Urodynamic effects of propiverine in children and adolescents with neurogenic bladder: results of a prospective long-term study.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate prospectively the efficacy and tolerability of propiverine for long-term treatment of neurogenic detrusor overactivity (NDO) in children. MATERIALS AND METHODS: 17 children and adolescents with NDO (10 female, 7 male; average age at last consultation 13.0 years) were evaluated during long-term treatment with propiverine (0.8 mg/kg body weight/day). Outcome measurements included urodynamic parameters, continence, hydronephrosis and tolerability of propiverine. RESULTS: Average follow-up was 3.6 years (range 2.0-5.9). The average maximum detrusor pressure was 33.2 ± 4.8 cmH(2)O and bladder compliance was 20.0 ± 5.4 ml/cmH(2)O at the last follow-up visit. Maximum cystometric bladder capacity (MCBC) within the normal range was attained in 11 patients; it was still reduced (average of 61% of expected MCBC) in the remaining 6. Incontinence occurred on average once per day. Hydronephrosis was classified for each renal unit separately: grade 0 was measured in 26 and 22 cases, grade 1 or 2 in 6 and 8 cases, grade 3 or 4 in 2 and 4 cases pre and post treatment, respectively. In 6/17 patients adjuvant intravesical oxybutynin was applied, in 4 out of these 6 patients more invasive procedures, such as untethering, augmentation cystoplasty or botulinum toxin injections, were necessitated. Propiverine monotherapy was well tolerated in 11/17 patients. No serious adverse events were encountered during the study period. CONCLUSION: Long-term efficacy and tolerability of propiverine for NDO in children and adolescents is promising: clinically relevant improvements in key urodynamic outcomes were paralleled by improvements in incontinence score.

Pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of propiverine in children aged between 5 and 10 years with symptoms of overactive bladder.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Pharmacokinetic studies in children are particularly required for drugs with intensive hepatic and regioselective intestinal elimination and pharmacological effects that may be critical for absorption at therapeutic doses, such as a delay in intestinal transit. One example is the antimuscarinic drug propiverine, the pharmacokinetics of which were evaluated in the present study in children with symptoms of overactive bladder. METHODS: The pharmacokinetics of immediate-release propiverine were studied in a dose-escalating, parallel-group study (propiverine 5, 10 and 15 mg twice daily for 14 days) in 25 subjects (11 females and 14 males aged 5-10 years; bodyweight 17-44 kg; body mass index 14-21 kg/m2) with symptoms of overactive bladder during waking hours. Serum concentration-time curves of propiverine and its major metabolite propiverine N-oxide (M-5) were evaluated up to 3 hours and 8 hours after the first and last administration, respectively, using liquid chromatography with tandem mass spectrometry. The voiding frequency, number of incontinence and urgency episodes, single voided volume and urine flow variables were measured before and after treatment. RESULTS: Significant dose-related increases in the serum exposure (the area under the concentration-time curve, the maximum concentration and the minimum concentration) with propiverine and M-5 in the dose groups < or =0.3 mg/kg and 0.3 to < or =0.45 mg/kg after both single-dose and repeated-dose administration were found. The elimination half-lives of propiverine and M-5 at steady state were no different (mean +/- SD 12.2 +/- 11.2 and 14.5 +/- 9.94 hours, respectively). Higher doses did not result in additional dose-proportional increases in the respective pharmacokinetic parameters, particularly not after repeated-dose treatment. The voiding frequency, voided volume and urge symptoms were beneficially changed from baseline; significant dose-dependent changes were not observed. Most of the adverse events that were probably or possibly drug related were reported for patients in the high-dose group (>0.45 mg/kg). CONCLUSIONS: The disposition of propiverine is dose related after repeated administration of the recommended doses below 0.45 mg/kg (0.3-0.45 mg/kg) twice daily in children aged 5-10 years with symptoms of overactive bladder and urinary incontinence. ( TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBERS: [clinicaltrials.gov] NCT00795925; [EudraCT] 2004-001243-30).

Efficacy, tolerability and safety of propiverine hydrochloride in comparison to oxybutynin in children with urge incontinence due to overactive bladder: Results of a multicentre observational cohort study.

OBJECTIVE: To compare, in a retrospective observational cohort study, the efficacy, tolerability and safety of propiverine and oxybutynin in children with urge incontinence (UI) due to overactive bladder. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Medical records were scrutinized for children with UI. As a primary efficacy outcome variable the achievement of continence after treatment with variable doses of propiverine or oxybutynin was assessed. Weekly UI episodes and daily voiding frequency were evaluated as secondary efficacy outcomes. Tolerability was evaluated by the rate of adverse events, adverse drug reactions caused by antimuscarinics and premature treatment termination. RESULTS: At 16 study centres, 621 children aged 5-14 years with UI due to overactive bladder were enrolled. After anticholinergic treatment (437 propiverine, 184 oxybutynin) continence was achieved in 61.6% and 58.7% of the patients after 186 and 259 days, respectively. There were clinically relevant improvements in voiding frequency across treatment groups. Daily doses of propiverine were markedly below the recommendations (0.54 vs 0.8 mg/kg body weight), daily doses of oxybutynin were according to the recommendations (0.31 vs 0.2-0.4 mg/kg body weight) at treatment initiation. There was a significantly more favourable tolerability to propiverine than oxybutynin for the overall rate of adverse events (3.9% vs 16.3%, odds ratio 4.813), adverse drug reactions caused by propiverine or oxybutynin (2.8% vs 9.2%) and premature treatment termination due to adverse drug reactions (1.6% vs 4.4%). CONCLUSION: Propiverine and oxybutynin are effective in children with UI due to overactive bladder. Sufficient treatment periods of at least 2, preferably 3-4, months are the crucial factors for a successful treatment. The tolerability profile of propiverine is better than for oxybutynin.

Failure of monotherapy in primary monosymptomatic enuresis: a combined desmopressin and propiverine treatment regimen improves efficacy outcomes.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate, in a prospective study, the combination of the antimuscarinic propiverine and the antidiuretic hormone-agonist desmopressin in children and adolescents not responsive to previous monotherapy, as in primary monosymptomatic enuresis (PME), combined treatments are considered a second-line approach after the failure of monotherapy. PATIENTS AND METHODS: The study included 122 children and adolescents (mean age 10.8 years, range 5-21) with PME and so far unresponsive to single or multiple monotherapy. Propiverine (body weight <30 kg, 15 mg/day; >or=30 kg, 20 mg/day) and desmopressin (0.4 mg/night) were administered over 3 months, followed by successive structured withdrawal programmes for propiverine and desmopressin, depending on the amount of loss of urine at night before treatment. RESULTS: The re-evaluation of unresponsive patients, incorporating video-urodynamics, showed neurogenic detrusor overactivity, isolated detrusor sphincter dyssynergia and vesicorenal reflux in 12.3% (15/122) of patients, so far falsely treated as enuresis. In 107 of 122 patients the diagnosis of PME was confirmed. The primary efficacy outcome, continence at night, was achieved in 104 of 107 patients (97.2%). During the individual follow-up periods (3-12 months), 23 of 107 (21.5%) patients relapsed after withdrawal of both medications. Adverse events of moderate intensity were rare (3.7%). CONCLUSION: Re-evaluation of patients after monotherapy has failed is justified, because other entities can be discovered in patients so far treated unsuccessfully for enuresis. The combination of propiverine and desmopressin is highly effective in children with PME. Our results support the case for further optimizing the inaugurated treatment algorithm of PME for treatment duration, dose-titration and structured withdrawal programmes, thus possibly further decreasing relapse rates.

Propiverine vs oxybutynin for treating neurogenic detrusor overactivity in children and adolescents: results of a multicentre observational cohort study.

OBJECTIVE: To compare, in a retrospective observational cohort study, the efficacy, tolerability, safety and clinical effectiveness of propiverine and oxybutynin in children and adolescents with neurogenic detrusor overactivity (NDO). PATIENTS AND METHODS: In all, 255 children and adolescents (aged 1-18 years) with NDO (199 myelomeningocele, 46 spinal cord injury, 10 other diagnoses) were enrolled at 14 study centres. To evaluate the efficacy of propiverine and oxybutynin, urodynamic and clinical variables were assessed before and after at least 12 month of the antimuscarinic agents administered at variable doses. RESULTS: In all, 127 patients given propiverine and 128 given oxybutynin were enrolled. The primary efficacy outcome, i.e. reductions in urodynamically assessed individual maximum detrusor pressure (P(detmax)), was assumed to indicate success in 74.2% of those on propiverine vs 49.6% on oxybutynin. The mean P(detmax) was significantly reduced during treatment, from 59.8 to 36.7 cmH(2)O in the propiverine and from 65.2 to 54.9 cmH(2)O in the oxybutynin groups. The mean maximum cystometric bladder capacity increased from 146 to 242 mL in the propiverine and from 222 to 310 mL in the oxybutynin group. Propiverine was better tolerated than oxybutynin, having fewer adverse drug reactions (9.4% vs 17.2%, odds ratio 2.04), and for its severity grades and premature treatment termination (none vs 11 cases). CONCLUSION: In this non-interventional study, reflecting 'real-life' clinical practice, comparing the efficacy, tolerability and safety of propiverine and oxybutynin in children and adolescents with NDO, propiverine was at least as effective as oxybutynin, but better tolerated, resulting in superior clinical effectiveness than for oxybutynin.

Propiverine compared to oxybutynin in neurogenic detrusor overactivity--results of a randomized, double-blind, multicenter clinical study.

OBJECTIVES: To compare the efficacy and tolerability of propiverine and oxybutynin in patients with neurogenic detrusor overactivity. METHODS: Patients were eligible, if at least 18 years of age and suffering from neurogenic detrusor overactivity. Eligibility also required a maximum cystometric capacity less than 300 ml. After a one-week run-in period, propiverine 15 mg t.i.d. or oxybutynin 5mg t.i.d. were administered for 21 days. As primary efficacy outcomes urodynamic parameters were assessed. As tolerability outcome the percentage of patients with newly manifesting anticholinergic adverse events was taken. RESULTS: 131 patients were recruited at 20 study centers. The maximum cystometric capacity (ml) was increased significantly in the propiverine group from 198 (+/-110) to 309 (+/-166), and in the oxybutynin group from 164 (+/-64) to 298 (+/-125). Similarly, maximum detrusor pressure during the filling phase (cm H(2)O) was lowered significantly in the propiverine group from 56.8 (+/-36.2) to 37.8 (+/-31.6), and in the oxybutynin group from 68.6 (+/-34.5) to 43.1 (+/-29.2). No significant differences resulted between treatment groups. Anticholinergic adverse events were reported less frequently in the propiverine compared to the oxybutynin group (63.0% versus 77.8%). Dryness of the mouth, the most frequent adverse event, was reported significantly less (47.1% versus 67.2%; p=0.02) in the propiverine compared to the oxybutynin group. CONCLUSION: Propiverine and oxybutynin are equally effective in increasing bladder capacity and lowering bladder pressure in patients with neurogenic detrusor overactivity. The trend for better tolerability of propiverine compared to oxybutynin achieved significance for dryness of the mouth.

Efficacy, tolerability and safety of propiverine hydrochloride in children and adolescents with congenital or traumatic neurogenic detrusor overactivity--a retrospective study.

OBJECTIVES: Anticholinergic treatment combined with intermittent catheterisation is the cornerstone of the conservative treatment strategy in children with neurogenic detrusor overactivity, which in most cases is due to congenital causes. Efficacy, tolerability and safety of propiverine hydrochloride were evaluated retrospectively in these children. METHODS: At four specialized outpatient clinics, all children's records were scrutinized for first-line propiverine hydrochloride treatment, or second- or third-line treatment after failure of a non-selective alpha-blocker (phenoxybenzamine) and/or other anticholinergics (oxybutynin, trospium chloride). The primary efficacy outcomes were urodynamic parameters, with clinical symptoms as secondary outcomes. Statistical analysis was performed by paired t-tests (significance level p < 0.05). RESULTS: Altogether 74 children and adolescents (40 boys, 34 girls; age range 11 months-19 years) were treated with propiverine hydrochloride (average duration 2 years and approximately 4 months; individual dose range 5-75 mg). The primary efficacy outcome parameters improved significantly: maximum cystometric capacity 161.2 [standard deviation (SD) 97.3] to 252.2 ml (SD 117.2), p < 0.001; maximum detrusor pressure 43.8 (SD 39.2) to 27.1 cm H(2)O (SD 26.4), p = 0.002; bladder compliance 7.6 (SD 6.4) to 17.0 ml/cm H(2)O (SD 16.2), p < 0.001. Phasic detrusor overactivity was abolished by 63%; incontinence resolved by 54%. One patient spontaneously reported a typical anticholinergic adverse event, which resolved after dose reduction. No safety concerns were documented. CONCLUSIONS: Propiverine hydrochloride is effective in neurogenic detrusor overactivity in children and adolescents, even in some of those cases unresponsive to other anticholinergics. The low incidence rate (<1.5%) of adverse events evidences a favourable risk-benefit profile of propiverine hydrochloride, considering in particular the total documented treatment and surveillance period of 171 patient years and nine months.

Urodynamic effects of propiverine hydrochloride in children with neurogenic detrusor overactivity: a prospective analysis.

OBJECTIVES: To evaluate prospectively the efficacy and tolerability of propiverine for treating neurogenic detrusor overactivity (NDO) in children. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Twenty children (mean age 8.9 years; median 5.6) with NDO due to an upper motor neurone lesion were enrolled (17 had myelomeningocele). In the urodynamic examination, reflex volume (RV), maximum detrusor pressure (MDP), maximum cystometric bladder capacity (MCBC) and bladder compliance (BC) before and after a twice-daily propiverine hydrochloride regimen were determined. The urodynamic follow-up was after 3-6 months. Incontinence was assessed by an incontinence score. RESULTS: The mean (sem) RV increased from 103.8 (21.3) to 174.5 (33.7) mL (P < 0.005), MDP decreased from 52.5 (7.9) to 40.1 (6.2) cmH(2)O (P < 0.05), MCBC increased from 166 (28.8) to 231.9 (34.8) mL (P < 0.005), and BC improved from 11.2 (2.8) to 30.6 (9.7) mL/cmH(2)O (P < 0.01), with propiverine treatment. The incontinence score (scale 0-3) improved from 2.4 (0.2) to 1.6 (0.3) (P < 0.05). Propiverine was well tolerated, although some children were given higher doses than recommended. CONCLUSIONS: Propiverine hydrochloride is effective and well tolerated in the treatment of children with NDO. Because of its dual mode of action, it is well tolerated even in children who need higher doses. Propiverine hydrochloride is a preferable alternative to oxybutynin, the anticholinergic most frequently used in children with NDO to date.

Propiverine versus tolterodine: efficacy and tolerability in patients with overactive bladder.

OBJECTIVES: Propiverine and tolterodine were compared with respect to efficacy, tolerability and impact on the quality of life in the treatment of patients with idiopathic detrusor overactivity. METHODS: In a randomised, double-blind, multicentre clinical trial, patients with idiopathic detrusor overactivity were treated with 15 mg propiverine twice daily or 2mg tolterodine twice daily over a period of 28 days. The maximum cystometric capacity was determined at baseline and after 4 weeks of therapy. The difference of both values was used as the primary endpoint. Secondary endpoints were voided volume per micturition, evaluation of efficacy (by the investigator), tolerability, post void residual urine, and quality of life. RESULTS: The mean maximum cystometric capacity increased significantly (p < 0.01) in both groups. The volume at first urge and the frequency/volume chart parameters also showed relevant improvements during treatment. 42/100 patients in the propiverine group and 43/102 in the tolterodine group experienced adverse events. The most common adverse event, dry mouth, occurred in 20 patients in the propiverine group and in 19 patients in the tolterodine group. The scores for the quality of life improved comparably in both groups. CONCLUSION: The study demonstrates comparable efficacy, tolerability, and improvement in the quality of life of 15 mg propiverine twice-daily and 2mg tolterodine twice-daily in the treatment of the symptoms of idiopathic detrusor overactivity.

An empirical treatment algorithm for incontinent children.

PURPOSE: Successful response rates of monotherapeutic strategies in urge incontinent children are limited. We evaluate whether adjuvant treatment improves outcomes. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Incontinent children were evaluated according to International Consultation on Incontinence standards. Propiverine (0.4 mg/kg) was applied 2 times daily for 4 weeks (treatment period 1) before reevaluation. Primary outcome was achievement of continence and secondary outcome was improvement of functional bladder capacity. In partial responders an alternative adjuvant treatment was initiated for another 12 weeks (treatment period 2). RESULTS: Of 70 enrolled patients 29 achieved continence (responders) and 35 responded partially and were assigned to adjuvant treatment, which consisted of selective alpha-blocker for functional bladder outflow obstruction (6), desmopressin for excessive nocturnal urine production (19) and biofeedback for increased pelvic floor activity during micturition (10). Only 6 nonresponders (9%) were assigned to specialized management. After treatment 2, 20 of the 35 partial responders achieved continence, thus avoiding specialized management. CONCLUSIONS: Propiverine monotherapy for incontinent children is effective. However, applying adjuvant treatment modalities to partial responders increases overall efficacy rates.