[Effects of remimazolam versus propofol on postoperative recovery quality in elderly patients undergoing thoracoscopic laparoscopic radical esophagectomy].

Objective: To investigate the effects of remimazolam versus propofol on postoperative recovery quality in elderly patients undergoing thoracoscopic laparoscopic radical esophagectomy. Methods: A total of 108 elderly patients undergoing thoracoscopic laparoscopic radical esophagectomy under general anesthesia in the Affiliated Cancer Hospital of Zhengzhou University from May to October 2022 were prospectively included. The participants were divided into two groups by the random number table method: remimazolam group (R group, n=54) and propofol group (P group, n=54). There were 54 cases in the R group, with 35males and 19 females, and aged (65.4±3.1) years. Meanwhile, there were 54 cases in the P group, with 33males and 21 females, and aged (64.5±3.0) years. Anesthesia was induced as follows: remimazolam 0.2-0.3 mg/kg and remifentanil 0.5-1.0 µg/kg were intravenously injected in R group, while propofol 1-2 mg/kg and remifentanil 0.5-1.0 µg/kg were intravenously injected in P group. Subsequently, anesthesia was maintained as follows: remimazolam 0.4-1.0 mg·kg-1·h-1 and remifentanil 0.05-0.2 µg·kg-1·min-1 were intravenously infused in group R, while propofol 4-10 mg·kg-1·h-1 and remifentanil 0.05-0.2 µg·kg-1·min-1 were intravenously infused in group P. Bispectral index (BIS) was maintained at 45-60 during operation. The main outcome measures were the 15-item quality of recovery (QoR-15) scores 1 day before surgery, 1 day and 3 days after surgery. Secondary outcome measures included mean arterial pressure (MAP), heart rate and pulse oxygen saturation (SpO2) recorded 5 min before anesthesia induction (T0), 1 min after induction (T1), 1 min after endotracheal intubation (T2), immediately after skin incision (T3) and tracheal extubation (T4). The incidence of bradycardia and hypotension and the frequency of application of vasoactive drugs during anesthesia were recorded. Restlessness score (RS) and Ramsay sedation scale during the awakening period were recorded. Emergence time, tracheal extubation time, duration of postanesthesia care unit (PACU) stay and postoperative length of hospital stay were recorded. The incidence of postoperative pulmonary infection and other complications were also recorded. Results: The QoR-15 scale scores [M (Q1, Q3)] of R group 1 day and 3 days after surgery were 114.0 (109.0, 118.3) and 131.0 (127.8, 133.0), which were higher than those of P group [106.0 (101.0, 112.0) and 127.0 (125.0, 129.3)] (both P<0.001). The incidence of bradycardia, hypotension and the frequency of application of vasoactive drugs of R group during anesthesia were 5.6% (3/54), 35.2% (19/54) and 27.8% (15/54), which were lower than those in P group [33.3% (18/54), 63.0% (34/54) and 55.6% (30/54), respectively] (all P<0.05). RS score during the awakening period in R group was 0.9±0.5, which was lower than that of P group (1.1±0.6) (P=0.046). Emergence time, tracheal extubation time and postoperative length of hospital stay of R group were (15.4±4.9) min, (16.6±4.7) min and (11.6±1.4) d, which were shorter than those of P group [(26.2±6.4) min, (27.8±5.8) min and (12.6±1.3) d] (all P<0.05). There were no statistically significant differences in Ramsay scores during the awakening period, duration of PACU stay and the incidence of postoperative complications (all P>0.05). Conclusions: Both remimazolam and propofol can achieve satisfactory postoperative recovery quality in elderly patients undergoing thoracoscopic laparoscopic radical esophagectomy. Remimazolam has more stable hemodynamics and lower incidence of adverse reactions.

[Effects of S(+)-ketamine combined with sufentanil for patient-controlled intravenous analgesia on the early recovery in elderly patients undergoing laparoscopic radical resection of rectal cancer].

Objective: To observe the efficacy and safety of S(+)-ketamine combined with sufentanil for patient-controlled intravenous analgesia (PCIA) in elderly patients undergoing laparoscopic radical resection of rectal cancer and explore its impact on patients' early recovery. Methods: One hundred and ten patients undergoing laparoscopic radical resection of rectal cancer in Affiliated Cancer Hospital of Zhengzhou University from December 2020 to March 2021, were divided into two groups (n=55) using a random number table: group S received PCIA, with continuous infusion of S(+)-ketamine combined with sufentanil, while group C received PCIA, with continuous infusion of sufentanil. PCIA was initiated at the end of the surgery, and the formulations were as follows: group S, S(+)-ketamine (1.44 mg/kg), sufentanil (1.05 µg/kg), ketorolac tromethamine (2.0 mg/kg) and tropisetron (5 mg), in 100 ml of normal saline; group C: sufentanil (1.50 µg/kg), ketorolac tromethamine (2.0 mg/kg) and tropisetron (5 mg), in 100 ml of normal saline. Postoperative visual analogue scale (VAS) and Ramsay sedation scale were recorded at 6, 12, 24, 36, 48 h after the surgery. The incidence of remedial analgesia, the effective compressions number of PCI during 48 h after the operation. Time to first ambulation, time to first anal exhaust, time to resume oral feeding were recorded. The occurrence of adverse effects was compared between the two groups. Results: A total of 10 patients were excluded during the study, including 4 cases of conversion to laparotomy, 3 cases of dropping out of the study, and 3 cases with operation time more than 4 hours. Finally, 50 cases in group S and 50 cases in group C completed the study. There were no significant differences in VAS scores and Ramsay sedation sores at all time points between two groups (all P>0.05). Likewise, there were also no significant differences in the number of remedial analgesia and effective compressions of PCIA during 48 h after the operation between the two groups (both P>0.05). The total dosage of sufentanil consumption in group S [(64±9) µg] was lower than that in group C [(95±12) µg] within 48 h of PCIA, with a statistically significant difference (P<0.001). Time to first ambulation in group S was (1.1±0.2) d, which was shorter than that in group C [(1.6±0.5) d], and the difference was statistically significant (P<0.001). Likewise, time to first anal exhaust in group S [(1.3±0.4) d] was shorter than that in group C [(1.8±0.6) d], with a statistically significant difference (P<0.001). Additionally, time to resume oral feeding in group S was (2.5±0.6) d, which was shorter than that in group C [(3.1±0.7) d], and there was a statistically significant difference (P<0.001). The incidence of nausea, vomiting and pruritus in group S were 4.0%, 2.0% and 0, which were lower than that in group C (16.0%, 10% and 8.0%, respectively), with statistically significant differences (all P<0.05). No case with psychiatric symptoms was found in both groups. Conclusion: When used for postoperative intravenous analgesia in elderly patients undergoing laparoscopic radical resection of rectal cancer, S(+)-ketamine combined with sufentanil can provide satisfactory analgesic effects, decrease total consumption of sufentanil and the incidence of adverse effects, and thus facilitate patients' early recovery.

[Efficacy of two-lung ventilation with different tidal volume assisted by CO2 pneumothorax for airway management in patients undergoing radical resection of esophageal cancer using combined laparoscopic and thoracoscopic approach].

Objective: To evaluate the efficacy of two-lung ventilation with different tidal volume assisted by CO2 pneumothorax for airway management in patients undergoing radical esophagectomy using combined thoracoscopic and laparoscopic approach. Methods: One hundred and eighty patients undergoing radical esophagectomy using combined thoracoscopy and laparoscopy under general anesthesia from the Affiliated Cancer Hospital of Zhengzhou University between February and September 2019 were randomly divided into three groups (group V1, V2, V3, n=60) according to the tidal volume (TV) used. The TVs of group V1-V3 were 4, 5, 7 ml/kg during thoracoscopic surgery, respectively. All the patients were intubated with a single-lumen endotracheal tube and underwent two-lung ventilation assisted by continuous positive pressure CO2 pneumothorax in group V1, V2 and V3, with the CO2 pressure of 10 mmHg (1 mmHg=0.133 kPa) and the frequency of 20 times/min. Mean arterial pressure (MAP) and heart rate (HR) were recorded before thoracoscopic surgery (T1), 30 minutes after thoracoscopic surgery (T2), at the end of thoracoscopic surgery (T3), after thoracoscopic surgery and 30 minutes after two-lung intermittent positive pressure ventilation, respectively. The results of arterial blood gas were collected at T1, T2, T3 and T4. Recovery time from anesthesia, consciousness recovery time, and lung collapse condition were recorded. Results: At T2, the value of MAP in group V1 was (81±10) mmHg, which was higher than those of group V2 [(69±7) mmHg] and group V3 [(71±8) mmHg], with a statistically significant difference (F=9.270, P<0.05). Meanwhile, at T2, the value of HR in group V1 was (83±7) times/min, which was higher than those of group V2 [(68±6) times/min] and group V3 [(71±7) times/min], and there was a statistically significant difference (F=23.460, P<0.05). However, at T2, the values of arterial partial pressure of oxygen (PaO2) in three groups were (262±16), (249±16) and (241±20) mmHg, respectively, with no statistically significant difference (F=1.929, P>0.05). At T3, the value of arterial partial pressure of carbon dioxide (PaCO2) in group V3 was (46±5) mmHg, which was lower than those of group V1 [(63±9) mmHg] and V2 [(62±10) mmHg], with a statistically significant difference (F=20.890, P<0.05). Moreover, at T3, the value of pH in group V3 was (7.35±0.04), which was higher than those of group V1 (7.28±0.04) and V2 (7.32±0.04), and there was a statistically significant difference (F=9.309, P<0.05). Additionally, the satisfaction rates of lung collapse in group V3 was 57.1%, which was lower than those of group V1 (94.7%) and group V2 (96.3%), with a statistically significant difference (χ²=7.601, P<0.05). There was no statistical significance in the time of awakening and consciousness recovery among three groups (F=1.020 and 1.110, both P>0.05). Conclusion: The two-lung ventilation with 5 ml/kg tidal volume assisted by CO2 pneumothorax has advantages in terms of hemodynamics and surgical field exposure, and is more suitable as the appropriate dose for respiratory management in patients undergoing radical resection of esophageal cancer using combined thoracoscopic and laparoscopic approach.

[Application of different kinds of endotracheal intubation in the combined thoracoscopic and laparoscopic esophagectomy].

Objective: To observe the application of three different kinds of endotracheal intubation in the combined thoracoscopic and laparoscopic esophagectomy. Methods: one hundred and eighty patients undergoing combined thoracoscopic and laparoscopic esophagectomy under general anesthesia from the Affiliated Cancer Hospital of Zhengzhou University from February to September 2019 were randomly divided into three groups which include: double-lumen endotracheal intubation group (group S,n=60),single-lumen endotracheal intubation group (group D,n=60) and Coopdech occlusion of bronchial catheter combined with a single-lumen endotracheal intubation group (group C,n=60). The arterial blood samples were collected immediately after endotracheal intubation (T0), 30 min after artificial pneumothorax (single lung ventilation) (T1), 30 min after artificial pneumothorax (double lung ventilation) (T2), and 30 min after extubation (T3) to detect arterial blood gas. Patients' heart rate (HR), blood oxygen partial pressure (PaO2), blood carbon dioxide partial pressure (PaCO2) and airway pressure(Paw) were recorded at T0-T3.Completion time of endotracheal intubation, carbon dioxide intrathoracic inflation pressure, degree of lung collapse and incidence of postoperative 3-day pneumonia in three groups were recorded. The bronchoalveolar lavage fluid (BALF) of patients at T0, T2 and the end of the operation (T4) were collected to detect the levels of tumor necrosis factor-α(TNF-α), interleukin-6 (IL-6) and interleukin-8 (IL-8) in BALF by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA). Results: A total of 14 patients were excluded during the operation, of which 9 cases lasted longer than 6 hours, 3 cases had arrhythmia during the operation and 2 cases lasted less than 1 hour. Finally, 56 cases in group S, 54 cases in group D and 56 cases in group C completed the experiment. The satisfaction rates of lung collapse in group S, group D and group C were 85.7% (48/56), 100.0% (54/54), 89.2% (50/56), respectively, with no statistically significant difference (χ²=1.308, P>0.05). The intrathoracic inflation pressure of carbon dioxide in group D was (10.2±2.2) mmHg (1 mmHg=0.133 kPa), which was higher than (5.1±3.4) mmHg in group S and (5.6±3.1) mmHg in group C, the difference was statistically significant (F=-9.303, P<0.05). The incidence of postoperative 3-day pneumonia in group D was 14.8%, which was lower than 39.3% in group S and 17.8% in group C, the difference was statistically significant (χ²=8.300, P<0.05). At T4, the value of TNF-α in group D was (122.4±4.4) ng/L, which was lower than that in group S and group C, (257.9±6.3) and (185.8±5.6) ng/L, with statistically significant difference (F=69.020, P<0.05). At T4, the value of IL-6 in group D was (175.4±4.9) ng/L, which was lower than that of patients in group S and group C, (289.6±6.8) and (226.2±4.4) ng/L, with statistically significant difference (F=59.750, P<0.05). At T4, the value of IL-8 in group D was (303.1±7.2) ng/L, which was lower than in group S and group C, (595.4±22.1) and (436.8±10.9) ng/L, with statistically significant difference (F=55.359, P<0.05). Conclusion: All the three endotracheal intubations can produce satisfactory ventilation effect in the combined thoracoscopic and laparoscopic esophagectomy, however, single-lumen endotracheal intubation has less effect on lung injury.

[Effects of patient-controlled intravenous analgesia with butorphanol versus sufentanil on early postoperative rehabilitation following radical laparoscopic nephrectomy].

Objective: To investigate the effects of patient-controlled intravenous analgesia with butorphanol versus sufentanil on early postoperative rehabilitation following radical laparoscopic nephrectomy. Methods: One hundred patients undergoing radical laparoscopic nephrectomy in Affiliated Cancer Hospital of Zhengzhou University from September 2018 to February 2020 were divided into two groups (n=50) using a random number table: butorphanol patient-controlled intravenous analgesia group (group A) and sufentanil patient-controlled intravenous analgesia group (group B). Patient-controlled intravenous analgesia (PCIA) was performed at the end of surgery. The formulation of group A was butorphanol (0.15 mg/kg) and ketorolac tromethamine (180 mg) using the physiological saline at a dilution of 100 ml. The formulation of group B was sufentanil (1.5 µg/kg) and ketorolac tromethamine (180 mg) using the physiological saline at a dilution of 100 ml. At the time points of 4, 8, 24, 48 h after operation (T(1), T(2), T(3), T(4)), VAS scores at rest and cough were recorded. The incidence of remedial analgesia, the number of pressings during 48 h after the operation, the postoperative anal exhaust recovery time of the patients were recorded. Quality of recovery-40(QoR-40) scores were recorded at T(3) and T(4). Adverse reactions were recorded. Results: There was no significant difference in VAS scores at rest and cough at T(1), T(2), T(3) and T(4) between two groups (all P>0.05). There was no significant difference in the incidence of remedial analgesia and the number of pressings during 48 h after the operation between two groups (all P>0.05). The postoperative anal exhaust recovery time of the patients in group A was (32±6) h, which was lower than that in group B with statistically significant difference [(40±5) h, t=7.937, P<0.01]. The QoR-40 total scores in group A were higher than those in group B at T(3) and T(4), which were (185.8±2.5) vs (170.7±2.7), (194.8±1.9) vs (183.6±2.6), and the differences were statistically significant (t=28.878, 25.025, all P<0.01). The incidence of nausea, retching/vomiting, respiratory depression and itch during 48 h after the operation in group A were 10%, 6%, 2%, 2%, which were lower than that in group B (32%, 20%, 14%, 18%), with statistically significant difference (χ(2)=7.294, 4.322, 4.891, 5.983, all P<0.05). Conclusion: PCIA with butorphanol or sufentanil can provide satisfactory analgesia for patients undergoing radical laparoscopic nephrectomy, but butorphanol can promote postoperative rehabilitation with fewer adverse reactions.