Use of an automated pyrosequencing technique for confirmation of sickle cell disease.

BACKGROUND: The diagnosis of sickle cell disease (SCD) is made by hemoglobin assays such as high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC), isoelectric focusing and cellulose acetate or citrate agar electrophoresis. These assays are easy to perform and used in large-scale newborn screening in many countries. These tests however may not easily differentiate Sß0 thalassemia from SS or identify other hemoglobin variants, and in this case, hemoglobin (HBB) gene sequencing may be necessary. OBJECTIVES: To develop a high throughput DNA based confirmatory assay for SCD and to detect mutations in the HBB gene. METHODS: We developed an automated pyrosequencing technique (PyS) based on QIAGEN technology (Hilden, Germany) to detect homozygous or heterozygous hemoglobin S mutations as well as hemoglobin C mutations. The technique was tested on 2,748 samples from patients enrolled in a multi-center SCD cohort in Brazil. Patients were previously tested using HPLC to diagnose SCD as part of routine clinical care. Any subjects with discrepant results between HPLC and PyS or with heterozygous hemoglobin S detected had Sanger sequencing of the HBB gene. RESULTS: We identified 168 samples with discrepant results between HPLC and PyS and 100 with concordant PyS = heterozygous S and HPLC, which would suggest SB-thalassemia or other heterozygous S variants. The PyS assay correctly identified 1906 (98.7%) of the 1930 HbSS and 628 (98.7%) of the 636 HbSC samples. Of the 179 remaining samples, PyS correctly indicated S heterozygosis in 165 (92.2%). Of the 165 heterozygous S samples confirmed by Sanger as consistent with Sß thalassemia genotype, 84 samples were classified as Sß0 thalassemia and 81 as Sß+ thalassemia. The most frequent beta thalassemia mutations of Sß0 and Sß+ were HBB: c.118C>T (Gln40Stop) and HBB c.92 + 6T> C, respectively. DISCUSSION: The PyS proved to be satisfactory for large-scale confirmatory testing of hemoglobin mutation. Moreover, with this study we were able to describe the most common ß+ and ß0 mutations in SCD patients with Sß-thalassemia in a large multi-institutional SCD cohort in Brazil.

Patterns of care and burden of chronic idiopathic thrombocytopenic purpura in Brazil.

AIMS: Although several therapeutic options are available for chronic immune thrombocytopenic purpura (cITP), little is known about the treatment of cITP in Brazil. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A multi-center, retrospective chart review, observational study was designed to describe the treatment patterns, clinical burden, resources use, and associated costs for adult patients diagnosed with cITP and treated in public and private institutions in Brazil. Patient charts were screened in reverse chronological order based on their last visit post January 1, 2012. (All costs were calculated using 1.00 USD = 3.9571 BRL, from February 2016.) Results: Of 340 patient charts screened, 50 patients were eligible for inclusion in the study. Single-drug therapy (prednisone, dexamethasone, or dapsone) was the most commonly used treatment, followed by combination therapies (azathioprine + prednisone, azathioprine + prednisone + danazol, and prednisone + dapsone). Splenectomy was performed in 22% of patients after at least first-line treatment. Platelet count and number of bleeding episodes at diagnosis were 31,561.1/mm3 (SD = ±26,396.1) and 40 episodes, respectively; in first-line, 92,631.1/mm3 (SD = ±79,955.3) and 19 episodes, respectively; in second-line, 96,950.0/mm3 (SD = ±76,476.4) and 17 episodes, respectively. Private system patients had a higher median cost compared to public system patients (USD 17.49/month, range = 0-2,020.77 vs USD 9.51/month, range = 0-192.64, respectively). LIMITATIONS: This study does not allow conclusions for causal explanations due to the cohort study design, and treatment patterns represent only the practices of physicians who have agreed to participate in the study. CONCLUSIONS: The data indicate that available therapeutic strategies for second- and third-line therapies appear to be limited.