Comparative utility of omnipolar and bipolar electroanatomic mapping methods to detect and localize dual nodal substrate in patients with atrioventricular nodal reentrant tachycardia.

BACKGROUND: Catheter-based slow pathway modification (SPM) for atrioventricular nodal reentrant tachycardia (AVNRT) is traditionally performed at empiric sites using anatomical landmarks and test ablation feedback within the triangle of Koch (TK). While studies have described more tailored techniques such as bipolar low voltage bridge (LVB) and wavefront collision identification, few have systematically compared the diagnostic yields of each and none have investigated whether omnipolar mapping technology provides incremental benefit. The objective of this study was to compare the utility of omnipolar and bipolar-derived qualitative and quantitative measurements in identifying and localizing dual AVN substrate in patients with versus without AVNRT. METHODS: A retrospective case-control study of consecutive patients with paroxysmal supraventricular tachycardia undergoing electrophysiology study with both omnipolar and bipolar mapping from 2022-2023. RESULTS: Thirteen AVNRT cases (median age 16.1 years, 512 TK points) were compared to nine non-AVNRT controls (median age 15.7 years, 332 TK points). Among qualitative variables, an omnipolar activation vector pivot, defined as a ≥45 degree change in activation direction within the TK, had the highest positive (81%) and negative predictive values (100%) for identifying AVNRT cases and had a median distance of 1 mm from SPM sites. Among quantitative variables, the optimal discriminatory performance for successful SPM sites was observed using bipolar voltage restricted to a peak frequency >340 Hz (c statistic 0.75). CONCLUSIONS: Omnipolar vector pivot analysis represents an automated, annotation-independent qualitative technique that is sensitive and specific for AVNRT substrate and co-localizes with successful SPM sites. Bipolar voltage quantitatively describes SP anisotropy better than omnipolar voltage, and the addition of peak frequency signal analysis further optimizes the selection of SPM sites.

Safety and efficacy of combined dilation/stenting of venous abnormalities, including complete obstructions, during lead extractions in patients with congenital heart disease.

INTRODUCTION: Management of transvenous leads in patients with congenital heart disease (CHD) can be complicated by venous obstructions and residual shunts. We present our experience performing concurrent lead extraction and dilation/stenting of venous pathways, including patients with complete venous obstruction. METHODS: All cases of concurrent lead extraction and recanalization of vena cavae/baffles between 2017 and 2021 at Boston Children's Hospital were retrospectively included and reviewed for safety and efficacy. RESULTS: Eight patients, 4 female, median 38.5 years of age (range 16.7-49 years) and 81.6 kg weight (range 41.3-97.8 kg) at time of procedure were included. All patients had CHD, a majority (n = 7) having transposition of the great arteries palliated via atrial switch. All leads were removed in their entirety, with most patients having two leads extracted (n = 7). Median lead dwell time was 13.8 years (range 3.6-35.3 years). Three patients had complete obstructions, three required stenting of their innominate veins and three required recanalization of their femoral vessels. Median procedure time was 9.8 h (range 5.4-12.8 h). Complications included blood transfusion (n = 2), arrhythmia (n = 3), pleural effusion (n = 1), and pressure ulcer (n = 1). There were no cardiac perforations, venous tears, or deaths. CONCLUSION: Lead extraction along with dilation and stenting of venous anomalies, though long in duration, proved effective with minimal complications. This combined procedure can safely and effectively resolve complete obstructions secondary to transvenous leads.

Long-Term Outcomes of Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy in Patients With Repaired Tetralogy of Fallot: A Multicenter Study.

BACKGROUND: A growing number of patients with tetralogy of Fallot develop left ventricular systolic dysfunction and heart failure, in addition to right ventricular dysfunction. Although cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) is an established treatment option, the effect of CRT in this population is still not well defined. This study aimed to investigate the early and late efficacy, survival, and safety of CRT in patients with tetralogy of Fallot. METHODS: Data were analyzed from an observational, retrospective, multicenter cohort, initiated jointly by the Pediatric and Congenital Electrophysiology Society and the International Society of Adult Congenital Heart Disease. Twelve centers contributed baseline and longitudinal data, including vital status, left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF), QRS duration, and NYHA functional class. Outcomes were analyzed at early (3 months), intermediate (1 year), and late follow-up (≥2 years) after CRT implantation. RESULTS: A total of 44 patients (40.3±19.2 years) with tetralogy of Fallot and CRT were enrolled. Twenty-nine (65.9%) patients had right ventricular pacing before CRT upgrade. The left ventricular ejection fraction improved from 32% [24%-44%] at baseline to 42% [32%-50%] at early follow-up (P<0.001) and remained improved from baseline thereafter (P≤0.002). The QRS duration decreased from 180 [160-205] ms at baseline to 152 [133-182] ms at early follow-up (P<0.001) and remained decreased at intermediate and late follow-up (P≤0.001). Patients with upgraded CRT had consistent improvement in left ventricular ejection fraction and QRS duration at each time point (P≤0.004). Patients had a significantly improved New York Heart Association functional class after CRT implantation at each time point compared with baseline (P≤0.002). The transplant-free survival rates at 3, 5, and 8 years after CRT implantation were 85%, 79%, and 73%. CONCLUSIONS: In patients with tetralogy of Fallot treated with CRT consistent improvement in QRS duration, left ventricular ejection fraction, New York Heart Association functional class, and reasonable long-term survival were observed. The findings from this multicenter study support the consideration of CRT in this unique population.

Multicenter Study of Survival Benefit of Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy in Pediatric and Congenital Heart Disease.

BACKGROUND: Evidence for the efficacy of cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) in pediatric and congenital heart disease (CHD) has been limited to surrogate outcomes. OBJECTIVES: This study aimed to assess the impact of CRT upon the risk of transplantation or death in a retrospective, high-risk, controlled cohort at 5 quaternary referral centers. METHODS: Both CRT patients and control patients were <21 years of age or had CHD; had systemic ventricular ejection fraction <45%; symptomatic heart failure; and significant electrical dyssynchrony (QRS duration z score >3 or single-site ventricular pacing >40%) at enrollment. Patients with CRT were matched with control patients via 1:1 propensity score matching. CRT patients were enrolled at CRT implantation; control patients were enrolled at the outpatient clinical encounter where inclusion criteria were first met. The primary endpoint was transplantation or death. RESULTS: In total, 324 control patients and 167 CRT recipients were identified. Mean follow-up was 4.2 ± 3.7 years. Upon propensity score matching, 139 closely matched pairs were identified (20 baseline indices). Of the 139 matched pairs, 52 (37.0%) control patients and 31 (22.0%) CRT recipients reached the primary endpoint. On both unadjusted and multivariable Cox regression analysis, the risk reduction associated with CRT for the primary endpoint was significant (HR: 0.40; 95% CI: 0.25-0.64; P < 0.001; and HR: 0.44; 95% CI: 0.28-0.71; P = 0.001, respectively). On longitudinal assessment, the CRT group had significantly improved systemic ventricular ejection fraction (P < 0.001) and shorter QRS duration (P = 0.015), sustained to 5 years. CONCLUSIONS: In pediatric and CHD patients with symptomatic systolic heart failure and electrical dyssynchrony, CRT was associated with improved heart transplantation-free survival.

Medical cardioversion of atrial fibrillation and flutter with class IC antiarrhythmic drugs in young patients with and without congenital heart disease.

INTRODUCTION: The use of flecainide and propafenone for medical cardioversion of atrial fibrillation (AF) and atrial flutter/intra-atrial reentrant tachycardia (IART) is well-described in adults without congenital heart disease (CHD). Data are sparse regarding their use for the same purpose in adults with CHD and in adolescent patients with anatomically normal hearts and we sought to describe the use of class IC drugs in this population and identify factors associated with decreased likelihood of success. METHODS: Single center retrospective cohort study of patients who received oral flecainide or propafenone for medical cardioversion of AF or IART from 2000 to 2022. The unit of analysis was each episode of AF/IART. We performed a time-to-sinus rhythm analysis using a Cox proportional hazards model clustering on the patient to identify factors associated with increased likelihood of success. RESULTS: We identified 45 episodes involving 41 patients. As only episodes of AF were successfully cardioverted with medical therapy, episodes of IART were excluded from our analyses. Use of flecainide was the only factor associated with increased likelihood of success. There was a statistically insignificant trend toward decreased likelihood of success in patients with CHD. CONCLUSIONS: Flecainide was more effective than propafenone. We did not detect a difference in rate of conversion to sinus rhythm between patients with and without CHD and were likely underpowered to do so, however, there was a trend toward decreased likelihood of success in patients with CHD. That said, medical therapy was effective in >50% of patients with CHD with AF.

Lead Management in Patients with Congenital Heart Disease.

Pediatric patients with congenital heart disease present unique challenges when it comes to cardiac implantable electronic devices. Pacing strategy is often determined by patient size/weight and operator experience. Anatomic considerations, including residual shunts, anatomic obstructions and barriers, and abnormalities in the native conduction system, will affect the type of CIED implanted. Given the young age of patients, it is important to have an "eye on the future" when making pacemaker/defibrillator decisions, as one can expect several generator changes, lead revisions, and potential lead extractions during their lifetime.

Multicenter retrospective evaluation of magnetic resonance imaging in pediatric and congenital heart disease patients with cardiac implantable electronic devices.

BACKGROUND: Guidelines addressing magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in patients with cardiac implantable electronic devices (CIEDs) provide algorithms for imaging pediatric and congenital heart disease (CHD) patients. Guideline acceptance varies by institution. Guidelines also do not support routine MRI scans in patients with epicardial or abandoned leads, common in pediatric and CHD patients. OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to determine the incidence of MRI-related complications in pediatric and CHD patients with CIEDs, including epicardial and/or abandoned leads. METHODS: A multicenter retrospective review included patients with CIEDs who underwent any MRI between 2007 and 2022 at congenital cardiac centers. The primary outcome was any patient adverse event or clinically significant CIED change after MRI, defined as pacing lead capture threshold increase >0.5 V with output change, P- or R- wave amplitude decrease >50% with sensitivity change, or impedance change >50%. RESULTS: Across 14 institutions, 314 patients (median age 18.8 [1.3; 31.4] years) underwent 389 MRIs. There were 288 pacemakers (74%) and 87 implantable cardioverter-defibrillators (22%); 52% contained epicardial leads, and 14 (4%) were abandoned leads only. Symptoms or CIED changes occurred in 4.9% of MRI scans (6.1% of patients). On 9 occasions (2%), warmth or pain occurred. Pacing capture threshold or lead impedance changes occurred in 1.4% and 2.0% of CIEDs post-MRI and at follow-up. CONCLUSION: Our data provide evidence that MRIs can be performed in pediatric and CHD patients with CIEDs, including non-MRI-conditional CIEDs and epicardial and/or abandoned leads, with rare minor symptoms or CIED changes but no other complications.

Retroflexed catheter course reduces the risk of right free wall accessory pathway recurrence.

INTRODUCTION: Accessory atrioventricular pathways (APs) may mediate atrioventricular reciprocating tachycardia and, in some cases, have the potential to conduct atrial tachycardia rapidly, which can be life threatening. While catheter ablation can be curative, ablation of right free wall APs is associated with a high rate of recurrence, likely secondary to reduced catheter stability along the right free wall atrioventricular groove. We sought to identify characteristics associated with a lower rate of recurrence and hypothesized ablation lesions placed on the ventricular side of the atrioventricular groove using a retroflexed catheter approach would decrease rates of recurrence. METHODS AND RESULTS: Retrospective chart review of patients who underwent catheter ablation of a right free wall AP from January 1, 2008 through June 1, 2021 with >2 months follow up. Cox proportional hazards regression was used to identify relationships between predictor variables and AP recurrence. We identified 95 patients who underwent ablation of 98 right free wall APs. Median age was 13.1 years and median weight at ablation was 52.3 kg. Overall, 23/98 (23%) APs recurred. Use of a retroflexed catheter course approaching the atrioventricular groove from the ventricular aspect was associated with reduced risk of AP recurrence with (univariable hazard ratio of 0.10 [95% confidence interval: 0.01-0.78]), which remained significant in multiple two variable Cox proportional hazards models. CONCLUSION: Use of a retroflexed catheter course is associated with a reduced likelihood of AP recurrence. This approach results in improved catheter stability and should be considered for ablation of right free wall APs.

Pacemaker lead insertion sites contribute to abnormalities of myocardial function and histopathology.

BACKGROUND: Ventricular pacing can cause myocardial dysfunction, but how lead anchoring to the myocardium affects function has not been studied. OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to evaluate patterns of regional and global ventricular function in patients with a ventricular lead using cine cardiac computed tomography (CCT) and histology. METHODS: This was a single-center retrospective study with 2 groups of patients with a ventricular lead: (1) those who underwent cine CCT from September 2020 to June 2021 and (2) those whose cardiac specimen was analyzed histologically. Regional wall motion abnormalities on CCT were assessed in relation to lead characteristics. RESULTS: For the CCT group, 122 ventricular lead insertion sites were analyzed in 43 patients (47% female; median age 19 years; range 3-57 years). Regional wall motion abnormalities were present at 51 of 122 lead insertion sites (42%) in 23 of 43 patients (53%). The prevalence of a lead insertion-associated regional wall motion abnormality was higher with active pacing (55% vs 18%; P < .001). Patients with lead insertion-associated regional wall motion abnormalities had a lower systemic ventricular ejection fraction (median 38% vs 53%; P < .001) than did those without regional wall motion abnormalities. For the histology group, 3 patients with 10 epicardial lead insertion sites were studied. Myocardial compression, fibrosis, and calcifications were commonly present directly under active leads. CONCLUSION: Lead insertion site-associated regional wall motion abnormalities are common and associated with systemic ventricular dysfunction. Histopathological alterations including myocardial compression, fibrosis, and calcifications beneath active leads may explain this finding.

Ventricular arrhythmias after fibroma resection: Are patients still at risk?

BACKGROUND: Ventricular fibromas frequently present with life-threatening ventricular tachycardia (VT) or ventricular fibrillation (VF) in children. The long-term risk of sustained ventricular arrhythmias after surgical resection is unknown. OBJECTIVES: The aims of this study were to quantify the VT/VF risk after surgical resection and to examine the results of early (during index surgical hospitalization) and late (≥3 months after surgery) postoperative ventricular stimulation (V-stim) studies. METHODS: We performed a retrospective cohort study of all patients with ventricular fibromas who underwent surgical resection at our institution (2000-2020). The primary outcome was defined as recurrent VT/VF ≥3 months after index surgical resection. RESULTS: Forty-six patients with a median age at surgery of 2 years (range 0.3-18.9 years) formed our study cohort. Indications for surgery included cardiac arrest in 11 (24%), sustained VT in 16 (35%), premature ventricular contractions/nonsustained VT in 10 (22%), and hemodynamic abnormalities in 9 (20%). Of the 11 patients who presented with cardiac arrest, 4 underwent pre-resection implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD) implantation, all of which were explanted at the time of surgery. An early postoperative V-stim study was performed in 26 (57%) patients, and all were negative for inducible VT/VF. Of the 13 late postoperative V-stim studies, 3 were positive: 2 underwent ICD implantation and 1 was initiated on amiodarone and underwent loop recorder implantation. At the time of last follow-up (median 1.5 years; range 0.3-16.5 years), 45 (98%) were free of clinical VT/VF and no patient with an ICD has received an appropriate shock. CONCLUSION: Surgical resection of ventricular fibromas significantly reduces the risk of life-threatening arrhythmias in children; however, a small number of patients remain vulnerable.

Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy for Adult Patients With a Failing Systemic Right Ventricle: A Multicenter Study.

Background The objective of this international multicenter study was to investigate both early and late outcomes of cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) in patients with a systemic right ventricle (SRV) and to identify predictors for congestive heart failure readmissions and mortality. Methods and Results This retrospective international multicenter study included 13 centers. The study population comprised 80 adult patients with SRV (48.9% women) with a mean age of 45±14 (range, 18-77) years at initiation of CRT. Median follow-up time was 4.1 (25th-75th percentile, 1.3-8.3) years. Underlying congenital heart disease consisted of congenitally corrected transposition of the great arteries and dextro-transposition of the great arteries in 63 (78.8%) and 17 (21.3%) patients, respectively. CRT resulted in significant improvement in functional class (before CRT: III, 25th-75th percentile, II-III; after CRT: II, 25th-75th percentile, II-III; P=0.005) and QRS duration (before CRT: 176±27; after CRT: 150±24 milliseconds; P=0.003) in patients with pre-CRT ventricular pacing who underwent an upgrade to a CRT device (n=49). These improvements persisted during long-term follow-up with a marginal but significant increase in SRV function (before CRT; 30%, 25th-75th percentile, 25-35; after CRT: 31%, 25th-75th percentile, 21-38; P=0.049). In contrast, no beneficial change in the above-mentioned variables was observed in patients who underwent de novo CRT (n=31). A quarter of all patients were readmitted for heart failure during follow-up, and mortality at latest follow-up was 21.3%. Conclusions This international experience with CRT in patients with an SRV demonstrated that CRT in selected patients with SRV dysfunction and pacing-induced dyssynchrony yielded consistent improvement in QRS duration and New York Heart Association functional status, with a marginal increase in SRV function.

Radiofrequency Catheter Ablation for Pediatric Atrioventricular Nodal Reentrant Tachycardia: Impact of Age on Procedural Methods and Durable Success.

Background Catheter-based slow-pathway modification (SPM) is the treatment of choice for symptomatic atrioventricular nodal reentrant tachycardia (AVNRT). We sought to investigate the interactions between patient age and procedural outcomes in pediatric patients undergoing catheter-based SPM for AVNRT. Methods and Results A retrospective cohort study was performed, including consecutive patients undergoing acutely successful SPM for AVNRT from 2008 to 2017. Those with congenital heart disease, cardiomyopathy, and accessory pathways were excluded. Patients were stratified by age quartile at time of SPM. The primary outcome was AVNRT recurrence. A total of 512 patients underwent successful SPM for AVNRT. Age quartile 1 had 129 patients with a median age and weight of 8.9 years and 30.6 kg, respectively. Radiofrequency energy was used in 98% of cases. Follow-up was available in 447 (87%) patients with a median duration of 0.8 years (interquartile range, 0.2-2.5 years). AVNRT recurred in 22 patients. Multivariable Cox proportional hazard modeling identified atypical AVNRT (hazard ratio [HR], 5.83; 95% CI, 2.01-16.96; P=0.001), dual atrioventricular nodal only (HR, 4.09; 95% CI, 1.39-12.02; P=0.011), total radiofrequency lesions (HR, 1.06 per lesion; 95% CI, 1.01-1.12; P=0.032), and the use of a long sheath (HR, 3.52; 95% CI, 1.23-10.03; P=0.010) as predictors of AVNRT recurrence; quartile 1 patients were not at higher risk of recurrence (HR, 0.45; 95% CI, 0.10-1.97; P=0.29). Complete heart block requiring permanent pacing occurred in one quartile 2 patient at 14.9 years of age. Conclusions Pediatric AVNRT can be treated with radiofrequency-SPM with high procedural efficacy and minimal risk of complications, including heart block. Atypical AVNRT and dual atrioventricular nodal physiology without inducible tachycardia remain challenging substrates.

Lead Extraction at a Pediatric/Congenital Heart Disease Center: The Importance of Patient Age at Implant.

OBJECTIVES: This study sought to evaluate the safety and efficacy of transvenous lead extraction (TLE) at a single pediatric/congenital heart disease (CHD) center. BACKGROUND: Data on TLE in pediatric and CHD patients are limited. METHODS: Retrospective cohort study evaluating TLE from 2008 to 2019. RESULTS: A total of 113 patients underwent TLE with 162 leads removed (including 38 high-voltage leads). Median age at lead implantation was 13 years (range 0.6-61.8 years), with a median age at extraction of 21.6 years (6.4-64.3 years). Median lead age was 7.2 years (1.0-35.3 years). Successful extraction occurred in 110 (97%) patients, 159 (98%) leads. Complex extraction was needed for 120 leads; 52 (44%) using laser alone, 27 (23%) mechanical sheath alone, and 21 (18%) using both. Femoral extraction was used for 19 (16%) leads. Risk factors for complex extraction were ≥2 leads extracted (odds ratio: 3.36; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.2-9.36; P = 0.021), lead within the right ventricle (odds ratio: 2.8; 95% CI: 1.2-6.5; P = 0.017), and a combination of younger patient age at implant and older lead age at extraction, with patients ≤12 years of age at implant and leads ≥7 years of age having an odds ratio: of 10.1 (95% CI: 2.21-45.9; P = 0.003). Major complications occurred in 5 (4.4%) of patients, with no mortality, but a high incidence of tricuspid valve injury. CONCLUSIONS: TLE can be performed successfully and safely in a pediatric and CHD center. Patient age at lead implantation, not age at extraction, is an important predictor of needing a complex extraction, with younger patients at implant and older leads at extraction having the highest risk.

Activity During the COVID-19 Pandemic in Children with Cardiac Rhythm Management Devices.

Decreased physical activity is associated with cardiovascular, metabolic and mental health disease. While decreases in physical activity during the COVID-19 pandemic have been described in the general population, there is a paucity of data regarding children with underlying cardiovascular disease. We hypothesized there would be a decrease in physical activity at the onset of the COVID-19 pandemic. Performed a single-center, retrospective cohort study of children aged < 19 years with cardiac rhythm management devices. Patients were included if they had device-measured physical activity data from > 80% of dates from February 3, 2020 through June 30, 2020. Patients with significant neurologic/neuromuscular disease were excluded. We identified 144 patients with a median age of 15.4 years. 47% were female. 34% had congenital heart disease, 20% had cardiomyopathy, 19% had an inherited arrhythmia syndrome and 5% had atrioventricular block without congenital heart disease. 47% of patients had an implantable loop recorder, 29% had a permanent pacemaker and 24% had an implantable cardioverter-defibrillator. We observed a significant decrease in device-measured physical activity from baseline (February 3-March 9), with up to a 21% decrease in physical activity during mid-March through early May. Activity levels returned to pre-pandemic levels in June. Physical activity sharply declined in children with cardiac rhythm management devices at the onset of the COVID-19 pandemic. These data highlight the importance of finding strategies to maintain physical activity during the current pandemic and future public health crises.

2021 PACES Expert Consensus Statement on the Indications and Management of Cardiovascular Implantable Electronic Devices in Pediatric Patients: Developed in collaboration with and endorsed by the Heart Rhythm Society (HRS), the American College of Cardiology (ACC), the American Heart Association (AHA), and the Association for European Paediatric and Congenital Cardiology (AEPC) Endorsed by the Asia Pacific Heart Rhythm Society (APHRS), the Indian Heart Rhythm Society (IHRS), and the Latin American Heart Rhythm Society (LAHRS).

In view of the increasing complexity of both cardiovascular implantable electronic devices (CIEDs) and patients in the current era, practice guidelines, by necessity, have become increasingly specific. This document is an expert consensus statement that has been developed to update and further delineate indications and management of CIEDs in pediatric patients, defined as ≤21 years of age, and is intended to focus primarily on the indications for CIEDs in the setting of specific disease categories. The document also highlights variations between previously published adult and pediatric CIED recommendations and provides rationale for underlying important differences. The document addresses some of the deterrents to CIED access in low- and middle-income countries and strategies to circumvent them. The document sections were divided up and drafted by the writing committee members according to their expertise. The recommendations represent the consensus opinion of the entire writing committee, graded by class of recommendation and level of evidence. Several questions addressed in this document either do not lend themselves to clinical trials or are rare disease entities, and in these instances recommendations are based on consensus expert opinion. Furthermore, specific recommendations, even when supported by substantial data, do not replace the need for clinical judgment and patient-specific decision-making. The recommendations were opened for public comment to Pediatric and Congenital Electrophysiology Society (PACES) members and underwent external review by the scientific and clinical document committee of the Heart Rhythm Society (HRS), the science advisory and coordinating committee of the American Heart Association (AHA), the American College of Cardiology (ACC), and the Association for European Paediatric and Congenital Cardiology (AEPC). The document received endorsement by all the collaborators and the Asia Pacific Heart Rhythm Society (APHRS), the Indian Heart Rhythm Society (IHRS), and the Latin American Heart Rhythm Society (LAHRS). This document is expected to provide support for clinicians and patients to allow for appropriate CIED use, appropriate CIED management, and appropriate CIED follow-up in pediatric patients.