Treatment of loco-regional recurrence of nasopharyngeal carcinoma in a non-endemic area: oncologic outcomes, morbidity, and proposal of a prognostic nomogram.

Introduction: The study assessed outcomes and toxicities of different treatment modalities for local and/or regional recurrent nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC) in a non-endemic area. Methods: Patients treated with curative intent for recurrent NPC with salvage surgery, photon-based radiotherapy, proton therapy (PT), with or without chemotherapy, at different Italian referral centers between 1998 and 2020 were included. Adverse events and complications were classified according to the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events. Characteristics of the patients, tumors, treatments, and complications are presented along with uni- and multivariate analysis of prognostic factors. A survival predictive nomogram is also provided. Results: A total of 140 patients treated from 1998 to 2020 were retrospectively assessed. Cases with lower age, comorbidity rate, stage, and shorter disease-free interval (DFI) preferentially underwent endoscopic surgery. More advanced cases underwent re-irradiation, fairly distributed between photon-based radiotherapy and PT. Age and DFI were independent factors influencing overall survival. No independent prognostic effect of treatment modality was observed. No significant difference in the morbidity profile of treatments was observed, with 40% of patients experiencing at least one adverse event classified as G3 or higher. Conclusion: Recurrent NPC in a non-endemic area has dissimilar aspects compared to its endemic counterpart, suggesting the need for further studies that can guide the choice of the best treatment modality.

Patient-Reported Outcomes After Swallowing (SWOARs)-Sparing IMRT in Head and Neck Cancers: Primary Results from a Prospective Study Endorsed by the Head and Neck Study Group (HNSG) of the Italian Association of Radiotherapy and Clinical Oncology (AIRO).

OBJECTIVES: To prospectively investigate changes in M.D. Anderson Dysphagia Inventory (MDADI) scores in patients affected by naso- and oropharynx cancer after definitive radiochemotherapy (ChemoRT) using swallowing organs at risk (SWOARs)-sparing IMRT. METHODS: MDADI questionnaires were collected at baseline and at 6 and 12 months after treatment. MDADI scores were categorized as follows: ≥ 80 "optimal," 80-60 "adequate," < 60 "poor" deglutition-related quality of life (QoL) group, and dichotomized as "optimal" vs "adequate/poor" for the analysis. A mean MDADI composite (MDADI-C) change of 10 points was considered as minimal clinically important difference (MCID). RESULTS: Sixty-three patients were enrolled of which 47 were considered for the analysis. At baseline, 26 (55%) were "optimal" and 21 (45%) were "adequate/poor." The mean baseline MDADI-C score was 93.6 dropping to 81 at 6 months (p = 0.013) and slightly rising to 85.5 at 12 months (p = 0.321) for the "optimal" group. Indeed, the mean baseline MDADI-C score was 64.3 rising to 77.5 at 6 months (p = 0.006) and stabilizing at 76 at 12 months (p = 0.999) for the "adequate/poor" group. A statistically significant but not clinically relevant worsening of the MDADI-C score was reported for the "optimal" group, whereas both a statistically significant and clinically meaningful improvement of the MDADI-C score were reported for the "adequate/poor" group from before to post-treatment. CONCLUSION: Our results suggest a doubly clinical benefit of dose optimization to SWOARs to minimize the RT sequalae in patients with a baseline "optimal" deglutition-related QoL and to recover from cancer dysphagia in those with a baseline "adequate/poor" deglutition-related QoL.

AIRO GORTEC consensus on postoperative radiotherapy (PORT) in low-intermediate risk early stages oral squamous cell cancers (OSCC).

Evidence on the efficacy of postoperative radiotherapy (PORT) in low-intermediate risk squamous cell carcinoma of the oral cavity (OSCC) remains inconclusive. Members of a task force from two national radio-oncology Associations (AIRO and GORTEC) defined 14 clinically relevant questions to identify "gray areas" pertinent to the indication for PORT in this clinical setting. Consequently, a literature review was performed on the topic. The resulting statements were then rated by an Expert Panel (EP) using a modified Delphi method. Only radiation oncologists were part of the discussion and voting on the scenarios. There was agreement on the 14 statements at the first round of voting. The task force then decided to propose clinical cases for the two more controversial statements that had received a lower agreement to better capture the Experts' attitudes. The clinical cases highlighted a more significant decisional heterogeneity. However, the good level of consensus reached among the two Associations gives relevant support in informing clinical choices while acknowledging general indications cannot fit all clinical situations and do not replace multidisciplinary discussion.

Treatment de-escalation for HPV+ oropharyngeal cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Human Papillomavirus (HPV) related oropharyngeal carcinoma (OPC) carries a better prognosis compared with HPV-counterparts, thereby pushing the adoption of de-intensification treatment approaches as new strategies to preserve superior oncologic outcomes while minimizing toxicity. We evaluated the effect of treatment de-intensification in terms of overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS), locoregional and distant control (LRC and DM) by selecting prospective or retrospective studies, providing outcome data with reduced intensification versus standard curative treatment in HPV+ OPC patients, with a systematic analysis till September 2020. The primary outcome of interest was OS. Secondary endpoints were PFS, LRC, and DM expressed as HR. A total of 55 studies (from 1393 screened references) were employed for quantitative synthesis for 38 929 patients. Among n = 48 studies with data available, de-intensified treatments reduced OS in HPV+ OPCs (HR = 1.33, 95% CI 1.17-1.52; p < 0.01). In de-escalated treatments, PFS was also decreased (HR = 2.11, 95% CI 1.65-2.69; p < 0.01). Compared with standard treatments, reduced intensity approaches were associated with reduced locoregional and distant disease control (HR = 2.51, 95% CI 1.75-3.59; p < 0.01; and HR = 1.9, 95% CI 1.25-2.9; p < 0.01). Chemoradiation improved survival in a definitive curative setting compared with radiotherapy alone (HR = 1.42, 95% CI 1.16-1.75; p < 0.01). When adjuvant treatments were compared, standard and de-escalation strategies provided similar OS. In conclusion, in patients with HPV+ OPC, de-escalation treatments should not be widely and agnostically adopted in clinical practice, as therein lies a concrete risk of offering a sub-optimal treatment to patients.

Baseline prognostic factors affecting survival in recurrent and/or metastatic salivary gland adenoid cystic carcinoma.

OBJECTIVES: Adenoid cystic carcinoma (AdCC) is a rare disease, with indolent behavior and poor long-term survival. Many studies have evaluated the role of clinical and pathological factors at presentation on the risk of recurrence. In this study we investigated whether baseline demographic, clinical, and pathological characteristics at the time of primary curative treatment could influence the prognosis of patients once local and/or distant recurrence occurred. METHODS: All patients affected by primary salivary gland AdCC and treated with curative surgery from January 1997 to June 2016 were reviewed, evaluating those who later developed loco-regional recurrence and/or distant metastasis. Time from the first relapse to death (recurrent/metastatic overall survival, RMOS) was considered the outcome of interest. RESULTS: Out of 87 surgically treated AdCC patients, 36 relapsing lesions were included. Median ages at first presentation and recurrence were 55 and 60-year-old, respectively; 58% were females. Median disease-free-interval (DFI) was 22.0 months. Five-year RMOS was 47%. At univariate analysis, age ≥ 60-year-old (HR:2.67, p = 0.030), primary tumor lympho-vascular invasion (LVI) (HR:5.38, p = 0.003), adjuvant radiotherapy (RT) in the primary setting (HR:0.37, p = 0.043), and DFI < 30 months (HR:3.94, p = 0.008) significantly affected RMOS. Multivariable analysis confirmed the presence of LVI and shorter DFI as independent risk factors. CONCLUSIONS: Knowledge of baseline clinicopathological features is helpful in the prognostic stratification of patients with recurrent AdCC, with LVI as the most relevant baseline factor. Adjuvant RT demonstrated its protective role on survival even once recurrence occurred, further supporting its adoption in the primary setting.

Three weekly versus weekly concurrent cisplatin: safety propensity score analysis on 166 head and neck cancer patients.

BACKGROUND: Radio-chemotherapy with CDDP is the standard for H&N squamous cell cancer. CDDP 100 mg/m2/q3 is the standard; alternative schedules are used to reduce toxicity, mostly 40 mg/m2/q1. METHODS: Patients were treated from 1/2010 to 1/2017 in two Radiation Oncology Centres. Propensity score analysis (PS) was retrospectively used to compare these two schedules. RESULTS: Patients analyzed were 166. Most (114/166) had 1w-CDDP while 52 had 3w-CDDP. In the 3w-CDDP group, patients were younger, with better performance status, smaller disease extent and a more common nodal involvement than in the 1w-CDDP. Acute toxicity was similar in the groups. Treatment compliance was lower in the w-CCDP. Overall survival before PS was better for female, for oropharyngeal disease and for 3w-CDDP group. After PS, survival was not related to the CDDP schedule. CONCLUSIONS: 3w-CDDP remains the standard for fit patients, weekly schedule could be safely used in selected patients.

Thoracic re-irradiation with 3D-conformal or more advanced techniques: A systematic review of treatment safety by the Re-irradiation Study Group of the Italian Association of Radiation and Oncology AIRO.

Re-irradiation (re-RT) is a treatment modality that has been actively investigated in recurrent lung cancer or in lung metastases appeared in previously irradiated areas. A literature search, according PRISMA recommendations and a meta-analysis technique were performed with the aims to identify possible factors related to the toxicity incidence and severity of ≥ G3 acute toxicity. 1243 patients and 36 studies, met inclusion criteria. Our results, showed that there was no difference in ≥ G3 acute (10,5%) toxicity rate with respect to different radiation techniques, cumulative dose and re-irradiation total dose and fractionation. Factors eventually related to severe toxicity were described. The frequent lack of a sufficient description of the treatment's intent, the heterogeneity in technique and radiotherapy regimen, makes balancing risk and benefit of re-RT based on published data even more difficult.

18F-FDG-PET/CT in laryngeal cancer: comparison with conventional imaging and prognostic role.

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to investigate the diagnostic accuracy of staging 18 F-FDG-PET/CT in laryngeal cancer, compare these results with conventional imaging (CI) and assess the value of 18 F-FDG-PET/CT features to predict survival. METHODS: Fifty-four patients with laryngeal squamous cell cancer and baseline 18 F-FDG-PET/CT were retrospectively enrolled. The PET images were analyzed visually and semi-quantitatively by measuring several metabolic parameters. A combination of clinical follow-up/imaging follow-up and/or histopathology was taken as reference standard. Progression free survival (PFS) and disease specific survival (DSS) were computed using Kaplan-Meier curves. RESULTS: All primary tumors were clearly identified by CI, and 52/54 by 18 F-FDG-PET/CT with a sensitivity of 96.3%. Cervical nodal metastases were detected in 40/54 patients at 18 F-FDG-PET/CT and in 34/49 patients at CI. Sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, negative predictive value, and accuracy on a patient-based analysis for nodal disease were 100%, 85.7%, 94.6%, 100% and 95.9% at 18 F-FDG-PET/CT, and 91.4%, 85.7%, 94.1%, 80%, 89.8% at CI. Diagnostic performances of PET/CT and CI were not significantly different on a patient-based, side-by-side and level-by-level analysis. 18 F-FDG-PET/CT recognized distant metastases in 7 patients allowing to an upstaging. At a median follow-up of 27 months, relapse/progression of disease occurred in 31 patients and death occurred in 32. Metabolic tumor volume (MTV T), MTV total and total lesion glycolysis (TLG) showed to be independent prognostic factors for PFS. CONCLUSIONS: Both CI and PET/CT had good diagnostic performances for the staging of laryngeal cancer; baseline metabolic features (MTV and TLG) showed an important prognostic value in assessing the rate of PFS.

Survival and toxicity of weekly cisplatin chemoradiotherapy versus three-weekly cisplatin chemoradiotherapy for head and neck cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis endorsed by the Italian Association of Radiotherapy and Clinical Oncology (AIRO).

PURPOSE: To evaluate efficacy and toxicity of weekly cisplatin chemoradiotherapy versus three-weekly cisplatin chemoradiotherapy and identify differences in clinical outcomes and severe toxicity rate. METHODS: PICOS/PRISMA methods were used to identify studies on PubMed, EMBASE and Cochrane Library, 2005-2019. RESULTS: Six randomized clinical trials (554 patients) were identified. Weekly cisplatin was not associated with significant overall survival (HR 1.13, 95 % CI 0.84-1.51) and progression-free survival (HR 1.23, 95 %CI 0.91-1.65) improvement compared with three-weekly regimen. Severe acute toxicity (RR 0.95), treatment compliance to chemotherapy (RR 1.67) and radiotherapy (RR 0.61) were similar between regimens. CONCLUSION: Weekly cisplatin is not associated with better clinical outcomes compared to three-weekly cisplatin. Three-weekly cisplatin chemoradiotherapy should be considered the standard approach in the management of locally advanced head and neck cancer. Methodologically robust RCTs designs are needed to improve the quality of evidence. Differences on long-term toxicity and cost-effectiveness remain to be tested.

A snapshot on radiotherapy for head and neck cancer patients during the COVID-19 pandemic: a survey of the Italian Association of Radiotherapy and Clinical Oncology (AIRO) head and neck working group.

OBJECTIVES: The objective of the paper was to assess real-life experience in the management of head and neck cancer (HNC) patients during the COVID-19 pandemic in radiotherapy departments and to evaluate the variability in terms of adherence to American Society of Radiation Oncology (ASTRO) and European Society for Radiotherapy and Oncology (ESTRO) recommendations. MATERIALS AND METHODS: In May 2020, an anonymous 30-question online survey, comparing acute phase of outbreak and pre-COVID-19 period, was conducted. Two sections exploited changes in general management of HNC patients and different HNC primary tumors, addressing specific statements from ASTRO ESTRO consensus statement as well. RESULTS: Eighty-eight questionnaires were included in the demographic/clinical workflow analysis, and 64 were analyzed for treatment management. Forty-eight percent of radiotherapy departments became part of oncologic hubs. First consultations reduced, and patients were addressed to other centers in 33.8 and 18.3% of cases, respectively. Telematic consultations were used in 50% of follow-up visits and 73.9% of multidisciplinary tumor board discussions. There were no practical changes in the management of patients affected by different primitive HNCs. Hypofractionation was not favored over conventional schedules. CONCLUSIONS: Compared to pre-COVID era, the clinical workflow was highly re-organized, whereas there were no consistent changes in RT indications and schedules.

Radiotherapy for the treatment of solitary plasmacytoma: 7-year outcomes by a mono-institutional experience.

OBJECTIVES: Solitary plasmacytoma (SP) is characterized by a single mass of clonal plasma cells. Definitive RT can result in long-term local control of the SP. Due to the small number of patients and narrow range of doses, phase III randomized trials are lacking. The aim of this study is to further support the potential use of RT for the treatment of SP. METHODS: Clinical data of all patients treated for SP at our Institution between 1992 and 2018 were reviewed. A total of 42 consecutive patients were analyzed. RESULTS: The median follow-up was 84.8 months. Radiation dose did not differ significantly as a function of sex, type of SP (solitary bone plasmacytoma or as extramedullary plasmacytoma), tumor size; conversely differs significantly as a function of age (p = 0.04). The 5y-OS and 10y-OS were, respectively, 96 and 91%. Local recurrences developed in 21.4% of patients (9/42). 16 patients progressed to MM (38.1%). The 5y-progression to MM free survival (PMFS) and the 10y-PMFS were, respectively, 68.6 and 61.9%. CONCLUSIONS: Our data confirm that good results are achievable with RT to treat SP, but they don't allow defining a dose-effect correlation; therefore, it remains uncertain which is the most effective dose and whether lower doses can guarantee adequate disease control.

A single-center retrospective safety analysis of cyclin-dependent kinase 4/6 inhibitors concurrent with radiation therapy in metastatic breast cancer patients.

Cyclin dependent kinases 4/6 (CDK4/6) inhibitors gained an essential role in the treatment of metastatic breast cancer. Nevertheless, data regarding their use in combination with radiotherapy are still scarce. We performed a retrospective preliminary analysis of breast cancer patients treated at our Center with palliative radiation therapy and concurrent CDK4/6 inhibitors. Toxicities were measured according to CTCAE 4.0, local response according to RECIST 1.1 or PERCIST 1.0 and pain control using verbal numeric scale. 18 patients (32 treated sites) were identified; 50% received palbociclib, 33.3% ribociclib and 16.7% abemacliclib. Acute non-hematologic toxicity was fair, with the only exception of a patient who developed G3 ileitis. During 3 months following RT, 61.1% of patients developed G 3-4 neutropenia; nevertheless no patient required permanent suspension of treatment. Pain control was complete in 88.2% of patients three months after radiotherapy; 94.4% of patients achieved and maintained local control of disease. Radiotherapy concomitant to CDK4/6 inhibitors is feasible and characterized by a fair toxicity profile, with isolated episodes of high-grade reversible intestinal toxicity. Rate of G 3-4 neutropenia was comparable with that measured for CDK4/6 inhibitors alone. Promising results were reported in terms of pain relief and local control of disease.

Head and neck radiotherapy amid the COVID-19 pandemic: practice recommendations of the Italian Association of Radiotherapy and Clinical Oncology (AIRO).

Management of patients with head and neck cancers (HNCs) is challenging for the Radiation Oncologist, especially in the COVID-19 era. The Italian Society of Radiotherapy and Clinical Oncology (AIRO) identified the need of practice recommendations on logistic issues, treatment delivery and healthcare personnel's protection in a time of limited resources. A panel of 15 national experts on HNCs completed a modified Delphi process. A five-point Likert scale was used; the chosen cut-offs for strong agreement and agreement were 75% and 66%, respectively. Items were organized into two sections: (1) general recommendations (10 items) and (2) special recommendations (45 items), detailing a set of procedures to be applied to all specific phases of the Radiation Oncology workflow. The distribution of facilities across the country was as follows: 47% Northern, 33% Central and 20% Southern regions. There was agreement or strong agreement across the majority (93%) of proposed items including treatment strategies, use of personal protection devices, set-up modifications and follow-up re-scheduling. Guaranteeing treatment delivery for HNC patients is well-recognized in Radiation Oncology. Our recommendations provide a flexible tool for management both in the pandemic and post-pandemic phase of the COVID-19 outbreak.

A randomized, double-blind, placebo controlled, phase II study to evaluate the efficacy of ginseng in reducing fatigue in patients treated for head and neck cancer.

PURPOSE: Fatigue is a distressing symptom in head & neck cancer patients before during and at the end of curative therapy. Pharmacologic and not pharmacologic treatments have been proposed with scarce or no evidence of efficacy. The aim of the study is to evaluate the efficacy of American ginseng in respect to placebo in reducing fatigue in patients treated for head and neck cancer with curative intent. METHODS: Thirty-two patients who had completed oncological treatment for a primary Head & neck tumor for at least 1 year and had a global fatigue score > 4 by means of Brief Fatigue Inventory (BFI) were randomized to receive 1000 mg of American ginseng or placebo per day for 8 weeks with the aim to assess their efficacy. Changes in fatigue scores in the 2 subgroups of patients before and after the treatment with American ginseng or placebo, were assessed by the BFI at baseline and at the end of week 8. RESULTS: The mean of the mean values of the BFI measured at 8 weeks (end of treatment) was 4.6 in the Ginseng arm and 3.4 in the Placebo arm (p = ns). Mean comparison showed a tendency to statistical significance only for the single item on interference with general activity (p = 0.06), with better performance for placebo. The mean of the differences between baseline values and 8 weeks values was not significantly different between treatment arms considering the entire questionnaire. CONCLUSION: The present data shows that American ginseng has insufficient evidence to be recommended for Cancer Related Fatigue (CRF) in post treatment HNC survivors.

Cetuximab and Radiation Therapy Versus Cisplatin and Radiation Therapy for Locally Advanced Head and Neck Cancer: Long-Term Survival and Toxicity Outcomes of a Randomized Phase 2 Trial.

PURPOSE: This study describes the long-term survival and toxicity outcomes of a multicenter randomized phase 2 trial comparing radiation therapy (RT) plus cisplatin (CDDP) or cetuximab (CTX) as first line treatment in locally advanced head and neck cancer (LASCCHN). METHODS AND MATERIALS: Between January 2011 and August 2014, 70 patients were enrolled and randomized to receive RT plus weekly CDDP (40 mg/m2) or CTX (250 mg/m2 plus a loading dose of 400 mg/m2). This updated series focuses on late toxicities (graded by using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events version 4.0) and long-term survival outcomes in terms of local control, overall survival, cancer-specific survival, and metastasis-free survival (MFS). A supplementary analysis based on human papilloma virus (HPV) status was also performed. RESULTS: No statistically significant difference was found in terms of late effects (xerostomia, fibrosis, mucosal atrophy, weight loss). In the CDDP arm and the CTX arm, 5-year local control rates were 67% and 48%; 5-year MFS rates were 83% and 97%; 5-year overall survival rates were 61% and 52%; and 5-year cancer-specific survival rates were 70% and 59%, respectively. None of these differences reached statistical significance. A subgroup analysis by HPV status and anatomic subsites revealed that in HPV+ oropharyngeal carcinoma, better survival was obtained in the CDDP arm (although statistical tests were not performed owing to the small sample size). Conversely, no statistically significant differences were observed in HPV- oropharyngeal carcinoma and other anatomic subsites, except for the confirmed better MFS rates of the CTX arm. CONCLUSIONS: Long-term results are in line with current literature suggesting that RT + CTX is inferior to RT + CDDP for the definitive treatment of LASCCHN. However, if not as an alternative to CDDP, CTX might still play a role in LASCCHN, particularly in HPV- cases.

A pilot study on the Vanderbilt head and neck symptom survey Italian version (VHNSS-IT) to test its feasibility and utility in routine clinical practice.

PURPOSE: Patient-reported outcome measures can be useful to assess symptoms in head and neck cancer (HNC) patients treated with radio-chemotherapy. This is a pilot study on the VHNSS-IT (the Italian version of the Vanderbilt head and neck symptom survey) performed to assess both the feasibility and utility of its administration in clinical practice. METHODS: The outcomes analyzed were feasibility to recruit patients, feasibility to complete the questionnaire, feasibility to review the questionnaire, utility perceived by clinicians, distribution of patient's answers reflecting symptom's intensity. RESULTS: Among the 38 patients enrolled, 37 completed the VHNSS-IT (refusal rate 2.6%). Median time of completion was 6'57″. Time of completion was influenced by age (p = 0.002), grade of education (p = 0.023) and employment status (p = 0.004). Time after the start of the radiotherapy course (< 6 months vs. > 6 months) and surgery (yes vs. no) influenced symptoms' intensity. Median time for review was 2'15″. Time burden was perceived to be acceptable for all clinicians; they all also found the questionnaire easy to use. Rates of global perceived utility and future intention to use the questionnaire were 100%. CONCLUSIONS: The VHNSS-IT has demonstrated to be a useful measurement of symptoms' burden for patients with HNC. The survey can be easily completed during the clinic routine without interfering with doctors' visits schedule, and it can help healthcare providers to identify symptoms that require referral, education or intervention.

The linguistic validation process of the Vanderbilt Head and Neck Symptom Survey - Italian Version (VHNSS-IT).

PURPOSE: To linguistically validate the Italian translation of the Vanderbilt Head and Neck Symptom Survey (VHNSS), there is a patient-reported outcome measure to screen for symptoms in the head and neck cancer (HNC) patients population. The goal was to ensure conceptually equivalence with the original version and maintain clarity, ease of use and understanding. METHODS: We conducted a multi-step linguistic process (forward translation, backward translation and patient testing) to generate and validate an Italian translation of the VHNSS. RESULTS: Two intermediate Italian versions were created: The first Italian version was derived from a reconciliation of the three forward translations, and the second Italian version was derived from changes in the first version after the backward translation step. All investigators involved actively discussed possible solutions to produce a translated instrument that maintained a reading and comprehension level accessible by most respondents, without altering the meaning and content of the original source. During the patient testing step, only two patients reported problems with items comprehension and the rate of comprehension problems per single item was lower than expected. This phase allowed patients to give suggestion in order to make items clearer and easier to understand: 43% of patients proposed a revision of the survey during the face-to-face interview, and most of these suggestions were retained. CONCLUSIONS: A valid multi-step process leads to the creation of the final version of the VHNSS-IT, a suitable instrument to screen for symptoms in the Italian HNC patients population and an official measurement tool that can be used in cooperative research group.

Treatment paths for localised prostate cancer in Italy: The results of a multidisciplinary, observational, prospective study (Pros-IT CNR).

BACKGROUND: There are several treatments available to newly diagnosed prostate cancer (PCA) patients. Although surgery and radiotherapy (RT) with or without androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) are widely adopted treatment options for localized PCA together with active surveillance (AS), there is no consensus nor randomised trials on treatment selection, prospective quality of life (QOL), along with toxicity outcomes and according to treatment modality in the Italian population. The current study aimed to describe clinical-therapeutic features and QOL at PCA diagnosis, according to different treatment patterns in a large prospective, Italian population, enrolled in the Pros-IT CNR study. METHODS: The Pros-IT CNR is an on-going national, multicenter, observational, prospective study on patients affected by PCA who have been referred by 97 Italian Urology, Radiation Oncology and Medical Oncology facilities participating in the project. The possible relationships between the treatment patterns reported in the 6 month follow-up case report form and patients' features at diagnosis were evaluated using exploratory multiple correspondence analysis (MCA) and other data analysis method. RESULTS: At diagnosis, surgery and AS patients were significantly younger, had fewer comorbidities, lower PSA levels and Gleason Score (GS) values; they were also diagnosed at an earlier stage of disease with respect to the RT or ADT patients who showed significantly worse QoL scores at the time of diagnosis. CONCLUSIONS: An analysis of the data collected at baseline and 6 months later uncovered substantial differences in ages, comorbidities, clinical and QOL features in the various treatment groups. These findings do not fully reflect the current PCA treatment guidelines and suggest the need for a multidisciplinary consensus guideline to ameliorate both the counselling and treatments of PCA patients.

Recommended ESTRO Core Curriculum for Radiation Oncology/Radiotherapy 4th edition.

INTRODUCTION: In 2017 it was decided to revise the European Core Curriculum for Radiation Oncology/Radiotherapy to produce a 4th edition. The aims of the ESTRO curriculum are to develop comparable standards for training across Europe and to facilitate free movement of specialists across borders. It is also hoped that it will improve the level of training across Europe and will make the non-medical expert roles more explicit. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A wide range of stakeholders including National Society representatives, trainees, recently appointed specialists, members of the European Union Medical Specialists Radiotherapy section, an RTT, a radiobiologist, a physicist and lay members from ESTRO staff developed and commented on iterations of the curriculum. RESULTS: The 4th edition is based on the CanMEDS 2015 framework and identifies 14 Entrustable Professional Activities (EPAs) and the competencies required to perform these. The manager role is replaced by competencies related to leadership. The levels of proficiency required for tumour sites is defined as levels of EPAs. CONCLUSIONS: It is hoped that the inclusive method of developing the 4th edition has resulted in a document that will have utility in the wide range of environments in which radiation oncology is practised in Europe.