RESUMO
The global incidence of renal disorders is on the rise, demanding the implementation of novel and comprehensive strategies for patient care. The present study demonstrates the significance of renal health, offering a comprehensive comprehension of renal physiology and the escalating load of renal illnesses. The relevance of controlling renal illnesses is underscored by a thorough examination of conventional treatments, which encompass pharmaceutical interventions, dialysis, and transplantation. Subsequently, the story redirects its attention towards complementary therapies, classifying them into several categories, such as herbal medicine, acupuncture, dietary supplements, and mind-body activities, among various others. This paper presents a comprehensive examination of the available information, providing a critical study of the effectiveness and safety of alternative therapies in renal care. This study focuses on the central idea of integrative medicine, distinguished by its patient-centered and holistic approach and its seamless integration of conventional and complementary therapies. This study examines several integrative care models, using case studies to illustrate successful integrative approaches that have enhanced patient outcomes. The review thoroughly examines the current body of literature on integrative renal care, including meta-analyses, systematic reviews, and notable research discoveries. This study highlights the need for further research to address knowledge gaps and explore areas that require additional examination. These findings emphasize the importance of future research endeavors in this crucial sector. In addition, the paper thoroughly examines the safety issues and regulatory factors pertaining to complementary therapies, underscoring the importance of making educated decisions and maintaining diligent monitoring to safeguard patients' well-being. Integrating patient perspectives, experiences, and shared decision-making is essential to the integrated healthcare process, promoting a collaborative and patient-centered approach. The study culminates by providing a concise overview of the primary discoveries and delineating the ramifications of implementing therapeutic procedures. This statement underscores the considerable potential of integrative medicine in augmenting renal care, ultimately leading to enhanced patient outcomes and an improved overall quality of life for persons with renal diseases. Also, this literature review provides a thorough and knowledgeable examination of the incorporation of conventional and complementary therapies in the context of renal health. It gives valuable perspectives for healthcare practitioners, researchers, and policymakers interested in enhancing care strategies for individuals with renal conditions.
RESUMO
BACKGROUND: The emergence of genetically-modified human proteins and glucagon-like peptide-1 (GLP-1) receptor agonists have presented a promising strategy for effectively managing diabetes. Due to the scarcity of clinical trials focusing on the safety and efficacy of semaglutide as an adjunctive treatment for patients with type 2 diabetes who had inadequate glycemic control with metformin, we conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis. This was necessary to fill the gap and provide a comprehensive assessment of semaglutide compared to sitagliptin, a commonly prescribed DPP-4 inhibitor, in this patient population. METHODS: A comprehensive and systematic search was carried out on reputable databases including PubMed, the Cochrane Library, and Elsevier's ScienceDirect to identify relevant studies that compared the efficacy of once-weekly Semaglutide with once-daily Sitagliptin in individuals diagnosed with type 2 diabetes mellitus. The analysis of the gathered data was performed utilizing the random-effects model, which considers both within-study and between-study variations. RESULTS: The meta-analysis incorporated three randomized controlled trials (RCTs), encompassing 2401 participants, with a balanced distribution across the treatment groups. The primary focus of the study revolved around evaluating changes in HbA1C, blood pressure, pulse rate, body weight, waist circumference, and BMI. The findings revealed that once-weekly Semaglutide showed substantially improved HbA1C (WMD: -0.98; 95% CI: -1.28, -0.69, p-value: < 0.0001; I2: 100%), systolic (WMD: -3.73; 95% CI: -5.42, -2.04, p-value: <0.0001; I2: 100%) and diastolic blood pressures (WMD: -0.66; 95% CI: -1.02, -0.29, p-value: 0.0005; I2: 100%), and body weight (WMD: -3.17; 95% CI: -3.84, -2.49, p-value: <0.00001; I2: 100%) compared to once-daily Sitagliptin. However, there was an observed increase in pulse rate (WMD: 3.33; 95% CI: 1.61, 5.06, p-value: <0.00001; I2: 100%) associated with Semaglutide treatment. Regarding secondary outcomes, there was an elevated risk of total adverse events and premature treatment discontinuation with Semaglutide. The risk of serious, severe, moderate, and mild adverse events did not significantly differ between the two treatments. CONCLUSIONS: In conclusion, the administration of once-weekly Semaglutide exhibited a substantial reduction in HbA1c, average systolic blood pressure (SBP), mean diastolic blood pressure (DBP), body weight, waist circumference, body mass index (BMI), and a rise in pulse rate, as opposed to the once-daily administration of Sitagliptin.