RESUMO
Objective: Virtual Gynecologic Oncology fellowship recruitment has altered how candidates and programs exchange information. This study analyzes programs' web-based content and the priorities of fellowship candidates. Methods: Web-based materials of Gynecologic Oncology fellowship programs participating in the 2022 match were reviewed. An anonymous survey was emailed to applicants. Questions assessed importance of web-based materials on a Likert scale. Respondents were asked to rank factors from most to least important in their decisions to interview and rank programs. Results: Of the 66 programs participating in the 2022 Gynecologic Oncology fellowship match, 62 (93.9%) had accessible websites. Over one-fourth (25.8%) of program websites did not list application requirements. Most (74.2%) websites contained requests for letters of recommendation, but fewer (48.4%) specified the preferred quantity or authorship. Residency in-service exam score requirement information was present on 61.3% of websites. Of 100 applicants invited to participate, 44 returned surveys (44% response rate). The median number of programs applied to was 60 (IQR 51-65). Web-based materials most important to candidates were application requirements and deadlines, letter of recommendation details, and in-service exam requirements. Interaction with faculty and program information received during interview days were among the most important factors in decisions to rank programs. Conclusions: Gynecologic Oncology fellowship applicants surveyed in this study applied to nearly all participating fellowships. The content of web-based materials varies across program websites, particularly for application requirements, which applicants indicated as the most important electronically available material. Programs should have clear application requirements and provide clinical details on their websites.
RESUMO
BACKGROUND: There is a strong association between nutrition and long-term FEV1 in cystic fibrosis (CF), but studies have been driven by data from subjects with pancreatic insufficiency (PI-CF). We thus evaluated the association between body mass index (BMI) and FEV1 percent-predicted (FEV1pp) in children with pancreatic sufficiency (PS-CF) and contrasted it with the association in PI-CF. METHODS: We utilized data from the CF Foundation Patient Registry. The cohort included children born 1995-2010, diagnosed <2 years of age, and who had annualized data on BMI percentile and FEV1pp at ages 6-16 years. Pancreatic status was defined based on pancreatic enzyme replacement therapy. The association between BMI and FEV1 was evaluated using linear and mixed-effects longitudinal regression. RESULTS: There were 424 children with PS-CF and 7,849 with PI-CF. The association between BMI and FEV1 differed significantly by pancreatic status: each 10-pct higher BMI was associated with 2% [95%CI = 1.9-2.1] higher FEV1pp in PI-CF, compared to just 0.9% [0.5-1.3] in PS-CF (PINTERACTION < 0.001). Within the at-risk nutritional category (BMI <25pct), each 10-pct higher BMI was associated with 5% higher FEV1pp in PI-CF, but no significant increase in PS-CF. Moreover, in PS-CF, overweight/obesity (BMI ≥85pct) was associated with decreasing FEV1pp. In addition, FEV1pp decline through age 20 years in youth with PS-CF was modest (-0.6% per year) and independent of BMI (BMI*age PINTERACTION = 0.37). CONCLUSIONS: In children with PS-CF, BMI remains an important determinant of lung function. However, it may be less critical to attain a BMI >50th percentile; and BMI ≥85th percentile may be detrimental.