Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 20 de 58
Filtrar
1.
Expert Rev Vaccines ; 22(1): 1079-1090, 2023.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37877219

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Because SARS-CoV-2 mutations and immunity wane over time, a third dose of heterologous COVID-19 vaccine is proposed for individuals primed with inactivated COVID-19 vaccine. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS: We conducted a single-center, open-label trial to assess the safety, immunogenicity, and immune-persistence of a heterologous BBIBP-CorV/ZF2001 prime-boost vaccination in Chinese adults. 480 participants who had been primed with two doses of BBIBP-CorV, received a third dose of ZF2001 after an interval of 3-4, 5-6, or 7-9 months. RESULTS: The overall incidence of adverse reactions within 30 days after vaccination was 5.83%. No serious adverse reactions were reported. The respective geometric mean titers (GMTs) of neutralizing antibodies for 3-4, 5-6, and 7-9 months groups at baseline were 2.06, 2.02, and 2.10; which increased to 55.42, 63.45, and 62.06 on day 14; then decreased to 17.53, 23.79, and 26.73 on day 30; before finally waning to 8.29, 9.24, and 9.51 on day 180. After the booster, the three groups showed no significant differences in GMTs. GMTs were lower in older participants than younger participants. CONCLUSIONS: A heterologous BBIBP-CorV/ZF2001 prime-boost vaccination was safe and immunogenic. Prime-boost intervals did not affect the immune response. The immune response was weaker in older adults than younger adults. CLINICAL TRIAL IDENTIFIER: NCT05205083.


Assuntos
Vacinas contra COVID-19 , COVID-19 , Idoso , Humanos , Anticorpos Neutralizantes , Anticorpos Antivirais , COVID-19/prevenção & controle , Vacinas contra COVID-19/efeitos adversos , Imunização , Imunogenicidade da Vacina , SARS-CoV-2 , Vacinação
2.
Front Immunol ; 14: 1244373, 2023.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37736100

RESUMO

Introduction: China experienced a record surge of coronavirus disease 2019 cases in December 2022, during the pandemic. Methods: We conducted a randomized, parallel-controlled prospective cohort study to evaluate efficacy and antibody duration after a fourth-dose booster with Ad5-nCoV or inactivated severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) vaccine. Results: A total of 191 participants aged ≥18 years who had completed a three-dose regimen of the inactivated SARS-CoV-2 vaccine 6 months earlier were recruited to receive the intramuscular Ad5-nCoV booster or the inactivated SARS-CoV-2 vaccine. The Ad5-nCoV group had significantly higher antibody levels compared with the inactivated vaccine group at 6 months after the fourth vaccination dose. After the pandemic, the breakthrough infection rate for the Ad5-nCoV and the inactivated vaccine groups was 77.89% and 78.13%, respectively. Survival curve analysis (p = 0.872) and multivariable logistic regression analysis (p = 0.956) showed no statistically significant differences in breakthrough infection between the two groups. Discussion: Compared with a homologous fourth dose, a heterologous fourth dose of Ad5-nCoV elicited a higher immunogenic response in healthy adults who had been immunized with three doses of inactivated vaccine. Nevertheless, the efficacy of the two vaccine types was equivalent after the pandemic.


Assuntos
Infecções Irruptivas , Vacinas contra COVID-19 , COVID-19 , Adolescente , Adulto , Humanos , Anticorpos/imunologia , Infecções Irruptivas/epidemiologia , Infecções Irruptivas/imunologia , Infecções Irruptivas/prevenção & controle , COVID-19/imunologia , COVID-19/prevenção & controle , Vacinas contra COVID-19/imunologia , Vacinas contra COVID-19/uso terapêutico , População do Leste Asiático , Estudos Prospectivos , SARS-CoV-2 , Vacinas de Produtos Inativados/imunologia , Vacinas de Produtos Inativados/uso terapêutico , Eficácia de Vacinas , Imunização Secundária , Anticorpos Antivirais/imunologia , China/epidemiologia , Pandemias/estatística & dados numéricos , Surtos de Doenças/estatística & dados numéricos
3.
Nat Commun ; 14(1): 4757, 2023 08 08.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37553338

RESUMO

Data on the safety and immunity of a heterologous booster (fourth dose) after three-doses of inactivated SARS-CoV-2 vaccine in Chinese adults are limited. We evaluate the safety and immunogenicity of Ad5-nCoV in a randomized, double-blind, parallel-controlled phase 4 clinical trial in Zhejiang, China (NCT05373030). Participants aged 18-80 years (100 per group), administered three doses of inactivated SARS-CoV-2 vaccine ≥6 months earlier, are enrolled and randomized 1:1 into two groups, which are administered intramuscular Ad5-nCoV or inactivated SARS-CoV-2 vaccine (CoronaVac or Covilo). All observed adverse reactions are predictable and manageable. Ad5-nCoV elicits significantly higher RBD-specific IgG levels, with a geometric mean concentration of 2924.0 on day 14 post-booster, 7.8-fold that of the inactivated vaccine. Pseudovirus-neutralizing antibodies to Omicron BA.4/5 show a similar pattern, with geometric mean titers of 228.9 in Ad5-nCoV group and 65.5 in inactivated vaccine group. Ad5-nCoV booster maintains high antibody levels on day 90, with seroconversion of 71.4%, while that of inactivated vaccine is 5.2%, almost pre-booster levels. A fourth Ad5-nCoV vaccination following three-doses of inactivated SARS-CoV-2 vaccine is immunogenic, tolerable, and more efficient than inactivated SARS-CoV-2 vaccine. Ad5-nCoV elicits a stronger humoral response against Omicron BA.4/5 and maintains antibody levels for longer than homologous boosting.


Assuntos
Vacinas contra COVID-19 , COVID-19 , Adulto , Humanos , Anticorpos Neutralizantes , Anticorpos Antivirais , COVID-19/prevenção & controle , Vacinas contra COVID-19/administração & dosagem , Vacinas contra COVID-19/imunologia , População do Leste Asiático , SARS-CoV-2 , Vacinação , Vacinas de Produtos Inativados/administração & dosagem , Vacinas de Produtos Inativados/imunologia , Adulto Jovem , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Imunogenicidade da Vacina
4.
Hum Vaccin Immunother ; 19(2): 2217075, 2023 08 01.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37455405

RESUMO

Two RV vaccines have been licensed in Zhejiang province, China, including the pentavalent RotaTeq (RV5) and the monovalent RV vaccine (RV1). This study aimed to evaluate the cost-effectiveness of RV1 and RV5 to inform the prioritization of provincial immunization program. A decision tree-Markov model was applied to assess the cost-effectiveness of RV1 or RV5 vaccination, compared to no RV vaccination in a 5-year period. The incremental health cost per disability-adjusted life year (DALY) is averted when each kind of RV vaccine included in the immunization program was estimated. It was also compared to the willingness-to-pay (WTP) threshold of 1 time of the Gross Domestic Product (GDP) per capita of Zhejiang province in 2021 (16865.70US$). The uncertainties of these results were assessed through the one-way sensitivity analysis and probabilistic sensitivity analysis. In the base-case scenario, RV5 was the least costly RV vaccine with a cost-effectiveness ratio of 510 US$ per DALY averted. The other RV1 vaccines provided equivalent benefits but at higher costs, with a cost-effectiveness ratio of 4600 US$ per DALY averted. Compared to no vaccination, the probabilities of being cost-effective were 72.3% for RV1 and 88.4% for RV5, at a WTP threshold of 1 time of the GDP per capita. An RV vaccination program using any of the two China-licensed RV vaccines compared to no vaccination would avert 30-70% of outpatient visits, hospitalizations, and deaths from RVGE. RV5 was currently estimated to be the most cost-effective.


Assuntos
Infecções por Rotavirus , Vacinas contra Rotavirus , Humanos , Lactente , Infecções por Rotavirus/prevenção & controle , Análise de Custo-Efetividade , Análise Custo-Benefício , Programas de Imunização , China , Árvores de Decisões
5.
Elife ; 122023 03 16.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36928099

RESUMO

Background: Although inactivated COVID-19 vaccines are proven to be safe and effective in the general population, the dynamic response and duration of antibodies after vaccination in the real world should be further assessed. Methods: We enrolled 1067 volunteers who had been vaccinated with one or two doses of CoronaVac in Zhejiang Province, China. Another 90 healthy adults without previous vaccinations were recruited and vaccinated with three doses of CoronaVac, 28 days and 6 months apart. Serum samples were collected from multiple timepoints and analyzed for specific IgM/IgG and neutralizing antibodies (NAbs) for immunogenicity evaluation. Antibody responses to the Delta and Omicron variants were measured by pseudovirus-based neutralization tests. Results: Our results revealed that binding antibody IgM peaked 14-28 days after one dose of CoronaVac, while IgG and NAbs peaked approximately 1 month after the second dose then declined slightly over time. Antibody responses had waned by month 6 after vaccination and became undetectable in the majority of individuals at 12 months. Levels of NAbs to live SARS-CoV-2 were correlated with anti-SARS-CoV-2 IgG and NAbs to pseudovirus, but not IgM. Homologous booster around 6 months after primary vaccination activated anamnestic immunity and raised NAbs 25.5-fold. The neutralized fraction subsequently rose to 36.0% for Delta (p=0.03) and 4.3% for Omicron (p=0.004), and the response rate for Omicron rose from 7.9% (7/89)-17.8% (16/90). Conclusions: Two doses of CoronaVac vaccine resulted in limited protection over a short duration. The inactivated vaccine booster can reverse the decrease of antibody levels to prime strain, but it does not elicit potent neutralization against Omicron; therefore, the optimization of booster procedures is vital. Funding: Key Research and Development Program of Zhejiang Province; Key Program of Health Commission of Zhejiang Province/ Science Foundation of National Health Commission; Major Program of Zhejiang Municipal Natural Science Foundation; Explorer Program of Zhejiang Municipal Natural Science Foundation.


Assuntos
Vacinas contra COVID-19 , COVID-19 , Adulto , Humanos , Estudos de Coortes , Estudos Transversais , COVID-19/prevenção & controle , SARS-CoV-2 , Anticorpos Neutralizantes , Imunoglobulina G , Anticorpos Antivirais , China
6.
Hum Vaccin Immunother ; 18(7): 2152256, 2022 12 30.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36484114

RESUMO

The safety profile of the 9-valent human papillomavirus vaccine (9vHPV) was evaluated based on the reporting rate of adverse events following immunization (AEFI) obtained from the passive surveillance data in Zhejiang. The 9vHPV AEFI reports in Zhejiang were collected and reviewed from the National Adverse Event Following Immunization Surveillance System (NAEFISS) from 2019 to 2021. Reporting rates of AEFI were analyzed under multiple aspects, including age, city, number of vaccinations, AEFI categories, and diagnosis categories. This study used the reporting odds ratio (ROR) for anomalous signal assessment. The NAEFISS collected 331 AEFI reports after administering 1,064,851 doses of 9vHPV, with a crude AEFI rate of 3.12/10,000 doses. The third dose had the highest reporting rate of minor vaccine-related reaction (n = 80, 3.06 per 10,000), followed by the first dose (n = 134, 2.98 per 10,000), and second dose (n = 76, 2.15 per 10,000). Fever/redness/induration was the most common minor adverse event (281 records, 2.64/10,000 doses). Nine cases of urticaria, ten cases of allergic rash, and ten cases of syncope were recorded. This study found a positive signal association between 9vHPV immunization and adverse events such as syncope, encephalitis, sterile abscess, and urticaria. This study did not identify any new emerging safety concerns. In the future, more research is needed to validate and further explore adverse reactions associated with 9vHPV.


Assuntos
Vacinas contra Papillomavirus , Urticária , Humanos , Lactente , Vacinas contra Papillomavirus/efeitos adversos , Papillomavirus Humano , Sistemas de Notificação de Reações Adversas a Medicamentos , Vacinação/efeitos adversos , Imunização/efeitos adversos , Urticária/induzido quimicamente , Síncope/induzido quimicamente , China
7.
Front Immunol ; 13: 1017590, 2022.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36426361

RESUMO

Background: In response to SARS-CoV-2 mutations and waning antibody levels after two-dose inactivated vaccines, we assessed whether a third dose of recombinant protein subunit vaccine (ZF2001) boosts immune responses. Methods: An open-label single-center non-random trial was conducted on people aged 18 years and above at five sites in China. All participants received a two-dose inactivated vaccine (CoronaVac) as their prime doses within 3-9 months of the trial. Primary outcomes were safety and immunogenicity, primarily the geometric mean titers (GMTs) of neutralizing antibodies to live wildtype SARS-CoV-2. Results: A total of 480 participants (median age, 51; range 21-84 years) previously vaccinated with two-dose CoronaVac received a third booster dose of ZF2001 3-4, 5-6, or 7-9-months later. The overall incidence of adverse reactions within 30 days after vaccination was 5.83% (28/480). No serious adverse reactions were reported after the third dose of ZF2001. GMTs in the 3-4-, 5-6-, and 7-9-month groups before vaccination were 3.96, 4.60, and 3.78, respectively. On Day 14, GMTs increased to 33.06, 47.51, and 44.12, respectively. After the booster, GMTs showed no significant difference among the three prime-boost interval groups (all P>0.05). Additionally, GMTs in older adults were lower than those in younger adults on Day 14 for the three groups (P=0.0005, P<0.0001, and P<0.0001). Conclusion: Heterologous boosting with ZF2001 was safe and immunogenic, and prime-boost intervals did not affect the immune response. The immune response was weaker in older than younger adults.


Assuntos
Vacinas contra COVID-19 , COVID-19 , Idoso , Humanos , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , COVID-19/prevenção & controle , Vacinas contra COVID-19/efeitos adversos , Subunidades Proteicas , SARS-CoV-2 , Vacinas de Produtos Inativados/administração & dosagem , Vacinas de Subunidades Antigênicas/efeitos adversos , Vacinas Sintéticas/efeitos adversos , Adulto Jovem , Adulto , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais
8.
Front Public Health ; 10: 913478, 2022.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36159311

RESUMO

Background: The COVID-19 pandemic is striking the world with serious public health and economic losses. Complying with precautionary measures is affected by knowledge, attitudes, and practices (KAP) toward COVID-19 among the general public, so it is urgent to know the public's awareness of COVID-19 as to promote the epidemic management of COVID-19 in China. Methods: An online sample of Chinese residents was recruited. We administered a self-developed online KAP survey comprising 39 questions regarding awareness of COVID-19, transmission mode, symptoms, preventive measures, and respondents' attitudes and practices with respect to COVID-19. The total score of each item (knowledge, attitudes, and practices) adopts the ten points system, score of KAP is 30 points. Descriptive statistics, analysis of variance, and binomial logistic regression were used in the statistical analysis. Results: Among respondents, average scores for COVID-19-related knowledge, attitudes, and practice were 8.94 ± 0.79, 5.97 ± 1.58, and 7.03 ± 3.14, respectively. 91.2% were aware that COVID-19 is an acute viral infection and 99.95% knew that wearing a mask is one way to prevent COVID-19 infection. Participants correctly identified the symptoms of COVID-19 with a high accuracy rate of over 85%. Conclusion: Many adults in the present study had adequate knowledge, a positive attitude and engaged in correct practices against COVID-19. People in China have a high awareness of epidemic prevention and control. However, conducting KAP surveys among people with different demographic characteristics at different stages of the epidemic is important to improve public health education and implement proper COVID-19 prevention and control measures.


Assuntos
COVID-19 , Adulto , COVID-19/epidemiologia , COVID-19/prevenção & controle , China/epidemiologia , Estudos Transversais , Conhecimentos, Atitudes e Prática em Saúde , Humanos , Pandemias/prevenção & controle
9.
Front Immunol ; 13: 967051, 2022.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36159863

RESUMO

Background: BBIBP-CorV and CoronaVac inactivated COVID-19 vaccines are widely-used, World Health Organization-emergency-listed vaccines. Understanding antibody level changes over time after vaccination is important for booster dose policies. We evaluated neutralizing antibody (nAb) titers and associated factors for the first 12 months after primary-series vaccination with BBIBP-CorV and CoronaVac. Methods: Our study consisted of a set of cross-sectional sero-surveys in Zhejiang and Shanxi provinces, China. In 2021, we enrolled 1,527 consenting 18-59-year-olds who received two doses of BBIBP-CorV or CoronaVac 1, 3, 6, 9, or 12 months earlier and obtained blood samples and demographic and medical data. We obtained 6-month convalescent sera from 62 individuals in Hebei province. Serum nAb titers were measured by standard micro-neutralization cytopathic effect assay in Vero cells with ancestral SARS-CoV-2 strain HB01. We used the first WHO International Standard (IS) for anti-SARS-CoV-2 immunoglobulin (NIBSC code 20/136) to standardized geometric mean concentrations (IU/mL) derived from the nAb geometric mean titers (GMT over 1:4 was considered seropositive). We analyzed nAb titer trends using Chi-square and factors related to nAb titers with logistic regression and linear models. Results: Numbers of subjects in each of the five month-groupings ranged from 100 to 200 for each vaccine and met group-specific target sample sizes. Seropositivity rates from BBIBP-CorV were 98.0% at 1 month and 53.5% at 12 months, and GMTs were 25.0 and 4.0. Respective seropositivity rates from CoronaVac were 90.0% and 62.5%, and GMTs were 20.2 and 4.1. One-, three-, six-, nine-, and twelve-month GMCs were 217.2, 84.1, 85.7, 44.6, and 10.9 IU/mL in BBIBP-CorV recipients and 195.7, 94.6, 51.7, 27.6, and 13.4 IU/mL in CoronaVac recipients. Six-month convalescent seropositivity was 95.2%; GMC was 108.9 IU/mL. Seropositivity and GMCs were associated with age, sex, and time since vaccination. Conclusions: Neutralizing Ab levels against ancestral SARS-CoV-2 from BBIBP-CorV or CoronaVac vaccination were similar and decreased with increasing time since vaccination; over half of 12-month post-vaccination subjects were seropositive. Seropositivity and GMCs from BBIBP-CorV and CoronaVac six and nine months after vaccination were similar to or slightly lower than in six-month convalescent sera. These real-world data suggest necessity of six-month booster doses.


Assuntos
Vacinas contra COVID-19 , COVID-19 , Animais , Anticorpos Neutralizantes , Anticorpos Antivirais , COVID-19/prevenção & controle , COVID-19/terapia , Chlorocebus aethiops , Estudos Transversais , Humanos , Imunização Passiva , SARS-CoV-2 , Vacinação , Células Vero , Soroterapia para COVID-19
10.
Virol Sin ; 37(5): 724-730, 2022 Oct.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35926726

RESUMO

A randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled multicenter trial was conducted in healthy Chinese infants to assess the efficacy and safety of a hexavalent live human-bovine reassortant rotavirus vaccine (HRV) against rotavirus gastroenteritis (RVGE). A total of 6400 participants aged 6-12 weeks were enrolled and randomly assigned to either HRV (n â€‹= â€‹3200) or placebo (n â€‹= â€‹3200) group. All the subjects received three oral doses of vaccine four weeks apart. The vaccine efficacy (VE) against RVGE caused by rotavirus serotypes contained in HRV was evaluated from 14 days after three doses of administration up until the end of the second rotavirus season. VE against severe RVGE, VE against RVGE hospitalization caused by serotypes contained in HRV, and VE against RVGE, severe RVGE, and RVGE hospitalization caused by natural infection of any serotype of rotavirus were also investigated. All adverse events (AEs) were collected for 30 days after each dose. Serious AEs (SAEs) and intussusception cases were collected during the entire study. Our data showed that VE against RVGE caused by serotypes contained in HRV was 69.21% (95%CI: 53.31-79.69). VE against severe RVGE and RVGE hospitalization caused by serotypes contained in HRV were 91.36% (95%CI: 78.45-96.53) and 89.21% (95%CI: 64.51-96.72) respectively. VE against RVGE, severe RVGE, and RVGE hospitalization caused by natural infection of any serotype of rotavirus were 62.88% (95%CI: 49.11-72.92), 85.51% (95%CI: 72.74-92.30) and 83.68% (95%CI: 61.34-93.11). Incidences of AEs from the first dose to one month post the third dose in HRV and placebo groups were comparable. There was no significant difference in incidences of SAEs in HRV and placebo groups. This study shows that this hexavalent reassortant rotavirus vaccine is an effective, well-tolerated, and safe vaccine for Chinese infants.


Assuntos
Infecções por Enterovirus , Gastroenterite , Infecções por Rotavirus , Vacinas contra Rotavirus , Rotavirus , Administração Oral , Animais , Bovinos , China , Gastroenterite/epidemiologia , Humanos , Lactente , Infecções por Rotavirus/epidemiologia , Infecções por Rotavirus/prevenção & controle , Vacinas contra Rotavirus/efeitos adversos , Vacinação , Vacinas Atenuadas , Vacinas Combinadas
11.
Front Immunol ; 13: 939311, 2022.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36032136

RESUMO

Background: Owing to the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic and the emergency use of different types of COVID-19 vaccines, there is an urgent need to consider the effectiveness and persistence of different COVID-19 vaccines. Methods: We investigated the immunogenicity of CoronaVac and Covilo, two inactivated vaccines against COVID-19 that each contain inactivated severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2). The levels of neutralizing antibodies to live SARS-CoV-2 and the inhibition rates of neutralizing antibodies to pseudovirus, as well as the immunoglobulin (Ig)G and IgM responses towards the spike (S) and nucleocapsid (N) protein of SARS-CoV-2 at 180 days after two-dose vaccination were detected. Results: The CoronaVac and Covilo vaccines induced similar antibody responses. Regarding neutralizing antibodies to live SARS-CoV-2, 77.9% of the CoronaVac vaccine recipients and 78.3% of the Covilo vaccine recipients (aged 18-59 years) seroconverted by 28 days after the second vaccine dose. Regarding SARS-CoV-2-specific antibodies, 97.1% of the CoronaVac vaccine recipients and 95.7% of the Covilo vaccine recipients seroconverted by 28 days after the second vaccine dose. The inhibition rates of neutralizing antibody against a pseudovirus of the SARS-CoV-2 Delta variant were significantly lower compared with those against a pseudovirus of wildtype SARS-CoV-2. Associated with participant characteristics and antibody levels, persons in the older age group and with basic disease, especially a chronic respiratory disease, tended to have lower anti-SARS-CoV-2 antibody seroconversion rates. Conclusion: Antibodies that were elicited by these two inactivated COVID-19 vaccines appeared to wane following their peak after the second vaccine dose, but they persisted at detectable levels through 6 months after the second vaccine dose, and the effectiveness of these antibodies against the Delta variant of SARS-CoV-2 was lower than their effectiveness against wildtype SARS-CoV-2, which suggests that attention must be paid to the protective effectiveness, and its persistence, of COVID-19 vaccines on SARS-CoV-2 variants.


Assuntos
COVID-19 , Vacinas Virais , Idoso , Anticorpos Neutralizantes , Anticorpos Antivirais , Atenção , Vacinas contra COVID-19 , Estudos de Coortes , Humanos , Imunoglobulina G , SARS-CoV-2
12.
Hum Vaccin Immunother ; 18(5): 2083865, 2022 11 30.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35820038

RESUMO

OBJECTIVES: A cross-sectional survey was conducted among healthcare workers (HCWs) to assess their knowledge, attitude, and reporting behavior in adverse event following immunization (AEFI) surveillance as well as to identify barriers. METHODS: A simple random sample of 170 vaccination clinics was selected and one HCW was informed to participate in this survey in each selected vaccination clinic. The survey was developed using a secure online platform and consisted of a structured online questionnaire. The distributions of the respondents' characteristics were presented. Training status, knowledge, attitude, and reporting behavior were compared between sub-groups of HCWs. Barriers and suggestions on AEFI reporting were also summarized. RESULTS: Of the 170 surveyed HCWs, 61.76% received the training on AEFI surveillance while 15.88% had no AEFI training at all. The higher level of knowledge and the more positive attitude and reporting behavior on AEFI surveillance were observed among HCWs with the longer working duration on AEFI surveillance, or among HCWs who received the training. The most critical barrier to reporting an AEFI was 'not being sure if the AEFI is related to the vaccine' (122, 71.76%). Other barriers were: 'I do not want to raise unnecessary public alarm about a vaccine' (105, 61.76%); 'reporting form or other method being too complicated' (65, 38.23%). CONCLUSION: The study findings highlighted the need to prioritize training on AEFI surveillance for HCWs. It is recommended that the development of the targeted interventions to strengthen AEFI surveillance system be required based on the barriers found in this study.


Assuntos
Sistemas de Notificação de Reações Adversas a Medicamentos , Vacinas , Humanos , Estudos Transversais , Imunização/efeitos adversos , Vacinação/efeitos adversos , Vacinas/efeitos adversos , Pessoal de Saúde , China , Acessibilidade aos Serviços de Saúde
13.
Hum Vaccin Immunother ; 18(5): 2071061, 2022 11 30.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35687101

RESUMO

Yearly administration of influenza vaccine with recommendations can help control seasonal influenza epidemics in adults aged ≥60 years. Here, we describe the results of a prospective study observing the immunogenicity and persistence of induced immunity of a trivalent inactivated split-virion influenza vaccine (TIV) in adults aged ≥60 years during the 2018-2019 season in Taizhou City, Zhejiang Province in China. A total of 422 participants completed the study period. Vaccinated participants (284) received a single dose of TIV, but unvaccinated participants (138) didn't receive any vaccine. Study participants vaccinated with TIV had significantly higher GMTs of Hemagglutination Inhibition (HI) antibodies against AH1N1, AH2N3, and B/Victoria strains (all p < .0001) at day 30 post-vaccination compared with unvaccinated participants, but the antibody response to the B/Victoria strain was the weakest. Rates of seroprotection and seroconversion were generally higher in the TIV-vaccinated group. At day 180 post-vaccination, the seroconversion rates (95%CI) in the vaccinated group were 99.6% (99.0%-100.3%), 97.9% (96.2%-99.6%), and 68.3% (62.9%-73.8%) for antibodies against three influenza strains, respectively; these rates were significantly different compared with unvaccinated group only for strains AH3N2 and B/Victoria (p = .002 and p < .0001, respectively). These results confirm that in adults aged ≥60 years, a single dose of TIV can induce a protective immune response against influenza, but the protective HI antibody levels induced against strain B/Victoria do not persist through 6 months.


Assuntos
Vacinas contra Influenza , Influenza Humana , Adulto , Anticorpos Antivirais , China , Humanos , Influenza Humana/prevenção & controle , Estudos Prospectivos , Estações do Ano , Vacinas de Produtos Inativados
14.
Vaccines (Basel) ; 10(4)2022 Mar 28.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35455273

RESUMO

New vaccines are being developed in response to the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic. Vaccination provides a crucial preventive approach for managing COVID-19. We investigated adults' willingness to take COVID-19 vaccines in the Zhejiang province, and their cognitions regarding COVID-19, when the COVID-19 vaccine is authorized under Emergency Use Administration. An online survey was conducted from September to October 2020, which included social-demographic characteristics, risk perception, acceptance and influencing factors in relation to COVID-19 vaccines. Multivariate logistic regression was performed to identify the influencing factors of vaccination acceptance. Of the participants, 70% intended to be vaccinated when the COVID-19 vaccine was approved under Emergency Use Administration, among 2171 valid questionnaires. Logistic regression revealed that being male, having a high cognitive score regarding COVID-19, the belief that the COVID-19 vaccine is safe and effective, and the belief that one will be infected with SARS-CoV-2 this fall and winter, were associated with a greater probability of accepting vaccination. Respondents with junior college/university education or above were less likely to accept vaccination. Concerns about the safety and effectiveness of the vaccine were the main factors hindering vaccination acceptance. Health education is important for promoting accurate public knowledge regarding COVID-19 vaccination.

15.
Vaccine ; 40(23): 3263-3271, 2022 05 20.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35487814

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: The 9-valent human papillomavirus (9vHPV; HPV6/11/16/18/31/33/45/52/58) vaccine was approved for use in Chinese women aged 16-26 years in 2018. This phase 3, open-label study (NCT03903562) compared 9vHPV vaccine immunogenicity and safety in Chinese females aged 9-19 years and 27-45 years with Chinese females aged 20-26 years; we report results from day 1 through 1 month post-Dose 3. The study will continue through 54 months post-Dose 3 to assess antibody persistence in Chinese girls aged 9-19 years. METHODS: Participants aged 9-45 years received three doses of the 9vHPV vaccine. Geometric mean titers (GMTs) and seroconversion percentages for anti-HPV6/11/16/18/31/33/45/52/58 antibodies were determined by competitive Luminex immunoassay in serum samples obtained at day 1 and 1 month post-Dose 3. Adverse events (AEs) within 30 days post-vaccination and serious AEs (SAEs) occurring at any time were recorded. RESULTS: In total, 1990 participants (690 aged 9-19 years; 650 aged 20-26 years; 650 aged 27-45 years) were enrolled. At 1 month post-Dose 3, >99% of participants in the per-protocol immunogenicity population seroconverted to each vaccine HPV type. Anti-HPV6/11/16/18/31/33/45/52/58 antibody GMTs in the 9-19-year age group were non-inferior to those in participants aged 20-26 years. Anti-HPV6/11/16/18/31/33/45/52/58 seroconversion percentages in the 27-45-year age group were non-inferior to those in participants aged 20-26 years. Injection-site and systemic AEs were reported by 43.3% and 50.9%, 50.5% and 57.1%, and 43.8% and 43.4% of participants aged 9-19, 20-26, and 27-45 years, respectively. There were no vaccine-related SAEs, discontinuations due to AEs, and deaths. CONCLUSION: Antibody responses induced by 9vHPV vaccination in Chinese females aged 9-19 years and 27-45 years were non-inferior to those in Chinese females aged 20-26 years. The vaccine was generally well tolerated. CLINICALTRIALS: gov Identifier: NCT03903562.


Assuntos
Infecções por Papillomavirus , Vacinas contra Papillomavirus , Adolescente , Adulto , Anticorpos Antivirais , Criança , China , Feminino , Humanos , Imunogenicidade da Vacina , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Papillomaviridae , Infecções por Papillomavirus/prevenção & controle , Adulto Jovem
16.
Hum Vaccin Immunother ; 18(1): 2035141, 2022 12 31.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35240930

RESUMO

OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the safety of 13-valent pneumococcal conjugate vaccine (PCV13) after its licensure. METHODS: Review and describe the AEFI reported to national adverse event following immunization surveillance system (NAEFISS) in Zhejiang province from 2017 to 2020. Reporting rates of AEFI were calculated by age, city, severity of AEFI, categories of AEFI, and reaction categories. The data mining algorithm used in this study was reporting odds ratio (ROR). A value of ROR-1.96SE >1 (standard error [SE]) was considered as the positive signal. RESULTS: NAEFISS received 3332 AEFI cases following PCV13, with a reporting rate of 17.58/10000 doses. Of the reported AEFI, 652 were serious AEFI cases and the reporting rate was 3.44 for serious AEFI. The reporting rate of fever was the highest among all the clinical diagnosis (7.39/10000 doses). The positive signals were obtained for injection site reaction (ROR-1.96SE: 1.55), hypotonic hyporesponsive episode (HHE) (ROR-1.96SE: 1.62) and febrile seizure (ROR-1.96SE: 1.52). CONCLUSION: The present results supported previous observations that the PCV13 administered as the four-dose schedule was generally well tolerated in Chinese infants as we did not identify any new/unexpected safety concern from the NAEFISS during a four-year time period.


Assuntos
Imunização , Vacinação , Sistemas de Notificação de Reações Adversas a Medicamentos , China/epidemiologia , Humanos , Imunização/efeitos adversos , Lactente , Vacinação/efeitos adversos , Vacinas Conjugadas
17.
Vaccines (Basel) ; 10(2)2022 Feb 17.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35214777

RESUMO

OBJECTIVES: One dose of Sabin-strains inactivated polio vaccine (IPV) was introduced into the Chinese immunization program on 1 May 2016. This study aimed to evaluate the safety of Sabin-strains IPV and provide a comparison with conventional Salk-strains IPV. METHODS: Adverse events following immunization (AEFI) records associated with Sabin-strains IPV and Salk-strains IPV were extracted from the national AEFI surveillance system (NAEFISS) from 1 May 2016 to 31 December 2020. The vaccination information on Sabin-strains IPV and Salk-strains IPV during the same period was obtained from the Zhejiang provincial immunization information system. Reporting rates of AEFI were calculated by age, city, severity of AEFI, categories of AEFI, and reaction categories and were compared between Sabin-strains IPV and Salk-strains IPV. RESULTS: In total, 3,861,758 doses of Sabin-strains IPV and 1,018,604 doses of Salk-strains IPV were administered during the study period. The overall AEFI reporting rate for Sabin-strains IPV (3.96/10,000 doses) was significantly lower than that for Salk-strains IPV (5.03/10,000 doses) due to the reporting rate of the minor vaccine product-related reaction following Sabin-strains IPV was significantly lower than that for Salk-strains IPV (2.76/10,000 doses vs. 3.83/10,000 doses). The most frequently reported symptoms/signs were fever, induration/swelling, and rash/urticaria. The most frequently reported serious AEFI with a causal relationship was febrile convulsion, with the reporting rates of 0.10/10,000 doses for Sabin-strains IPV and 0.08/10,000 doses for Salk-strains IPV. No significant difference was found in the reporting rates of the other serious AEFI between the two types of IPV. CONCLUSION: Most of the AEFI following Sabin-strains IPV and Salk-strains IPV were mild and common adverse reactions. The reporting rate of serious AEFI was not significantly different between Sabin-strains IPV and Salk-strains IPV. Sabin-strains IPV had a favorable safety profile and could be widely used.

18.
Hum Vaccin Immunother ; 18(1): 2021711, 2022 12 31.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35108152

RESUMO

OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study is to describe the reporting rate of adverse events following immunization (AEFI) with pentavalent vaccine: diphtheria-pertussis-tetanus-poliomyelitis-Haemophilus influenzae type b (DPT-IPV/Hib), and to determine whether the reporting rate of AEFI following DPT-IPV/Hib was higher than the average level of the other vaccines. METHODS: Review and describe the AEFI reported to national adverse event following immunization surveillance system (NAEFISS) in Zhejiang province from 2015 to 2020. Reporting rates of AEFI were calculated by age, city, severity of AEFI, categories of AEFI, and reaction categories. The data mining algorithm used in this study was reporting odds ratio (ROR). A value of ROR­1.96SE >1 (standard error [SE]) was considered as positive signal. RESULTS: NAEFISS received 5726 AEFI reports following DTP-IPV/Hib, with a reporting rate of 20.01/10000 doses. Of the reported AEFI, 202 were serious vaccine product-related reactions, including two cases of anaphylactic shock, five cases of Guillain Barre Syndrome (GBS) and two cases of acute disseminated encephalomyelitis. The reporting rate of fever/redness/induration was the highest among all the clinical diagnosis (14.97/10000 doses). The positive signals were obtained for allergic rash (ROR-1.96SE: 1.36), febrile convulsion (ROR-1.96SE: 1.32) and GBS (ROR-1.96SE: 1.16). CONCLUSION: The present findings bolstered that the DTP-IPV/Hib administered as the four-dose schedule was generally well tolerated in Chinese infants as we did not identify any new/unexpected safety concern from the NAEFISS during a six-year timespan.


Assuntos
Vacinas Anti-Haemophilus , Haemophilus influenzae tipo b , Poliomielite , Vacina contra Difteria, Tétano e Coqueluche , Vacinas contra Hepatite B , Humanos , Imunização/efeitos adversos , Esquemas de Imunização , Lactente , Poliomielite/etiologia , Vacina Antipólio de Vírus Inativado/efeitos adversos , Vacinação , Vacinas Combinadas
19.
Lancet Reg Health West Pac ; 16: 100284, 2021 Nov.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34881371

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: China's three inactivated enterovirus A71 (EV-A71) vaccines are the first and currently world's only EV-A71 vaccines approved by a national regulatory authority and used to prevent EV-A71 associated diseases. The three vaccines vary by vaccine strain, manufacturing cell substrate, and antigen dose, but no head-to-head comparisons of these vaccines have been done. We compared immunogenicity of the vaccines in children 6-35 months old. METHODS: We recruited healthy children aged 6-35 months who lived in a study site county into a multicentre, open-label, non-inferiority, three-group, randomised controlled trial that was conducted in five counties in China. Enrolled children were randomly assigned (1:1:1) to receive two doses of one of the three EV-A71 vaccines. The primary outcome was the proportion of children with EV-A71 neutralizing antibody seroconversion 4 weeks after the second dose; a secondary outcome was adverse events in the 4 weeks after each dose. Analyses of immunogenicity included all children who completed the study (per-protocol analysis). Safety analysis included all children completed safety follow-up after at least one. We used a 10% margin to establish non-inferiority. This trial was registered on a World Health Organization platform: Chinese Clinical Trial Registry (ChiCTR1900026663). FINDINGS: 1631 children were assessed for eligibility between Nov 4 and Nov 20, 2019. Of 1500 (92%) enrolled children, 500 were assigned to vaccine group A, B, or C; 483 in group A,484 in group B, and 487 in group C completed the study. Before dose one, the seropositive rates in groups A, B, and C were 9.7%, 7.2%, and 7.0%. Four weeks after the second dose, seroconversion rates of groups A, B, and C were 98.8%, 99.4% and 99.8% - mutually non-inferior in all two-group comparisons. There were no serious adverse events in any group and no evidence of a difference among the three groups in the incidence of local adverse event or systemic adverse event. Fever was the most common adverse event. All children with reported adverse events recovered. INTERPRETATION: Non-inferior and high seroconversion rates and equivalent safety of three EV-A71 vaccines supports use any of these vaccines to prevent EV-A71-associated diseases. These results may be useful for regulators, vaccine policy makers, and immunization programmes in China and in countries where EV-A71 is endemic.

20.
Hum Vaccin Immunother ; 17(12): 5447-5453, 2021 Dec 02.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34613883

RESUMO

OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the reporting rate of adverse events following immunization (AEFI) of the quadrivalent human papillomavirus vaccine (4vHPV) and to compare the reporting rate of AEFI following 4vHPV with those following other vaccines. METHODS: Review and describe the AEFI reported to national adverse event following immunization surveillance system (NAEFISS) in Zhejiang province from 2018 to 2020. Reporting rates of AEFI were calculated by age, city, severity of AEFI, categories of AEFI, and reaction categories. The data mining algorithm used in this study was reporting odds ratio (ROR). A value of ROR­1.96SE >1 (standard error [SE]) was considered as positive signal. RESULTS: NAEFISS received 238 reports after receipt of 4vHPV and 899,282 doses of 4vHPV were administered during the study period, with a crude reporting rate of 2.7/10000 doses. Fever/redness/induration (101 reports) was the most common event reported (1.12/10000 doses). Two cases of anaphylactic shock, three cases of Guillain Barre Syndrome and two cases of acute disseminated encephalomyelitis were reported. ROR showed positive signals for seizure (ROR­1.96SE: 2.1), syncope (ROR­1.96SE: 1.3), allergic rash (ROR­1.96SE: 1.6) and headache (ROR­1.96SE: 2.1). CONCLUSION: The present analysis did not identify new/unexpected safety concerns. Further epidemiological studies are required to systematically validate the data provided by NAEFISS.


Assuntos
Síndrome de Guillain-Barré , Vacinas contra Papillomavirus , Sistemas de Notificação de Reações Adversas a Medicamentos , Síndrome de Guillain-Barré/induzido quimicamente , Humanos , Imunização/efeitos adversos , Vacinas contra Papillomavirus/efeitos adversos , Vacinação/efeitos adversos
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA