Effects of weight loss medications on mortality and cardiovascular events: A systematic review of randomized controlled trials in adults with overweight and obesity.

AIMS: Adults affected by obesity are at higher risk of premature mortality. Medications can help to lose weight and to maintain weight loss. Aim of this meta-analysis was to assess whether anti-obesity medications affect all-cause mortality, mortality due to cardiovascular events, cardiovascular risk factors and body weight. DATA SYNTHESIS: A Medline search was performed to identify randomized controlled trials (RCTs) of anti-obesity medications in adults with overweight or obesity reporting data on all-cause mortality, cardiovascular mortality or non-fatal cardiovascular events, with a follow-up of at least 6 months. We identified 28 RCTs with 50,106 participants. The median follow-up was 52 weeks. Evidence did not show superiority of anti-obesity medications over placebo in reducing all-cause mortality (risk ratio 1.03, 95%Confidence Interval [CI] 0.87 to 1.21) or cardiovascular mortality (risk ratio 0.92, 95%CI 0.72 to 1.18). All-cause mortality rate was positively associated with weight loss (ß = 0.0007; p = 0.045); hence, for each kg of body weight lost there was a 0.07% decrease of all-cause mortality. The pharmacological treatment reduced total-cholesterol (7.15 mg/dl; 95%CI 1.46-12.85), LDL-cholesterol (5.06 mg/dl; 95%CI 1.12-9.00), and triglycerides levels (9.88 mg/dl; 95%CI 5.02-14.75), while it increased HDL-cholesterol (1.37 mg/dl; 95%CI 0.17-2.57). Systolic blood pressure decreased (0.90 mmHg; 95%CI 0.15-1.64). CONCLUSIONS: Although we were unable to demonstrate a superiority of anti-obesity medications over placebo on mortality, metaregression showed that even a small weight reduction tends to reduce all-cause mortality in obesity. Our data support public health measures to reduce the obesity burden by including the use of anti-obesity medications. REGISTRATION NUMBER (PROSPERO): CRD42020210329.

The Long-Term Impact of Renin-Angiotensin System (RAS) Inhibition on Cardiorenal Outcomes (LIRICO): A Randomized, Controlled Trial.

BACKGROUND: The comparative effectiveness of treatment with angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitors, angiotensin receptor blockers (ARBs), or their combination in people with albuminuria and cardiovascular risk factors is unclear. METHODS: In a multicenter, randomized, open label, blinded end point trial, we evaluated the effectiveness on cardiovascular events of ACE or ARB monotherapy or combination therapy, targeting BP<130/80 in patients with moderate or severe albuminuria and diabetes or other cardiovascular risk factors. End points included a primary composite of cardiovascular death, nonfatal myocardial infarction, nonfatal stroke, and hospitalization for cardiovascular causes and a revised end point of all-cause mortality. Additional end points included ESRD, doubling of serum creatinine, albuminuria, eGFR, BP, and adverse events. RESULTS: Because of slow enrollment, the trial was modified and stopped 41% short of targeted enrollment of 2100 participants, corresponding to 35% power to detect a 25% reduced risk in the primary outcome. Our analysis included 1243 adults, with median follow-up of 2.7 years. Efficacy outcomes were similar between groups (ACE inhibitor versus ARB, ACE inhibitor versus combination, ARB versus combination) as were rates of serious adverse events. The rate of permanent discontinuation for ARB monotherapy (6.3%) was significantly lower than for ACE inhibitor monotherapy (15.7%) or combined therapy (18.3%). CONCLUSIONS: Patients may tolerate ARB monotherapy better than ACE inhibitor monotherapy. However, data from this trial and similar trials, although as yet inconclusive, show no trend suggesting differences in mortality and renal outcomes with ACE inhibitors or ARBs as dual or monotherapy in patients with albuminuria and diabetes or other cardiovascular risk factors.

Revascularisation versus medical treatment in patients with stable coronary artery disease: network meta-analysis.

OBJECTIVE: To investigate whether revascularisation improves prognosis compared with medical treatment among patients with stable coronary artery disease. DESIGN: Bayesian network meta-analyses to combine direct within trial comparisons between treatments with indirect evidence from other trials while maintaining randomisation. ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA FOR SELECTING STUDIES: A strategy of initial medical treatment compared with revascularisation by coronary artery bypass grafting or Food and Drug Administration approved techniques for percutaneous revascularization: balloon angioplasty, bare metal stent, early generation paclitaxel eluting stent, sirolimus eluting stent, and zotarolimus eluting (Endeavor) stent, and new generation everolimus eluting stent, and zotarolimus eluting (Resolute) stent among patients with stable coronary artery disease. DATA SOURCES: Medline and Embase from 1980 to 2013 for randomised trials comparing medical treatment with revascularisation. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE: All cause mortality. RESULTS: 100 trials in 93,553 patients with 262,090 patient years of follow-up were included. Coronary artery bypass grafting was associated with a survival benefit (rate ratio 0.80, 95% credibility interval 0.70 to 0.91) compared with medical treatment. New generation drug eluting stents (everolimus: 0.75, 0.59 to 0.96; zotarolimus (Resolute): 0.65, 0.42 to 1.00) but not balloon angioplasty (0.85, 0.68 to 1.04), bare metal stents (0.92, 0.79 to 1.05), or early generation drug eluting stents (paclitaxel: 0.92, 0.75 to 1.12; sirolimus: 0.91, 0.75 to 1.10; zotarolimus (Endeavor): 0.88, 0.69 to 1.10) were associated with improved survival compared with medical treatment. Coronary artery bypass grafting reduced the risk of myocardial infarction compared with medical treatment (0.79, 0.63 to 0.99), and everolimus eluting stents showed a trend towards a reduced risk of myocardial infarction (0.75, 0.55 to 1.01). The risk of subsequent revascularisation was noticeably reduced by coronary artery bypass grafting (0.16, 0.13 to 0.20) followed by new generation drug eluting stents (zotarolimus (Resolute): 0.26, 0.17 to 0.40; everolimus: 0.27, 0.21 to 0.35), early generation drug eluting stents (zotarolimus (Endeavor): 0.37, 0.28 to 0.50; sirolimus: 0.29, 0.24 to 0.36; paclitaxel: 0.44, 0.35 to 0.54), and bare metal stents (0.69, 0.59 to 0.81) compared with medical treatment. CONCLUSION: Among patients with stable coronary artery disease, coronary artery bypass grafting reduces the risk of death, myocardial infarction, and subsequent revascularisation compared with medical treatment. All stent based coronary revascularisation technologies reduce the need for revascularisation to a variable degree. Our results provide evidence for improved survival with new generation drug eluting stents but no other percutaneous revascularisation technology compared with medical treatment.

Angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors, angiotensin receptor blockers and combined therapy in patients with micro- and macroalbuminuria and other cardiovascular risk factors: a systematic review of randomized controlled trials.

BACKGROUND: A recent clinical trial showed harmful renal effects with the combined use of angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors (ACEI) and angiotensin-II receptor blockers (ARB) in people with diabetes or vascular disease. We examined the benefits and risks of these agents in people with albuminuria and one or more cardiovascular risk factors. METHODS: MEDLINE, EMBASE and Renal Health Library were searched for trials comparing ACEI, ARB or their combination with placebo or with one another in people with albuminuria and one or more cardiovascular risk factor. RESULTS: Eighty-five trials (21,708 patients) were included. There was no significant reduction in the risk of all-cause mortality or fatal cardiac-cerebrovascular outcomes with ACEI versus placebo, ARB versus placebo, ACEI versus ARB or with combined therapy with ACEI + ARB versus monotherapy. There was a significant reduction in the risk of nonfatal cardiovascular events with ACEI versus placebo but not with ARB versus placebo, ACEI versus ARB or with combined therapy with ACEI + ARB versus monotherapy. Development of end-stage kidney disease and progression of microalbuminuria to macroalbuminuria were reduced significantly with ACEI versus placebo and ARB versus placebo but not with combined therapy with ACEI + ARB versus monotherapy. CONCLUSIONS: ACEI and ARB exert independent renal and nonfatal cardiovascular benefits while their effects on mortality and fatal cardiovascular disease are uncertain. There is a lack of evidence to support the use of combination therapy. A comparative clinical trial with ACE, ARB and its combination in people with albuminuria and a cardiovascular risk factor is warranted.

Proteinuria and clinical outcomes in hypertensive patients.

This narrative review focuses on outcomes related to proteinuria in hypertension (HT), and also examines the role of current and future therapeutic strategies. Proteinuria is an independent marker of renal and cardiovascular (CV) disease in hypertensive populations, particularly in high-risk groups such as diabetic patients. Effective blood pressure (BP) control and proteinuria management are associated with significant improvements in the risk of key adverse outcomes, although a causative relationship needs careful assessment. Available antihypertensives have varying effects on proteinuria reduction. Drugs affecting the renin system offer antiproteinuric and renoprotective effects that are probably at least partially independent of their BP effects. Economic evaluations of these interventions confirm their cost-saving benefits relative to other antihypertensives, but outcomes-based research is needed in some settings.

Risk factors for the development and progression of renal diseases in disadvantaged populations: role of the renin-angiotensin system blockade.

Chronic kidney disease is becoming a public health challenge due to the high risk of progression to end-stage kidney disease, the increased cardiovascular burden and management costs, especially among disadvantaged communities. Although the high prevalence of hypertension and diabetes in these populations are recognized risk factors and a leading cause of chronic kidney disease, ethnic populations show a greater likelihood of developing end-stage kidney disease regardless of these cardiovascular risk factors. The association between low socioeconomic status and the prevalence/progression of chronic kidney disease observed in population-based studies suggests that socioeconomic disadvantage could be a plausible reason for the increased burden of renal disease among minorities. Interventions for management and prevention of chronic kidney disease include angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitors and angiotensin receptor blockers. Few studies of these agents have been conducted in indigenous populations, but there is evidence that angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitors are effective in reducing premature deaths and progression of chronic kidney disease, as well as being highly cost-effective, especially in terms of renal replacement therapies avoided. It is plausible that these disadvantaged groups may benefit more than others from a renal and cardiovascular prevention program, but considerable under-recognition and under-treatment of these conditions still exist.