Medicare Advantage Supplemental Benefits for Dual-Eligible Benificiaries and Recommendations for Reform.

This Viewpoint discusses Dual Eligible Special Needs Plans supplemental benefits, identifies challenges of benefit coordination and accessibility, and highlights policy reforms to remedy these problems.

Changes in Care Associated With Integrating Medicare and Medicaid for Dual-Eligible Individuals.

Importance: There is growing interest in expanding integrated models, in which 1 insurer manages Medicare and Medicaid spending for dually eligible individuals. Fully integrated dual-eligible special needs plans (FIDE-SNPs) are one of the largest integrated models, but evidence about their performance is limited. Objective: To evaluate changes in care associated with integrating Medicare and Medicaid coverage in a FIDE-SNP in Pennsylvania. Design, Setting, and Participants: This cohort study using a difference-in-differences analysis compared changes in care between 2 cohorts of dual-eligible individuals: (1) an integration cohort composed of Medicare Dual Eligible Special Needs Plan enrollees who joined a companion Medicaid plan following a 2018 state reform mandating Medicaid managed care (leading to integration), and (2) a comparison cohort with nonintegrated coverage before and after the start of Medicaid managed care. Analyses were conducted between February 2022 and June 2023. Main Outcomes and Measures: Analyses examined outcomes in 4 domains: use of home- and community-based services (HCBS), care management and coordination, hospital stays and postacute care, and long-term nursing home stays. Results: The study included 7967 individuals in the integration cohort and 3832 individuals in the comparison cohort. In the integration cohort, the mean (SD) age at baseline was 63.3 (14.7) years, and 5268 individuals (66.1%) were female and 2699 (33.9%) were male. In the comparison cohort, the mean (SD) age at baseline was 64.8 (18.6) years, and 2341 individuals (61.1%) were female and 1491 (38.9%) were male. At baseline, integration cohort members received a mean (SD) of 2.83 (8.70) days of HCBS per month and 3.34 (3.56) medications for chronic conditions per month, and the proportion with a follow-up outpatient visit after a hospital stay was 0.47. From baseline through 3 years after integration, HCBS use increased differentially in the integration vs comparison cohorts by 0.61 days/person-month (95% CI, 0.28-0.94; P < .001). However, integration was not associated with changes in care management and coordination, including medication use for chronic conditions (-0.02 fills/person-month; 95% CI, -0.10 to 0.06; P = .65) or follow-up outpatient care after a hospital stay (-0.01 visits/hospital stay; 95% CI, -0.04 to 0.03; P = .61). Hospital stays did not change differentially between the cohorts. Unmeasured factors contributing to differential mortality limited the ability to identify changes in long-term nursing home stays associated with integration. Conclusions and Relevance: In this cohort study with a difference-in-differences analysis of 2 cohorts of individuals dually eligible for Medicare and Medicaid, integration was associated with greater HCBS use but not with other changes in care patterns. The findings highlight opportunities to strengthen how integrated programs manage care and a need to further evaluate their performance.

A Novel Framework to Address the Complexities of Housing Insecurity and Its Associated Health Outcomes and Inequities: "Give, Partner, Invest".

The association between housing insecurity and reduced access to healthcare, diminished mental and physical health, and increased mortality is well-known. This association, along with structural racism, social inequities, and lack of economic opportunities, continues to widen the gap in health outcomes and other disparities between those in higher and lower socio-economic strata in the United States and throughout the advanced economies of the world. System-wide infrastructure failures at municipal, state, and federal government levels have inadequately addressed the difficulty with housing affordability and stability and its associated impact on health outcomes and inequities. Healthcare systems are uniquely poised to help fill this gap and engage with proposed solutions. Strategies that incorporate multiple investment pathways and emphasize community-based partnerships and innovation have the potential for broad public health impacts. In this manuscript, we describe a novel framework, "Give, Partner, Invest," which was created and utilized by the University of Pittsburgh Medical Center (UPMC) Insurance Services Division (ISD) as part of the Integrated Delivery and Finance System to demonstrate the financial, policy, partnership, and workforce levers that could make substantive investments in affordable housing and community-based interventions to improve the health and well-being of our communities. Further, we address housing policy limitations and infrastructure challenges and offer potential solutions.

Examination of Differences in Nonmedical Supplemental Benefit Coverage for Dual-Eligible Enrollees in Medicare Advantage Plans in 2021.

This cross-sectional study uses Medicare Advantage benefit package data for 2021 to examine differences in the coverage of nonmedical supplemental benefits­such as transportation services and food and meal assistance­for dual-eligible enrollees with health-related social needs.

Screening, Brief Intervention, and Referral to Treatment in the Emergency Department: An Examination of Health Care Utilization and Costs.

BACKGROUND: There is increasing interest in deploying screening, brief intervention, and referral to treatment (SBIRT) practices in emergency departments (ED) to intervene with patients at risk for substance use disorders. However, the current literature is inconclusive on whether SBIRT practices are effective in reducing costs and utilization. OBJECTIVE: This study sought to evaluate the health care costs and health care utilization associated with SBIRT services in the ED. RESEARCH DESIGN: This study analyzed downstream health care utilization and costs for patients who were exposed to SBIRT services within an Allegheny County, Pennsylvania, ED through a program titled Safe Landing compared with 3 control groups of ED patients (intervention hospital preintervention, and preintervention and postintervention time period at a comparable, nonintervention hospital). SUBJECTS: The subjects were patients who received ED SBIRT services from January 1 to December 31 in 2012 as part of the Safe Landing program. One control group received ED services at the same hospital during a previous year. Two other control groups were patients who received ED services at another comparable hospital. MEASURES: Measures include total health care costs, 30-day ED visits, 1-year ED visits, inpatient claims, and behavioral health claims. RESULTS: Results found that patients who received SBIRT services experienced a 21% reduction in health care costs and a significant reduction in 1-year ED visits (decrease of 3.3 percentage points). CONCLUSIONS: This study provides further support that SBIRT programs are cost-effective and cost-beneficial approaches to substance use disorders management, important factors as policy advocates continue to disseminate SBIRT practices throughout the health care system.

Advancing Value-Based Population Health Management Through Payer-Provider Partnerships: Improving Outcomes for Children With Complex Conditions.

Population health management (PHM) approaches to improve cost and quality remain limited. To address this gap, stakeholders within an integrated delivery and financing system in Western Pennsylvania designed, implemented, and tested a value-based care model for children with medically complex conditions that could be scaled across the broader pediatric population. The model included: (1) a multilevel, interdisciplinary infrastructure; (2) actionable analytics reports to guide continuous quality improvement; (3) alternative provider payments; (4) consumer-directed spending accounts; and (5) shared savings with practices. Four practices caring for 215 children (

Effectiveness of a Wellness Program for Individuals With Spina Bifida and Spinal Cord Injury Within an Integrated Delivery System.

OBJECTIVE: To determine whether an evidence-based wellness program for individuals with spina bifida and spinal cord injury would improve health outcomes and patient experience of care, result in a positive return on investment (ROI), and provide evidence for scalability. DESIGN: Nonrandomized, noncontrolled cohort study; 2 years of enrollment. SETTING: Academic hospital-based outpatient physiatry clinic partnered with an insurance division within an integrated health care delivery and financing system. PARTICIPANTS: Individuals (N=69) with spina bifida and spinal cord injury were consented; 4 were excluded (5.7%), and the remaining 65 (94.2%) participated in the intervention. INTERVENTIONS: Evidence-based wellness program consisting of care coordination from a mobile nurse, patient education, and patient incentives. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Validated measures of function, mood, quality of life, and perception of care delivery; knowledge of preventable conditions; self-rating of health; and utilization and cost. RESULTS: Improvements in all main outcome measures were seen after 2 years of enrollment. Although cost in year 1 of enrollment increased because of hospitalizations and the overall ROI was negative, a small positive ROI was seen in year 2 of enrollment. CONCLUSIONS: Participation in an evidence-based wellness program was associated with improved health and experience of care. Scaling the program to larger numbers may result in an overall positive ROI.

Connected Care: improving outcomes for adults with serious mental illness.

OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the effectiveness of Connected Care-a care coordination effort of physical and behavioral health managed care partners in Pennsylvania-on acute service use among adult Medicaid beneficiaries with serious mental illness (SMI). STUDY DESIGN: We examined changes in service utilization using a difference-in-differences model, comparing study group with a comparison group, and conducted key informant interviews to better understand aspects of program implementation. METHODS: We compared the difference in service use rates between baseline year and 2-year intervention period for the Connected Care group (n = 8633) with the difference in rates for the comparison group (n = 10,514), confirming results using a regression adjustment. RESULTS: Mental health hospitalizations (per 1000 members per month) decreased for the Connected Care group from 41.1 to 39.6, while increasing for the comparison group from 33.8 to 37.2 (P = .04). All-cause readmissions within 30 days decreased nearly 10% for Connected Care while increasing slightly for the comparison group (P < .01), with a similar pattern observed for 60- and 90-day all-cause readmissions. No differences were observed in physical health hospitalizations, drug and alcohol admissions, or ED use. Data from qualitative stakeholder interviews illuminated facilitators and barriers of implementing Connected Care. CONCLUSIONS: Payer-level healthcare information sharing can help identify members who could benefit from care coordination services, inform care management activities, and assist with pharmacy management. Results can inform state, health plan, and provider efforts around integration of care for individuals with SMI and improve care efficiencies and quality, which is especially important in this time of Medicaid expansion.

Adapting pediatric obesity treatment delivery for low-income families: a public-private partnership.

OBJECTIVE: The objective was to evaluate the feasibility of delivering a pediatric weight management intervention adapted for low-income families. Academic researchers, a Medicaid health plan, a State Medicaid agency, and community pediatric providers partnered in the project. METHODS: Participants were 48 families with 52 overweight/obese children aged 4 to 12 recruited from Medicaid health plan and providers' offices. Elements of efficacious pediatric obesity interventions were modified for low literacy and implemented in person and telephonically with parents. RESULTS: Families report ents in food shopping and preparation, and child eating and activity habits. The retention rate was 88%. Children grew significantly taller (F = 7.1; P = .012) but did not gain significant weight (F = 0.91; P = .35), with a trend toward decreased BMI ( F = 3.2; P = .08). CONCLUSIONS: The authors demonstrate the feasibility of delivering an adapted pediatric obesity intervention with low-income families. They also discuss implications for public-private partnerships among key stakeholders to address pediatric obesity in this high-risk population.