Bivalirudin Monitoring in Pediatric Ventricular Assist Device and Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation: Analysis of Single-Center Retrospective Cohort Data 2018-2022.

OBJECTIVES: The activated partial thromboplastin time (aPTT) is the most frequently used monitoring assay for bivalirudin in children and young adults on mechanical circulatory support including ventricular assist devices (VADs) and extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO). However, intrinsic variability of the aPTT complicates management and risks bleeding or thrombotic complications. We evaluated the utility and reliability of a bivalirudin-calibrated dilute thrombin time (Bival dTT) assay for bivalirudin monitoring in this population. DESIGN: Retrospective analysis of clinical data (including aPTT, dilute thrombin time [dTT]) and results of residual plasma samples from VAD patients were assessed in two drug-calibrated experimental assays. One assay (Bival dTT) was validated for clinical use in VAD patients, and subsequently used by clinicians in ECMO patients. Pearson correlation and simple linear regression were used to determine R2 correlation coefficients between the different laboratory parameters using Statistical Package for Social Sciences (Armonk, NY). SETTING: ICUs at Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center. SUBJECTS: Children on VAD or ECMO support anticoagulated with bivalirudin. INTERVENTIONS: None. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: One hundred fifteen plasma samples from 11 VAD patients were analyzed. Both drug-calibrated experimental assays (anti-IIa and Bival dTT) showed excellent correlation with each other (R2 = 0.94) and with the dTT (R2 = 0.87), but poor correlation with aPTT (R2 = 0.1). Bival dTT was selected for validation in VAD patients. Subsequently, clinically ordered results (105) from 11 ECMO patients demonstrated excellent correlation between the Bival dTT and the standard dTT (R2 = 0.86) but very poor correlation with aPTT (R2 = 0.004). CONCLUSIONS: APTT is unreliable and correlates poorly with bivalirudin's anticoagulant effect in ECMO and VAD patients. A drug-calibrated Bival dTT offers superior reliability and opportunity to standardize results across institutions. Additional studies are needed to determine an appropriate therapeutic range and correlation with clinical outcomes.

A prospective multicenter feasibility study of a miniaturized implantable continuous flow ventricular assist device in smaller children with heart failure.

BACKGROUND: There is no FDA-approved left ventricular assist device (LVAD) for smaller children permitting routine hospital discharge. Smaller children supported with LVADs typically remain hospitalized for months awaiting heart transplant-a major burden for families and a challenge for hospitals. We describe the initial outcomes of the Jarvik 2015, a miniaturized implantable continuous flow LVAD, in the NHLBI-funded Pumps for Kids, Infants, and Neonates (PumpKIN) study, for bridge-to-heart transplant. METHODS: Children weighing 8 to 30 kg with severe systolic heart failure and failing optimal medical therapy were recruited at 7 centers in the United States. Patients with severe right heart failure and single-ventricle congenital heart disease were excluded. The primary feasibility endpoint was survival to 30 days without severe stroke or non-operational device failure. RESULTS: Of 7 children implanted, the median age was 2.2 (range 0.7, 7.1) years, median weight 10 (8.2 to 20.7) kilograms; 86% had dilated cardiomyopathy; 29% were INTERMACS profile 1. The median duration of Jarvik 2015 support was 149 (range 5 to 188) days where all 7 children survived including 5 to heart transplant, 1 to recovery, and 1 to conversion to a paracorporeal device. One patient experienced an ischemic stroke on day 53 of device support in the setting of myocardial recovery. One patient required ECMO support for intractable ventricular arrhythmias and was eventually transplanted from paracorporeal biventricular VAD support. The median pump speed was 1600 RPM with power ranging from 1-4 Watts. The median plasma free hemoglobin was 19, 30, 19 and 30 mg/dL at 7, 30, 90 and 180 days or time of explant, respectively. All patients reached the primary feasibility endpoint. Patient-reported outcomes with the device were favorable with respect to participation in a full range of activities. Due to financial issues with the manufacturer, the study was suspended after consent of the eighth patient. CONCLUSION: The Jarvik 2015 LVAD appears to hold important promise as an implantable continuous flow device for smaller children that may support hospital discharge. The FDA has approved the device to proceed to a 22-subject pivotal trial. Whether this device will survive to commercialization remains unclear because of the financial challenges faced by industry seeking to develop pediatric medical devices. (Supported by NIH/NHLBI HHS Contract N268201200001I, clinicaltrials.gov 02954497).

Impact of inflammation and steroids on anti-coagulation in children supported on a ventricular assist device.

Critically ill pediatric patients supported on ventricular assist devices (VADs) are increasingly being anticoagulated on bivalirudin, but with difficulty monitoring anticoagulation. Activated partial thromboplastin time (aPTT) has recently been shown to poorly correlate with bivalirudin plasma concentrations, while dTT had excellent correlation. However, aPTT is the more common monitoring test and dTT testing is rarely used. In addition, effects of frequent clinical VAD scenarios (such as inflammation) on the accuracy of aPTT and dTT testing remains uncertain. We reviewed the effects of clinical scenarios (infection/inflammation, chylothorax, and steroids administration) on anticoagulation monitoring in 10 pediatric VAD patients less than 3 years at Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center from 10/27/2020 to 5/6/2022 using bivalirudin for anticoagulation. There were 16 inflammation/infection, 3 chylothorax, and 6 steroids events. Correlation between dTT and aPTT was significantly lower after infection/inflammation, with dTT increasing prior to inflammation/infection while aPTT remained unchanged. In addition, steroids are administered to VAD patients to reduce inflammation and thus additionally stabilize anticoagulation. However, this anticoagulation stabilization effect was reflected more accurately by dTT compared to aPTT. In children requiring VAD support utilizing bivalirudin anticoagulation, inflammation/infection is a common occurrence resulting in anticoagulation changes that may be more accurately reflected by dTT as opposed to aPTT.

Mechanical Ventilation and Outcomes of Children Who Undergo Ventricular Assist Device Placement: 2014-2020 Linked Analysis From the Advanced Cardiac Therapies Improving Outcomes Network and Pediatric Cardiac Critical Care Consortium Registries.

OBJECTIVES: Placement of a ventricular assist device (VAD) improves outcomes in children with advanced heart failure, but adverse events remain important consequences. Preoperative mechanical ventilation (MV) increases mortality, but it is unknown what impact prolonged postoperative MV has. DESIGN: Advanced Cardiac Therapies Improving Outcomes Network (ACTION) and Pediatric Cardiac Critical Care Consortium (PC4) registries were used to identify and link children with initial VAD placement admitted to the cardiac ICU (CICU) from August 2014 to July 2020. Demographics, cardiac diagnosis, preoperative and postoperative CICU courses, and outcomes were compiled. Univariable and multivariable statistics assessed association of patient factors with prolonged postoperative MV. Multivariable logistic regression sought independent associations with outcomes. SETTING: Thirty-five pediatric CICUs across the United States and Canada. PATIENTS: Children on VADs included in both registries. INTERVENTIONS: None. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Two hundred forty-eight ACTION subjects were linked to a matching patient in PC4. Median (interquartile) age 7.7 years (1.5-15.5 yr), weight 21.3 kg (9.1-58 kg), and 56% male. Primary diagnosis was congenital heart disease (CHD) in 35%. Pre-VAD explanatory variables independently associated with prolonged postoperative MV included: age (incidence rate ratio [IRR], 0.95; 95% CI, 0.93-0.96; p < 0.01); preoperative MV within 48 hours (IRR, 2.76; 95% CI, 1.59-4.79; p < 0.01), 2-7 days (IRR, 1.82; 95% CI, 1.15-2.89; p = 0.011), and greater than 7 days before VAD implant (IRR, 2.35; 95% CI, 1.62-3.4; p < 0.01); and CHD (IRR, 1.96; 95% CI, 1.48-2.59; p < 0.01). Each additional day of postoperative MV was associated with greater odds of mortality (odds ratio [OR], 1.09 per day; p < 0.01) in the full cohort. We identified an associated greater odds of mortality in the 102 patients with intracorporeal devices (OR, 1.24; 95% CI, 1.04-1.48; p = 0.014), but not paracorporeal devices (77 patients; OR, 1.04; 95% CI, 0.99-1.09; p = 0.115). CONCLUSIONS: Prolonged MV after VAD placement is associated with greater odds of mortality in intracorporeal devices, which may indicate inadequacy of cardiopulmonary support in this group. This linkage provides a platform for future analyses in this population.

Wireless Pulmonary Artery Pressure Monitor Implantation in a Patient with Duchenne Muscular Dystrophy.

Assessing heart failure progression in patients with Duchenne Muscular Dystrophy (DMD) is challenging given the multi-system nature of disease. Herein we describe the first case use of an implantable pulmonary artery pressure monitor and describe the potential clinical utility of this approach in patients with DMD.

Impact of center volume on outcomes after ventricular assist device implantation in pediatric patients: An analysis of the STS-Pedimacs database.

BACKGROUND: To date, no pediatric studies have highlighted the impact of center's ventricular assist device (VAD) volumes on post implant outcomes. METHODS: Children (age <19) enrolled in Pedimacs undergoing initial left ventricular assist device implantation from 2012 to 2020 were included. Center volume was analyzed as a continuous and categorical variable. For categorical analysis, center volumes were divided as: low volume (1-15 implants), medium volume (15-30 implants), and high volume (>30 implants) during our study period. Patient characteristics and outcomes were compared by center's VAD volumes. RESULTS: Of 44 centers, 16 (36.4%) were low, 11 (25%) were medium, and 17 (38.6%) were high-volume centers. Children at high-volume centers were least likely intubated, sedated, or paralyzed, and most likely ambulating preimplant (p < 0.05 for all). Center's VAD volumes were not a significant risk factor for mortality post implant when treated as a continuous or a categorical variable (p > 0.05). Compared to low volume, children at high-volume centers had fewer early neurological events. Compared to medium volume, those at high-volume centers had fewer late bleeding events (p < 0.05 for all). There were no significant differences in survival after an adverse event by hospital volumes (p > 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Although hospital volume does not affect post-VAD implant mortality, pediatric centers with higher VAD volumes have fewer patients intubated, sedated, paralyzed pre implant, and have lower adverse events. Failure to rescue was not significantly different between low, medium, and high-volume VAD centers.

Reducing donor acceptance practice variation - Learnings from a discussion forum.

PURPOSE: Although waitlist mortality is unacceptably high, nearly half of donor heart offers are rejected by pediatric heart transplant centers. The Advanced Cardiac Therapy Improving Outcome Network (ACTION) and Pediatric Heart Transplant Society (PHTS) convened a multi-institutional donor decision discussion forum (DDDF) aimed at assessing donor acceptance practices and reducing practice variation. METHODS: A 1-h-long virtual DDDF for providers across North America, the United Kingdom, and Brazil was held monthly. Each session typically included two case presentations posing a real-world donor decision challenge. Attendees were polled before the presenting center's decision was revealed. Group discussion followed, including a review of relevant literature and PHTS data. Metrics of participation, participant agreement with presenting center decisions, and impact on future decision-making were collected and analyzed. RESULTS: Over 2 years, 41 cases were discussed. Approximately 50 clinicians attended each call. Risk factors influencing decision-making included donor quality (10), size discrepancy (8), and COVID-19 (8). Donor characteristics influenced 63% of decisions, recipient factors 35%. Participants agreed with the decision made by the presenting center only 49% of the time. Post-presentation discussion resulted in 25% of participants changing their original decision. Survey conducted reported that 50% respondents changed their donor acceptance practices. CONCLUSION: DDDF identified significant variation in pediatric donor decision-making among centers. DDDF may be an effective format to reduce practice variation, provide education to decision-makers, and ultimately increase donor utilization.

Modifiable risk factor reduction for pediatric ventricular assist devices and the influence of persistent modifiable risk factors at transplant.

OBJECTIVES: Ventricular assist devices (VADs) are associated with a mortality benefit in children. Database-driven analyses have associated VADs with reduction of modifiable risk factors (MRFs), but validation with institutional data is required. The authors studied MRF reduction on VAD and the influence of persistent MRFs on survival after heart transplant. METHODS: All patients at the authors' institution requiring a VAD at transplant (2011-2022) were retrospectively identified. MRFs included renal dysfunction (estimated glomerular filtration rate <60 mL/min/1.73 m2), hepatic dysfunction (total bilirubin ≥1.2 mg/dL), total parenteral nutrition dependence, sedatives, paralytics, inotropes, and mechanical ventilation. RESULTS: Thirty-nine patients were identified. At time of VAD implantation, 18 patients had ≥3 MRFs, 21 had 1 to 2 MRFs, and 0 had 0 MRFs. At time of transplant, 6 patients had ≥3 MRFs, 17 had 1 to 2 MRFs, and 16 had 0 MRFs. Hospital mortality occurred in 50% (3 out of 6) patients with ≥3 MRFs at transplant vs 0% of patients with 1 to 2 and 0 MRFs (P = .01 for ≥3 vs 1-2 and 0 MRFs). MRFs independently associated with hospital mortality included paralytics (1.76 [range, 1.32-2.30]), ventilator (1.59 [range, 1.28-1.97]), total parenteral nutrition dependence (1.49 [range, 1.07-2.07]), and renal dysfunction (1.31 [range, 1.02-1.67]). Two late mortalities occurred (3.6 and 5.7 y), both in patients with 1 to 2 MRFs at transplant. Overall posttransplant survival was significantly worse for ≥3 versus 0 MRFs (P = .006) but comparable between other cohorts (P > .1). CONCLUSIONS: VADs are associated with MRF reduction in children, yet those with persistent MRFs at transplant experience a high burden of mortality. Transplanting VAD patients with ≥3 MRFs may not be prudent. Time should be given on VAD support to achieve aggressive pre-transplant optimization of MRFs.

Successful implementation of telehealth visits in the paediatric heart failure and heart transplant population.

The Advanced Cardiac Therapies Improving Outcomes Network (ACTION) and Pediatric Heart Transplant Society (PHTS) convened a working group at the beginning of 2020 during the COVID-19 pandemic, with the aim of using telehealth as an alternative medium to provide quality care to a high-acuity paediatric population receiving advanced cardiac therapies. An algorithm was developed to determine appropriateness, educational handouts were developed for both patients and providers, and post-visit surveys were collected. Telehealth was found to be a viable modality for health care delivery in the paediatric heart failure and transplant population and has promising application in the continuity of follow-up, medication titration, and patient education/counselling domains.

Clinical Outcomes of SARS-CoV-2 Infection in Pediatric Patients on Ventricular Assist Device Support: An ACTION Registry Analysis.

Adult patients on left ventricular assist device (LVAD) support have increased morbidity and mortality after severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) infection. There are no reported clinical data describing outcomes among pediatric patients on ventricular assist device (VAD) support infected with SARS-CoV-2. We conducted a retrospective study using the Advanced Cardiac Therapies Improving Outcomes Network (ACTION) registry to evaluate patient characteristics and clinical outcomes after SARS-CoV-2 infection. A total of 22 children on VAD support (median age at infection 10.6 years) from 16 centers tested positive for SARS-CoV-2. Cardiomyopathy (59.1%) and congenital heart disease (40.9%) were the most common primary diagnoses. The type of support included LVAD in 19 (86.4%), biventricular assist device (BIVAD) in one (4.5%), and single ventricle VAD in two (9%) patients. At the time of infection, 50% were outpatients, 23% were inpatients on a general cardiology floor, and 27% were in the cardiac intensive care unit (CICU). Most patients (82%) were symptomatic at time of diagnosis, but only 13% required escalation of respiratory support, and 31% received SARS-CoV-2 therapies. Notably, no mortality occurred, and significant morbidity was rare after SARS-CoV-2 infection in pediatric patients on VAD support.

Outcomes after initial heart failure consultation in Fontan patients.

BACKGROUND: Patients with Fontan failure are high-risk candidates for heart transplantation and other advanced therapies. Understanding the outcomes following initial heart failure consultation can help define appropriate timing of referral for advanced heart failure care. METHODS: This is a survey study of heart failure providers seeing any Fontan patient for initial heart failure care. Part 1 of the survey captured data on clinical characteristics at the time of heart failure consultation, and Part 2, completed 30 days later, captured outcomes (death, transplant evaluation outcome, and other interventions). Patients were classified as "too late" (death or declined for transplant due to being too sick) and/or "care escalation" (ventricular assist device implanted, inotrope initiated, and/or listed for transplant), within 30 days. "Late referral" was defined as those referred too late and/or had care escalation. RESULTS: Between 7/2020 and 7/2022, 77 Fontan patients (52% inpatient) had an initial heart failure consultation. Ten per cent were referred too late (6 were too sick for heart transplantation with one subsequent death, and two others died without heart transplantation evaluation, within 30 days), and 36% had care escalation (21 listed ± 5 ventricular assist device implanted ± 6 inotrope initiated). Overall, 42% were late referrals. Heart failure consultation < 1 year after Fontan surgery was strongly associated with late referral (OR 6.2, 95% CI 1.8-21.5, p=0.004). CONCLUSIONS: Over 40% of Fontan patients seen for an initial heart failure consultation were late referrals, with 10% dying or being declined for transplant within a month of consultation. Earlier referral, particularly for those with heart failure soon after Fontan surgery, should be encouraged.

Durable Mechanical Circulatory Support: JACC Scientific Statement.

Despite advances in medical therapy for patients with stage C heart failure (HF), survival for patients with advanced HF is <20% at 5 years. Durable left ventricular assist device (dLVAD) support is an important treatment option for patients with advanced HF. Innovations in dLVAD technology have reduced the risk of several adverse events, including pump thrombosis, stroke, and bleeding. Average patient survival is now similar to that of heart transplantation at 2 years, with 5-year dLVAD survival now approaching 60%. Unfortunately, greater adoption of dLVAD therapy has not been realized due to delayed referral of patients to advanced HF centers, insufficient clinician knowledge of contemporary dLVAD outcomes (including gains in quality of life), and deprioritization of patients with dLVAD support waiting for heart transplantation. Despite these challenges, novel devices are on the horizon of clinical investigation, offering smaller size, permitting less invasive surgical implantation, and eliminating the percutaneous lead for power supply.

Widening care gap in VAD therapy.

BACKGROUND: The removal of the HeartWare ventricular assist device (HVAD) due to pump malfunctions and inferior outcomes compared to HeartMate 3 (HM3) in adults has created a care gap for younger patients. It is unclear if the reported HVAD survival differs by age and if the initial experience with HM3 can bridge the gap. METHODS: Using the Society of Thoracic Surgeons (STS) Intermacs and Pedimacs registries, durable ventricular assist device (VAD) implants between September 2012 and December 2021 were identified. Young adults (YA) were defined as <40 years old in Intermacs. Patients were excluded if they had an isolated right VAD (RVAD) or were implanted as destination therapy (DT). Survival analysis by Kaplan-Meier (KM) and competing outcomes curves was performed, and 1-year survival is reported. RESULTS: The Intermacs cohort consisted of YA (n = 1226; HVAD 818; HM3 408) with a median age of YA of 32.07 (26.66-36.27) years and weight (wt) of 83.2 (68-104.2) kg. Most had cardiomyopathy (CM) (92.2%). The Pedimacs cohort was 668 patients (median age 9.47 [1.82-14.23] years, wt 27.2 [10-57.05] kg), and most also had CM (70.5%). Device breakdown included HVAD (n = 326), Berlin EXCOR (n = 277), and HM3 (n = 65). HVAD survival differed by age in adults, with YA fairing better than adults >40 years old (88.8% vs 79.4% at 1 year, p < 0.0001). YA survival was also better compared to Pedimacs patient (88.9% vs 83.7%, p = 0.0002), but when competing events were analyzed, mortality was similar to YA (9.2% vs 9.6%, p = 0.1) with a higher proportion of patient undergoing transplant at 1 year in Pedimacs (74% vs 31.3%, p < 0.0001). Survival by device differed between HVAD and HM3 in YA (88.8% vs 94.4%, p = 0.0025). This difference in device survival was not seen in all children (83.7% vs 87.3%, p = 0.21), including those ≥25 kg. Adverse event profiles also differed across the groups with adults seeing less adverse events with the HM3, but the same was not found (including stroke) in the pediatric cohort. Survival outcomes for patients between 10 and 25 kg were similar with the HVAD compared to the Berlin Heart EXCOR (p = 0.4290), with similarities in stroke risk. CONCLUSION: The removal of the HVAD device may result in a care gap in younger patient whose survival outcomes do not mirror that of older adults. The HM3 can fill a portion of this gap with good survival, but there remains a subset of pediatric patients that, based on initial HM3 use, will no longer have access to intracorporeal support and therefore, despite reasonable outcomes with the Berlin Heart EXCOR, will not be able to be discharged home. Lastly, it is essential that future changes to the availability of devices take into account the various patient populations that utilize the device to avoid unintended consequences of access inequality.

Survival in Pediatric Patients With Ventricular Assist Devices: A Special Pediatric Interagency Registry for Mechanical Circulatory Support (Pedimacs) Report.

BACKGROUND: The Pediatric Interagency Registry for Mechanical Circulatory Support (Pedimacs) provides detailed understanding on pediatric patients supported with ventricular assist devices (VADs). We sought to identify important variables affecting mortality in pediatric VADs. METHODS: Patients aged <19 years, from 2012 to 2021, were included. Survival analyses were performed using Kaplan-Meier. Parametric hazard modeling was used to identify risk factors for death. RESULTS: Of the 1109 patients, the most common devices were implantable continuous (IC, 448 [40%]), followed by paracorporeal pulsatile (PP, 306 [28%]), paracorporeal continuous (PC, 293 [26%]), and percutaneous (58 [5%]). Patients with percutaneous device, infants, congenital heart disease, biventricular support, and Interagency Registry for Mechanically Assisted Circulatory Support profile 1 had worse overall survival at 6 months. Positive outcome was 83% at 6 months. Consistent with their cohort composition, device type positive outcomes at 6 months were IC, 92%; PP, 84%; and PC, 69%. Parametric hazard modeling for overall survival showed an early hazard for death with biventricular support, congenital heart disease (CHD), intubation before implantation, PC device, and renal impairment, whereas a constant hazard was associated with ascites. For patients <10 kg, parametric modeling showed an early hazard for CHD, intubation, and renal impairment. Modeling in CHD patients showed an early hazard for biventricular support, renal impairment, and use of PC/PP devices. CONCLUSIONS: This multivariable analysis of the complete Pedimacs database demonstrates that illness at VAD implantation, diagnosis, and strategy of support affect survival and differ by device type. We hope this is the first step in creating a predictive tool to help providers and families have informed expectations.

Expanding use of the HeartMate 3 ventricular assist device in pediatric and adult patients within the Advanced Cardiac Therapies Improving Outcomes Network (ACTION).

BACKGROUND: We report current outcomes in patients supported with the HeartMate 3 (HM3) ventricular assist device in a multicenter learning network. METHODS: The Advanced Cardiac Therapies Improving Outcomes Network database was queried for HM3 implants between 12/2017 and 5/2022. Clinical characteristics, postimplant course, and adverse events were collected. Patients were stratified according to body surface area (BSA) (<1.4 m2, 1.4-1.8 m2, and >1.8 m2) at device implantation. RESULTS: During the study period, 170 patients were implanted with the HM3 at participating network centers, with median age 15.3years; 27.1% were female. Median BSA was 1.68 m2; the smallest patient was 0.73 m2 (17.7 kg). Most (71.8%) had a diagnosis of dilated cardiomyopathy. With a median support time of 102.5days, 61.2% underwent transplantation, 22.9% remained supported on device, 7.6% died, and 2.4% underwent device explantation for recovery; the remainder had transferred to another institution or transitioned to a different device type. The most common adverse events included major bleeding (20.8%) and driveline infection (12.9%); ischemic and hemorrhagic stroke were encountered in 6.5% and 1.2% of patients, respectively. Patients with BSA <1.4 m2 had a higher incidence of infection, renal dysfunction, and ischemic stroke. CONCLUSIONS: In this updated cohort of predominantly pediatric patients supported with the HM3 ventricular assist device, outcomes are excellent with <8% mortality on device. Device-related adverse events including stroke, infection, and renal dysfunction were more commonly seen in smaller patients, highlighting opportunities for improvements in care.

Taking ACTION: A Prognostic Tool for Pediatric Ventricular Assist Device Mortality.

We sought to develop a contemporary risk assessment tool for use in pediatric ventricular assist device (VAD) candidates to estimate risk for mortality on the device using readily available preimplantation clinical data. Training and testing datasets were created from Advanced Cardiac Therapies Improving Outcomes Network (ACTION) registry data on patients supported with a VAD from 2012 to 2021. Potential risk factors for mortality were assessed and incorporated into a simplified risk prediction model utilizing an open-source, gradient-boosted decision tree machine learning library, known as random forest. Predictive performance was assessed by the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve in the testing dataset. Nine significant risk factors were included in the final predictive model which demonstrated excellent discrimination with an area under the curve of 0.95. In addition to providing a framework for establishing pediatric-specific risk profiles, our model can help inform team expectations, guide optimal patient selection, and ultimately improve patient outcomes.

In the era of outpatient ventricular assist devices, is it time to reconsider the practice of bridging older children to transplant on outpatient inotropes?

OBJECTIVE: Ventricular assist devices (VADs) and inotropes are feasible modalities to bridge children to heart transplant (HT) in outpatient settings. However, it is unclear which modality yields superior clinical status at HT and posttransplant survival. METHODS: The United Network for Organ Sharing was used to identify patients aged 18 years or younger, weighing >25 kg, from 2012 to 2022 who were outpatients at HT (n = 835). Patients were grouped by bridging modality at HT: VAD (n = 235 [28%]), inotropes (n = 176 [21%]), or neither (no support) (n = 424 [50%]). RESULTS: VAD patients were of similar age (P = .260) but heavier (P = .007) and more likely to have dilated cardiomyopathy (P < .001) than their inotrope counterparts. VAD patients had similar clinical status at HT but superior functional status (performance scale >70%) (59% vs 31%) (P < .001). Overall posttransplant survival in VAD patients (1-year and 5-year survival, 97% and 88%, respectively) was comparable to patients with no support (93% and 87%, respectively) (P = .090) and those on inotropes (98% and 83%, respectively) (P = .089). One-year conditional survival was superior for VAD vs inotrope (2-year and 6-year survival, 96% and 91%, respectively vs 97% and 79%, respectively) (P = .030) and 5-year conditional survival for VAD patients was superior to inotrope (7-year and 10-year survival, 100% and 100%, respectively vs 100% and 88%, respectively) (P = .022) and no support (100% and 83%, respectively) (P = .011). CONCLUSIONS: Consistent with prior studies, short-term outcomes for pediatric patients bridged to HT in the outpatient setting with VAD or inotropes is excellent. However, compared with outpatients bridged to HT on inotropes, outpatient VAD support allowed for better functional status at HT and superior late posttransplant survival.

Single Center Experience With Durable Continuous Flow Single Ventricle Assist Device: A Viable Option in Fontan Circulatory Failure.

Ventricular assist devices are increasingly used for patients with single ventricle physiology. We describe the use of durable, continuous flow, single ventricular assist device (SVAD) therapy in Fontan circulatory failure patients. Retrospective, single-center review of patients with Fontan circulation implanted with a SVAD between 2017 and 2022. Patient characteristics and outcomes were obtained by chart review. Nine patients underwent SVAD implantation (median age 24 years). Most patients had a total cavopulmonary connection; one had an atriopulmonary Fontan. Five patients had a systemic right ventricle. SVAD was most often utilized as bridge to candidacy (67%). Eight patients had at least moderate systemic ventricular systolic dysfunction. SVAD support continued for a median of 65 days (longest duration, 1,105 days) and one patient remains on support at time of submission. Of five patients discharged home, median length of stay after SVAD was 24 days. Six patients were transplanted (median 96 days from SVAD). Two patients died from pretransplant multisystem organ failure before transplant. All transplanted patients remain alive (median time since transplant 593 days). Continuous flow SVAD therapy can be effective for patients with Fontan circulatory failure and systolic dysfunction. Further studies should investigate feasibility and optimal SVAD timing with more advanced Fontan associated end-organ dysfunction.

Considerations for Advanced Heart Failure Consultation in Individuals With Fontan Circulation: Recommendations From ACTION.

Individuals with Fontan circulation are at risk of late mortality from both cardiac and noncardiac causes. Despite the known risk of mortality, referral indications for advanced heart failure care vary between centers, and many individuals die from Fontan circulation-related complications either after late consideration for advanced heart failure therapies or having never seen a heart failure specialist. There is a critical need for guidelines to direct appropriately timed referral for advanced heart failure consultation. The Advanced Cardiac Therapies Improving Outcomes Network (ACTION) Fontan Committee has developed recommended thresholds for advanced heart failure referral to guide primary cardiologists. These recommendations are divided into 4 categories of clinical Fontan circulatory dysfunction including (1) cardiac/systemic ventricular dysfunction, (2) Fontan pathway dysfunction, (3) lymphatic dysfunction, and (4) extracardiac dysfunction.

Patient and parent-reported outcomes in paediatric ventricular assist device support: a multi-center ACTION learning network feasibility and pilot experience.

BACKGROUND: Patient- and proxy-reported outcomes (PROs) are an important indicator of healthcare quality and can be used to inform treatment. Despite the widescale use of PROs in adult cardiology, they are underutilised in paediatric cardiac care. This study describes a six-center feasibility and pilot experience implementing PROs in the paediatric and young adult ventricular assist device population. METHODS: The Advanced Cardiac Therapies Improving Outcomes Network (ACTION) is a collaborative learning network comprised of 55 centres focused on improving clinical outcomes and the patient/family experience for children with heart failure and those supported by ventricular assist devices. The development of ACTION's PRO programme via engagement with patient and parent stakeholders is described. Pilot feasibility, patient/parent and clinician feedback, and initial PRO findings of patients and families receiving paediatric ventricular assist support across six centres are detailed. RESULTS: Thirty of the thirty-five eligible patients (85.7%) were enrolled in the PRO programme during the pilot study period. Clinicians and participating patients/parents reported positive experiences with the PRO pilot programme. The most common symptoms reported by patients/parents in the first month post-implant period included limitations in activities, dressing change distress, and post-operative pain. Poor sleep, dressing change distress, sadness, and fatigue were the most common symptoms endorsed >30 days post-implant. Parental sadness and worry were notable throughout the entirety of the post-implant experience. CONCLUSIONS: This multi-center ACTION learning network-based PRO programme demonstrated initial success in this six-center pilot study experience and yields important next steps for larger-scale PRO collection, research, and clinical intervention.