Response to local corticosteroid injections in carpal tunnel syndrome with normal conduction studies.

INTRODUCTION: Nerve conduction studies (NCS) have been considered as the gold standard in carpal tunnel syndrome (CTS) diagnosis, despite correlation between clinical symptomatology and NCS severity has shown to be poor. In fact, clinical symptoms precede NCS changes in months or years. Few papers have been published about the clinical response to treatment of clinically typical CTS, but with normal NCS (NNCS). OBJECTIVE: To compare the clinical response to local corticosteroid injections (LCI) in clinically typical CTS, with NNCS and abnormal NCS (ANCS). METHOD: We included patients older than 18, with typical CTS symptoms (ongoing daily nocturnal pain/paresthesias in hand, at least during 3 months). Follow-up was done at 3, 6 and 12 months. Primary outcome was the visual analog scale for pain (p-VAS), comparing NNCS CTS wrists with ANCS CTS wrists. Statistic signification was established by the Student's t test, Mann-Whitney's "U", χ2 test and Yates' correction. RESULTS: We included 44 wrists in the NNCS group, and 83 in the ANCS group. There was no statistical significance between data in both groups, except in the 12-month follow-up, where the NNCS group achieved better results than the ANCS group in the 20% response (p=0.006). There was a trend toward a better 50% response in the 12-month follow-up. CONCLUSIONS: Our data suggest that LCI are similarly effective in both CTS with NNCS and ANCS. Nonetheless, there is a mild better effect in NNCS than in ANCS at 12-month follow-up.

Long-term Outcome of Local Steroid Injections Versus Surgery in Carpal Tunnel Syndrome: Observational Extension of a Randomized Clinical Trial.

Background: In a previous paper, we have demonstrated that: (1) local injection of corticosteroids for carpal tunnel syndrome (CTS) is as effective as decompressive surgery, at 1-year follow-up; and (2) surgery has an additional benefit in the 2-year follow-up. In this study, we assess the long-term outcomes of both therapies in an observational extension of the patients originally enrolled in our randomized clinical trial. Methods: Patients were included in an open, randomized clinical trial, comparing injections versus surgery in CTS. After the end of the clinical trial, patients received the treatment prescribed by their general practitioner or specialist. Therapeutic failure was defined as the need of any new therapeutic intervention on the involved wrist. Comparison between groups was made using Cox multiple regression analysis. Estimation of the accumulated incidence of new therapeutic failure was made considering the withdrawal as a competitive risk (Gooley's test). Results: Of 163 randomized wrists at the beginning of the study, only 148 were available at the final follow-up. The mean follow-up was 6.3 and the median was 5.9 years. In the long-term follow-up, the accumulated incidence of therapeutic failure in the surgery group was 11.6% versus 41.8% in the injection group. The Cox multiple regression analysis showed a risk of failure associated with injection group of 4.5 (95% confidence interval [CI], 2.1-9.8; P < .0001). Conclusions: In long-term follow-up, surgery seems more effective than local corticosteroid injections in primary CTS. Nonetheless, about 58% of the patients in the injection group will not need further therapeutic interventions during the follow-up.

Response to Local Corticosteroid Injections in Carpal Tunnel Syndrome With Normal Conduction Studies.

INTRODUCTION: Nerve conduction studies (NCS) have been considered as the gold standard in carpal tunnel syndrome (CTS) diagnosis, despite correlation between clinical symptomatology and NCS severity has shown to be poor. In fact, clinical symptoms precede NCS changes in months or years. Few papers have been published about the clinical response to treatment of clinically typical CTS, but with normal NCS (NNCS). OBJECTIVE: To compare the clinical response to local corticosteroid injections (LCI) in clinically typical CTS, with NNCS and abnormal NCS (ANCS). METHOD: We included patients older than 18, with typical CTS symptoms (ongoing daily nocturnal pain/paresthesias in hand, at least during 3 months). Follow-up was done at 3, 6 and 12 months. Primary outcome was the visual analog scale for pain (p-VAS), comparing NNCS CTS wrists with ANCS CTS wrists. Statistic signification was established by the Student's t test, Mann-Whitney's "U", χ2 test and Yates' correction. RESULTS: We included 44 wrists in the NNCS group, and 83 in the ANCS group. There was no statistical significance between data in both groups, except in the 12-month follow-up, where the NNCS group achieved better results than the ANCS group in the 20% response (p=0.006). There was a trend toward a better 50% response in the 12-month follow-up. CONCLUSIONS: Our data suggest that LCI are similarly effective in both CTS with NNCS and ANCS. Nonetheless, there is a mild better effect in NNCS than in ANCS at 12-month follow-up.

Prevalence, Incidence, and Sex Ratio of Transsexualism in the Autonomous Region of Madrid (Spain) According to Healthcare Demand.

In recent years, different studies have provided estimates of the prevalence of transsexualism with very diverse results. The purpose of this study was to ascertain the prevalence, incidence, and sex ratio of transsexualism in the autonomous region of Madrid (Spain). A total of 1234 patients who attended from 2007 to the end of 2015 in the only Gender Identity Unit (GIU) in Madrid were analyzed. Sixty-three patients were excluded for various reasons; thus, 1171 could be included: 803 male-to-female (MtF) and 368 female-to-male (FtM) transsexual patients. Transsexualism was diagnosed based on the ICD-10, World Health Organization, 1992, and/or gender identity disorder based on the DSM-IV-TR, American Psychiatric Association, 2000. The demographic statistics were calculated on the basis of the population over 15 years old of Madrid. Based on healthcare demand, the prevalence of transsexualism was 22.1 in 100,000 inhabitants: 31.2 for MtF and 12.9 for FtM, making the MtF/FtM ratio approximately 2.2:1. The incidence rate was 2.5 in 100,000 inhabitants, representing an annual average of 130 demands. Although transsexualism occurs in all countries with different rates of prevalence, in our area, this prevalence was higher than reported from other European countries. We believe that two main circumstances might influence this high prevalence: the easy accessibility and the absence of a waiting list to the GIU, and the permissive social and legal climate and openness of Spain, especially in Madrid.

Local injection versus surgery in carpal tunnel syndrome: neurophysiologic outcomes of a randomized clinical trial.

OBJECTIVE: The aim of our study was to characterize the neurophysiologic outcomes in a randomized clinical trial comparing local corticosteroid injection and decompressive surgery in idiopathic carpal tunnel syndrome. METHODS: Clinical and neurophysiologic assessments were done at baseline and 12 months after treatment. Four parameters were evaluated in the nerve conduction study (NCS): distal motor latency, motor amplitude, sensory conduction velocity and sensory amplitude. Statistic signification was established by the Student's t test, independent and paired samples, and Mann-Whitney test. Repeated measures analysis of variance was used by the three domains of symptoms. Correlations between the changes showed in clinical parameters and those evidenced by electromyography were calculated by the Pearson's test. RESULTS: Both groups of therapy were comparable at baseline. In 95 wrists, a second NCS was done 12 months post-treatment. Although clinical outcome improved in a similar way in both groups, we found statistically significant improvement in three (distal motor latency, sensory conduction velocity and sensory amplitude) of four neurophysiologic parameters only in the surgery group, when compared to baseline values. CONCLUSIONS: Although local corticosteroid injection and decompressive surgery are clinically effective in reducing symptoms of carpal tunnel syndrome, only surgery results in an improvement of the neurophysiologic parameters, at 12-months follow-up. SIGNIFICANCE: Only decompressive surgery allows resolution of neurophysiologic changes. The symptoms of the syndrome are resolved with corticosteroid injections.

Comparison of surgical decompression and local steroid injection in the treatment of carpal tunnel syndrome: 2-year clinical results from a randomized trial.

OBJECTIVE: To compare the efficacy of surgical decompression vs local steroid injection in the treatment of idiopathic CTS. METHODS: This is an open, prospective, randomized clinical trial. We studied the effects of surgical decompression vs local steroid injection in 163 wrists with a clinical diagnosis and neurophysiological confirmation of CTS, with an extended follow-up of 2 years. The primary end point was the percentage of wrists that reached a ≥ 20% improvement in the visual analogue scale score for nocturnal paraesthesias. Statistical analysis was done by Student's t-test for continuous variables and by chi-square test for categorical variables. Analyses were performed on an intent-to-treat basis. P < 0.05 were considered statistically significant. RESULTS: Both treatment groups had comparable severity of CTS at baseline. Eighty wrists were randomly assigned to surgical decompression and 83 wrists to local steroid injection. Fifty-five wrists in the surgery group and 48 wrists in the injection group completed the 2-year follow-up. In the intent-to-treat analysis, at 2-year follow-up, 60% of the wrists in the injection group vs 69% in the surgery group reached a 20% response for nocturnal paraesthesias (P < 0.001). CONCLUSION: Our findings suggest that both local steroid injection and surgical decompression are effective treatments in alleviating symptoms in primary CTS at 2-year follow-up. Surgery has an additional benefit in the 2-year follow-up, although clinical relevance of those differences remains to be defined. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Current Controlled Trials, www.controlled-trials.com, ISRCTN26264638.

[Economic evaluation of tramadol/paracetamol in the management of pain in patients with osteoarthritis in Spain]. / Evaluación económica de tramadol/paracetamol en el manejo del dolor en pacientes con osteoartrosis en España.

OBJECTIVE: To compare the costs of treating osteoarthritis (OA) pain using combination tramadol/paracetamol tablets, Non-Steroidal Anti-Inflammatory Agents (NSAID) alone or NSAID plus proton pump inhibitors (PPI) from the perspective of the Spanish National Health System. METHODS: A decision-analytical model was constructed to analyze the cost associated with three treatment strategies over 6 months. A cost-minimization approach was used, which considered data related to resource use, medication costs and costs for the treatment of adverse events. RESULTS: In the base-case analysis, costs for 6 months of treatment of OA pain using tramadol/paracetamol were €232.86, compared with €274.60 for NSAID + PPI and €133.75 for NSAID alone. This provided a savings of €41.74 per patient over 6 months for tramadol/paracetamol compared with NSAID + PPI and a cost increase of €99.11 compared with NSAID alone. When renal adverse events associated with NSAID were considered, tramadol/paracetamol was cost saving compared with all NSAID-based regimens (saving €140.02 vs NSAID alone, €280.86 vs NSAID + PPI). CONCLUSION: Based on the results of a theoretical decision-analytic model, the data obtained may suggest that tramadol/paracetamol is cost saving compared with NSAID + PPI for the treatment of OA pain over a period of 6 months. Tramadol/paracetamol is also cost saving compared with treatment with NSAID alone if considering renal adverse events.

Surgical decompression versus local steroid injection in carpal tunnel syndrome: a one-year, prospective, randomized, open, controlled clinical trial.

OBJECTIVE: Optimal treatment of carpal tunnel syndrome (CTS) has not been established. This study compared the effects of local steroid injection versus surgical decompression in new-onset CTS of at least 3 months' duration. METHODS: In a 1-year, prospective, randomized, open, controlled clinical trial, we studied the effects of surgical decompression versus local steroid injection in 163 wrists with a clinical and neurophysiologic diagnosis of CTS. Clinical assessments were done at baseline and at 3, 6, and 12 months after treatment. The primary end point was the percentage of wrists that reached a >or=20% improvement in the visual analog scale score for nocturnal paresthesias at 3 months of followup. Statistical analysis was done by Student's t-test for continuous variables and by chi-square test for categorical variables. Analyses were performed on an intent-to-treat basis. P values less than 0.05 were considered statistically significant. RESULTS: Both treatment groups had comparable severity of CTS at baseline. Eighty wrists were randomly assigned to the surgery group and 83 wrists to the local steroid injection group. In the intent-to-treat analysis, at 3 months of followup, 94.0% of the wrists in the steroid injection group versus 75.0% in the surgery group reached a 20% response for nocturnal paresthesias (P = 0.001). At 6 and 12 months, the percentages of responders were 85.5% versus 76.3% (P = 0.163) and 69.9% versus 75.0% (P = 0.488), for local steroid injection and surgical decompression, respectively. CONCLUSION: Over the short term, local steroid injection is better than surgical decompression for the symptomatic relief of CTS. At 1 year, local steroid injection is as effective as surgical decompression for the symptomatic relief of CTS.