Use of noninvasive measurement of the indocyanine green plasma disappearance rate in patients with septic shock.

OBJECTIVE: Our aim was to analyse the relation between serial values of the indocyanine green plasma disappearance rate (ICG-PDR) with hospital mortality in the first 48 hours of ICU admission in patients with septic shock. METHODS: A prospective observational study was carried out over 12 months of patients admitted to the ICU with septic shock. Each patient underwent noninvasive determination of ICG-PDR at 24 and 48 hours with the LiMON® module. Follow-up was performed until hospital discharge or exitus. RESULTS: 63 patients. Age 61.1±12.3 years. 60.3% men. SOFA score on admission 8.7±3.3, APACHE II score was 27.9±10.7 points. A total of 44.4% of patients died. The ICG-PDR values in the first 24 hours of ICU admission were lower in nonsurvivors: 10.5 (5.7-13.0)%/min vs. 15.9 (11.4-28.0)%/min, p <0.001. Furthermore, in nonsurvivors, there was no improvement in ICG-PDR between 24 h and 48 h, while in survivors, there was an increase of 25%: 15.9 (11.4-28.0)%/min and 20.9 (18.0-27.0)%/min, p=0.020. The silhouette measure of ICG-PDR cohesion and separation for the clusters analysed (nonsurvivors and survivors) was satisfactory (0.6). ICG-PDR<11.7%/min was related to in-hospital mortality, ICG-PDR> 18%/min to survival, and the interval between 11.7% and 18%/min covered a range of uncertainty. In the two-stage cluster, ICG-PDR, SOFA and APACHE II present satisfactory predictive scores 24 hours after patient admission. CONCLUSIONS: ICG-PDR in our setting is a useful clinical prognostic tool and could optimise the decision tree in patients with septic shock.

[New therapeutic alternatives for severe sepsis in the critical patient. A review]. / Nuevas alternativas terapéuticas para la sepsis grave en el paciente crítico. Revisión.

BACKGROUND: Despite efforts to establish uniform protocols for the management of severe sepsis, this condition continues to have high morbidity and mortality. This is due, among other factors, to the many barriers for the development of the protocols and the application time. That is why new therapeutic measures are continuing to be investigated and developed. OBJECTIVE: To review the literature on the new and future therapeutic alternatives available in the management of sepsis in critically ill patients. DATA SOURCE AND SEARCH METHOD: A search was made for articles consistent with evidence- based medicine guidelines published between 2004 and 2009 in different databases (Cochrane Plus Library, National Guideline Clearinghouse, Clinical Evidence, REMI and PubMed) and the NIH Clinical Trails database (ClinicalTrials.gov) using the TRIP meta-search engine. STUDY SELECTION: A total of 357 documents were retrieved, selecting 48 of which included systematic reviews, meta-analyses, clinical practice guidelines, structured abstracts of original articles, and clinical trials. The selection criteria followed the peer review process. DATA EXTRACTION: Data were extracted by two independent reviewers. CONCLUSIONS: Based on the 2004-2009 study period, sufficient evidence was not obtained to make further recommendations on the treatment of sepsis. Although the abundant evidence needed to suggest the utility of these therapeutic measures, inhaled nitric oxide, statins, and immunoglobulins are probably good options for the adjuvant treatment of sepsis. However, we must wait for the results of different ongoing clinical trials on new treatment modalities. Stem cells and gene therapy will probably emerge as novel therapies in the future.