Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 4 de 4
Filtrar
Mais filtros

Base de dados
Tipo de documento
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Trauma Surg Acute Care Open ; 9(1): e001297, 2024.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38666014

RESUMO

Objective: Venous thromboembolism (VTE) risk reduction strategies include early initiation of chemoprophylaxis, reducing missed doses, weight-based dosing and dose adjustment using anti-Xa levels. We hypothesized that time to initiation of chemoprophylaxis would be the strongest modifiable risk for VTE, even after adjusting for competing risk factors. Methods: A prospectively maintained trauma registry was queried for patients admitted July 2017-October 2021 who were 18 years and older and received emergency release blood products. Patients with deep vein thrombosis or pulmonary embolism (VTE) were compared to those without (no VTE). Door-to-prophylaxis was defined as time from hospital arrival to first dose of VTE chemoprophylaxis (hours). Univariate and multivariate analyses were then performed between the two groups. Results: 2047 patients met inclusion (106 VTE, 1941 no VTE). There were no differences in baseline or demographic data. VTE patients had higher injury severity score (29 vs 24), more evidence of shock by arrival lactate (4.6 vs 3.9) and received more post-ED transfusions (8 vs 2 units); all p<0.05. While there was no difference in need for enoxaparin dose adjustment or missed doses, door-to-prophylaxis time was longer in the VTE group (35 vs 25 hours; p=0.009). On multivariate logistic regression analysis, every hour delay from time of arrival increased likelihood of VTE by 1.5% (OR 1.015, 95% CI 1.004 to 1.023, p=0.004). Conclusion: The current retrospective study of severely injured patients with trauma who required emergency release blood products found that increased door-to-prophylaxis time was significantly associated with an increased likelihood for VTE. Chemoprophylaxis initiation is one of the few modifiable risk factors available to combat VTE, therefore early initiation is paramount. Similar to door-to-balloon time in treating myocardial infarction and door-to-tPA time in stroke, "door-to-prophylaxis time" should be considered as a hospital metric for prevention of VTE in trauma. Level of evidence: Level III, retrospective study with up to two negative criteria.

2.
J Trauma Acute Care Surg ; 95(5): 685-690, 2023 11 01.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37125814

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Following COVID and the subsequent blood shortage, several investigators evaluated futility cut points in massive transfusion. We hypothesized that early aggressive use of damage-control resuscitation, including whole blood (WB), would demonstrate that these cut points of futility were significantly underestimating potential survival among patients receiving >50 U of blood in the first 4 hours. METHODS: Adult trauma patients admitted from November 2017 to October 2021 who received emergency-release blood products in prehospital or emergency department setting were included. Deaths within 30 minutes of arrival were excluded. Total blood products were defined as total red blood cell, plasma, and WB in the field and in the first 4 hours after arrival. Patients were first divided into those receiving ≤50 or >50 U of blood in the first 4 hours. We then evaluated patients by whether they received any WB or received only component therapy. Thirty-day survival was evaluated for all included patients. RESULTS: A total of 2,299 patients met the inclusion criteria (2,043 in ≤50 U, 256 in >50 U groups). While there were no differences in age or sex, the >50 U group was more likely to sustain penetrating injury (47% vs. 30%, p < 0.05). Patients receiving >50 U of blood had lower field and arrival blood pressure and larger prehospital and emergency department resuscitation volumes ( p < 0.05). Patients in the >50 U group had lower survival than those in the ≤50 cohort (31% vs. 79%; p < 0.05). Patients who received WB (n = 1,291) had 43% increased odds of survival compared with those who received only component therapy (n = 1,008) (1.09-1.87, p = 0.009) and higher 30-day survival at transfusion volumes >50 U. CONCLUSION: Patient survival rates in patients receiving >50 U of blood in the first 4 hours of care are as high as 50% to 60%, with survival still at 15% to 25% after 100 U. While responsible blood stewardship is critical, futility should not be declared based on high transfusion volumes alone. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Therapeutic/Care Management; Level III.


Assuntos
Futilidade Médica , Ferimentos e Lesões , Adulto , Humanos , Transfusão de Sangue , Serviço Hospitalar de Emergência , Plasma , Ressuscitação , Ferimentos e Lesões/terapia , Estudos Retrospectivos , Escala de Gravidade do Ferimento , Transfusão de Componentes Sanguíneos
3.
World Neurosurg ; 116: e1122-e1128, 2018 Aug.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29870850

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: To investigate the impact that chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) has on postoperative complication rates, ambulation, and hospital length of stay for elderly spinal deformity patients after elective spinal fusion (≥3 levels). METHODS: The medical records of 559 elderly (≥60 years old) spine deformity patients undergoing elective spinal fusion (≥3 levels) at a major academic institution from 2005 to 2015 were reviewed. We identified 60 patients with COPD (10.7%) and 499 patients without COPD (89.3%). Patient demographics, comorbidities, postoperative complications, ambulatory status, and readmission rates were collected. The primary outcomes investigated in this study were complication rates and length of hospital stay. RESULTS: Demographics and comorbidities were similar between groups, with a difference in proportion of smokers (COPD group: 25.0% vs. no COPD group: 9.6%, P = 0.0004). The median number of fusion levels (P = 0.840), operative time (P = 0.842), estimated blood loss (P = 0.336), and incidences of durotomy (P = 0.258) was similar between both cohorts. The COPD cohort experienced a higher rate of postoperative fever (10.0% vs. 3.0%, P = 0.007) and pneumonia (5.0% vs. 0.4%, P = 0.0004), respectively. There was a significant difference in the number of feet walked on the first day of ambulation after surgery (COPD group: 58.6 ± 78.4 vs. no COPD group: 84.0 ± 102.8, P = 0.040). Length of hospital stay was significantly longer in the COPD cohort than the no COPD cohort (7.7 ± 6.4 vs. 6.0 ± 4.0 days, respectively; P = 0.0498). CONCLUSIONS: Our study demonstrates that elderly patients with COPD have increased lengths of stay and higher rates of postoperative pneumonia after spinal fusion. This determination identifies a potentially modifiable risk factor for increased utilization of health care resources.


Assuntos
Tempo de Internação , Complicações Pós-Operatórias/epidemiologia , Fusão Vertebral , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Eletivos/métodos , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Readmissão do Paciente/estatística & dados numéricos , Doença Pulmonar Obstrutiva Crônica/complicações , Estudos Retrospectivos , Fatores de Risco , Doenças da Coluna Vertebral/cirurgia , Fusão Vertebral/efeitos adversos , Caminhada/fisiologia
4.
World Neurosurg ; 112: e348-e354, 2018 Apr.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29355811

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Measures of health care use such as length of hospital stay (LOS) are used as proxies for quality of care after spine surgery. Accordingly, hospitals and health systems are investing considerable resources into the preoperative identification of patients at risk for prolonged LOS. This study aims to investigate the impact of preoperative level on outcomes and LOS after spinal fusion. METHODS: The medical records of 204 elderly (≥60 years) male patients undergoing elective spinal fusion (≥3 levels) at a major academic institution from 2005 to 2015 were reviewed. The lower hemoglobin (Hgb) level was designated as <13.5 g/dL. We identified 83 (40.7%) patients with preoperative lower Hgb levels and 121 (59.3%) with normal levels (low Hgb, n = 83; normal Hgb, n = 121). The primary outcomes investigated were complications and LOS. RESULTS: Demographics and comorbidities were similar between both groups, with mean Hgb levels being 12.3 ± 0.9 g/dL and 14.9 ± 1.0 g/dL for the low and normal cohorts, respectively. The lower Hgb cohort experienced higher rates of postoperative delirium (21.7% vs. 5.8%; P = 0.0007), non-wound infections (6.0% vs. 0.0%; P = 0.006), and hematoma formation (3.6% vs. 0.0%; P = 0.035). There was a significant difference in LOS between the cohorts, with the low Hgb cohort experiencing approximately a 2-fold increase (low Hgb, 8.1 ± 5.9 days vs. normal Hgb, 4.8 ± 2.5 days; P < 0.0001). Preoperative Hgb and hematocrit levels negatively correlated with LOS (Hgb, R = -0.388, P < 0.001 and Hct, R = -0.2883, P < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Our study shows that elderly male patients with lower preoperative Hgb levels have increased LOS and postoperative delirium after spinal fusion. Moreover, preoperative Hgb levels negatively correlate with LOS.


Assuntos
Anemia/complicações , Doenças da Coluna Vertebral/complicações , Doenças da Coluna Vertebral/cirurgia , Fusão Vertebral/efeitos adversos , Idoso , Biomarcadores/sangue , Delírio/sangue , Delírio/etiologia , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Eletivos , Hemoglobinas/análise , Humanos , Tempo de Internação , Masculino , Complicações Pós-Operatórias/epidemiologia , Complicações Pós-Operatórias/etiologia , Estudos Retrospectivos
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA