided by the echocardiogram with respect to RV function, right heart catheterization frequently offers additional support for the assessment and optimization of RV function in LVAD-supported patients. In any patient candidate for LVAD therapy, evaluation and treatment of RV function and failure should be assessed in a multidimensional and multidisciplinary manner.

How to tackle therapeutic inertia in heart failure with reduced ejection fraction. A scientific statement of the Heart Failure Association of the ESC.

Guideline-directed medical therapy (GDMT) in patients with heart failure and reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF) reduces morbidity and mortality, but its implementation is often poor in daily clinical practice. Barriers to implementation include clinical and organizational factors that might contribute to clinical inertia, i.e. avoidance/delay of recommended treatment initiation/optimization. The spectrum of strategies that might be applied to foster GDMT implementation is wide, and involves the organizational set-up of heart failure care pathways, tailored drug initiation/optimization strategies increasing the chance of successful implementation, digital tools/telehealth interventions, educational activities and strategies targeting patient/physician awareness, and use of quality registries. This scientific statement by the Heart Failure Association of the ESC provides an overview of the current state of GDMT implementation in HFrEF, clinical and organizational barriers to implementation, and aims at suggesting a comprehensive framework on how to overcome clinical inertia and ultimately improve implementation of GDMT in HFrEF based on up-to-date evidence.

Decongestion strategies in patients presenting with acutely decompensated heart failure: A worldwide survey among physicians.

AIMS: Decongestion strategies for acute decompensated heart failure (ADHF) characterized by volume overload differ widely. The aim of this independent international academic web-based survey was to capture the therapeutic strategies that physicians use to treat ADHF and to assess differences in therapeutic approaches between cardiologists versus non-cardiologists. METHODS AND RESULTS: Physicians were invited to complete a web-based questionnaire, capturing anonymized data on physicians' characteristics and treatment preferences based on a hypothetical clinical scenario of a patient hospitalized with ADHF. A total of 641 physicians from 60 countries participated. A wide variation in the management of the patient was observed. There was conservative use of diuretics, i.e. only 7% started intravenous furosemide at a dose ≥2 times the baseline oral dose, and infrequent use of ultrasound in assessing congestion (20.4%). Spot urinary sodium was infrequently or never measured by ≥85% of physicians. A third considered a patient with ongoing oedema as being stabilized. There were significant differences between cardiologists and non-cardiologists in the management of ADHF, the targets for daily body weight loss and urine output, diuretic escalation strategies (66.3% vs. 40.7% would escalate diuresis by adding a thiazide) and assessment of response to treatment (27.0% vs. 52.9% considered patients with minimal congestion as stabilized). CONCLUSIONS: There is substantial variability amongst physicians and between cardiologists and non-cardiologists in the management of patients with ADHF, with regard to clinical parameters used to tailor treatment, treatment goals, diuretic dosing and escalation strategies.

Impact of heart failure on all-cause mortality in COVID-19: findings from the Eurasian International Registry.

AIMS: To study all-cause mortality in patients hospitalized with COVID-19 with or without chronic heart failure (CHF) during hospitalization and at 3 and 6 months of follow-up. METHODS AND RESULTS: The international registry Analysis of Comorbid Disease Dynamics in Patients with SARS-CoV-2 Infection (ACTIV) was conducted at 26 centres in seven countries: Armenia, Belarus, Kazakhstan, Kyrgyzstan, Moldova, Russian Federation, and Uzbekistan. The primary endpoints were in-hospital all-cause mortality and all-cause mortality at 3 and 6 months of follow-up. Of the 5616 patients hospitalized with COVID-19, 917 (16.3%) had CHF. Total in-hospital mortality was 7.6%. In-hospital mortality was higher in patients with CHF than in patients without a history of CHF [17.7% vs. 4.0%, P < 0.001; odds ratio (OR) 4.614, 95% confidence interval (CI) 3.633-5.859; P < 0.001]. The risk of in-hospital all-cause mortality correlated significantly with the severity of CHF; specifically, the risk of in-hospital all-cause mortality was greater for patients in New York Heart Association functional classes III and IV (OR 6.124, 95% CI 4.538-8.266; P < 0.001 vs. patients without CHF) than for patients in functional classes I and II (OR 2.446, 95% CI 1.831-3.267, P < 0.001 vs. patients without CHF). The risk of mortality in patients with ischemic CHF was 58% higher than in patients with non-ischaemic CHF [OR 1.58 (95% CI 1.05-2.45), P = 0.030]. In the first 3 months of follow-up, the all-cause mortality rate in patients with CHF was 10.32%, compared with 1.83% in patients without CHF (P < 0.001). At 6 months of follow-up, NYHA classes II-IV was a strong risk factor for all-cause mortality [OR 5.343 (95% CI 2.717-10.508); P < 0.001]. CONCLUSIONS: Hospitalized COVID-19 patients with CHF have an increased risk of in-hospital all-cause mortality, which remains high 6 months after discharge.

Prevention of sudden death in heart failure with reduced ejection fraction: do we still need an implantable cardioverter-defibrillator for primary prevention?

Sudden death is a devastating complication of heart failure (HF). Current guidelines recommend an implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD) for prevention of sudden death in patients with HF and reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF) specifically those with a left ventricular ejection fraction ≤35% after at least 3 months of optimized HF treatment. The benefit of ICD in patients with symptomatic HFrEF caused by coronary artery disease has been well documented; however, the evidence for a benefit of prophylactic ICD implantation in patients with HFrEF of non-ischaemic aetiology is less strong. Angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors or angiotensin receptor blockers, beta-blockers (BB), and mineralocorticoid receptor antagonists (MRA) block the deleterious actions of angiotensin II, norepinephrine, and aldosterone, respectively. Neprilysin inhibition potentiates the actions of endogenous natriuretic peptides that mitigate adverse ventricular remodelling. BB, MRA, angiotensin receptor-neprilysin inhibitor (ARNI) have a favourable effect on reduction of sudden cardiac death in HFrEF. Recent data suggest a beneficial effect of sodium-glucose cotransporter 2 inhibitors (SGLT2i) in reducing serious ventricular arrhythmias and sudden cardiac death in patients with HFrEF. So, in the current era of new drugs for HFrEF and with the optimal use of disease-modifying therapies (BB, MRA, ARNI and SGLT2i), we might need to reconsider the need and timing for use of ICD as primary prevention of sudden death, especially in HF of non-ischaemic aetiology.

Reduction of Hospitalization and Mortality by Echocardiography-Guided Treatment in Advanced Heart Failure.

In advanced heart failure (AHF) clinical evaluation fails to detect subclinical HF deterioration in outpatient settings. The aim of the study was to determine whether the strategy of intensive outpatient echocardiographic monitoring, followed by treatment modification, reduces mortality and re-hospitalizations at 12 months. Methods: 214 patients with ejection fraction < 30% and >1 hospitalization during the last year underwent clinical evaluation and echocardiography at discharge and were divided into intensive (IMG; N = 143) or standard monitoring group (SMG; N = 71). In IMG, volemic status and left ventricular filling pressure were assessed 14, 30, 90, 180 and 365 days after discharge. HF treatment, particularly diuretic therapy, was temporarily intensified when HF deterioration signs and E/e' > 15 were detected. In SMG, standard outpatient monitoring without obligatory echocardiography at outpatient visits was performed. Results: We observed lower hospitalization (absolute risk reduction [ARR]-0.343, CI-95%: 0.287−0.434, p < 0.05; number needed to treat [NNT]-2.91) and mortality (ARR-0.159, CI 95%: 0.127−0.224, p < 0.05; NNT-6.29) in IMG at 12 months. One-year survival was 88.8% in IMG and 71.8% in SMG (p < 0.05). Conclusion: In AHF, outpatient monitoring of volemic status and intracardiac filling pressures to individualize treatment may potentially reduce hospitalizations and mortality at 12 months follow-up. Echocardiography-guided outpatient therapy is feasible and clinically beneficial, providing evidence for the larger application of this approach.

Анализ влияния коморбидной сердечно-сосудистой патологии на течение и Ð¸ÑÑ Ð¾Ð´Ñ‹ COVID-19 у Ð³Ð¾ÑÐ¿Ð¸Ñ‚Ð°Ð»Ð¸Ð·Ð¸Ñ€Ð¾Ð²Ð°Ð½Ð½Ñ‹Ñ Ð¿Ð°Ñ†Ð¸ÐµÐ½Ñ‚Ð¾Ð² в первую и вторую волну пандемии в Евразийском регионе.

Цель:  Ð˜Ð·ÑƒÑ‡ÐµÐ½Ð¸Ðµ особенностей клинического течения новой коронавирусной инфекции и  влияния сопутствующих заболеваний на исход заболевания у госпитализированных больных с инфекцией SARS-CoV-2 в первую и вторую волны пандемии.Методы и результаты.  Для оценки особенностей течения COVID-19 в Евразийском регионе были созданы международные регистры АКТИВ 1 и во время второй волны пандемии АКТИВ 2. Набор больных в регистр АКТИВ 1 проводили с 29.06.20 по 29.10.20, набрано 5 397 пациентов. Прием пациентов на учет в АКТИВ 2 проводили с 01.11.20 до 30.03.21, набрано 2 665 больных.Результаты. Госпитальная летальность снизилась в  Ð¿ÐµÑ€Ð¸Ð¾Ð´ второй волны пандемии и  ÑÐ¾ÑÑ‚Ð°Ð²Ð¸Ð»Ð° 4,8 % против 7,6 % в  Ð¿ÐµÑ€Ð¸Ð¾Ð´ первой волны. В  Ð¿ÐµÑ€Ð¸Ð¾Ð´ второй волны пациенты были старше, имели больше сопутствующих заболеваний и поступали в стационар в более тяжелом состоянии, пациенты имели более высокий уровень полиморбидности. В период второй волны пандемии увеличилась заболеваемость бактериальной пневмонией и сепсисом, но реже встречались тромбозы глубоких вен и «Ñ†Ð¸Ñ‚Ð¾ÐºÐ¸Ð½Ð¾Ð²Ñ‹Ð¹ шторм¼. Наиболее неблагоприятными для прогноза смертности, как в первую, так и во вторую волны эпидемии были сочетания сопутствующих заболеваний: артериальная гипертензия (АГ) + хроническая сердечная недостаточность (ХСН) + сахарный диабет (СД) + ожирение, АГ + ишемическая болезнь сердца (ИБС) + ХСН + СД, АГ + ИБС + ХСН + ожирение.Заключение. Ð£ пациентов во вторую волну пандемии наблюдалось более обширное поражение ткани легких, чаще возникала фебрильная лихорадка, были выше уровни С-реактивного белка и  Ñ‚Ñ€Ð¾Ð¿Ð¾Ð½Ð¸Ð½Ð°, ниже уровни гемоглобина и лимфоцитов. Это, вероятно, связано с различной тактикой госпитализации пациентов в первую и вторую волны пандемии в странах, принявших участие в формировании регистров АКТИВ 1 и АКТИВ 2.

[Анализ влияния коморбидной сердечно-сосудистой патологии на течение и Ð¸ÑÑ Ð¾Ð´Ñ‹ COVID-19 у Ð³Ð¾ÑÐ¿Ð¸Ñ‚Ð°Ð»Ð¸Ð·Ð¸Ñ€Ð¾Ð²Ð°Ð½Ð½Ñ‹Ñ Ð¿Ð°Ñ†Ð¸ÐµÐ½Ñ‚Ð¾Ð² в первую и вторую волну пандемии в Евразийском регионе].

Цель:  Ð˜Ð·ÑƒÑ‡ÐµÐ½Ð¸Ðµ особенностей клинического течения новой коронавирусной инфекции и  влияния сопутствующих заболеваний на исход заболевания у госпитализированных больных с инфекцией SARS-CoV-2 в первую и вторую волны пандемии.Методы и результаты.  Для оценки особенностей течения COVID-19 в Евразийском регионе были созданы международные регистры АКТИВ 1 и во время второй волны пандемии АКТИВ 2. Набор больных в регистр АКТИВ 1 проводили с 29.06.20 по 29.10.20, набрано 5 397 пациентов. Прием пациентов на учет в АКТИВ 2 проводили с 01.11.20 до 30.03.21, набрано 2 665 больных.Результаты. Госпитальная летальность снизилась в  Ð¿ÐµÑ€Ð¸Ð¾Ð´ второй волны пандемии и  ÑÐ¾ÑÑ‚Ð°Ð²Ð¸Ð»Ð° 4,8 % против 7,6 % в  Ð¿ÐµÑ€Ð¸Ð¾Ð´ первой волны. В  Ð¿ÐµÑ€Ð¸Ð¾Ð´ второй волны пациенты были старше, имели больше сопутствующих заболеваний и поступали в стационар в более тяжелом состоянии, пациенты имели более высокий уровень полиморбидности. В период второй волны пандемии увеличилась заболеваемость бактериальной пневмонией и сепсисом, но реже встречались тромбозы глубоких вен и «Ñ†Ð¸Ñ‚Ð¾ÐºÐ¸Ð½Ð¾Ð²Ñ‹Ð¹ шторм¼. Наиболее неблагоприятными для прогноза смертности, как в первую, так и во вторую волны эпидемии были сочетания сопутствующих заболеваний: артериальная гипертензия (АГ) + хроническая сердечная недостаточность (ХСН) + сахарный диабет (СД) + ожирение, АГ + ишемическая болезнь сердца (ИБС) + ХСН + СД, АГ + ИБС + ХСН + ожирение.Заключение. Ð£ пациентов во вторую волну пандемии наблюдалось более обширное поражение ткани легких, чаще возникала фебрильная лихорадка, были выше уровни С-реактивного белка и  Ñ‚Ñ€Ð¾Ð¿Ð¾Ð½Ð¸Ð½Ð°, ниже уровни гемоглобина и лимфоцитов. Это, вероятно, связано с различной тактикой госпитализации пациентов в первую и вторую волны пандемии в странах, принявших участие в формировании регистров АКТИВ 1 и АКТИВ 2.

COVID-19 vaccination in patients with heart failure: a position paper of the Heart Failure Association of the European Society of Cardiology.

Patients with heart failure (HF) who contract SARS-CoV-2 infection are at a higher risk of cardiovascular and non-cardiovascular morbidity and mortality. Regardless of therapeutic attempts in COVID-19, vaccination remains the most promising global approach at present for controlling this disease. There are several concerns and misconceptions regarding the clinical indications, optimal mode of delivery, safety and efficacy of COVID-19 vaccines for patients with HF. This document provides guidance to all healthcare professionals regarding the implementation of a COVID-19 vaccination scheme in patients with HF. COVID-19 vaccination is indicated in all patients with HF, including those who are immunocompromised (e.g. after heart transplantation receiving immunosuppressive therapy) and with frailty syndrome. It is preferable to vaccinate against COVID-19 patients with HF in an optimal clinical state, which would include clinical stability, adequate hydration and nutrition, optimized treatment of HF and other comorbidities (including iron deficiency), but corrective measures should not be allowed to delay vaccination. Patients with HF who have been vaccinated against COVID-19 need to continue precautionary measures, including the use of facemasks, hand hygiene and social distancing. Knowledge on strategies preventing SARS-CoV-2 infection (including the COVID-19 vaccination) should be included in the comprehensive educational programmes delivered to patients with HF.

Metabolic Therapy in Heart Failure.

Metabolic impairments play an important role in the development and progression of heart failure. The use of metabolic modulators, the number of which is steadily increasing, may be particularly effective in the treatment of heart failure. Recent evidence suggests that modulating cardiac energy metabolism by reducing fatty acid oxidation and/or increasing glucose oxidation represents a promising approach to the treatment of patients with heart failure. This review focuses on the role of metabolic modulators, in particular trimetazidine, as a potential additional medication to conventional medical therapy in heart failure.