A comparative study on clinical and serological characteristics between patients with rhupus and those with systemic lupus erythematosus and rheumatoid arthritis.

BACKGROUND: The concomitant presence of two autoimmune diseases - systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) and rheumatoid arthritis (RA) - in the same patient is known as rhupus. We evaluated a group of patients with rhupus to clarify further their clinical, serological and immunogenic features in a multi-centre cohort. In addition, the study aimed to explore the utility of the 2019 European League Against Rheumatism/American College of Rheumatology (EULAR/ACR) SLE classification criteria in our group of patients with rhupus. METHODS: This was a cross-sectional study. We included rhupus patients from 11 different rheumatology departments, and compared them to SLE and RA patients at a ratio of 2:1. All information was recorded following a pre-established protocol. RESULTS: A total of 200 patients were included: 40 rhupus patients and 80 each of SLE and RA patients as controls. Disease duration was similar among SLE and rhupus groups (around 13 years), but the RA group had a significantly lower disease duration. Main clinical manifestations were articular (94.2%), cutaneous (77.5%) and haematological (72.5%). Rhupus patients had articular manifestations similar to those expected in RA. Only 10% of rhupus patients had renal involvement compared with 25% of those with SLE (p < 0.05), while interstitial lung disease was more common in patients affected by RA. The 2019 EULAR/ACR SLE criteria were met in 92.5% of the rhupus patients and in 96.3% of the SLE cohort (p > 0.05). Excluding the joint domain, there were no differences between the numbers of patients who met the classification criteria. CONCLUSION: Rhupus patients follow a particular clinical course, with full expression of both SLE and RA in terms of organ involvement, except for a lower prevalence of kidney affection. The new 2019 EULAR/ACR SLE criteria are not useful for differentiating SLE and rhupus patients. A new way of classifying autoimmune diseases is needed to identify overlapping clusters.

Coexistence of septic and crystal-induced arthritis: A diagnostic challenge. A report of 25 cases. / Coexistencia de artritis séptica y microcristalina: un reto diagnóstico. A propósito de 25 casos.

OBJECTIVE: Septic arthritis is a medical emergency and crystal-induced arthritis is a risk factor for its development. If both occur simultaneously, crystal-induced arthritis may mask the diagnosis of infection and delay antibiotic therapy. METHOD: Retrospective analysis of patients with coexistence of septic and crystal-induced arthritis. We included only patients with isolation of crystals in synovial fluid analysis and positive culture of synovial fluid and/or blood culture. RESULTS: A total of 25 patients (17 men and 8 women) with a mean age of 67 years. The most commonly affected joint was the knee. In synovial fluid cytological studies, the most frequently identified crystals were monosodium urate. Risk factors included diabetes and chronic renal failure. The most frequently isolated germs were methicillin-sensitive S. aureus (48%), methicillin-resistant S. aureus (12%) and Mycobacterium tuberculosis (12%). In all, 36% of subjects required surgical drainage (excluding those caused by M. tuberculosis). Clinical outcome was favorable in 56%, although intercurrent complications were usual (40%). Mortality was 8%. CONCLUSIONS: Coexistence of septic and crystal-induced arthritis represents a diagnostic challenge and requires a high index of suspicion. Gout was the most prevalent crystal-induced arthritis. S. aureus was the most commonly causative pathogen, with a high rate of methicillin-resistant S. aureus infection. If treated early, the outcome is usually favorable, making synovial fluid microbiological study imperative.

Immune-mediated inflammatory diseases differently affect IGRAs' accuracy for latent tuberculosis infection diagnosis in clinical practice.

BACKGROUND: Clinical accuracy of IGRAs remains unclear on patients with immune-mediated inflammatory diseases (IMIDs). Here, we assess the impact of immunosuppressants and IMIDs on QuantiFERON-TB Gold In-Tube (QFN-G-IT) and T-SPOT.TB accuracy. METHODS: Patients with IMIDs who required latent tuberculosis infection (LTBI) screening were enrolled and classified into: (i) 50 patients with inflammatory rheumatic diseases, (ii) 50 patients with psoriasis and (iii) 30 patients with Crohn's disease. A total of 44 healthy individuals without immunosuppression were also included as controls. Tuberculin skin test (TST), T-SPOT.TB and QFN-G-IT assays were performed. IGRAs were performed following manufacturer's instructions. RESULTS: Immunosuppressant's intake was more frequent on patients with Crohn's disease and psoriasis. Positive IGRAs and TST results were reduced in Crohn's disease patients, whereas rate of indeterminate T-SPOT.TB results was increased in this group with respect to the other IMIDs analysed and controls. When IFN-γ response was studied, the levels of this cytokine after mitogen stimulation were significantly lower in Crohn's and inflammatory rheumatic diseases than in psoriasis. Interestingly, psoriatic patients were the only ones not receiving corticosteroids. Furthermore, a negative correlation was observed between the IFN-γ secreted after mitogen stimulation and corticosteroids dose. CONCLUSIONS: IMIDs seem to negatively affect the clinical accuracy of IGRAs, being Crohn's disease patients the most affected individuals due to their concomitant drug-profile and impaired immune response.

Use of IFN-γ and IP-10 detection in the diagnosis of latent tuberculosis infection in patients with inflammatory rheumatic diseases.

OBJECTIVES: Biologic agents are used against rheumatic diseases, however, they increase the risk of developing severe infections and diseases such as tuberculosis. We aimed to determine the benefits of IP-10 detection to diagnose latent tuberculosis infection (LTBI) in patients with inflammatory rheumatic diseases on different immunosuppressive drug regimens, and compare these results with IFN-γ detection. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We included 64 patients with inflammatory rheumatic diseases. We used QuantiFERON Gold In-Tube (QFN-G-IT) and T-SPOT.TB to detect IFN-γ production, and an in-house ELISA for IP-10 detection from the previous QFN-G-IT stimulated samples. We assessed the combined use of IFN-γ release assays (IGRAs) and IP-10 test, and analyzed the influence of immunotherapy on the tests performance. RESULTS: We obtained 34.9% positive results by T-SPOT.TB, 25.0% by QFN-G-IT and 31.3% by IP-10 test. The combined use of IGRAs and IP-10 detection increased significantly the amount of positive results (p < 0.0001). Treatment intake had no significant effect on in vitro tests (p > 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: IP-10 and IFN-γ detection is comparable and their combined use could increase the number of positive results in the diagnosis of LTBI in rheumatic patients. The tested assays were not influenced by rheumatoid immunosuppressive therapy. Thus, IP-10 could be of use in the development of new and improved LTBI diagnostic tools.

Septic arthritis due to methylcyllin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus in adults.

INTRODUCTION: Septic arthritis due to methylcyllin resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) is a serious infection that has increased in incidence in the past 10years. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective study (1984-2011) in which a description of the clinical and epidemiological characteristics of MRSA arthritis in adults was performed and then compared to native joint infections caused by MRSA vs. methylcyllin sensitive Staphylococcus aureus (MSSA). RESULTS: Fourteen MRSA infections were included (7 native joint, 5 prosthetic and 2 bursae). No case was polyarticular. There was significant comorbidity, although none was associated to rheumatoid arthritis. Seven patients had bacteremia. Four required surgical treatment. Six died. When comparing the 7 patients with native joint MRSA infection with the 17 cases caused by MSSA, no significant differences in risk factors were seen, except more malignancies in the MRSA group. The infection was polyarticular in 7 cases (41%) of the MSSA group. Bacteremia was more frequent in the MRSA group (71.4 vs 58.8%). Empirical antibiotic was useful in 28.6% of MRSA cases versus 100% of MSSA cases. There was a greater tendency to associated mortality in MRSA arthritis (57.1% vs 17.6%, P=.07). CONCLUSIONS: MRSA septic arthritis is a serious condition that occurs in the elderly and patients with high comorbidity. It is usually monoarticular, with positive blood cultures and higher mortality than MSSA arthritis. In patients at risk, vancomycin empiric antibiotic therapy is indicated.

Interferon-gamma release assays in the detection of latent tuberculosis infection in patients with inflammatory arthritis scheduled for anti-tumour necrosis factor treatment.

Biological agents, particularly anti-Tumour Necrosis Factor (TNF)-α agents, have emerged as an effective treatment in patients with chronic inflammatory diseases. An association between anti-TNF-α antibodies and reactivation of latent tuberculosis infection (LTBI) has been established. Appropriate screening for TB infection has become mandatory before starting a treatment based on TNF-α inhibition. The objective was to determine the usefulness of IFN-γ release assays in diagnosing LTBI in patients with inflammatory rheumatic diseases scheduled for anti-TNF-α treatment. The study included 53 individuals with inflammatory rheumatism. All patients had a TST, a chest radiograph, QuantiFERON Gold In-Tube (QFN-G-IT) and T-SPOT.TB. To investigate the influence of non-tuberculous mycobacteria (NTM) infections on non-BCG-vaccinated patients, with a positive TST result and both negative IFN-γ assays, we performed an ex vivo ELISPOT, stimulating the cells separately with NTM sensitins. TST was positive in 7 cases, T-SPOT.TB in 11 and QFN-G-IT in 9 cases. Agreement between TST and T-SPOT.TB and QFN-G-IT was 77.35% (κ = 0.33 and κ = 0.40, respectively), and between both in vitro tests, it was 83.01% (κ = 0.57). Of the three patients with positive TST and negative T-SPOT.TB and QFN-G-IT, one positive ELISPOT result was obtained after stimulation with NTM sensitins. Positive TST, T-SPOT.TB and QFN-G-IT results were not affected by the immunosuppressive therapies. IFN-γ release assays are useful methods for avoiding TST false-positive results, but in those patients with a high risk of developing active TB and in the absence of predictive value studies in this specific kind of population for knowing how safe is the use of IGRAs alone, the combined use of TST and IFN-γ tests should be recommended in order to increase the overall number of LTBI diagnoses.

Visceral leishmaniasis and macrophagic activation syndrome in a patient with rheumatoid arthritis under treatment with adalimumab.

BACKGROUND: Visceral leishmaniasis is a protozoan infection usually asymptomatic, but can progress to fatal disease in immunocompromised hosts, especially in HIV patients. Visceral leishmaniasis is rare among patients under immunosuppressive therapies, and even more among patients under anti-TNF-alpha treatment, where only four cases have been described. OBJECTIVE: 1) To describe a patient with rheumatoid arthritis receiving adalimumab who developed fever, pancytopenia, splenomegaly, and extreme hyperferritinemia. 2) To perform a review of the published cases of visceral leishmaniasis and anti-TNF-alpha therapy, and cases of coexisting leishmaniasis and macrophagic activation syndrome by search in PubMed (period 1991-2008). RESULTS: Visceral leishmaniasis was established by bone marrow aspiration, and although there was no histological confirmation, according to HLH-2004 criteria, a secondary macrophagic activation syndrome was established. The patient had a favourable outcome. CONCLUSION: We report herein the fifth case of visceral leishmaniasis in a patient under TNF-alpha therapy, and the first one, to our knowledge, presenting a consequent secondary macrophagic activation syndrome.

Transverse myelitis affecting more than 4 spinal segments associated with systemic lupus erythematosus: clinical, immunological, and radiological characteristics of 22 patients.

OBJECTIVE: To analyze the clinical and laboratory characteristics and outcomes of patients with transverse myelitis affecting more than 4 spinal segments secondary to systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE). METHODS: A computer-assisted (PubMed) search of the literature was performed to identify all cases of transverse myelitis affecting more than 4 spinal segments secondary to SLE from 1966 to April 2008. In addition, we present 2 previously unreported cases of SLE patients with transverse myelitis affecting more than 4 spinal segments. RESULTS: Twenty-two SLE patients with transverse myelitis affecting more than 4 spinal segments were finally reviewed. There were 17 (77%) females and the mean age at the diagnosis of myelitis was 29.3 +/- 9.4 years (range, 12-53 years). It was the first manifestation of SLE in 5 (23%) patients. The most frequent clinical manifestations were sensory deficit in 20 (91%) patients, variable motor deficit in 19 (86%), and urinary sphincter dysfunction in 15 (83%) patients. On magnetic resonance imaging, all patients showed increased T2 signal intensity of the spinal cord, most frequently in the cervical to mid-lower thoracic spinal segments. Most patients received a combination of therapies; corticosteroids and cyclophosphamide was the most common (45%). Three patients (14%) had complete resolution of symptoms and 14 (59%) had partial recovery. CONCLUSIONS: Transverse myelitis affecting more than 4 spinal segments is a rare complication in patients with SLE but may be the first clinical manifestation of the disease in some patients. A high proportion of affected patients have variable degrees of disability after treatment.