Reproducibility of surface-based deep inspiration breath-hold technique for lung stereotactic body radiotherapy on a closed-bore gantry linac.

Background and purpose: Tumor motion and delivery efficiency are two main challenges of lung stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT). The present work implemented the deep inspiration breath hold technique (DIBH) with surface guided radiation therapy (SGRT) on closed-bore linacs and investigated the correlation between SGRT data and internal target position. Materials and methods: Thirteen lung SBRT patients treated in DIBH using a closed-bore gantry linac and a ring-mounted SGRT system were retrospectively analysed. Visual coaching was used to achieve DIBH with a ± 1 mm threshold window in the anterior-posterior direction. Three kV-CBCTs were added to the treatment workflow and examined offline to verify intra-fraction tumor position. Surface-based DIBH was analysed using SGRT treatment reports and an in-house python script. Data from 73 treatment sessions and 175 kV-CBCTs were studied. Correlations between target and surface positions were studied with Linear Mixed Models. Results: Median intra-fraction tumor motion was 0.8 mm (range: 0.7-1.3 mm) in the anterior-posterior direction, 1.2 mm (range: 1-1.7 mm) in the superior-inferior direction, and 1 mm (range: 0.7-1.1 mm) in the left-right direction, with rotations of <1° (range: 0.6°-1.1°) degree in all three directions. Planned target volumes and healthy lung volumes receiving 12.5 Gy and 13.5 Gy were reduced on average by 67% and 54%, respectively. Conclusions: Lung SBRT in DIBH with the ring-mounted SGRT system proved reproducible. The surface monitoring provided by SGRT was found to be a reliable surrogate for internal target motion. Moreover, the implementation of DIBH technique helped reduce target volumes and lung doses.

Combined intra-cavitary and interstitial image-guided adaptative brachytherapy for cervical stump carcinomas: technical and clinical results of six patients.

Purpose: According to European guidelines for cervix cancers, the management of cervical stump cancers should follow recommendations for patients without previous sub-total hysterectomy, but may require adaptation of radiotherapy modalities, especially brachytherapy (BT). However, data with modern BT technics are very scarce. Material and methods: From May 2013 to March 2020, 6 patients (age range, 71-88 years) with cervical stump squamous cell carcinoma (previously treated by sub-total hysterectomy) have been treated with external beam radiotherapy (intensity-modulated radiation therapy - IMRT, 45 Gy in 25 fractions, 5 patients, or 50.4 Gy in 28 fractions, 1 patient), with concomitant chemotherapy in 2 patients, followed by image-guided adaptive brachytherapy with pulsed-dose-rate in 5 patients or high-dose-rate in 1 patient. We used Utrecht BT applicator (Elekta®), with the implant of interstitial needles within the parametrium (unilaterally in 3 and bilaterally in 3 patients), and/or within the residual cervix (3 patients). Dosimetry was based on GEC-ESTRO recommendations. Results: The median high-risk (HR) and intermediate-risk (IR) clinical target volumes (CTV) were 14.5 cc (range, 12-35 cc) and 40 cc (range, 31-62 cc), respectively. The median dose (D90) delivered to HR and IR CTVs were 81.2 (range, 78.2-89.8) and 68.95 (range, 64.3-72.3) Gy EQD2, respectively. With a 26.5 months median follow-up (range, 10-92 months), we did not observe any local or distant recurrence. No grade 2 or more acute or late toxicities were reported. Conclusions: Cervix brachytherapy with Utrecht applicator using interstitial needle is safe and effective in cervical stump cancer patients.

Efficacy of Surgical Excision and Brachytherapy in the Treatment of Keloids: A Retrospective Cohort Study.

OBJECTIVE: To demonstrate the efficacy of a protocol combining surgical excision and high-dose-rate brachytherapy for treatment of keloids. METHODS: The authors performed a unicentric retrospective cohort study between 2013 and 2018. The minimum follow-up was 12 months. All patients treated for keloids at the authors' institution were included. Extralesional excision was performed with placement of a brachytherapy sheath under the skin. The total dose of irradiation was 18 Gy. The postoperative results were evaluated for aesthetic and functional outcomes with a validated scale, as well as the presence or absence of recurrence. RESULTS: Fifteen patients were lost to follow-up. Thirty-eight patients with 67 keloids were included. The control rate was 94%. The aesthetic and functional outcomes were considered good in 62% of cases. The main limitation of the study was the small patient population. CONCLUSIONS: Extralesional excision combined with postoperative high-dose-rate brachytherapy seems to be one of the most effective invasive protocols to treat and prevent keloids.

Prostate brachytherapy under hypnosedation: A prospective evaluation.

PURPOSE: Hypnosedation (HS) for brachytherapy has been proposed in patients with prostate cancer and has been evaluated. MATERIALS AND METHODS: 79 patients were treated with brachytherapy under HS. The Visual Analog Scale questionnaire was used to assess comfort and anxiety and the lowest, mean, and highest level of pain. Data for 79 patients who underwent general anesthesia (GA) and 37 patients who underwent spinal anesthesia (SA) treated at the same period were compared with HS group in terms of medication and treatment duration. RESULTS: 11 patients (13.9%) requested a GA, because they did not reach the hypnotic level. For the remaining 68 patients, the mean pain and comfort scores evaluated just after the intervention were 3.1 and 7.4, respectively. At 8 weeks, the scores were 2.8 and 7.5, respectively. 66 patients (97%) would choose this approach again and recommend it to other patients. The patients in the HS group received significant less medications than in the GA (remifentanil, propofol, kétamine, phenylephrine, ephedrine…) or SA (sufentanil, midazolam, morphine, bupivacaine…) groups with mean values of 3.1 vs. 7.9 vs. 5.6 (p < 0.0001), respectively. HS increased the mean time of surgery room occupation by 12 min vs. GA and by 20 min vs. SA. However, the recovery room occupation is avoided with HS (GA = 61 min and SA = 67 min) and a shorter duration of a need for a urinary catheter was noted. CONCLUSIONS: HS is a feasible and comfortable method of anesthesia and a good alternative to GA and SA for patients undergoing prostate brachytherapy, with reduced treatment duration and number of medications.

Pathologic Response, When Increased by Longer Interval, Is a Marker but Not the Cause of Good Prognosis in Rectal Cancer: 17-year Follow-up of the Lyon R90-01 Randomized Trial.

PURPOSE: The Lyon R90-01 randomized trial investigated whether the interval between preoperative radiation therapy and surgery influenced rectal cancer outcome. Long-term results are reported here after a median follow-up of 17 years. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Between February 1991 and December 1995, 210 patients from 29 French centers were randomly assigned (ratio of 1:1) to groups that waited either 2 weeks (short interval [SI]) or 6 to 8 weeks (long interval [LI]) between neoadjuvant radiation therapy and surgery. The primary endpoint was sphincter-preserving surgery. RESULTS: LI group showed a better pathologic response (complete response or few residual cells) after radiation therapy than the SI group (26% vs 10.3%, P=.015). A better pathologic response was associated in multivariate analysis with significant improvement of overall survival (pT: P=.0293 and pN: P=.0048) but it was irrespective of the interval duration. The median follow-up was 17.2 years. The 5-, 10-, 15-, and 17-year overall survival rates were, respectively, 66.8%, 48.7%, 40.0%, and 34.0% for the SI group and, respectively, 67.1%, 53.5%, 41.9%, and 34.0% for the LI group. There were no significant differences between groups in terms of survival (P=.7656) or local recurrence rates (SI: 14.4% vs LI: 12.1%, respectively; P=.6202). Of 24 local disease recurrences, 20 (83%) occurred during the first 2 postoperative years, and all but one (96%) occurred during the first 5 postoperative years. The rate of second new malignancies was 9.4% (19 patients). CONCLUSIONS: The radiation-induced sterilization rate of the preoperative cancer specimen was a marker of good prognosis. The interval duration (the treatment being the same) although it is modifying the sterilization rate has no impact on survival. Radiation therapy did not postpone local recurrence, because the rate of local relapse after 5 years was low. Radiation-induced cancers after radiation therapy were unusual and should not influence treatment decisions in adults.

Preoperative radiotherapy in elderly patients with rectal cancer.

PURPOSE: We performed a retrospective analysis in order to evaluate the compliance with preoperative radiotherapy in patients aged>or=70 with locally advanced resectable rectal cancer, and to evaluate the influence of comorbidities on treatment tolerance and oncological results. METHODS: From March 1984 to December 2000, 95 patients with T3-T4 N0 M0 rectal cancer received a preoperative radiotherapy in 2 radiotherapy departments. Nineteen patients received concomitant chemotherapy. RESULTS: All patients completed the radiation schedule. Six patients suffered grade 3 acute WHO toxicity. Surgical resection was performed in 87 patients. There were 3 post-operative deaths. Analysis of peri-operative complications showed thromboembolism (4.9%), ileus (9.8%) and diarrhoea (6.1%). After a median follow-up of 29 months, the 3- and 5-year overall survival rates were 65% and 49% respectively. In univariate analysis, a tumour located in the mid part of the rectum, a radiation dose less than 40 Gy, the absence of chemotherapy were significantly associated with a poor prognosis. There was a trend to a better survival for patients with a Charlson score of 0 (P=0.0584). In multivariate analysis, only initial WHO performance status was significant. CONCLUSIONS: Compliance with preoperative radiotherapy is good in elderly patients. Toxicity rates are similar to those described in randomised trials in which only younger patients were included. Initial WHO performance status

Combining cisplatin and mitomycin with radiotherapy in anal carcinoma.

PURPOSE: The European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) phase II study No. 22953 demonstrated the feasibility of reducing the overall treatment time of chemoradiation, delivering mitomycin C twice rather than once and fluorouracil during the whole treatment. We tested the feasibility of chemoradiation in anal carcinoma with mitomycin and cisplatin in a phase II study. METHODS: Twenty-one patients with locally advanced anal carcinoma (15 women, 6 men) were treated. The first sequence of radiotherapy consisted of 36 Gy over four weeks. After a gap interval of 16 days, a second sequence of radiotherapy was given, delivering 23.4 Gy over 2.5 weeks. Mitomycin C was delivered at 10 mg/m(2) day 1 of each sequence and cisplatin was delivered at 25 mg/m(2)/week of each sequence. RESULTS: The compliance rates for the first sequence with radiation, mitomycinm, and cispaltin (dose and timing) were 100 percent. The median duration gap was 16 days (14-30 days). The compliance rates for the second sequence with radiation, mitomycin, and cisplatin (dose and timing) were 100, 76.2, and 85.7 percent, respectively. Grade > or = 2 acute toxicities of 62, 29, 25, and 5 percent were observed for skin, diarrhea, hematologic, and renal toxicities, respectively. Nineteen patients were in complete response (90.5 percent). CONCLUSIONS: Combining radiation with mitomycin and cisplatin in patients with locally advanced anal cancer is feasible. The results are promising. The EORTC is currently comparing this combination with mitomycin and 5-fluorouracil in a large phase II-III trial.

[Place of neoadjuvant treatments in oesophageal cancers care]. / Place des traitements néoadjuvants dans la prise en charge des cancers de l'oesophage.

Esophageal cancer has a poor prognosis. Recent epidemiological data has shown a modification of histologic types, as adenocarcinoma represents more than 50% of all patients newly diagnosed. Despite progress of surgery, overall survival at 5 years is still about 20% for resectable tumors, supporting the need for additional therapies. Objectives for neoadjuvant treatments are to increase the rate of resectability R0, to decrease the rate of local failure, to treat precociously the micrometastatic disease especially since adjuvant therapies were inefficient or inapplicable. This work is a review of main data from the literature about preoperative treatments : radiotherapy, chemotherapy and chemoradiotherapy for both adenocarcinoma and squamous cell cancers. New therapeutic strategies are arising in order to optimize these results including new drugs as irinotecan, taxans and targeted therapies. Moreover it is necessary to question the place of surgery in locally advanced but resectable tumors.

Tumor volume as outcome determinant in patients treated with chemoradiation for locally advanced esophageal cancer.

OBJECTIVE: The currently used tumor-node metastasis (TNM) staging method is generally not applicable to patients with unresectable esophageal carcinomas. There is a need for both an efficient, easy-to-perform clinical classification and for identification of pretherapeutic prognostic factors that would be useful for oncologists, one of which is tumor volume. METHODS: Records of 148 patients, admitted to hospital during the period January 1993 to December 2001, were evaluated retrospectively. Median age was 65.7 years (range, 35.5-85.5 years). Most patients had SCC (84.5%). Using the computed tomography (CT) scan classification, tumors were recorded as follows: 1 T1, 42 T2, 93 T3, 6 T4, 2 Nx, 72 N0, 74 N1. Tumor volume from the CT scans was determined as the sum of 2 opposed truncated cones. Median tumor volume was 57.5 cm3 (range, 0.6-288 cm3). RESULTS: Median follow-up was 15.1 month (range, 0.3-82.8 months). Survival rates at 1, 2, and 3 years were 42.5%, 21.6%, and 8%, respectively. Prognostic factors identified by univariate analysis were: dysphagia grade > or =2, other histology than squamous cell, tumor location below the carina, age <65 years and tumor volume > or =100 cm3. Prognostic factors identified with multivariate analysis were: dysphagia grade > or =2 (P = 0.013), weight loss > or =10% (P = 0.047), tumor location below the carina (P = 0.002), and tumor volume > or =100 cm3 (P = 0.041). CONCLUSIONS: For patients that the TNM staging system is not applicable, tumor volume is a new powerful determinant of survival. Further clinical trials need to be carried out to validate this prospectively.

[Induction chemotherapy in patients with head and neck cancer]. / Chimiothérapie d'induction chez les patients présentant un cancer des voies aérodigestives supérieures.

Neoadjuvant chemotherapies for patients with advanced head and neck squamous cell carcinoma have been widely studied for twenty years. Despite a high level of activity on the primary tumor, no study has demonstrated a survival benefit suggesting the use of neoadjvant chemotherapy. One can consider that the only benefit of such strategy is for larynx preservation in patients with operable hypopharnx or larynx cancer. Nevertheless, recently the well established preservation strategy based on induction chemotherapy following according to the activity by radiotherapy has been knocked over by a strategy developed by Forastiere et al. using primary concomitant chemoradiotherapy. However, the lack of benefit reported by neoadjuvant chemotherapy has been thwarted by the recent results provided by the EORTC study which assessed the survival benefit of neoadjuvant chemotherapy by docetaxel-cisplatin-fluorouracile. Interestingly, since 2002 the clearly established strategies for patients with advanced head and neck cancer have been challenged and new options are emerging. This paper reviews the standard strategy of the past and the future proposal emerging from recent studies.

[Locoregional recurrent rectal cancer: the place of radiotherapy]. / Récidives locorégionales des cancers du rectum: place de la radiothérapie.

Currently, locoregional recurrence of rectal cancer is rare due to the therapeutic progress of total mesorectal excision and pre-operative radiotherapy. Nevertheless, a curative treatment could be proposed provided that surgical removal is possible and complete. Here, we will discuss the position of both external and intra-operative radiotherapy, and concomitant chemotherapy. Actually, multimodal therapy provides the best results for local control and overall survival. Exclusive external radiotherapy is indicated for palliative treatment of unresectable cases of recurrence.