Laparoscopic Sacral Mesh Fixation for Ventral Rectopexy: Clinical Implications From a Cadaver Study.

BACKGROUND: Correct tack placement at the sacral promontory for mesh fixation in ventral mesh rectopexy is crucial to avoid bleeding, nerve dysfunction, and spondylodiscitis. OBJECTIVE: The present cadaver study was designed to assess the true location of tacks after mesh fixation during laparoscopic ventral mesh rectopexy in relation to vascular and nerve structures and bony landmarks. DESIGN: This was an interventional cadaver study. SETTING: This study was conducted after laparoscopic mesh fixation detailed pelvic dissection was performed following a standardized protocol. In addition, 64-row multidetector computed tomography was conducted to further define lumbosacral anatomy and tack positioning. PATIENTS: Eighteen fresh cadavers (10 female, 8 male) were included in this study. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: True tack position and vascular and neuronal involvement served as outcome measures. RESULTS: A total of 52 tacks were deployed (median 3, range 2-3 tacks). Median tack distance to the midsacral promontory was 16.1 mm (0.0-54.2). Only a total of 22 tacks (42.3%) were found on the right surface of the S1 vertebra, correlating with the planned deployment area. In 7 cadavers (38.8%), all tacks were deployed on the planned deployment area. The median distance to the major vessels was 10.5 mm (0.0-35.0), which was the internal iliac artery in half of the cases. Median distance of tacks to the right ureter was 32.1 mm (7.5-46.1). Neither major vessels nor the ureter was injured. Dissection of the hypogastric plexus was undertaken in 14 cadavers, and in each cadaver, tacks affected the hypogastric nerve plexus. LIMITATIONS: This study was limited by the moderate number of cadavers. CONCLUSIONS: Tack placement showed significant variation in our specimen, emphasising the need for reliable anatomic landmarks and sufficient exposure during ventral mesh rectopexy. Hypogastric nerve plexus involvement is common, thus detailed functional assessment after surgery is required. It also points out the importance of cadaver studies before implementing new surgical techniques into clinical practice. See Video Abstract at http://links.lww.com/DCR/B827. FIJACIN LAPAROSCPICA DE MALLA SACRA PARA RECTOPEXIA VENTRAL IMPLICACIONES CLNICAS DE UN ESTUDIO SOBRE CADAVERS: ANTECEDENTES:La colocación correcta de la tachuela en el promontorio sacro para la fijación de la malla en la rectopexia con malla ventral es crucial para evitar hemorragias, disfunción nerviosa y espondilodiscitis.OBJETIVO:El presente estudio en cadáveres fue diseñado para evaluar la verdadera ubicación de las tachuelas después de la fijación de la malla durante la rectopexia laparoscópica con malla ventral en relación con las estructuras vasculares y nerviosas y los puntos de referencia óseos.DISEÑO:Estudio intervencionista de cadáveres.AJUSTE:Después de la fijación laparoscópica de la malla, se realizó una disección pélvica detallada siguiendo un protocolo estandarizado. Además, se realizó una tomografía computarizada multidetector de 64 cortes para definir mejor la anatomía lumbosacra y la posición de la tachuela.PACIENTES:Se incluyeron en este estudio dieciocho cadáveres frescos (10 mujeres, 8 hombres).PRINCIPALES MEDIDAS DE RESULTADO:Posición real de tachuela y compromiso vascular y neuronal.RESULTADOS:Se utilizaron un total de 52 tachuelas (mediana 3, 2-3 tachuelas). La distancia media de tachuela al promontorio sacro medio fue de 16,1 mm (0,0-54,2). Solo se encontraron un total de 22 tachuelas (42,3%) en la superficie derecha de la vértebra S1, correlacionándose con el área planificada. En siete cadáveres (38,8%) todas las tachuelas se utilizaron en el área de planificada. La distancia media a los vasos principales fue de 10,5 mm (0,0-35,0), que era la arteria ilíaca interna en la mitad de los casos. La distancia media de las tachuelas al uréter derecho fue de 32,1 mm (7,5-46,1). No se lesionó ni los grandes vasos ni el uréter. La disección del plexo hipogástrico se realizó en 14 cadáveres y en cada cadáver, las tachuelas afectaron el plexo nervioso hipogástrico.LIMITACIONES:Número moderado de cadáveres incluidos en el estudio.CONCLUSIONES:La colocación de tachuelas mostró una variación significativa en nuestra muestra, enfatizando la necesidad de puntos de referencia anatómicos confiables y una exposición suficiente durante la rectopexia con malla ventral. La afectación del plexo nervioso hipogástrico es común, por lo que se requiere una evaluación funcional detallada después de la cirugía. También destaca la importancia de los estudios sobre cadáveres antes de implementar nuevas técnicas quirúrgicas en la práctica clínica. Consulte Video Resumen en http://links.lww.com/DCR/B827. (Traducción-Dr Yolanda Colorado).

Imaging fecal incontinence.

Fecal incontinence is the inability to defer release of gas or stool from the anus and rectum by mechanisms of voluntary control. It is an important medical disorder affecting the quality of life of up to 20% of the population above 65 years. The most common contributing factors include previous vaginal deliveries, pelvic or perineal trauma, previous anorectal surgery, and rectal prolapse. Many physicians lack experience and knowledge related to pelvic floor incontinence disorders, but advancing technology has improved this knowledge. Increased experience with endoanal ultrasound and endoanal magnetic resonance imaging have given us a better understanding not only of the anatomy of the anal canal but also of the underlying morphological defects in fecal incontinence. Current imaging methods are emphasized and recent literature is reviewed.

Comparison of transrectal sonography and double-contrast MR imaging when staging rectal cancer.

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was the prospective comparison of the diagnostic yield of transrectal sonography and double-contrast MR imaging for preoperative staging of rectal cancer. SUBJECTS AND METHODS. Thirty-nine rectal cancer patients (20 men, 19 women) underwent transrectal sonography performed with a 10-MHz endoanal probe and MR imaging (1.0 T or 1.5 T) using a whole-body coil. After rectal application of a superparamagnetic iron oxide MR contrast agent, T1- and T2-weighted images and gadolinium-enhanced double-contrast images were obtained. The results of examinations were compared with the histology of resected specimens. RESULTS: Histopathology showed four stage T1, 11 stage T2, 18 stage T3, and six stage T4 tumors using the TNM staging system. Nodal metastases were seen in 16 patients. Transrectal sonography could not be performed in 11 patients because of the high location of the tumor. In the remaining 28 patients, the accuracy of transrectal sonography for T stage was 64% overall (patients not receiving radiation, 69%; patients receiving radiation, 60%) and 70% for N stage. In 39 patients, double-contrast MR imaging correctly identified the T stage with an accuracy of 64% overall (patients not receiving radiation, 75%; patients receiving radiation, 53%) and the N stage with an accuracy of 62%. The assessment of rectal wall penetration (Dukes' classification A versus B) revealed a sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy of 93%, 71%, and 82%, respectively, for transrectal sonography and 100%, 60%, and 85% for MR imaging. CONCLUSION: If it is technically feasible, transrectal sonography is an accurate method for staging rectal cancer. In proximal or stenotic tumors, double-contrast MR imaging is the method of choice. Diagnostic accuracy of transrectal sonography and MR imaging is high for predicting bowel wall penetration.