Safety and efficacy of extended versus standard interval dosing of natalizumab in multiple sclerosis patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

BACKGROUND: Multiple sclerosis (MS) is a chronic inflammatory, immune-mediated disease affecting the central nervous system. Natalizumab, an FDA-approved monoclonal antibody for MS, has been explored for its off-label extended interval dosing (EID), suggesting a potential reduction in the risk of progressive multifocal leukoencephalopathy (PML) compared to standard interval dosing (SID). Our objective was to assess the efficacy and safety of EID in comparison to SID for natalizumab treatment in patients with MS. METHODS: We searched PubMed, Embase, WOS, Scopus, Ovid, Science Direct, Clinical trials.gov, and Cochrane Library. Our assessed outcomes were clinical relapses, MRI activity, change in expanded disability status scale [EDSS], and the risk of PML. The EID group was defined as 5 to 8 weeks [EID (Q5-8W)]. The analysis was conducted using RevMan ver. 5.4. The effect estimates were presented as a risk ratio [RR] or mean difference with 95% confidence intervals [CI] using SID group as the reference for comparisons. RESULTS: Fourteen studies met our inclusion criteria: 2 RCTs, 1 switched single-arm trial, and 12 observational studies. No significant differences were found in all efficacy outcomes of interest. Risk of clinical relapses [RR = 0.90, (95%CI 0.80, 1.02)], risk of new or newly enlarging T2 hyperintense MRI lesions [RR = 0.78, (95%CI 0.59, 1.04)], risk gadolinium enhancing lesions [RR = 1.30, (95%CI 0.98, 1.72)], change in EDSS [MD = 0.09 (95%CI - 0.57, 0.76)], risk of PML [RR = 1.09, 95%CI (0.24, 4.94)]. CONCLUSION: In summary, our meta-analysis indicates that natalizumab maintains its effectiveness under extended interval dosing [up to 8 weeks], presenting comparable risks for clinical relapses, MRI lesions, EDSS, and PML. Caution is advised given study limitations and heterogeneity. Robust conclusions necessitate well-designed high-quality prospective studies.

Does ramadan fasting affect the therapeutic and clinical outcomes of warfarin? a systematic review and meta-analysis.

BACKGROUND: Warfarin's therapeutic effect is affected by many factors, including diet modifications. The impact of Ramadan fasting on warfarin is controversial. The aim of this systematic review and meta-analysis was to investigate the effect of Ramadan fasting on patients taking warfarin. METHODS: A literature search was done in PubMed, WOS, Scopus, and Embase from inception to May 24, 2021. All relevant studies measuring the international normalized ratio (INR), time in therapeutic range (TTR), or the number of patients within therapeutic range before, during, and after Ramadan were assessed by full-text screening for achieving all of the inclusion criteria. We used the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale for quality assessment and RevMan 5.4 software for meta-analysis. RESULTS: A total of five studies with 446 patients were included in the meta-analysis. The patients served as their own control. Our pooled analyses showed no significant difference during Ramadan compared to pre-Ramadan (MD: 0.08; 95% CI: - 0.00, 0.15; P = 0.06) and post-Ramadan (MD: - 0.00; 95% CI: - 0.14, 0.14; P = 1.00, respectively). There was only a significant increase in the risk ratio of supratherapeutic INR when comparing post-Ramadan vs. pre-Ramadan (RR: 1.69; 95% CI: 1.22, 2.33; P = 0.001). However, there was no significant risk for supratherapeutic INR during Ramadan compared to pre-Ramadan or post-Ramadan; the number of patients within the therapeutic range of INR during Ramadan compared to pre-Ramadan; and TTR during Ramadan, pre-Ramadan, and post-Ramadan. CONCLUSION: Ramadan fasting did not affect INR level, TTR, or the number of patients within the therapeutic range before, during, and after Ramadan. However, there was a possibility of achieving a supratherapeutic INR post-Ramadan compared to pre-Ramadan. Therefore, INR monitoring and warfarin dose adjustments accordingly are recommended after Ramadan.

Association of vitamin D receptor gene polymorphisms with breast cancer risk in an Egyptian population.

This study aimed to explore whether genetic polymorphisms in vitamin D receptor are correlated to the breast cancer prevalence in an Egyptian population. Polymerase chain reaction-restriction fragment polymorphism was used to genotype three frequently analyzed vitamin D receptor gene single-nucleotide polymorphisms (rs1544410, rs7975232, and rs731236) and were identified by sequencing analysis. This is the first study that recorded a new single-nucleotide polymorphism in ApaI genotype within an Egyptian population and was registered with the accession number KY859868. The authors found that TC in rs731236, and TG in KY859868 single-nucleotide polymorphism showed significant distribution differences with an increased risk of breast cancer ( p < 0.05, odds ratio = 3.71, 95% confidence interval: 1.04-13.28 and p < 0.001, odds ratio = 7.05, 95% confidence interval: 2.02-24, respectively) compared with the wild-type TT genotype carriers in both single-nucleotide polymorphisms. In addition, the distribution frequencies of haplotypes ACT, GTT, and ATT in the patients group were significant, where ATT haplotype was associated with the highest breast cancer risk among all other haplotypes in the patients group ( p = 0.0023, odds ratio = 1.72, 95% confidence interval: 1.24-2.437). In conclusion, vitamin D receptors ApaI and TaqI confer high breast cancer susceptibility, particularly in Egyptians females carrying haplotype ATT. However, further studies focusing on the vitamin D receptor variants and haplotypes effects on vitamin D and vitamin D receptor concentrations, activities, and functionalities are needed.