Sleep quality, anxiety and depression in advanced lung cancer: patients and caregivers.

OBJECTIVE: To investigate the clinical implications of sleep quality, anxiety and depression in patients with advanced lung cancer (LC) and their family caregivers (FCs). METHODS: A total of 98 patients with advanced LC and their FCs (n=98) were recruited from the Oncology Department in Nanfang Hospital. The Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index (PSQI), consisting of seven components that evaluate subjective sleep quality, sleep latency, duration of sleep, sleep efficiency, sleep disturbances, sleep medication usage and daytime dysfunction, was used to assess sleep quality. Using the tool of Zung Self-rating Anxiety Scale (SAS) and Zung Self-rating Depression Scale (SDS), we tested the patients' status of anxiety and depression, respectively. RESULTS: The prevalences of poor sleep quality, anxiety and depression in patients were 56.1%, 48.9% and 56.1%, respectively, while those in FCs were 16.3%, 32.6% and 25.5%, respectively. Patients had higher PSQI, SAS and SDS scores than did FCs (p<0.05). Significant correlations were found between the patients' and FCs' scores of PSQI/SAS/SDS (p<0.05). Multivariate Cox regression analyses indicated that sleep disturbances in patients (HR 0.413, 95% CI 0.21 to 0.80, p=0.01) and the global PSQI score of FCs (HR 0.31, 95% CI 0.14 to 0.71, p=0.00) were independent risk factors for patients' first-line progression-free survival (PFS). Moreover, patients' sleep latency (HR 2.329, 95% CI 1.36 to 3.96, p=0.00) and epidermal growth factor receptor mutations (HR 1.953, 95% CI 1.12 to 3.38, p=0.01) were significant prognostic factors for their overall survival (OS). CONCLUSIONS: We demonstrated that presence of sleep disturbances in patients with advanced LC and the global PSQI Score of their FCs may be risk predictors for patients' poor first-line PFS. Patients' sleep latency was a potential risk factor for their OS.

Prognostic Implications of Tripartite Motif Containing 24 Expression Levels in Patients with Solid Tumors: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Objective: To systematically investigate the prognostic implications of tripartite motif containing 24 (Trim 24) expression levels in Patients with solid tumors. Materials and Methods: Pubmed, Embase, China National Knowledge Infrastructure, and Wanfang databases were searched through December 2017 to identify studies examining the relationship between Trim 24 expression levels and outcomes in solid tumor patients. The hazard ratios (HRs) with corresponding 95% confidence intervals were used to evaluate the association between Trim 24 and overall survival (OS). Results: Ten studies with 1370 patients were included. The overall pooled prevalence for Trim 24 overexpression was 59.0% (p < 0.01). Moreover, the pooled HR of Trim 24 for OS was 0.43 (p = 0.04) by univariate analysis in 10 articles (1370) and 0.62 (p = 0.08) by multivariate analysis in 5 studies (845). Trim 24 over-expression was associated with tumor invasiveness (odds ratio [OR] = 2.05, p < 0.01) and tumor-node-metastasis stage (OR = 2.42, p = 0.03). Conclusions: This study demonstrated that Trim 24 expression levels may be a useful prognostic biomarker in patients with solid tumors.