Fusion rate of 89% after knee arthrodesis using an intramedullary nail: a mono-centric retrospective review of 48 cases.

PURPOSE: Knee arthrodesis is an established procedure for limb salvage in cases of recurrent infection, total knee arthroplasty soft tissue defect, poor bone stock or a deficient extensor mechanism. Surgical options include compression plate, external fixator and arthrodesis nail. Different types of nail exist: long fusion nail, short modular nail and bridging nail. This study presents the results on knee arthrodesis using different types of intramedullary nails. The aim is to assess if a specific type of nail has a better fusion rate, clinical outcome and lower complication rate. METHODS: A mono-centric retrospective study of 48 knees arthrodesis was performed between 2000 and 2018. 15 T2™ Arthrodesis Nail, 6 OsteoBridge® Knee Arthrodesis and 27 Wichita® fusion nail were used. The mean clinic and radiological follow-up was 9.8 ± 3.8 years (2.6-18 years). RESULTS: Fusion rate was 89.6%. Time to fusion was 6.9 months. Mean Parker score was 6.9/9 points. Visual Analogic Scale was 1.9. The Wichita® fusion nail showed better results in terms of fusion, time to fusion and clinical outcome measured by Parker score and VAS but without statistical significance. The early revision rate was 10.4% and 20.8% presented a late complication requiring a surgery, due to nonunion or infection. 93.3% of infection was cured. Two patients live with a fistula (4.2%) and 1 was amputated (2.1%). CONCLUSION: Although burdened by a big complication rate, knee arthrodesis with an intramedullary nail provides satisfactory results and is a good alternative to above-knee-amputation. The Wichita® fusion nail shows a tendency to better results compared to the two other nails. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Case series, level IV.

Are there more wound complications or infections with direct anterior approach total hip arthroplasty?

INTRODUCTION: Compared to a lateral or posterior approach (PA), the direct anterior approach (DAA) does permit a better muscle preservation for total hip arthroplasty (THA). However, there is concern whether this advantage come with increased wound complication and infection leading to reoperation or sometimes major procedures. METHOD: We retrospectively reviewed all patients who underwent primary THA through the PA between January 2009 and April 2013 ( n = 796) and through the DAA between January 2011 and April 2013 ( n = 399) at our institution with a minimum of 2 years follow up regarding all wound complications and all infections. RESULTS: Of the 796 patients in the PA group, there were 6 wound complications leading to reoperation and 6 infections; 4 early and 2 delayed onset. Among the infected cases, one was obese (body mass index [BMI] >30 kg/m2). Two procedures were teaching-based. Of the 399 patients in the DAA group, there were three dehiscences leading to reoperation, two of which were in obese patients. 6 infections were also found; 4 with early and 2 with delayed onset. Of the infected cases, three were obese. 4 procedures were teaching-based. CONCLUSION: In our series of patients undergoing THA, the DAA did not increase the rates of either wound complications leading to reoperation nor early or delayed infection compared to the PA.

Knee arthrodesis with modular nail after failed TKA due to infection.

INTRODUCTION: Knee arthrodesis is an established procedure for limb salvage after failed total knee arthroplasty (TKA) in cases of recurrent infection, soft tissue damage, reduced bone stock or with a deficient extensor mechanism. Walking with an arthrodesis is more efficient and less costly in terms of energy expenditure than above-knee amputation. Surgical options include an arthrodesis nail, external fixator or compression plate. We present our results of knee arthrodesis using the modular Wichita Fusion Nail(®) in patients after infected TKA. METHODS: Fifteen patients with irretrievably failed TKA, due to infection, who underwent arthrodesis with the Wichita Fusion Nail(®) from 2004 to 2012 were retrospectively reviewed to assess fusion rate, time to fusion, complication rate, including new infections, and ambulatory status. RESULTS: Three patients were lost to follow-up. Mean follow-up was 33 months (6-132 months). At their most recent follow-up, all patients were walking with full weight bearing on a fused arthrodesis. Mean time to union was 9 months (3-29 months). Three patients necessitated a revision arthrodesis to achieve union after a mean of 5 months after the last procedure. CONCLUSION: Arthrodesis with the Wichita Fusion Nail(®) provides satisfactory results in patients with failure after infected TKA, with 75 % primary union rate and no new or persistent infection at last follow-up visit. Although burdened with a high complication rate, it represents an acceptable option for limb salvage in this particular pathology.

Unexpected wear of an unicompartimental knee arthroplasty in oxidized zirconium.

Unicompartimental knee arthroplasty is a successful procedure for the treatment of localized osteoarthritis to one compartment of the knee with good long-term results. However, several modes of failure of unicompartimental knee arthroplasty have been described, namely aseptic or septic loosening, progression of disease, wear, and instability. Metallosis after unicompartimental knee arthroplasty is rarely reported and is most often related with polyethylene wear or break. We report on a case of rapid failure of unicompartimental knee arthroplasty in oxidized zirconium associated with metallosis secondary to the dislocation of the polyethylene.