Optimising Cardiology Ambulatory Care Pathways: A Comprehensive Approach to Admission Avoidance and Timely Intervention in a Post-Pandemic Healthcare Landscape.

INTRODUCTION: Cardiovascular diseases are a substantial burden on healthcare systems, contributing significantly to avoidable hospital admissions. We propose a Cardiology Ambulatory Care Pathway. METHODS: Conducted a 1 month study redirecting admission streams from primary and emergency care, into a Cardiology Ambulatory Care Hub providing triage in Hot Clinic, and access to a Multi-Modal Testing Platform. RESULTS: 98 patients were referred to the Ambulatory Care Hub, 91 of which avoided admission. 52 patients received care in the cardiology hub, 38 of which required further testing. CONCLUSION: We successfully streamlined various service streams, reducing admissions, and improving patient outcomes. Outpatient CTCA, ambulatory ECG, and echocardiography proved instrumental. We project a cost saving of £53,379 per month in bed days (£640,556 annual saving).

Intra-cardiac tumour and bicuspid aortic valve in a patient with neurofibromatosis type 1-rare associations: a case report.

Background: Neurofibromatosis (NF) is an autosomal dominant neurocutaneous disease with multi-system involvement. Three cardiovascular associations are recognized but infrequently reported: congenital heart disease, vasculopathy, and hypertension. Cardiac outflow tract pathology, pulmonary stenosis, and aortic co-arctation have been described in the literature with varying frequency. The incidence of intra-cardiac tumour is exceeding rare. Case summary: A 53-year-old man presented to the neurosurgical team with myelopathy secondary to cord compression arising from multiple cervical neurofibromas secondary to NF-1. Further cardiac evaluation with echocardiography and cardiac MRI uncovered the presence of both a bicuspid aortic valve (with mild aortic stenosis and moderate aortic regurgitation) and a concurrent intra-cardiac tumour of the mitral papillary muscle; a combined finding which was not reported previously. Serial evaluation confirmed stable disease with no major progression over time. Discussion: Our case highlights the importance of recognizing cardiovascular manifestations of NF-1 and instituting appropriate screening and surveillance strategies. Targeted non-invasive imaging strategies may be more suited for this purpose over routine clinical examination alone.

Critical appraisal of clinical practice guidelines in pediatric infectious diseases.

BACKGROUND: There is a need to critically appraise clinical practice guidelines in order to ensure safe and effective practices are being implemented to optimize patient care. Appraising guidelines within one therapeutic area enable recommendations for improvement during guideline creation and dissemination. OBJECTIVES: Study objectives were to systematically appraise selected published guidelines used in the treatment of pediatric infectious diseases and to make recommendations for improvement throughout the development and dissemination processes. SETTING: The study occurred between collaborative academic and practice-based institutions located in Canada and Qatar. METHODS: A literature search identified guidelines for management of pediatric infectious diseases from 1997 to 2013. Each guideline was appraised by four independent assessors, according to the appraisal of guidelines for research and evaluation II (AGREE II) instrument. Standardized domain scores were calculated for each guideline and pooled. Final endorsements for use in clinical practice were also determined. Inter-rater reliability was assessed using intraclass correlation coefficients. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE: Standardized domain scores according to the AGREE II instrument. RESULTS: Twenty guidelines met inclusion criteria and were appraised. Pooled domain scores were: scope and purpose (69.9), stakeholder involvement (40.1), rigour of development (47.1), clarity of presentation (73.4), applicability (23.7), editorial independence (46.7), and overall assessment (55.8). Two (10%) guidelines were recommended for use without revision, 13 (65%) guidelines were recommended with modifications, and 5 (25%) guidelines were not recommended for implementation into practice. Inter-rater reliability was moderate to good with intra-class correlations of 0.65-0.93 per guideline. CONCLUSION: The majority of appraised guidelines were moderately rated, with a 25% of guidelines not recommended for use. Strategies for improvement require the involvement of all key stakeholders (caregivers, patients, and allied health professionals), and consideration of facilitators, barriers and resource implications during implementation. Additionally, critical appraisal of guidelines should become standard practice prior to adoption into clinical settings.