A mental workload and biomechanical assessment during split-belt locomotor adaptation with and without optic flow.

Adaptive human performance relies on the central nervous system to regulate the engagement of cognitive-motor resources as task demands vary. Despite numerous studies which employed a split-belt induced perturbation to examine biomechanical outcomes during locomotor adaptation, none concurrently examined the cerebral cortical dynamics to assess changes in mental workload. Additionally, while prior work suggests that optic flow provides critical information for walking regulation, a few studies have manipulated visual inputs during adaption to split-belt walking. This study aimed to examine the concurrent modulation of gait and Electroencephalography (EEG) cortical dynamics underlying mental workload during split-belt locomotor adaptation, with and without optic flow. Thirteen uninjured participants with minimal inherent walking asymmetries at baseline underwent adaptation, while temporal-spatial gait and EEG spectral metrics were recorded. The results revealed a reduction in step length and time asymmetry from early to late adaptation, accompanied by an elevated frontal and temporal theta power; the former being well corelated to biomechanical changes. While the absence of optic flow during adaptation did not affect temporal-spatial gait metrics, it led to an increase of theta and low-alpha power. Thus, as individuals adapt their locomotor patterns, the cognitive-motor resources underlying the encoding and consolidation processes of the procedural memory were recruited to acquire a new internal model of the perturbation. Also, when adaption occurs without optic flow, a further reduction of arousal is accompanied with an elevation of attentional engagement due to enhanced neurocognitive resources likely to maintain adaptive walking patterns.

Fall Prevention Training for Service Members With an Amputation or Limb Salvage Following Lower Extremity Trauma.

INTRODUCTION: Recent military conflicts have resulted in a significant number of lower extremity injuries to U.S. service members that result in amputation or limb preservation (LP) procedures. Service members receiving these procedures report a high prevalence and deleterious consequences of falls. Very little research exists to improve balance and reduce falls, especially among young active populations such as service members with LP or limb loss. To address this research gap, we evaluated the success of a fall prevention training program for service members with lower extremity trauma by (1) measuring fall rates, (2) quantifying improvements in trunk control, and (3) determining skill retention at 3 and 6 months after training. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Forty-five participants (40 males, mean [±SD] age, 34 ± 8 years) with lower extremity trauma (20 with unilateral transtibial amputation, 6 with unilateral transfemoral amputation, 5 with bilateral transtibial amputation, and 14 with unilateral LP procedures) were enrolled. A microprocessor-controlled treadmill was used to produce task-specific postural perturbations which simulated a trip. The training was conducted over a 2-week period and consisted of six 30-minute sessions. The task difficulty was increased as the participant's ability progressed. The effectiveness of the training program was assessed by collecting data before training (baseline; repeated twice), immediately after training (0 month), and at 3 and 6 months post-training. Training effectiveness was quantified by participant-reported falls in the free-living environment before and after training. Perturbation-induced recovery step trunk flexion angle and velocity was also collected. RESULTS: Participants reported reduced falls and improved balance confidence in the free-living environment following the training. Repeated testing before training revealed that there were no pre-training differences in trunk control. The training program improved trunk control following training, and these skills were retained at 3 and 6 months after training. CONCLUSION: This study showed that task-specific fall prevention training reduced falls across a cohort of service members with diverse types of amputations and LP procedures following lower extremity trauma. Importantly, the clinical outcome of this effort (i.e., reduced falls and improved balance confidence) can lead to increased participation in occupational, recreational, and social activities and thus improved quality of life.

Relationship between phantom limb pain, function, and psychosocial health in individuals with lower-limb loss.

INTRODUCTION: The adverse influence of chronic pain on function and psychological health in the general population is well understood. However, the relationship between phantom limb pain (PLP) after limb loss with function and psychological health is less clear. The study purpose was to assess the influences of PLP presence and intensity on function and psychosocial health in individuals with lower-limb loss (LLL). METHODS: One hundred two individuals with major LLL completed a study-specific questionnaire on the presence and intensity of their PLP. The Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System -29 questionnaire was also administered. RESULTS: Of 102 participants, 64% reported PLP, with a mean intensity of 4.8 ± 2.3 out of 10. Individuals with vs. without PLP demonstrated significantly greater sleep disturbances ( p = 0.03), whereas the differences in function, fatigue, pain interference, depressive symptoms, anxiety, or ability to participate in social roles and activities were not statistically different between groups ( p > 0.05). Of note, mean scores for many of the Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System-29 short forms among the current sample were similar to the mean of the general population, minimizing the potential clinical impact of PLP on these domains. CONCLUSIONS: Our findings indicate a lack of meaningful associations between PLP presence or intensity with function, and psychosocial health among individuals with LLL. These findings conflict with previous research suggesting an adverse relationship between PLP, function, and psychosocial health after limb loss.

A single-subject comparison of functional outcomes between lower limb salvage vs. transtibial amputation through sequential participation in a fall-prevention program.

PURPOSE: Prior research has noted similar functional and subjective outcomes between individuals with delayed amputation vs. limb salvage; however, these reports are generally retrospective in nature. Here, we prospectively compare functional and subjective outcomes from an individual with limb salvage to a delayed transtibial amputation using a single-subject design with sequential participation in a fall-prevention program. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The subject participated in a fall-prevention rehabilitation training program, once before undergoing a delayed transtibial amputation and again after. As part of the fall-prevention program, the participant completed pretraining and post-training assessments which quantified trunk control by 1) trunk flexion and flexion velocity after trip-inducing perturbations on a treadmill and 2) trunk sway parameters during unstable sitting. In addition, the four square step test was administered, and patient-reported outcomes, including pain, prosthetic/orthotic comfort, and walking/running endurance, were collected. RESULTS: In general, the participant demonstrated improved trunk control after amputation, as evidenced by decreases in trunk flexion and flexion velocity after perturbation and sway parameters during unstable sitting. In addition, four square step test times were shorter with amputation vs. limb salvage; the participant also reported reduced pain and greater comfort with amputation (vs. limb salvage). CONCLUSIONS: Although just a single participant, within-subject comparisons provide quantitative evidence that, for some individuals, delayed/late (transtibial) amputation after prolonged limb salvage may be beneficial in reducing pain and restoring function.

Common fall-risk indicators are not associated with fall prevalence in a high-functioning military population with lower limb trauma.

BACKGROUND: Persons with lower limb trauma are at high risk for falls. Although there is a wide range of measures used to assess stability and fall-risk that include performance measures, temporal-spatial gait parameters, and nonlinear dynamic stability calculations, these measures are typically derived from fall-prone populations, such as older adults. Thus, it is unclear if these commonly used fall-risk indicators are effective at evaluating fall-risk in a younger, higher-functioning population of Service members with lower limb trauma. METHODS: Twenty-one Service members with lower limb trauma completed a battery of fall-risk assessments that included performance measures (e.g., four-square-step-test), and gait parameters (e.g., step width, step length, step time) and dynamic stability measures (e.g., local divergence exponents) during 10 min of treadmill walking. Participants also reported the number of stumbles and falls over the previous 4 weeks. Negative Binomial and Quasibinomial Regressions were used to evaluate the strength of associations between fall-risk indicators and self-reported falls. FINDING: Participants reported on average stumbling 6(4) times and falling 2(3) times in the previous 4 weeks. At least one fall was reported by 62% of the participants. None of the fall-risk indicators were significantly associated with fall prevalence in this population of Service members with lower limb trauma (p > 0.1). INTERPRETATION: Despite the high number of reported falls in this young active population, none of the fall-risk indicators investigated effectively captured and quantified the fall-risk. Further research is needed to identify appropriate fall-risk assessments for young, high-functioning individuals with lower limb trauma.

Biomechanical accommodation to walking with an ankle-foot prosthesis: An exploratory analysis of novice users with transtibial limb loss within the first year of ambulation.

BACKGROUND: The way in which a person with limb loss interacts with a prosthesis changes over time; however, there remains a lack of guidance for defining accommodation to walking with a prosthesis, limiting consistency and generalizability of research. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate accommodations to walking with dynamic elastic response prosthetic ankle-foot devices among novice users with unilateral transtibial limb loss during the first year of ambulation. STUDY DESIGN: This is a retrospective cohort study. METHODS: Prosthetic and intact ankle-foot mechanical power profiles and mechanical work during step-to-step transitions were calculated using the Unified Deformable model for 22 male individuals with limb loss at five time points within the first year of independent ambulation (0, 2, 4, 6, and 12 months). Subjects walked at a self-selected walking velocity and controlled walking velocity (CWV). Subjective measures included the Prosthetic Evaluation Questionnaire and the 36-Item Short-Form Health Survey. RESULTS: Self-selected walking velocity ranged from 1.24 ± 0.06 m/s at 0 month to 1.38 ± 0.04 m/s at 12 months, whereas CWV was 1.20 ± 0.02 m/s. At both velocities, positive work/peak power during prosthetic push-off trended upward until the 4-month time point. In addition, negative peak power during intact foot-strike seemed to qualitatively become less negative until 4 months. Positive work during intact push-off trended downward until 4 months at CWV, whereas positive peak power during intact push-off qualitatively became more positive at self-selected walking velocity. CONCLUSIONS: These trends may partially indicate (biomechanical) accommodation to walking by appearance of a "plateau" at 4 months after initial ambulation with a prosthesis.

Assessments of trunk postural control within a fall-prevention training program for service members with lower limb trauma and loss.

BACKGROUND: Trunk postural control (TPC) is critical in maintaining balance following perturbations (i.e., avoiding falls), and impaired among persons with lower extremity trauma, contributing to elevated fall risk. Previously, a fall-prevention program improved TPC in individuals with unilateral transtibial amputation following trip-inducing perturbations. However, it is presently unclear if these improvements are task specific. RESEARCH QUESTION: Do improvements to TPC gained from a fall-prevention program translate to another task which assesses TPC in isolation (i.e., unstable sitting)? Secondarily, can isolated TPC be used to identify who would benefit most from the fall-prevention program? METHODS: Twenty-five individuals (21 male/4 female) with lower extremity trauma, who participated in a larger fall-prevention program, were included in this analysis. Trunk flexion and flexion velocity quantified TPC following perturbation; accelerometer-based sway parameters quantified TPC during unstable sitting. A generalized linear mixed-effects model assessed training-induced differences in TPC after perturbation; a generalized linear model assessed differences in sway parameters following training. Spearman's rho related training-induced changes to TPC following perturbation (i.e., the difference in TPC measures at pre- and post-training assessments) with pre- vs. post-training changes to sway parameters during unstable sitting (i.e., the difference in sway parameters at pre- and post-training assessments) as well as pre-training sway parameters with the pre- vs. post-training differences in TPC following perturbation. RESULTS: Following training, trunk flexion angles decreased, indicating improved TPC; however, sway parameters did not differ pre- and post-training. In addition, pre- vs. post-training differences in TPC following perturbation were neither strongly nor significantly correlated with sway parameters. Moreover, pre-training sway parameters did not correlate with pre- vs. post-training differences in trunk flexion/flexion velocity. SIGNIFICANCE: Overall, these results indicate that improvements to TPC gained from fall-prevention training are task-specific and do not translate to other activities. Moreover, isolated TPC measures are not able to identify individuals that benefit most from the fall-prevention program.

Changes in Trunk and Pelvis Motion Among Persons With Unilateral Lower Limb Loss During the First Year of Ambulation.

OBJECTIVE: To retrospectively investigate trunk-pelvis kinematic outcomes among persons with unilateral transtibial and transfemoral limb loss with time from initial independent ambulation with a prosthesis, while secondarily describing self-reported presence and intensity of low back pain. Over time, increasing trunk-pelvis range of motion and decreasing trunk-pelvis coordination with increasing presence and/or intensity of low back pain were hypothesized. Additionally, less trunk-pelvis range of motion and more trunk-pelvis coordination for persons with more distal limb loss was hypothesized. DESIGN: Inception cohort with up to 5 repeated evaluations, including both biomechanical and subjective outcomes, during a 1-year period (0, 2, 4, 6, 12 months) after initial ambulation with a prosthesis. SETTING: Biomechanics laboratory within military treatment facility. PARTICIPANTS: Twenty-two men with unilateral transtibial limb loss and 10 men with unilateral transfemoral limb loss (N=32). INTERVENTIONS: Not applicable. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Triplanar trunk-pelvis range of motion and intersegmental coordination (continuous relative phase) obtained at self-selected (∼1.30m/s) and controlled (∼1.20m/s) walking velocities. Self-reported presence and intensity of low back pain. RESULTS: An interaction effect between time and group existed for sagittal (P=.039) and transverse (P=.009) continuous relative phase at self-selected walking velocity and transverse trunk range of motion (P=.013) and sagittal continuous relative phase (P=.005) at controlled walking velocity. Trunk range of motion generally decreased, and trunk-pelvis coordination generally increased with increasing time after initial ambulation. Sagittal trunk and pelvis range of motion were always less and frontal trunk-pelvis coordination was always greater for persons with more distal limb loss. Low back pain increased for persons with transtibial limb loss and decreased for persons with transfemoral limb loss following the 4-month time point. CONCLUSIONS: Temporal changes (or lack thereof) in features of trunk-pelvis motions within the first year of ambulation help elucidate relationships between (biomechanical) risk factors for low back pain after limb loss.

The Relationship Between Gait Symmetry and Metabolic Demand in Individuals With Unilateral Transfemoral Amputation: A Preliminary Study.

INTRODUCTION: Temporal-spatial symmetry allows for optimal metabolic economy in unimpaired human gait. The gait of individuals with unilateral transfemoral amputation is characterized by temporal-spatial asymmetries and greater metabolic energy expenditure. The objective of this study was to determine whether temporal-spatial asymmetries account for greater metabolic energy expenditure in individuals with unilateral transfemoral amputation. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The relationship between temporal-spatial gait asymmetry and metabolic economy (metabolic power normalized by walking speed) was retrospectively examined in eighteen individuals with transfemoral amputation walking at a self-selected velocity overground. Pearson's product-moment correlations were used to assess the relationship between: (1) step time symmetry and metabolic economy and (2) step length symmetry and metabolic economy. The retrospective analysis of this data was approved by the Walter Reed National Military Medical Center Institutional Review Board and all individuals provided written consent. Additional insights on this relationship are presented through a case series describing the temporal-spatial and metabolic responses of two individuals with transfemoral amputation who completed a split-belt treadmill walking test. RESULTS: For the cohort of individuals, there was no significant relationship between metabolic economy and either step time asymmetry or step length asymmetry. However, the case series showed a positive relationship between step length asymmetry and metabolic power as participants adapted to split-belt treadmill walking. CONCLUSION: There is mixed evidence for the relationship between temporal-spatial asymmetries and metabolic energy expenditure. This preliminary study may suggest optimal metabolic energy expenditure in individuals with transfemoral amputation occurs at an individualized level of symmetry and resultant deviations incur a metabolic penalty. The results of this study support the idea that addressing only temporal-spatial gait asymmetries in individuals with transfemoral amputation through rehabilitation may not improve metabolic economy. Nevertheless, future prospective research is necessary to confirm these results and implications for clinical practice.

Gait and Functional Outcomes for Young, Active Males With Traumatic Unilateral Transfemoral Limb Loss.

OBJECTIVE: Altered body structures that occur with the loss of a lower limb can impact mobility and quality of life. Specifically, biomechanical changes that result from wearing a prosthesis have been associated with an increased risk of falls or joint degeneration, as well as increased energy demands. While previous studies describing these outcomes are typically limited by number of outcome measures and/or small, diverse patient groups, recent military conflicts present a unique opportunity to collect outcomes from a relatively homogenous, active patient population with limb loss. Thus, the objective of this study is to provide reference outcome measures on the basis of a large, relatively homogenous cohort of military personnel with transfemoral limb loss. METHODS: A retrospective review of biomechanical, physiological, functional, and subjective measures was completed for 67 male servicemembers who sustained an injury resulting in traumatic, transfemoral limb loss during recent conflicts. These individuals represent a defined cohort, capable of exhibiting improved clinical outcomes resulting from demographic characteristics and extensive rehabilitation. Biomechanical and physiological outcome measures for 76 uninjured male servicemembers are also provided to serve as normative reference for full return to function. Select biomechanical and physiological outcomes related to stability, overuse, and efficiency are discussed in the text, on the basis of relevance to clinical gait assessment, in addition to functional and subjective measures. RESULTS: In general, individuals with transfemoral limb loss exhibit decreased stability relative to uninjured individuals, noted by larger peak trunk velocity and step width variability; increased risk of low back and knee joint pain and/or degeneration, noted by larger trunk lateral flexion and bending moments, as well as larger vertical ground reaction force (vGRF) loading rates and impulses, respectively; and decreased efficiency during gait, noted by larger oxygen costs and leading limb mechanical work. CONCLUSION: Although the comprehensive set of measures presented here indicates overall reductions in biomechanical and functional performance with transfemoral limb loss compared to uninjured individuals, these reductions were relatively smaller than existing evidence among populations that are more diverse in age and activity level. Therefore, this data set may be used as benchmarks for young, active individuals with transfemoral limb loss, to assist with setting clinical goals, and to aid in the evaluation of new treatment techniques or interventions. These measures will also be particularly important for subsequent evaluations and longitudinal follow-ups to determine the longer-term impact of transfemoral limb loss on this cohort.

A comparison of kinematic-based gait event detection methods in a self-paced treadmill application.

Kinematic-based algorithms for detecting gait events are efficient and useful in the absence of (reliable) kinetic data. However, the validity of these kinematic-based algorithms for self-paced treadmill walking is unknown, particularly given the influence of walking speed on such data. We quantified offsets in event detection of four foot kinematics-based algorithms (horizontal position, horizontal velocity, vertical velocity, and sagittal resultant velocity) relative to events determined by a threshold in vertical ground reaction force among seven uninjured individuals - and nine with unilateral transtibial amputation - walking on a self-paced treadmill. Across walking speeds from 0.48-1.64m/s (0.5-31.7% CV), offsets ranged from -7 to +3 frames (≈83.3ms) in heel strike, and -3 to +5 frames (≈66.6 ms) in toe off. Regardless of method, offsets in heel strike were not influenced (-0.010.61) by variability in walking speed. However, offsets in toe-off were positively correlated with variability in walking speed for the horizontal position (r=0.539; P<0.001) and velocity (r=0.463; P<0.001) algorithms, and negatively correlated (r=-0.317; P<0.001) for the vertical velocity algorithm; offsets from the sagittal resultant velocity algorithm, with thresholds adjusted for walking speed, were not strongly associated (r=0.126; P=0.27). Although relatively minimal offsets support the applicability of these algorithms to self-paced walking, for individuals with asymptomatic and pathological gait patterns, sagittal resultant velocity of the foot produces the most consistent event detection over the widest range of (and variability in) walking speeds.

Individual limb mechanical analysis of gait following stroke.

The step-to-step transition of walking requires significant mechanical and metabolic energy to redirect the center of mass. Inter-limb mechanical asymmetries during the step-to-step transition may increase overall energy demands and require compensation during single-support. The purpose of this study was to compare individual limb mechanical gait asymmetries during the step-to-step transitions, single-support and over a complete stride between two groups of individuals following stroke stratified by gait speed (≥0.8 m/s or <0.8 m/s). Twenty-six individuals with chronic stroke walked on an instrumented treadmill to collect ground reaction force data. Using the individual limbs method, mechanical power produced on the center of mass was calculated during the trailing double-support, leading double-support, and single-support phases of a stride, as well as over a complete stride. Robust inter-limb asymmetries in mechanical power existed during walking after stroke; for both groups, the non-paretic limb produced significantly more positive net mechanical power than the paretic limb during all phases of a stride and over a complete stride. Interestingly, no differences in inter-limb mechanical power asymmetry were noted between groups based on walking speed, during any phase or over a complete stride. Paretic propulsion, however, was different between speed-based groups. The fact that paretic propulsion (calculated from anterior-posterior forces) is different between groups, but our measure of mechanical work (calculated from all three directions) is not, suggests that limb power output may be dominated by vertical components, which are required for upright support.