Changes in the clinico-functional characteristics of stroke patients in the acute phase during the COVID-19 pandemic.

OBJECTIVE: To compare the sociodemographic and clinico-functional characteristics of patients admitted to a stroke unit immediately before and during two different COVID-19 pandemic phases. METHODS: This exploratory study was conducted in the stroke unit of a public hospital in Brazil. Patients consecutively admitted to a stroke unit for 18 months with primary stroke aged ≥20 years were included and divided into three groups: G1: Pre-pandemic; G2: Early pandemic; and G3: Late pandemic. The sociodemographic and clinico-functional characteristics of the groups were compared (α=0.05). RESULTS: The study included 383 individuals (G1=124; G2=151; G3=108). The number of risk factors (higher in G2; p≤0.001), smoking (more common in G2; p≤0.01), type of stroke (ischemic more common in G3; p=0.002), stroke severity (more severe in G2; p=0.02), and level of disability (more severe in G2: p≤0.01) were significantly different among the groups. CONCLUSION: A greater number of serious events and risk factors including smoking and higher level of disability was observed in patients in the beginning of the pandemic than in the late phases. Only the occurrence of ischemic stroke increased in the late phase. Therefore, these individuals may have an increased need for rehabilitation services monitoring and care during their lifespan. Additionally, these results indicate that health promotion and prevention services should be strengthened for future health emergencies.

Changes in the clinico-functional characteristics of stroke patients in the acute phase during the COVID-19 pandemic

ABSTRACT Objective To compare the sociodemographic and clinico-functional characteristics of patients admitted to a stroke unit immediately before and during two different COVID-19 pandemic phases. Methods This exploratory study was conducted in the stroke unit of a public hospital in Brazil. Patients consecutively admitted to a stroke unit for 18 months with primary stroke aged ≥20 years were included and divided into three groups: G1: Pre-pandemic; G2: Early pandemic; and G3: Late pandemic. The sociodemographic and clinico-functional characteristics of the groups were compared (α=0.05). Results The study included 383 individuals (G1=124; G2=151; G3=108). The number of risk factors (higher in G2; p≤0.001), smoking (more common in G2; p≤0.01), type of stroke (ischemic more common in G3; p=0.002), stroke severity (more severe in G2; p=0.02), and level of disability (more severe in G2: p≤0.01) were significantly different among the groups. Conclusion A greater number of serious events and risk factors including smoking and higher level of disability was observed in patients in the beginning of the pandemic than in the late phases. Only the occurrence of ischemic stroke increased in the late phase. Therefore, these individuals may have an increased need for rehabilitation services monitoring and care during their lifespan. Additionally, these results indicate that health promotion and prevention services should be strengthened for future health emergencies.

Walking confidence and perceived locomotion ability explain participation after stroke: A cross-sectional experimental study.

OBJECTIVE: To explore the relationship between walking measurements (i.e., walking speed, walking performance and walking confidence), and participation in ambulatory people with chronic stroke. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Participation was measured using the mobility domain of Brazilian version of the Stroke Impact Scale 3.0. Walking measures were walking speed, assessed by 10-m Walk Test, walking performance, assessed by ABILOCO, walking confidence, assessed by mGES. Pearson correlation coefficients were used to explore the relationships between the walking measures and social participation, and step-wise multiple linear regression analysis was used to identify which walking measures would explain participation after stroke. RESULTS: Ninety-five chronic stroke individuals (38 men), with a mean age of 67 (SD 13) years were assessed. Significant positive correlations, of high magnitude, were found between participation and all walking measures (r ≥ .53; p < .001). Regarding the regression analysis, walking confidence alone explained 44% (F = 72.4; p < .001) of the variance in participation. When perceived locomotion ability was included in the model, the explained variance increased to 48% (F = 42.8; p < .001). CONCLUSION: All walking measures were correlated with social participation after stroke, but only perceived locomotion ability and walking confidence explained the variance in participation. Clinicians should be encouraged to evaluate real-life performance and personal factors that may limit community participation after stroke.