[Younger patients with hip joint pain].

This review summarises the present knowledge of diagnosing and treating hip joint pain. The results of joint preserving surgery are good in symptomatic patients with hip dysplasia, acetabular retroversion or impingement (cam or pincer) without signs of osteoarthritis. Confirmation of intraarticular pathology as the cause of symptoms is established clinically, and the pathology can in many cases be visualised by a standing, standardised radiograph of the pelvis, which is the basis for admission to the relevant orthopaedic department. We present an algorithm for this. Dysplasia and retroversion can be treated by periacetabular osteotomy and impingement by arthroscopic procedures.

Danish Hip Arthroscopy Registry: predictors of outcome in patients with femoroacetabular impingement (FAI).

PURPOSE: Predictors of outcome after femoroacetabular impingement (FAI) surgery are not well-documented. This study presents data from the Danish Hip Arthroscopy Registry (DHAR) for such analyses. The purpose of this study was to identify predictors of poor outcome after FAI surgery in a Danish FAI population. The primary hypothesis was that older patients, patients with severe cartilage damage and female patients might have inferior outcome results compared with younger patients, patients with minor cartilage damage and male patients. METHODS: Radiological and surgical data as well as patient-reported outcome measures (PROM) from FAI patients in DHAR between January 2012 and May 2015 were collected. PROMs consisting of Copenhagen Hip and Groin Outcome Score (HAGOS), quality of life (EQ-5D), Hip Sports Activity Scale (HSAS) and Numeric Rating Scale (NRS) pain scores were assessed. The patients were divided into three age groups (< 25, 25-39 and ≥ 40 years). Cartilage injuries were classified according to International Cartilage Repair Society (ICRS) (femoral side) and modified Becks (acetabular side) classifications. A non-parametric statistic method was used to analyze the differences between the preoperative and postoperative PROM values. RESULTS: Data from 2054 FAI procedures in DHAR was collected. 53% of the procedures were done in female patients. All HAGOS sub-scales, EQ-5D, HSAS and NRS pain (rest and walk) demonstrated significant improvements in all age groups at follow-up. Comparison between age groups demonstrated poorer outcomes in both older age groups when compared with the < 25 years age group at 1- and 2-year follow-ups. Higher degrees of femoral and acetabular cartilage injury did have a negative influence on outcome at follow-up. Comparison between genders demonstrated lower preoperative outcomes in females and lower outcome score (HSAS) 1 and 2 years after FAI surgery. CONCLUSIONS: Age above 25 and major cartilage injury might negatively affect the outcome of surgery, however, gender could not be identified as a negative predictor of clinical outcome after FAI surgery, but might negatively affect sports participation in females. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: III, prospective cohort study.

Danish Hip Arthroscopy Registry (DHAR): the outcome of patients with femoroacetabular impingement (FAI).

The Danish Hip Arthroscopy Registry (DHAR) was initiated in January 2012 as a web-based prospective registry. The purpose of this study was to evaluate and report the first registry based outcome data of a national population with radiological and clinical femoroacetabular impingement (FAI) undergoing hip arthroscopic treatment. Our primary hypothesis was that patients undergoing hip arthroscopy would improve significantly in pain, quality of life and sports related outcome measurements in Patient Related Outcome Measures (PROM). Peri-operative data and Patient Reported Outcome Measures (PROM) data from DHAR between January 2012 and November 2015 were extracted. Radiological pincer-type FAI was defined as LCE > 35° and cam FAI as alpha-angle > 55°. These data were combined with FAI surgical data such as osteochondroplasty and labral repair or resection. PROMs consisting of HAGOS, EQ-5 D, HSAS and NRS pain scores were submitted online by the patients pre-operatively and at 1 and 2-years follow-up. 2054 FAI procedures in 1835 patients were included in this study (219 patients had bilateral procedures performed). HAGOS demonstrated significant improvement in all subscales at follow up. EQ-5 D demonstrated improvement after 1 and 2 years from 0.66 pre-op to 0.78 at 2 years. HSAS improved significantly from 2.5 to 3.3. Pain score data demonstrated improvement in NRS-rest 39 to 17 and NRS Walk 49 to 22 at follow-up. We conclude that patients with FAI undergoing hip arthroscopy experience improvement in pain, quality of life and also in function and sports related outcome measures during the first 2 years after surgery.

Danish Hip Arthroscopy Registry: an epidemiologic and perioperative description of the first 2000 procedures.

Danish Hip Arthroscopy Registry (DHAR) was initiated in 2012 as a web-based prospective registry. The purpose of this study was to evaluate and report the epidemiologic and perioperative data of the first 2000 procedures in a Danish hip arthroscopy population and to describe the development of DHAR. We describe the use of various Patient Related Outcome Measures related to non-arthritic hip patients. The 2000 procedures consisted of 56% females and 44% males. Mean age 37.5 years, mean surgical time was 86.5 min and mean traction time 50.5 min. The most frequently performed procedure was CAM and Pincer resection in 93.5% of the cases. Labral refixation or repair was done in 70.3% of the cases. The most common type of acetabular chondral damage was grade II lesions (36.6%). Grade III and IV changes were seen in 36.1% of the cases. The preoperative iHOT12 was 45 (mean) based on all 12 items. EQ-5D was 0.65 and HAGOS sub-scores were 51 (pain), 49 (symptoms), 53 (ADL), 35 (sport), 20 (physical activity) and 29, respectively. We conclude that patients undergoing hip arthroscopy report considerable pain, loss of function, reduced level of activity and reduced quality-of-life prior to surgery. The problems with development and maintaining a large clinical registry are described and further studies are needed to validate data completeness. We consider the development of a national clinical registry for hip arthroscopy as a successful way of developing and maintaining a valuable clinical and scientific tool.