A mixed methods process evaluation: understanding the implementation and delivery of HIV prevention services integrated within sexual reproductive health (SRH) with or without peer support amongst adolescents and young adults in rural KwaZulu-Natal, South Africa.

BACKGROUND: Combination prevention interventions, when integrated with community-based support, have been shown to be particularly beneficial to adolescent and young peoples' sexual and reproductive health. Between 2020 and 2022, the Africa Health Research Institute in rural South Africa conducted a 2 × 2 randomised factorial trial among young people aged 16-29 years old (Isisekelo Sempilo) to evaluate whether integrated HIV and sexual and reproductive health (HIV/SRH) with or without peer support will optimise delivery of HIV prevention and care. Using mixed methods, we conducted a process evaluation to provide insights to and describe the implementation of a community-based peer-led HIV care and prevention intervention targeting adolescents and young people. METHODS: The process evaluation was conducted in accordance with the Medical Research Council guidelines using quantitative and qualitative approaches. Self-completed surveys and clinic and programmatic data were used to quantify the uptake of each component of the intervention and to understand intervention fidelity and reach. In-depth individual interviews were used to understand intervention experiences. Baseline sociodemographic factors were summarised for each trial arm, and proportions of participants who accepted and actively engaged in various components of the intervention as well as those who successfully linked to care were calculated. Qualitative data were thematically analysed. RESULTS: The intervention was feasible and acceptable to young people and intervention implementing teams. In particular, the STI testing and SRH components of the intervention were popular. The main challenges with the peer support implementation were due to fidelity, mainly because of the COVID-19 pandemic. The study found that it was important to incorporate familial support into interventions for young people's sexual health. Moreover, it was found that psychological and social support was an essential component to combination HIV prevention packages for young people. CONCLUSION: The results demonstrated that peer-led community-based care that integrates SRH services with HIV is a versatile model to decentralise health and social care. The family could be a platform to target restrictive gender and sexual norms, by challenging not only attitudes and behaviours related to gender among young people but also the gendered structures that surround them.

Effectiveness of integrating HIV prevention within sexual reproductive health services with or without peer support among adolescents and young adults in rural KwaZulu-Natal, South Africa (Isisekelo Sempilo): 2 × 2 factorial, open-label, randomised controlled trial.

BACKGROUND: Approximately 200 000 South Africans acquired HIV in 2021 despite the availability of universal HIV test and treat and pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP). The aim of this study was to test the effectiveness of sexual and reproductive health services or peer support, or both, on the uptake of serostatus neutral HIV services or reduction of sexually transmissible HIV. METHODS: We did an open-label, 2 × 2 randomised factorial trial among young people in a mostly rural area of KwaZulu-Natal, South Africa. Inclusion criteria included being aged 16-29 years, living in the mapped geographical areas that were accessible to the area-based peer navigators, being willing and able to provide informed consent, and being willing to provide a dried blood spot for anonymous HIV testing and HIV viral load measurement at 12 months. Participants were randomly allocated by computer-generated algorithm to one of four groups: those in the standard-of-care group were referred to youth-friendly services for differentiated HIV prevention (condoms, universal HIV test and treat with antiretroviral therapy, and PrEP if eligible); those in the sexual and reproductive health services group received baseline self-collected specimens for sexually transmitted infection (STI) testing and referral to integrated sexual and reproductive health and HIV prevention services; those in the peer support group were referred to peer navigators for health promotion, condom provision, and facilitation of attendance for differentiated HIV prevention services; and those in the final group received a combination of sexual and reproductive health services and peer support. Coprimary outcomes were linkage to clinical services within 60 days of enrolment, proportion of participants who had sexually transmissible HIV at 12 months after enrolment, and proportion of sampled individuals who consented to participation and gave a dried blood spot for HIV testing at 12 months. Logistic regression was used for analyses, and adjusted for age, sex, and rural or peri-urban area of residence. This study is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT04532307) and is closed. FINDINGS: Between March 2, 2020, and July 7, 2022, 1743 (75·7%) of 2301 eligible individuals were enrolled and followed up. 12-month dried blood spots were collected from 1168 participants (67·0%). The median age of the participants was 21 years (IQR 18-25), 51·4% were female, and 51·1% had secondary level education. Baseline characteristics and 12-month outcome ascertainment were similar between groups. 755 (43·3%) linked to services by 60 days. 430 (49·8%) of 863 who were in the sexual reproductive health services group were linked to care compared with 325 (36·9%) of 880 who were not in the sexual and reproductive health services group (adjusted odds ratio [aOR] 1·68; 95% CI 1·39-2·04); peer support had no effect: 385 (43·5%) of 858 compared with 370 (43·1%) of 885 (1·02, 0·84-1·23). At 12 months, 227 (19%) tested ELISA-positive for HIV, of whom 41 (18%) had viral loads of 400 copies per mL; overall prevalence of transmissible HIV was 3·5%. 22 (3·7%) of 578 participants in the sexual and reproductive health services group had transmissible HIV compared with 19 (3·3%) of 590 not in the sexual and reproductive health services group (aOR 1·12; 95% CI 0·60-2·11). The findings were also non-significant for peer support: 21 (3·3%) of 565 compared with 20 (3·3%) of 603 (aOR 1·03; 95% CI 0·55-1·94). There were no serious adverse events or deaths during the study. INTERPRETATION: This study provides evidence that STI testing and sexual and reproductive health services create demand for serostatus neutral HIV prevention in adolescents and young adults in Africa. STI testing and integration of HIV and sexual health has the potential to reach those at risk and tackle unmet sexual health needs. FUNDING: US National Institute of Health, Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation, and 3ie.

Adaptation and pre-test of a shortened Stepping Stones and Creating Futures intervention focused on HIV for young men in rural South Africa.

Men's engagement in HIV prevention and treatment is suboptimal, including in South Africa. We sought to address this through adapting an evidence-based intervention, Stepping Stones and Creating Futures (SSCF), to strengthen its HIV content and provide a more scalable (shorter) intervention in rural South Africa. We then conducted a mixed methods pre-test of the intervention among young men aged 18-35 years. To adapt SSCF, we reviewed the current evidence base and worked with male Peer Navigators to update the SSCF theory of change (ToC) and manual. The revised intervention was ~45 hours (9 sessions) as opposed to ~63 hours and included a greater focus on HIV prevention and treatment technologies. Overall, 64% (n = 60) of men approached agreed to participate in the intervention, uptake (attending one session) among those who agreed was n = 35(58%) and retention (attending 6 or more sessions) was n = 25(71%). Qualitative data emphasized the intervention was acceptable, with young men describing it as something they liked. The qualitative data also broadly supported the intervention ToC, including the normalization of HIV in men's lives, and the importance of health for men in achieving their life goals. However, it also highlighted the need to focus more on HIV-related stigma and fear, and the importance of HIV self-testing kits in encouraging testing. We revised the ToC and manual in light of this data. The adapted SSCF is acceptable and supports the ToC. Next steps is an evaluation to look at effectiveness of the intervention.

Participant recall and understandings of information on biobanking and future genomic research: experiences from a multi-disease community-based health screening and biobank platform in rural South Africa.

BACKGROUND: Limited research has been conducted on explanations and understandings of biobanking for future genomic research in African contexts with low literacy and limited healthcare access. We report on the findings of a sub-study on participant understanding embedded in a multi-disease community health screening and biobank platform study known as 'Vukuzazi' in rural KwaZulu-Natal, South Africa. METHODS: Semi-structured interviews were conducted with research participants who had been invited to take part in the Vukuzazi study, including both participants and non-participants, and research staff that worked on the study. The interviews were transcribed, and themes were identified from the interview transcripts, manually coded, and thematically analysed. RESULTS: Thirty-nine individuals were interviewed. We found that the research team explained biobanking and future genomic research by describing how hereditary characteristics create similarities among individuals. However, recollection and understanding of this explanation seven months after participation was variable. The large volume of information about the Vukuzazi study objectives and procedures presented a challenge to participant recall. By the time of interviews, some participants recalled rudimentary facts about the genetic aspects of the study, but many expressed little to no interest in genetics and biobanking. CONCLUSION: Participant's understanding of information related to genetics and biobanking provided during the consent process is affected by the volume of information as well as participant's interest (or lack thereof) in the subject matter being discussed. We recommend that future studies undertaking biobanking and genomic research treat explanations of this kind of research to participants as an on-going process of communication between researchers, participants and the community and that explanatory imagery and video graphic storytelling should be incorporated into theses explanations as these have previously been found to facilitate understanding among those with low literacy levels. Studies should also avoid having broader research objectives as this can divert participant's interest and therefore understanding of why their samples are being collected.

Process evaluation of peer-to-peer delivery of HIV self-testing and sexual health information to support HIV prevention among youth in rural KwaZulu-Natal, South Africa: qualitative analysis.

OBJECTIVE: Peer-to-peer (PTP) HIV self-testing (HIVST) distribution models can increase uptake of HIV testing and potentially create demand for HIV treatment and pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP). We describe the acceptability and experiences of young women and men participating in a cluster randomised trial of PTP HIVST distribution and antiretroviral/PrEP promotion in rural KwaZulu-Natal. METHODS: Between March and September 2019, 24 pairs of trained peer navigators were randomised to two approaches to distribute HIVST packs (kits+HIV prevention information): incentivised-peer-networks where peer-age friends distributed packs within their social network for a small incentive, or direct distribution where peer navigators distributed HIVST packs directly. Standard-of-care peer navigators distributed information without HIVST kits. For the process evaluation, we conducted semi-structured interviews with purposively sampled young women (n=30) and men (n=15) aged 18-29 years from all arms. Qualitative data were transcribed, translated, coded manually and thematically analysed using an interpretivist approach. RESULTS: Overall, PTP approaches were acceptable and valued by young people. Participants were comfortable sharing sexual health issues they would not share with adults. Coupled with HIVST, peer (friends) support facilitated HIV testing and solidarity for HIV status disclosure and treatment. However, some young people showed limited interest in other sexual health information provided. Some young people were wary of receiving health information from friends perceived as non-professionals while others avoided sharing personal issues with peer navigators from their community. Referral slips and youth-friendly clinics were facilitators to PrEP uptake. Family disapproval, limited information, daily pills and perceived risks were major barriers to PrEP uptake. CONCLUSION: Both professional (peer navigators) and social network (friends) approaches were acceptable methods to receive HIVST and sexual health information. Doubts about the professionalism of friends and overly exclusive focus on HIVST information materials may in part explain why HIVST kits, without peer navigators support, did not create demand for PrEP.

Opportunities for technologically driven dialogical health communication for participatory interventions: Perspectives from male peer navigators in rural South Africa.

There is increasing interest in the potential to deliver participatory dialogical HIV and intimate partner violence (IPV) prevention interventions via digital platforms, though the majority of mHealth interventions have been didactic in approach. We undertook 10 in-depth interviews with male Peer Navigators (PNs) who had been extensively trained and working on a larger intervention promoting young people's sexual and reproductive rights, in rural KwaZulu-Natal. Interviews focused on their, and their peers', use of technology in their everyday lives. Data were transcribed and translated, and subjected to thematic analysis. PNs described structural barriers to the use of technology, including poor connectivity, high data costs, and erratic electricity. They primarily used Facebook and WhatsApp for communication and highlighted how reading messages asynchronously was important to overcome connectivity challenges. PNs shared how groups were primarily for information sharing, they also discussed 'sensitive' issues online. Privacy was a concern, especially for conversations, and there was recognition of how confidentiality could be breached. It was also felt that WhatsApp could potentially support greater openness in discussions. We reflect on the potential for online interventions to support dialogical health communication, highlighting how dialogical health communication may be enabled through information provision, the asynchronous communication enhancing the potential for reflection, and greater participation in discussion by those who are shyer. Despite this potential there remain important risks around privacy of discussions and how to implement these approaches online.

Participant understanding of informed consent in a multidisease community-based health screening and biobank platform in rural South Africa.

BACKGROUND: In low- and middle-income settings, obtaining informed consent for biobanking may be complicated by socio-economic vulnerability and context-specific power dynamics. We explored participants experiences and perceptions of the research objectives in a community-based multidisease screening and biospecimen collection platform in rural KwaZulu-Natal, South Africa. METHODS: We undertook semi-structured in-depth interviews to assess participant understanding of the informed consent, research objectives and motivation for participation. RESULTS: Thirty-nine people participated (individuals who participated in screening/biospecimen collection and those who did not and members of the research team). Some participants said they understood the information shared with them. Some said they participated due to the perceived benefits of the reimbursement and convenience of free healthcare. Most who did not participate said it was due to logistical rather than ethical concerns. None of the participants recalled aspects of biobanking and genetics from the consent process. CONCLUSIONS: Although most people understood the study objectives, we observed challenges to identifying language appropriate to explain biobanking and genetic testing to our target population. Engagement with communities to adopt contextually relevant terminologies that participants can understand is crucial. Researchers need to be mindful of the impact of communities' socio-economic status and how compensation can be potentially coercive.