Publisher Correction: Feasibility and effects of enhanced recovery vs. conventional care after emergency colon surgery for patients with left colon perforation.

An amendment to this paper has been published and can be accessed via a link at the top of the paper.

Feasibility and effects of enhanced recovery vs. conventional care after emergency colon surgery for patients with left colon perforation.

The impact of an enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) programme in emergency colorectal surgery has not yet been reported. The objective of this study was to evaluate the feasibility and the results of patients included in an ERAS protocol following emergency colon surgery for left colon perforation. For this purpose, patients with a low to moderate risk of mortality, according to a Peritonitis Severity Score (PSS), and treated with an ERAS protocol (ERAS group) after emergency surgery for left colon perforation were compared for a period of 40 months (March 2014-June 2017) with a control group of patients treated with conventional care (CC group) during the 38 months prior to implementation of the new ERAS protocol (January 2011-February 2014). The main endpoint was 90-day postoperative morbidity according to the Clavien-Dindo classification. Secondary endpoints included length of postoperative hospital stay, 90-day readmission rate, protocol compliance and mortality. Fifty patients were included in the study, 29 in the ERAS group and 21 in the CC group. There were no significant differences between the groups in the demographic data or in the operative characteristics. A reduction in the incidence of postoperative complications (20.7% vs. 38%; p > 0.05) and in the postoperative hospital stay (7.7 + /- 3.85 vs. 10.9 + /- 5.6 days; p = 0.009) were observed in the ERAS group. The 90-day readmission rate did not differ significantly between the two groups (2 vs. 1). No 90-day mortality was observed in either group. The ERAS group showed better results than the CC group in protocol compliance. We conclude that ERAS protocols are feasible and help to reduce morbidity and length of hospital stay without adversely affecting the rate of readmission or mortality.

Laparoscopic versus open appendectomy: a prospective randomized trial.

To study comparative results between laparoscopic and open appendectomy, all the patients with suspected acute appendicitis who presented between January 1992 and December 1994 (N = 210) were randomized into two groups: laparoscopic (LA, n = 106) and open appendectomy (OA, n = 104). Patient demographics, pathological findings, operative time, postoperative course, and cost were analyzed. Age, gender, previous laparotomy, intraoperative diagnosis, and perforated appendix rate were comparable between both groups. Mean operative time was longer in the LA group (p < 0.05). Earlier resumption of a regular diet, shorter postoperative stay, and less postoperative analgesia also were observed in the LA group (p < 0.05). Postoperative morbidity and hospital readmissions were similar in both groups (p > 0.05). Higher operative cost was observed in the LA group, but global cost was lower in this group (p < 0.05). Laparoscopic appendectomy shows a more comfortable postoperative course (oral resumption, postoperative stay, and analgesia) over open appendectomy, with similar postoperative morbidity. The LA group showed more operative but less global cost.

[Suprarenal myelolipoma: an infrequent cause of acute abdomen]. / Mielolipoma suprarrenal: causa infrecuente de abdomen agudo.

Adrenal myelolipoma is a benign tumor associated with chronic disease and a long survival after surgical exeresis. It is scarcely symptomatic and only exceptionally has an acute onset, wherein lies the interest of this report.