Image quality evaluation of a new high-performance ring-gantry cone-beam computed tomography imager.

Objective. Newer cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) imaging systems offer reconstruction algorithms including metal artifact reduction (MAR) and extended field-of-view (eFoV) techniques to improve image quality. In this study a new CBCT imager, the new Varian HyperSight CBCT, is compared to fan-beam CT and two CBCT imagers installed in a ring-gantry and C-arm linear accelerator, respectively.Approach. The image quality was assessed for HyperSight CBCT which uses new hardware, including a large-size flat panel detector, and improved image reconstruction algorithms. The decrease of metal artifacts was quantified (structural similarity index measure (SSIM) and root-mean-squared error (RMSE)) when applying MAR reconstruction and iterative reconstruction for a dental and spine region using a head-and-neck phantom. The geometry and CT number accuracy of the eFoV reconstruction was evaluated outside the standard field-of-view (sFoV) on a large 3D-printed chest phantom. Phantom size dependency of CT numbers was evaluated on three cylindrical phantoms of increasing diameter. Signal-to-noise and contrast-to-noise were quantified on an abdominal phantom.Main results. In phantoms with streak artifacts, MAR showed comparable results for HyperSight CBCT and CT, with MAR increasing the SSIM (0.97-0.99) and decreasing the RMSE (62-55 HU) compared to iterative reconstruction without MAR. In addition, HyperSight CBCT showed better geometrical accuracy in the eFoV than CT (Jaccard Conformity Index increase of 0.02-0.03). However, the CT number accuracy outside the sFoV was lower than for CT. The maximum CT number variation between different phantom sizes was lower for the HyperSight CBCT imager (∼100 HU) compared to the two other CBCT imagers (∼200 HU), but not fully comparable to CT (∼50 HU).Significance. This study demonstrated the imaging performance of the new HyperSight CBCT imager and the potential of applying this CBCT system in more advanced scenarios by comparing the quality against fan-beam CT.

Evaluation of a cone-beam computed tomography system calibrated for accurate radiotherapy dose calculation.

Background and purpose: Dose calculation on cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) images has been less accurate than on computed tomography (CT) images due to lower image quality and discrepancies in CT numbers for CBCT. As increasing interest arises in offline and online re-planning, dose calculation accuracy was evaluated for a novel CBCT imager integrated into a ring gantry treatment machine. Materials and methods: The new CBCT system allowed fast image acquisition (5.9 s) by using new hardware, including a large-size flat panel detector, and incorporated image-processing algorithms with iterative reconstruction techniques, leading to accurate CT numbers allowing dose calculation. In this study, CBCT- and CT-based dose calculations were compared based on three anthropomorphic phantoms, after CBCT-to-mass-density calibration was performed. Six plans were created on the CT scans covering various target locations and complexities, followed by CBCT to CT registrations, copying of contours, and re-calculation of the plans on the CBCT scans. Dose-volume histogram metrics for target volumes and organs-at-risk (OARs) were evaluated, and global gamma analyses were performed. Results: Target coverage differences were consistently below 1.2 %, demonstrating the agreement between CT and re-calculated CBCT dose distributions. Differences in Dmean for OARs were below 0.5 Gy for all plans, except for three OARs, which were below 0.8 Gy (<1.1 %). All plans had a 3 %/1mm gamma pass rate > 97 %. Conclusions: This study demonstrated comparable results between dose calculations performed on CBCT and CT acquisitions. The new CBCT system with enhanced image quality and CT number accuracy opens possibilities for off-line and on-line re-planning.

Optimized automated cardiac MR scar quantification with GAN-based data augmentation.

BACKGROUND: The clinical utility of late gadolinium enhancement (LGE) cardiac MRI is limited by the lack of standardization, and time-consuming postprocessing. In this work, we tested the hypothesis that a cascaded deep learning pipeline trained with augmentation by synthetically generated data would improve model accuracy and robustness for automated scar quantification. METHODS: A cascaded pipeline consisting of three consecutive neural networks is proposed, starting with a bounding box regression network to identify a region of interest around the left ventricular (LV) myocardium. Two further nnU-Net models are then used to segment the myocardium and, if present, scar. The models were trained on the data from the EMIDEC challenge, supplemented with an extensive synthetic dataset generated with a conditional GAN. RESULTS: The cascaded pipeline significantly outperformed a single nnU-Net directly segmenting both the myocardium (mean Dice similarity coefficient (DSC) (standard deviation (SD)): 0.84 (0.09) vs 0.63 (0.20), p < 0.01) and scar (DSC: 0.72 (0.34) vs 0.46 (0.39), p < 0.01) on a per-slice level. The inclusion of the synthetic data as data augmentation during training improved the scar segmentation DSC by 0.06 (p < 0.01). The mean DSC per-subject on the challenge test set, for the cascaded pipeline augmented by synthetic generated data, was 0.86 (0.03) and 0.67 (0.29) for myocardium and scar, respectively. CONCLUSION: A cascaded deep learning-based pipeline trained with augmentation by synthetically generated data leads to myocardium and scar segmentations that are similar to the manual operator, and outperforms direct segmentation without the synthetic images.