Diagnostic workup for esophageal cancer patients can be improved with checklists and clearer protocols; a comparative study between two tertiary centers in Europe.

BACKGROUND: Rapid and complete workup of newly diagnosed esophageal cancer is vital for a timely, individual and high-quality treatment strategy. The aim of this study was to uncover potential delay, inefficiencies and non-contributing investigations in the diagnostic process in two tertiary referral centers. METHODS: This retrospective cohort study included all newly diagnosed esophageal cancer patients referred to or diagnosed in the Amsterdam UMC and Karolinska University Hospital between July 2020 and July 2021. Radiology, pathological assessment and multidisciplinary team meeting reports were reviewed. To assess time interval from diagnosis to treatment, dates of diagnosis, admittance to referral hospital, MDT meeting and start of treatment were collected. RESULTS: In total, 252 esophageal cancer patients were included, 187 were treated with curative intent. Curatively treated patients had a mean age of 66 years, were predominantly male (74.9 %) with an adenocarcinoma (71.1 %). Curatively treated patients had a median time from diagnosis to referral of seven days (IQR:0-11) and of 35 days (IQR:28-45) between diagnosis and start of treatment. Main reasons for the significant (P < 0.001) differences in time between diagnosis and treatment between centers, Amsterdam UMC (39 days) vs Karolinska (27 days), were need for additional diagnostics (47.8 %) and differences in referral routine. Gastroscopy was repeated in 32.2 % of patients, mainly for further anatomical mapping. CONCLUSION: Significant time differences between centers in the path from diagnosis to start treatment can be explained by differences in workup approach, referral routines and MDT meeting regulations. Repeat of gastroscopy can be prevented with clearer endoscopy guidelines.

ERAS guidelines-driven upper gastrointestinal contrast study after esophagectomy can detect delayed gastric conduit emptying and improve outcomes.

BACKGROUND: Delayed gastric conduit emptying can occur after esophagectomy and has been shown to be associated with increased risk for postoperative complications. Application of a standardized clinical protocol after esophagectomy including an upper gastrointestinal contrast study has the potential to improve postoperative outcomes. METHODS: Prospective cohort including all patients operated with esophagectomy at two high-volume centers for esophageal surgery. The standardized clinical protocol included an upper gastrointestinal contrast study on day 2 or 3 after surgery. All images were compiled and evaluated for the purpose of the study. Clinical data was collected in IRB approved institutional databases at the participating centers. RESULTS: The study included 119 patients treated with esophagectomy of whom 112 (94.1%) completed an upper gastrointestinal contrast study. The results showed that 8 (7.1%) patients had radiological delayed gastric conduit emptying defined as no emptying of contrast through the pylorus. Partial conduit emptying was seen in 34 (30.4%) patients, and 70 (62.5%) patients had complete conduit emptying. Complete or partial emptying was associated with significantly earlier nasogastric tube removal (3 vs. 6 days) and hospital discharge 8 vs. 17 days, P < 0.001). Radiological signs of delayed gastric conduit emptying were shown to be associated with increased risk of postoperative complications. There was, however, no association with severe postoperative complications according to Clavien-Dindo score, pulmonary complications, anastomotic leak or need for intensive care. CONCLUSION: The results of the study demonstrate that postoperative upper gastrointestinal contrast studies can be used to assess the level of emptying of the gastric conduit after esophagectomy. Application of upper gastrointestinal contrast study in the ERAS guidelines-driven standardized clinical pathway after esophagectomy has the potential to improve postoperative outcomes.

Review article: the role of gastrointestinal hormones in the treatment of delayed gastric emptying in critically ill patients.

BACKGROUND: Delayed gastric emptying limits the administration of enteral nutrition, leading to malnutrition, which is associated with higher mortality and morbidity. Currently available prokinetics have limitations in terms of sustained efficacy and side effects. AIM: To summarise the mechanisms of action and to discuss the possible utility of gastrointestinal hormones to prevent or treat delayed gastric emptying in critically ill patients. METHODS: We searched PubMed for articles discussing 'delayed gastric emptying', 'enteral nutrition', 'treatment', 'gastrointestinal hormones', 'prokinetic', 'agonist', 'antagonist' and 'critically ill patients'. RESULTS: Motilin and ghrelin receptor agonists initiate the migrating motor complex in the stomach, which accelerates gastric emptying. Cholecystokinin, glucagon-like peptide-1 and peptide YY have an inhibiting effect on gastric emptying; therefore, antagonising these gastrointestinal hormones may have therapeutic potential. Other gastrointestinal hormones appear less promising. CONCLUSIONS: Manipulation of endogenous secretion, physiological replacement and administration of gastrointestinal hormones in pharmacological doses is likely to have therapeutic potential in the treatment of delayed gastric emptying. Future challenges in this field will include the search for candidates with improved selectivity and favourable kinetic properties.

The role of a disturbed arginine/NO metabolism in the onset of cancer cachexia: a working hypothesis.

Cancer cachexia is a complex catabolic state in patients with a malignancy, associated with increased morbidity and mortality. This syndrome is characterized by a redistribution of the body's protein content and a subsequent muscle wasting. The aetiology of this syndrome seems multifactorial, but remains unclear. It is suggested that this catabolic state occurs in response to the alterations in immune interactions between tumor and host. The amino acid arginine and its derivate nitric oxide (NO) play various roles in anti-tumor immune response and the body's homeostasis. Glutamine is the precursor for arginine de novo synthesis and the most abundant amino acid in the body, mainly stored in skeletal muscle. Tumors develop a protection mechanism against the specific anti-tumor attack of the immune system by recruiting myeloid derived suppressor cells (MDSC). The MDSC deplete arginine levels and disturb NO production. We here hypothesize that the perturbation of the arginine/NO metabolism plays a significant role in the aetiology of cancer cachexia. Arginine/ NO metabolism is disturbed in patients with cancer. The body will try to correct this perturbation by mobilizing arginine and glutamine from muscles. The decreased arginine levels and the disturbed NO production activate several cascades, which in turn inhibit protein synthesis and promote proteolysis, leading to cachexia. Cachexia remains one of the most frequent and damaging opportunistic syndromes in cancer patients. In this review we will elaborate on a new hypothesised concept and the underlying mechanisms of this syndrome. New studies are essential to ground this hypothesis and to develop interventions to break through the pathological mechanisms underlying cachexia.