Subpectineal obturator nerve block reduces opioid consumption after hip arthroscopy: a triple-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled trial.

BACKGROUND: Hip arthroscopy causes severe pain during the first few hours in the postoperative care unit. This is probably due to the intraoperative stretching of the hip joint capsule. Pain relief requires high doses of opioids which may prolong recovery and may cause opioid-related adverse events.The majority of hip joint capsule nociceptors are located anteriorly. The obturator nerve innervates the anteromedial part of the hip joint capsule. We hypothesized that a subpectineal obturator nerve block using 15 ml bupivacaine 5 mg/mL with added epinephrine 5 µg/mL would reduce the opioid consumption after hip arthroscopy. METHODS: 40 ambulatory hip arthroscopy patients were enrolled in this randomized, triple-blind controlled trial. All patients were allocated to a preoperative active or placebo subpectineal obturator nerve block. The primary outcome was opioid consumption for the first 3 hours in the postanesthesia care unit. Secondary outcomes were pain, nausea, and hip adductor strength. RESULTS: 34 patients were analyzed for the primary outcome. The mean intravenous morphine equivalent consumption in the subpectineal obturator nerve block group was 11.9 mg vs 19.7 mg in the placebo group (p<0.001). The hip adductor strength was significantly reduced in the active group. No other intergroup differences were observed regarding the secondary outcomes. CONCLUSION: We found a significant reduction in the opioid consumption for patients receiving an active subpectineal obturator nerve block. The postoperative intravenous morphine equivalent reduction the first painful 3 hours was reduced by 40% for patients receiving a subpectineal obturator nerve block in this randomized, triple-blind trial. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: EudraCT database 2021-006575-42.

First-line treatment for femoroacetabular impingement syndrome and hip-related quality of life: study protocol for a multicentre randomised controlled trial comparing a 6-month supervised strength exercise intervention to usual care (the Better Hip Trial).

INTRODUCTION: Femoroacetabular impingement syndrome (FAIS) is a motion-related and position-related clinical condition of the hip associated with pain, reduced physical function and hip-related quality of life (QoL). Interestingly, higher maximal muscle strength is associated with less pain, better physical function and improved QoL in people with FAIS. Furthermore, preliminary evidence suggests that a proportion of patients with FAIS respond positively to strength exercise as first-line treatment. Nonetheless, there is little evidence supporting a specific exercise intervention offered as a first-line treatment. We will conduct a randomised controlled trial investigating the clinical effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of a 6-month strength exercise intervention compared with usual care as first-line treatment in patients with FAIS. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: This is a multicentre randomised controlled trial that will be conducted at hospitals and physiotherapy clinics across Denmark and Australia. A total of 120 patients with FAIS will be randomised (1:1) to 6 months of supervised strength exercise or usual care. The primary outcome is the change in hip-related QoL measured using the International Hip and Outcome Tool 33 (iHOT-33) from baseline to the end of intervention. A health economic evaluation will be conducted from a societal and healthcare perspective based on the data collection over a 12-month period starting at baseline. The analysis will calculate incremental cost-effectiveness ratios using quality-adjusted life-years and iHOT-33 scores while estimating costs using microcosting and cost questionnaires. Secondary outcomes include objectively measured physical function at baseline and after 6 months and patient-reported outcomes measured at baseline, 3-month, 6-month and 12-month follow-up. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: The trial has been approved by the Committee on Health Research Ethics in the Central Denmark Region (journal no 1-10-72-45-23) and La Trobe University Human Ethics Committee (HEC24042) and is registered at the Central Denmark Region List of Research Projects (journal no 1-16-02-115-23). Informed consent will be obtained from each participant before randomisation. Results will be published in international peer-reviewed scientific journals. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT05927935.

Open surgical repair of hip abductor tendon tears.

INTRODUCTION: Tendinopathy and tendon tears of the gluteus medius and/or minimus (GMM) insertion at the greater trochanter are increasingly recognised internationally as a cause of recalcitrant lateral hip pain (LHP). The purpose of this study was to report the first Danish results of open surgical repair of GMM tears in female patients. METHODS: In this retrospective observational study, we included 67 women (68 hips) with a mean (95% confidence interval (CI)) age of 59 (56-61) years who underwent open GMM repair between September 2018 and June 2022. All cases had magnetic resonance imaging before surgery. Pre-, three- and 12-month post-operative testing included LHP (numerical rating scale 0-10), Copenhagen Hip and Groin Outcome Score (HAGOS), Oxford Hip Score (OHS), the EuroQol-Visual Analogue Scale (EQ-VAS) and the Global Rating of Change score (GROC). Responses on GROC were considered successful if patients scored "moderately better" to "very much better". Function of the lower limbs was assessed by the 30-second Chair-Stand-Test (CST). RESULTS: From pre-testing to 12-month follow-up, LHP at rest and during activity decreased significantly, all HAGOS subgroups improved by 27-35 points, the OHS improved from 22 to 35 points, the EQ-VAS improved from 52 to 72 points and the mean (95% CI) number of repetitions in the CST improved by 2.4 (1.4-3.3). Success on the GROC was reported by 79% of the patients. CONCLUSION: Open surgical repair of GMM tendon tears in women produced statistically significant improvements in patient-reported outcomes at one-year follow-up. FUNDING: None. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Not relevant.

Efficacy of iliopsoas plane block for patients undergoing hip arthroscopy: a prospective, triple-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled trial.

BACKGROUND: Intraoperative stretching of the hip joint capsule often generates severe pain during the first 3 hours after hip arthroscopy. The short-lived severe pain mandates high opioid consumption, which may result in adverse events and delay recovery. The femoral nerve nociceptors are located anteriorly in the hip joint capsule. A femoral nerve block reduces pain and opioid demand after hip arthroscopy. It impedes, however, ambulation and home discharge after outpatient surgery. The iliopsoas plane block selectively anesthetizes the femoral sensory nerve branches innervating the hip joint capsule without compromising ambulation. We aimed to assess reduction of opioid consumption after iliopsoas plane block during the short-lived painful postsurgical period of time after hip arthroscopy. METHODS: In a randomized, triple-blind trial, 50 patients scheduled for hip arthroscopy in general anesthesia were allocated to active or placebo iliopsoas plane block. The primary outcome was opioid consumption during the first three postoperative hours in the postanesthesia care unit. Secondary outcomes included pain, nausea, and ability to ambulate. RESULTS: Forty-nine patients were analyzed for the primary outcome. The mean 3-hour intravenous morphine equivalent consumption in the iliopsoas plane block group was 10.4 mg vs 23.8 mg in the placebo group (p<0.001). No intergroup differences were observed for the secondary outcomes during the postoperative follow-up. CONCLUSION: An iliopsoas plane block reduces opioid consumption after hip arthroscopy. The reduction of opioid consumption during the clinically relevant 3-hour postsurgical period of time was larger than 50% for active versus placebo iliopsoas plane block in this randomized, triple-blind trial.

Limited clinical utility of a machine learning revision prediction model based on a national hip arthroscopy registry.

PURPOSE: Accurate prediction of outcome following hip arthroscopy is challenging and machine learning has the potential to improve our predictive capability. The purpose of this study was to determine if machine learning analysis of the Danish Hip Arthroscopy Registry (DHAR) can develop a clinically meaningful calculator for predicting the probability of a patient undergoing subsequent revision surgery following primary hip arthroscopy. METHODS: Machine learning analysis was performed on the DHAR. The primary outcome for the models was probability of revision hip arthroscopy within 1, 2, and/or 5 years after primary hip arthroscopy. Data were split randomly into training (75%) and test (25%) sets. Four models intended for these types of data were tested: Cox elastic net, random survival forest, gradient boosted regression (GBM), and super learner. These four models represent a range of approaches to statistical details like variable selection and model complexity. Model performance was assessed by calculating calibration and area under the curve (AUC). Analysis was performed using only variables available in the pre-operative clinical setting and then repeated to compare model performance using all variables available in the registry. RESULTS: In total, 5581 patients were included for analysis. Average follow-up time or time-to-revision was 4.25 years (± 2.51) years and overall revision rate was 11%. All four models were generally well calibrated and demonstrated concordance in the moderate range when restricted to only pre-operative variables (0.62-0.67), and when considering all variables available in the registry (0.63-0.66). The 95% confidence intervals for model concordance were wide for both analyses, ranging from a low of 0.53 to a high of 0.75, indicating uncertainty about the true accuracy of the models. CONCLUSION: The association between pre-surgical factors and outcome following hip arthroscopy is complex. Machine learning analysis of the DHAR produced a model capable of predicting revision surgery risk following primary hip arthroscopy that demonstrated moderate accuracy but likely limited clinical usefulness. Prediction accuracy would benefit from enhanced data quality within the registry and this preliminary study holds promise for future model generation as the DHAR matures. Ongoing collection of high-quality data by the DHAR should enable improved patient-specific outcome prediction that is generalisable across the population. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level III.

Low prevalence of trochanteric bursitis in patients with refractory lateral hip pain.

INTRODUCTION: Bursitis at the greater trochanter has historically been identified as a major pain generator in patients with lateral hip pain (LHP). We believe that hip abductor tendon pathology (HATP) plays an important and overlooked role in LHP. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the presence of isolated trochanteric bursitis on MRI in patients with refractory LHP. METHODS: The MRIs of 120 patients with LHP (94% women, median age 54 years) performed at our orthopaedic outpatient clinic between 2017 and 2020 were evaluated by two raters for trochanter-related pathologies, including HATP and bursitis. RESULTS: Two (2%) patients were registered with greater trochanteric bursitis with no relevant HATP, 30 (25%) patients had elements of inflammation (high-intensity signals) in the greater trochanteric bursa with relevant HATP. Five (4%) patients had relevant HATP with bursitis in the sub-gluteus minimus bursa with no bursitis in the greater trochanteric bursa. The remaining 83 (69%) patients had no sign of trochanter-related bursitis. CONCLUSION: Isolated trochanteric bursitis as the cause of refractory LHP appears to be rare. We believe that the presence of HATP in LHP has been severely underestimated and a shift in focus towards treatment of these structures is necessary. FUNDING: none. TRIAL REGISTRATION: According to current national legislation, no formal ethical approval was required for this study. The National Data Protection Agency approved the study (1-16-02-124-19).

Five-Year Follow-up After Hip Arthroscopic Surgery in the Horsens-Aarhus Femoroacetabular Impingement (HAFAI) Cohort.

Background: Patients with femoroacetabular impingement syndrome (FAIS) are offered hip arthroscopic surgery to decrease hip pain, improve their function, and decrease development of hip osteoarthritis (OA). Nonetheless, long-term follow-up data are few. Purpose: To investigate patient-reported outcomes, clinical tests, reoperations, and radiographic status 5 years after primary hip arthroscopy in patients with FAIS. Study Design: Case series; Level of evidence, 4. Methods: A total of 60 patients (age, 36 ± 9 years; 63% female) diagnosed with FAIS were included in the study and followed for 5 years after hip arthroscopy. Follow-up included Copenhagen Hip and Groin Outcome Score (HAGOS); Hip Sports Activity Scale; and clinical tests (flexion, adduction, internal rotation [FADIR]; flexion, abduction, external rotation [FABER]; and psoas muscle/tendon major pain provocation). Radiographic evaluation included lateral joint-space width (LJSW) and Tönnis classification for hip OA. Reoperations and conversion to total hip replacement (THR) were recorded. We calculated the proportion of patients who exceeded the minimal important change (MIC), achieved the Patient Acceptable Symptom State (PASS), and were within the 95% reference interval of age- and sex-matched persons with no hip problems. Changes were investigated using paired t tests. Results: Compared with preoperatively, all HAGOS subscales were improved substantially 5 years after surgery (mean, ≥21 points; P < .001), and 67% to 89% of patients reported improvements exceeding MIC. Between 56% and 80% achieved PASS, but only 7% to 24% reached the 95% reference interval for the HAGOS subscales. A total of 36% had a positive FADIR test and 25% had a positive FABER test, which were improvements compared with preoperatively (P < .001 for both). Patients with a positive FADIR test had significantly worse HAGOS subscales. Six patients (10%) had a THR since their primary hip arthroscopy. In the remaining patients, the mean LJSW was decreased (-0.4 mm; P = .043), and hip OA had worsened in 9 patients (23%; P = .003). Conclusion: Five years after surgery, the majority of patients experienced HAGOS improvements exceeding MIC while also showing an acceptable PASS. However, clinical tests, participation in physical activities, and quality of life indicated that many patients still experience hip problems. Registration: NCT04590924 (ClinicalTrials.gov identifier).

Gluteal-related lateral hip pain.

INTRODUCTION: Lateral hip pain (LHP) due to tendon pathologies of insertion of the M. gluteus medius and minimus at the greater trochanter are often misdiagnosed and may lead to unrecognised disability. The purpose of this study was to evaluate pain and patient-reported outcomes in patients presenting with LHP in the context of a publicly financed healthcare system. METHODS: Data were collected from September 2017 to November 2020 at a regional teaching hospital. Inclusion criteria were clinical and MRI-verified hip abductor tendon pathology. Baseline testing included pain scoring (numerical rating scale, NRS), and the following patient-reported outcome scores: Copenhagen Hip and Groin Outcome Score (HAGOS), Oxford Hip Score (OHS) and EuroQol-Visual Analogue Scale (EQ-VAS). RESULTS: A total of 151 patients (94% women) with a median age of 55 years were included. The mean LHP (NRS 0-10) at rest, during activity and worst pain at any given time was 4, 7 and 9, respectively. The mean patient-reported outcome scores were HAGOS: pain 42.9, symptoms 49.8, activities of daily living 42.2, sport/recreation 28.1, participation in physical activities 25, quality of life 27.8; OHS 24; EQ-VAS 59.6. CONCLUSIONS: We found that patients with hip abductor tendon pathology display poor patient-reported outcomes comparable to those of patients suffering from severe hip osteoarthrosis. Further research into this patient group is warranted. The results are based on a heterogeneous study population in terms of variety of hip abductor tendon pathology and comorbidities and need to be interpreted as such. FUNDING: none. TRIAL REGISTRATION: According to current Danish law, no formal ethical approval was required for this study. The National Data Protection Agency approved the study (1-16-02-125-19).

Os acetabuli-a new arthroscopic treatment option for the acetabular rim fracture.

Os acetabuli (Os) or acetabular rimfractures are often seen in femoroacetabular impingement patients and can result in groin pain. When seen in symptomatic patients, the question is whether to remove them or to fixate the loose fragment to the acetabular rim. This depends on acetabular coverage and the extent of the Os. If removal of the Os might lead to hip dysplasia and instability, fixation of the Os should be the goal. This technical article describes the author's technique in fixating the Os with a suture-bridge technique.

Clinical outcomes after revision hip arthroscopy in patients with femoroacetabular impingement syndrome (FAIS) are inferior compared to primary procedures. Results from the Danish Hip Arthroscopy Registry (DHAR).

PURPOSE: As many as 10% of primary hip arthroscopies end up with a revision arthroscopy procedure when treating patients suffering from femoroacetabular impingement syndrome (FAIS). In general, revision procedures are indicated because of residual impingement, but only a few studies present outcome data from revision hip arthroscopy after failed FAIS surgical treatment. The purpose of this study was to evaluate clinical outcomes after revision hip arthroscopy in a FAIS cohort and compare outcomes with a primary FAIS hip arthroscopy cohort and describe potential causes of failure after the primary hip arthroscopy. It was hypothesized that subjective outcomes improve after revision hip arthroscopy although outcomes were expected to be inferior to primary hip arthroscopic outcomes. METHODS: Three-hundred and thirty-one arthroscopic revision hip FAIS patients were included from the Danish Hip Arthroscopy Registry (DHAR). Patient-related outcome measures (PROM's), Copenhagen Hip and Groin Outcome Scores (HAGOS), Hip Sports Activity Scale (HSAS), EQ-5D and Numeric Rating Scale (NRS) pain, were assessed in the study cohort prior to the primary procedure and at revision and at follow-up one year after the revision procedure. These data were compared with 4154 primary hip arthroscopic FAIS patients. RESULTS: One-year after revision surgery, mean follow-up (in months ± SD): 12.3 ± 1.6, significant improvements (p < 0.05) in all PROMs was demonstrated, but FAIS patients in the primary hip arthroscopic cohort demonstrated significantly higher outcomes, in all PROMs, when compared at one-year follow-up. Scar tissue, residual osseous impingement and insufficient healing of the labral repair were reported as the main reasons for revision surgery. The conversion to total hip arthroplasty was low (6.4%). CONCLUSION: Revision hip arthroscopy in FAIS patients improves subjective outcomes significantly, although they are poorer than after primary FAIS hip arthroscopy. Main reasons for revision arthroscopy was scar tissue, residual femoroacetabular impingement and insufficient healing of labral repair. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level III.

A roadmap to develop clinical guidelines for open surgery of acute and chronic tears of hip abductor tendons.

PURPOSE: Abductor tendon tears are increasingly recognised as a common cause of lateral hip pain. Surgical treatment of these tears has been recommended, but the indications and types of open surgery have not been precisely elucidated yet. This manuscript aimed to critically review the literature concerning all open treatment options for this condition while identifying knowledge gaps and introducing a treatment algorithm. METHODS: Literature search was conducted, including PubMed, Cochrane library, ScienceDirect and Ovid MEDLINE from 2000 to May 2020. Inclusion criteria were set as: (i) clinical studies reporting outcomes following open surgical treatment of acute or chronic hip abductor tendon tears, (ii) studies reporting an open direct or augmented suturing or muscle transfer procedure, (iii) acute or chronic tears found in native or prosthetic hips. RESULTS: A total of 34 studies published between 2004 and 2020 were included. The vast majority of studies were uncontrolled case series of a single treatment method. A total of 970 patients (76% women) with an age range between 48 and 76 years were involved. Women between 60 and 75 years old were most commonly treated. Preoperative evaluation of patients and reporting of open surgical technique and outcomes are inconsistent. All studies reported variable improvement of pain, functional outcomes and gait of patients. Overall, complication rates ranged from 0 to 31.2%. CONCLUSION: The current literature on this topic is highly heterogeneous, and the overall level of the available evidence is low. A roadmap to develop practical guidelines for open surgery of acute and chronic tears of abductor tendons is provided. The anatomy and chronicity of the lesion, the extent of fatty infiltration and neurologic integrity of hip abductor muscles may influence both treatment choice and outcome. Further high-quality studies with standardisation of preoperative evaluation of patients and reporting of outcomes will help delineate best treatments. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: IV.

External Snapping Hip Syndrome Endoscopic Treatment: "Fan-like" Technique as a Stepwise, Tailor-made Solution.

Classically, external snapping hip syndrome (ESHS) is considered to be caused by friction of a tight iliotibial band (ITB) over the greater trochanter (GT), which leads to pain, inflammation, and palpable or audible snapping. Surgical treatment remains a gold standard in patients resistant to conservative measures. Many surgical procedures addressing ESHS exist in the literature, but the vast majority of them involve only plasties of the ITB. However, observations led us to the conclusion that friction of the ITB over the GT may not be the only cause of ESHS and other structures like gluteal fascias or an anterior scarred part of gluteus maximus may be involved. The aim of this article is to provide a detailed description and video demonstration of an endoscopic surgical procedure using a "fan-like" cut to treat the ESHS. Its greatest advantage is the ability to gradually increase the extent of surgery based on intraoperative observations. It turns the procedure into a tailor-made surgery, which offers good and reproducible results.

The Danish Hip Arthroscopy Registry: Registration Completeness and Patient Characteristics Between Responders and Non-Responders.

PURPOSE: To report completeness of registered surgeries in the Danish hip arthroscopy registry (DHAR) and proportion of patients completing patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) prior to surgery and at 1-year follow-up. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Completeness was determined as the number of surgeries registered in DHAR in comparison with the number of surgeries registered in the Danish National Patient Registry database (DNPR). The number of patients self-reporting pre-surgical PROMs was compared to the total number of surgeries registered in DHAR. Further, we evaluated potential differences in baseline characteristics between the groups of responders and non-responders at 1-year follow-up. Patient characteristics included age, sex, activity levels measured by the hip sports activity scale (HSAS), and PROMs (Copenhagen Hip and Groin Outcome Score, EQ-5D-3L and general hip status). Age was stratified in three groups (<25, 25-39, ≥40). RESULTS: From February 2012 to September 2018, 5565 arthroscopic hip surgeries were registered in DNPR, and 4937 were registered in DHAR (89%). The yearly rate of registrations in DHAR compared to DNPR increased from 77% in 2012 to 85% in 2018 and peaking in 2015 at 94%. A total of 3294 DHAR-registered patients (67%) had self-reported their pre-surgical outcome scores, and of those, 2886 (58%) completed PROMs at 1-year follow-up. More males (45 vs 41%, p = 0.002) and individuals younger than 25 years of age (24% vs 18%, p<0.001) had not completed follow-up questionnaire. The PROM baseline scores of the responders at follow-up did not differ from the non-responders. CONCLUSION: The proportion of arthroscopic hip surgeries registered in the Danish Hip Arthroscopy Registry and the proportion of self-reporting PROM scores have increased to acceptable levels, whereas the proportion of patients with follow-up data is comparably low. For further quality improvement, more attention should be given to patients completing PROMs, focusing on younger males and follow-up PROMs.

An Updated Description of More Than 5,000 Procedures from the Danish Hip Arthroscopy Registry.

BACKGROUND: The Danish Hip Arthroscopy Registry (DHAR) started as a web-based prospective registry in 2012. The aim of this study was to evaluate and report epidemiologic and perioperative data from 5,333 procedures and to describe the development of the DHAR. METHODS: The DHAR collects data from patients prospectively at the time of inclusion (preoperative evaluation) and at 1, 2, 5, and 10 years after arthroscopic hip surgery. The surgeon reports surgical data at the time of surgery. The DHAR uses a number of validated patient-related outcome measures (PROMs): the Copenhagen Hip and Groin Outcome Score (HAGOS), Hip Sports Activity Scale (HSAS), EuroQol 5 Dimensions (EQ-5D), and a numeric rating scale for pain (NRS pain). RESULTS: Of the 5,333 procedures, 58% were done in female patients. The mean age was 37.7 years. The mean duration of surgery was 78 minutes, and the mean duration of traction was 45 minutes. Combined cam and pincer resections were performed in 64% of the patients, and labral repair was done in 82%. The most common type of acetabular chondral damage found was Beck grade-2 lesions (43%). Grade-3 and 4 changes were seen in 29% and 11% of the patients, respectively. The 1-year HAGOS PROM values increased to a median of 69.1 (interquartile range [IQR], 68.2 to 70.0) for pain, 64.9 (IQR, 64.0 to 65.7) for symptoms, 71.3 (IQR, 70.3 to 72.3) for activities of daily living, 56.2 (IQR, 55.1 to 57.4) for sports, 42.2 (IQR, 40.8 to 43.5) for physical activity, and 50.7 (IQR, 49.7 to 51.8) for quality of life, and the 1-year EQ-5D increased to a median of 0.75 (IQR, 0.74 to 0.76). Five-year outcomes for 383 patients showed a significant increase in all PROMs (p < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Patients referred for hip arthroscopy reported pain, functional disabilities, and a decreased activity level and quality of life prior to surgery but demonstrated improvements after 1 and 5 years. The problems with developing and maintaining a large clinical registry are described. The development of a national clinical registry for hip arthroscopy was considered successful. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Therapeutic Level IV. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

[Younger patients with hip joint pain].

This review summarises the present knowledge of diagnosing and treating hip joint pain. The results of joint preserving surgery are good in symptomatic patients with hip dysplasia, acetabular retroversion or impingement (cam or pincer) without signs of osteoarthritis. Confirmation of intraarticular pathology as the cause of symptoms is established clinically, and the pathology can in many cases be visualised by a standing, standardised radiograph of the pelvis, which is the basis for admission to the relevant orthopaedic department. We present an algorithm for this. Dysplasia and retroversion can be treated by periacetabular osteotomy and impingement by arthroscopic procedures.

[Abductor-related lateral hip pain in patients older than 30 years].

Lateral hip pain is a complex entity, and recent focus has been brought to pathological changes in relation to the hip abductors as a cause of lateral hip pain. A short overview of anatomy, physiology, diagnostics and treatments of hip abductor pathologies is given in this review.

Despite patient-reported outcomes improve, patients with femoroacetabular impingement syndrome do not increase their objectively measured sport and physical activity level 1 year after hip arthroscopic surgery. Results from the HAFAI cohort.

PURPOSE: Patients with femoroacetabular impingement syndrome (FAIS) are young and middle-aged persons living physically active lives including sports activities. However, measurements of the physical activity level before and after hip arthroscopic surgery in patients with FAIS using both self-reported and objective accelerometer-based measures are lacking. Furthermore, comparing patients with a reference group of persons reporting no hip problems and conducting subgroup analyses investigating changes in physical activity level and self-reported outcomes according to pre-surgery activity level may further highlight the activity pattern for patients. METHODS: Sixty patients with FAIS eligible for hip arthroscopic surgery were consecutively included in a prospective cohort study (HAFAI cohort) together with 30 reference persons reporting no hip problems. Participants completed the Copenhagen Hip and Groin Outcome Score (HAGOS) together with questions regarding their sports activities. Furthermore, participants wore a three-axial accelerometer for five consecutive days during waking hours. The accelerometer-based data were analysed and presented as total activity and type, frequency and duration of activities. RESULTS: Patients experienced significant and clinically relevant changes in all HAGOS scores. 88% of patients participated in some kind of sports activity 1 year after surgery. Overall, objectively measured physical activity did not change from before to 1 year after surgery. However, subgroup analyses of the most sedentary patients preoperatively revealed significant changes towards a more active pattern. Compared to reference persons, patients performed less bicycling and running. CONCLUSION: Despite clinically relevant changes in self-reported outcomes, patients did not increase their overall physical activity level 1 year after surgery. Physical activity levels were lower in patients than in the reference group and patients continued bicycling and running less compared with the reference group. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: II.

High relative reliability and responsiveness of the forgotten joint score-12 in patients with femoroacetabular impingement undergoing hip arthroscopic treatment. A prospective survey-based study.

The forgotten joint score-12 (FJS-12) may be an advantageous questionnaire in young patients with high hip function and a low level of pain. We investigated the reliability and the responsiveness of the FJS-12 in patients with femoroacetabular impingement undergoing hip arthroscopic treatment. Fifty patients were included in the reliability study and 34 patients were included in the responsiveness study. Test-retest reliability was assessed with intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC), standard error of measurement (SEM) and minimal detectable change (MDC). Responsiveness was assessed from testing correlations between the FJS-12 and the Copenhagen Hip and Groin Outcome Score (HAGOS) of the change score, effect size (ES) and standardized response mean (SRM). Floor and ceiling effect were defined as present if the number of patients obtaining the maximum (100) and minimum score (0) exceeded 15%. The relative reliability was high (ICC = 0.9, 95% CI: 0.8-0.9) and the absolute reliability was low (SEM = 11, MDCindividual = 32, MDCgroup = 4.5). The responsiveness was high, and the change score was highly correlated with the subscale 'pain' from the HAGOS and moderately correlated with the subscale 'ADL'. Furthermore, the FJS-12 exceeded or equalled the HAGOS subscales in ES and SRM. Below 15% of the patients scored the maximum or minimum score. The FJS-12 has high reliability, high responsiveness to change and shows no floor or ceiling effect.

Demographic and Radiographic Factors Associated With Intra-articular Hip Cartilage Injury: A Cross-sectional Study of 1511 Hip Arthroscopy Procedures.

BACKGROUND: Moderate to severe (grade 3-4) hip joint cartilage injury seems to impair function in patients with femoroacetabular impingement syndrome. PURPOSE: To investigate whether demographic and radiographic factors were associated with moderate to severe hip joint cartilage injury. STUDY DESIGN: Cross-sectional study; Level of evidence, 3. METHODS: Patients were identified in the Danish Hip Arthroscopy Registry. The outcome variables were acetabular cartilage injury (modified Beck grade 0-2 vs 3-4) and femoral head cartilage injury (International Cartilage Repair Society grade 0-2 vs 3-4). Logistic regressions assessed the association with the following: age (<30 vs 30-50 years); sex; sport activity level (Hip Sports Activity Scale); alpha angle (AA) assessed as normal (AA <55°), cam (55°≤ AA <78°), or severe cam (AA ≥78°); lateral center-edge angle (LCEA) assessed as normal (25°≤ LCEA ≤ 39°), pincer (LCEA >39°), or borderline dysplasia (LCEA <25°); joint space width (JSW) assessed as normal (JSW >4.0 mm), mild reduction (3.1 mm ≤ JSW ≤ 4.0 mm), or severe reduction (2.1 mm ≤ JSW ≤ 3.0 mm). RESULTS: A total of 1511 patients were included (mean ± SD age: 34.9 ± 9.8 years). Male sex (odds ratio [OR], 4.42), higher age (OR, 1.70), increased AA (cam: OR, 2.23; severe cam: OR, 4.82), and reduced JSW (mild: OR, 2.04; severe: OR, 3.19) were associated (P < .05) with Beck grade 3-4. Higher age (OR, 1.92), increased Hip Sports Activity Scale (OR, 1.13), borderline dysplasia (OR, 3.08), and reduced JSW (mild: OR, 2.63; severe: OR, 3.04) were associated (P < .05) with International Cartilage Repair Society grade 3-4. CONCLUSION: Several demographic and radiographic factors were associated with moderate to severe hip joint cartilage injury. Most notably, increased cam severity and borderline dysplasia substantially increased the risk of grade 3-4 acetabular and femoral head cartilage injury, respectively, indicating that specific deformity may drive specific cartilage injury patterns in the hip joint.

[Femoroacetabular impingement syndrome].

Femoroacetabular impingement syndrome (FAIS) is defined as a motion-related disorder of the hip joint, consisting of a triad of symptoms, clinical findings, and imaging findings. Hip morphology related to FAIS is developed during skeletal growth and seems to be related to sports participation. Treatment for FAIS may include physiotherapy and/or surgery, but recent evidence suggests, that surgery is more effective in improving symptoms. No literature exists on the prevention of FAIS, and prophylactic surgery is not recommended.