WHO standards-based tools to measure service providers' and service users' views on the quality of hospital child care: development and validation in Italy.

OBJECTIVES: Evidence showed that, even in high-income countries, children and adolescents may not receive high quality of care (QOC). We describe the development and initial validation, in Italy, of two WHO standards-based questionnaires to conduct an assessment of QOC for children and young adolescents at inpatient level, based on the provider and user perspectives. DESIGN: Multiphase, mixed-methods study. SETTING, PARTICIPANTS AND METHODS: The two questionnaires were developed in four phases equally conducted for each tool. Phase 1 which included the prioritisation of the WHO Quality Measures according to predefined criteria and the development of the draft questionnaires. In phase 2 content face validation of the draft questionnaires was assessed among both experts and end-users. In phase 3 the optimised questionnaires were field tested to assess acceptability, perceived utility and comprehensiveness (N=163 end-users). In phase 4 intrarater reliability and internal consistency were evaluated (N=170 and N=301 end-users, respectively). RESULTS: The final questionnaires included 150 WHO Quality Measures. Observed face validity was excellent (kappa value of 1). The field test resulted in response rates of 98% and 76% for service users and health providers, respectively. Among respondents, 96.9% service users and 90.4% providers rated the questionnaires as useful, and 86.9% and 93.9%, respectively rated them as comprehensive. Intrarater reliability was good, with Cohen's kappa values exceeding 0.70. Cronbach alpha values ranged from 0.83 to 0.95, indicating excellent internal consistency. CONCLUSIONS: Study findings suggest these tools developed have good content and face validity, high acceptability and perceived utility, and good intrarater reliability and internal consistency, and therefore could be used in health facilities in Italy and similar contexts. Priority areas for future research include how tools measuring paediatric QOC can be more effectively used to help health professionals provide the best possible care.

How to recognize and manage psychosomatic pain in the pediatric emergency department.

AIM: Children and adolescents affected by somatization and somatic symptom disorder commonly refer to emergency services. Due to the absence of specific guidelines for the emergency setting and to a possible lack of knowledge, these patients are at risk of being unrecognized and mismanaged. This study aims at proposing a clinical practice to approach and manage these patients and their families in the emergency setting. METHODS: This manuscript derived from the work of a research group of italian pediatric emergency physicians and anesthesiologists, with an expertise in pain management, members of the PIPER group. The research group reviewed the literature about psychosomatic pain and somatic symptom disorder and developed a clinical practice specific for the pediatric emergency setting. RESULTS: The manuscript provides information about the main clinical features shared by patients with psychosomatic pain and about current diagnostic criteria and appropriate management in the emergency setting. Furthermore, it highlights the possible pitfalls in which the emergency physician may run into dealing with these patients. CONCLUSION: This clinical practice should be seen as a starting point toward a better understanding of patients with psychosomatic pain and a standardization of care in the pediatric emergency setting.

COnsensus on Pediatric Pain in the Emergency Room: the COPPER project, issued by 17 Italian scientific societies.

In the pediatric setting, management of pain in the emergency department - and even in common care - is a challenging exercise, due to the complexity of the pediatric patient, poor specific training of many physicians, and scant resources.A joint effort of several Italian societies involved in pediatrics or in pain management has led to the definition of the PIPER group and the COPPER project. By applying a modified Delphi method, the COPPER project resulted in the definition of 10 fundamental statements. These may represent the basis for improving the correct management of children pain in the emergency department.

Diagnosis and management of acquired aplastic anemia in childhood. Guidelines from the Marrow Failure Study Group of the Pediatric Haemato-Oncology Italian Association (AIEOP).

Acquired aplastic anemia (AA) is a rare heterogeneous disease characterized by pancytopenia and hypoplastic bone marrow. The incidence is 2-3/million inhabitants/year, in Europe, but higher in East Asia. Survival in severe aplastic anemia (SAA) has markedly improved in the past 2 decades because of advances in hematopoietic stem cell transplantation, immunosuppressive and biologic drugs, and supportive care. In SAA hematopoietic stem cell transplant (HSCT) from a matched sibling donor (MSD) is the treatment of choice. If a MSD is not available, the options include immunosuppressive therapy (IST) or unrelated donor HSCT. The objective of this guideline is to provide healthcare professionals with clear guidance on the diagnosis and management of pediatric patients with AA. A preliminary, evidence-based document issued by a group of pediatric hematologists was discussed, modified and approved during a series of "Consensus Conferences" according to procedures previously validated by the AIEOP Board. The guidelines highlight the importance of referring pediatric patients with AA to pediatric centers with long experience in diagnosis, differential diagnosis, management, supportive care and follow-up of AA.

Targeted strategies in the treatment of primary gastric lymphomas: from rituximab to recent insights into potential new drugs.

Primary gastric non-Hodgkin's lymphomas (PG-NHL) are the most common extranodal lymphomas, representing between 47% and 74% of all gastrointestinal lymphoma cases. In Western countries two histological types, diffuse large B-cell (DLBC) NHL and mucosa-associated lymphoid tissue (MALT) NHL, are more frequently represented, accounting for the majority of gastric tumors after adenocarcinoma. For several years treatment of these PG lymphomas consisted of surgery, chemotherapy and radiotherapy, alone or in combination. In the last two decades however, advances in our understanding of their pathogenesis and biology have changed the treatment strategy, at least as regards the early stages of disease. In addition to making tumor regression possible through the eradication of Helicobacter pylori, which is considered the main pathogenic agent, this understanding has also provided a solid rationale to assess the efficacy of targeted therapy, namely of drugs which interfere with specific molecules expressed by tumor cells or are involved in key growth pathways of these lymphomas. In particular, rituximab, a monoclonal anti-CD20 antibody, radioimmunotherapy, the first-generation proteasome inhibitor bortezomib and lenalidomide have been evaluated. Despite significant antitumor activity in this subset of NHL and manageable toxicity, many questions still remain however about the optimal dose, the best administration schedule and their combination with conventional chemotherapy. This review focuses on the pathogenesis of PG-MALT and DLBC lymphomas, and discusses the results of clinical trials on the impact of new agents on prognosis and survival in these patients, considering also potential new therapautic targets.