Population pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic modeling of serum biomarkers as predictors of tumor dynamics following lenvatinib treatment in patients with radioiodine-refractory differentiated thyroid cancer (RR-DTC).

Lenvatinib is a receptor tyrosine kinase (RTK) inhibitor targeting vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) receptors 1-3, fibroblast growth factor (FGF) receptors 1-4, platelet-derived growth factor receptor-α (PDGFRα), KIT, and RET that have been implicated in pathogenic angiogenesis, tumor growth, and cancer. The primary objective of this work was to evaluate, by establishing quantitative relationships, whether lenvatinib exposure and longitudinal serum biomarker data (VEGF, Ang-2, Tie-2, and FGF-23) are predictors for change in longitudinal tumor size which was assessed based on data from 558 patients with radioiodine-refractory differentiated thyroid cancer (RR-DTC) receiving either lenvatinib or placebo treatment. Lenvatinib PK was best described by a 3-compartment model with simultaneous first- and zero-order absorption and linear elimination from the central compartment with significant covariates (body weight, albumin <30 g/dL, ALP>ULN, RR-DTC, RCC, HCC subjects, and concomitant CYP3A inhibitors). Except for body weight, none of the covariates have any clinically meaningful effect on exposure to lenvatinib. Longitudinal biomarker measurements over time were reasonably well defined by a PK/PD model with common EC50, Emax, and a slope for disease progression for all biomarkers. Longitudinal tumor measurements over time were reasonably well defined by a tumor growth inhibition Emax model, which in addition to lenvatinib exposure, included model-predicted relative changes from baseline over time for Tie-2 and Ang-2 as having significant association with tumor response. The developed PK/PD models pave the way for dose optimization and potential prediction of clinical response.

Intravenous Perampanel as an Interchangeable Alternative to Oral Perampanel: A Randomized, Crossover, Phase I Pharmacokinetic and Safety Study.

Intravenous (IV) drug administration enables treatment of epilepsy when oral administration is temporarily not feasible. Perampanel is a once-daily antiseizure medication currently available as oral formulations. Study 050 (NCT03376997) was an open-label, randomized, single-dose, crossover study to evaluate the interchangeability of oral and IV perampanel in healthy subjects (N = 48). Bioequivalence of single 12-mg doses of IV (30-, 60-, or 90-minute infusion) and oral perampanel, ≥6 weeks apart, was assessed. Analyses indicated bioequivalence of area under the plasma concentration-time curve extrapolated to infinity for 30- and 60-minute IV infusions and oral perampanel doses (geometric mean ratio [90% confidence interval], 0.93 [0.84-1.02] and 1.03 [0.97-1.09], respectively); however, IV maximum observed drug concentration (Cmax ) values were 1.35- to 1.61-fold higher than Cmax . Simulated plasma concentration-time profiles using pooled pharmacokinetic data further supported oral and IV perampanel interchangeability in two scenarios: 12-mg per day IV dosing during a temporary 7-day switch from oral steady-state maintenance therapy, and treatment initiation with 2-mg perampanel. Thirty-four (70.8%) subjects experienced treatment-related adverse events. The IV perampanel safety profile was similar to that of oral perampanel without new safety concerns. Perampanel IV infusions may be a suitable temporary alternative to oral perampanel for treatment maintenance and/or initiation.

Population Pharmacokinetics and Exposure-Response Analyses for the Most Frequent Adverse Events Following Treatment With Lemborexant, an Orexin Receptor Antagonist, in Subjects With Insomnia Disorder.

Lemborexant is a novel orexin receptor antagonist approved in the United States and Japan for the treatment of insomnia. This article describes the population pharmacokinetics (PK) of lemborexant and the relationship of its daily steady-state exposure (Cav,ss ) to the probability of most frequent treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs). The 12 230-observation, 1892-subject PK data set included data from 12 clinical studies with predominantly female subjects (66%) ranging in age from 18 to 88 years and from 37 to 168 kg in body weight. The 1664-subject exposure-response data set included data from 3 late-stage studies. Lemborexant pharmacokinetics were described by a 3-compartment model with combined first- and zero-order absorption with lag time and linear elimination. Oral clearance decreased with increasing body mass index (exponent, -0.428), increasing alkaline phosphatase levels (exponent, -0.118), and was 26% lower in the elderly (≥65 years). Across the adverse event analysis, the frequency of subjects experiencing TEAEs during active treatment ranged from approximately 3% to 8%, in the range estimated for placebo. With and without adjustment for age, lemborexant exposure (Cav,ss ) was not a clinically meaningful linear predictor of the probability of specific TEAEs: somnolence, nasopharyngitis, flu/influenza, urinary tract infection, upper respiratory tract infection, or headache. Given the small effect sizes of covariates of the PK model and a low degree of association of lemborexant TEAEs and exposure over the range of phase 3 (therapeutic) 5- and 10-mg doses, lemborexant can be safely administered without the need for dose adjustment.

Adjunctive Perampanel Oral Suspension in Pediatric Patients From ≥2 to <12 Years of Age With Epilepsy: Pharmacokinetics, Safety, Tolerability, and Efficacy.

Study 232, an open-label pilot study with an extension phase, evaluated the pharmacokinetics and preliminary safety/tolerability and efficacy of adjunctive perampanel oral suspension (≤0.18 mg/kg/d) in epilepsy patients aged ≥2 to <12 years. Patients were grouped into cohorts 1 (aged ≥7 to <12 years) and 2 (aged ≥2 to <7 years). The Core Study included pretreatment (≤2 weeks) and treatment phases (7-week titration; 4-week maintenance; 4-week follow-up [for those not entering the extension]). The extension phase consisted of 41-week maintenance and 4-week follow-up periods. Pharmacokinetic data were pooled with adolescent pharmacokinetic data from phase II/III studies. Population pharmacokinetic analysis showed that perampanel pharmacokinetics was independent of age, weight, or liver function, suggesting age- or weight-based dosing is not required and that the same dose can be given to adults and children to achieve exposures shown to be efficacious. Perampanel was well tolerated and efficacious for ≤52 weeks.

On-the-road driving performance the morning after bedtime administration of lemborexant in healthy adult and elderly volunteers.

STUDY OBJECTIVES: To assess potential effects of lemborexant on next-morning driving performance in adult and elderly healthy volunteers. METHODS: Randomized, double-blind, double-dummy, placebo and active-controlled, four period incomplete crossover study in 48 healthy volunteers (22 females), 23-78 years old. Participants were treated at bedtime for eight consecutive nights with two of three dose levels of lemborexant (2.5, 5, or 10 mg), zopiclone 7.5 mg (on the first and last night with placebo on intervening nights), or placebo. Driving performance was assessed in the morning on days 2 and 9 using a standardized highway driving test in normal traffic, measuring standard deviation of lateral position (SDLP). Drug-placebo differences in SDLP >2.4 cm were considered to reflect clinically meaningful driving impairment. RESULTS: Mean drug-placebo differences in SDLP following lemborexant 2.5, 5, and 10 mg on days 2 and 9 were 0.74 cm or less. The upper bound of the 95% confidence intervals (CIs) for lemborexant treatment groups were all below 2.4 cm and the 95% CIs included zero, indicating that the effects were neither clinically meaningful nor statistically significant. Symmetry analysis further supported the lack of clinically meaningful impairment with lemborexant. CONCLUSIONS: When assessed starting ~9 h after lemborexant administration at bedtime the previous night, there was no statistically significant or clinically meaningful effect on driving performance in healthy adults and elderly, as assessed by either mean differences in SDLP relative to placebo or symmetry analysis. In this study, lemborexant at doses up to 10 mg was well-tolerated. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: clinicaltrials.gov, NCT02583451. https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT02583451.

Pharmacokinetics, exposure-cognition, and exposure-efficacy relationships of perampanel in adolescents with inadequately controlled partial-onset seizures.

OBJECTIVE: To characterize, in adolescents aged 12-17, the pharmacokinetic (PK) profile of perampanel, the impact of intrinsic and extrinsic factors on PK, and the relationships between perampanel exposure and cognitive function, seizure frequency, and responder status. METHODS: Population PK analysis used plasma concentration data from Phase II study 235 (NCT01161524), in which adolescents with inadequately controlled POS despite treatment with 1-3 antiepileptic drugs (AEDs) were randomized to receive once daily oral placebo or perampanel (8-12mg/day) for 19 weeks, pooled with data from adolescent patients in perampanel Phase III studies 304, 305, 306. Exposure-cognition and exposure-efficacy relationships were modelled using data from study 235. RESULTS: Population PK results from 152 adolescent patients revealed a perampanel apparent clearance of 0.729L/h, consistent with previous analyses in adolescents and adults. Clearance was increased with coadministration of inducing AEDs (carbamazepine, oxcarbazepine and phenytoin), and was slightly higher in females. The PK/pharmacodynamics (PD) analysis for cognition (n=110) showed that increasing perampanel exposure had no significant effect on overall cognition, measured by the Cognitive Drug Research global cognition score. The PK/PD analysis for efficacy (n=123) showed a significant decrease in seizure frequency and significant increased probability of being a responder, as perampanel concentration increased - both in the presence and absence of inducing AEDs. Carbamazepine, oxcarbazepine and phenytoin reduced perampanel exposure in adolescents, but reduced the magnitude of seizure frequency reduction and responder probability to a lesser extent. SIGNIFICANCE: Pharmacokinetics of perampanel are similar in adolescents to adults. Increasing perampanel exposure reduces seizure frequency and increases probability of being a responder regardless of concomitant inducers. The lack of relationship between perampanel exposure and cognitive function suggests a benign cognitive profile for this AED in adolescents. We await results from long-term exposure.

Impact of perampanel on pharmacokinetics of concomitant antiepileptics in patients with partial-onset seizures: pooled analysis of clinical trials.

AIMS: To evaluate the impact of perampanel and demographics on clearance of concomitant antiepileptic drugs (AEDs), in patients with refractory partial-onset seizures. METHODS: Pooled data from three Phase III clinical studies with adjunctive perampanel were used. Blood samples for evaluation of 11 concomitant AEDs were taken during baseline (before perampanel initiation), and at weeks 10, 14, and 19 during the maintenance phase of perampanel treatment (2-12 mg/day, once daily at bedtime). Models estimating apparent clearance of each concomitant AED were fitted to the data, and the effects of perampanel and demographic variables on clearance were determined. Final models were assessed with goodness of fit plots including population predictions and individual predictions against observations. RESULTS: No significant impact of perampanel on clearance was found for clonazepam (n = 81), levetiracetam (n = 330), phenobarbital (n = 54), phenytoin (n = 90), topiramate (n = 226) or zonisamide (n = 93). Statistically significant, but small and not clinically relevant increases in model-predicted clearance were detected for carbamazepine (+4.3% with 12 mg perampanel; n = 379), clobazam (+3.4% males, +7.7% females, 12 mg; n = 114), lamotrigine (+9.3%, 12 mg; n = 356), and valproic acid (+5.0%, 12 mg; n = 349). Oxcarbazepine clearance was reduced (26%; n = 200), but the clinical relevance is unclear as levels of the active metabolite (the monohydroxy derivative of oxcarbazepine) were not measured. CONCLUSIONS: Population PK data show that perampanel (2-12 mg/day, once daily at bedtime) has no relevant impact on the clearance of the most commonly used concomitant AEDs.

The practical impact of altered dosing on perampanel plasma concentrations: pharmacokinetic modeling from clinical studies.

RATIONALE: Perampanel is a selective AMPA receptor antagonist approved for adjunctive therapy in patients with refractory partial-onset seizures. Perampanel is metabolized primarily via CYP3A4, yet it has a relatively long half-life of 105h; it is, therefore, recommended that perampanel be given once daily (preferably at bedtime). Many patients occasionally have less-than-perfect adherence to their drug regimen, and given the known pharmacokinetic interactions of perampanel with commonly used enzyme-inducing antiepileptic drugs (EIAEDs), we explored the effects of a missed dose on steady-state perampanel plasma concentrations and the ramifications of "make up" doses in these patients. Although perampanel is approved for once-daily dosing, some clinicians may elect to give perampanel as a divided dose (i.e., twice daily), so we also sought to examine the pharmacokinetic impact of twice- versus once-daily dosing. METHODS: Pharmacokinetic simulations were performed using validated perampanel pharmacokinetic parameters, derived from 19 phase I studies in 606 subjects, to investigate the effect on perampanel plasma concentration of (1) missing a dose of perampanel followed by delayed replacement of the missed dose, (2) missing a dose followed by resumption of scheduled therapy, and (3) missing a dose in the presence/absence of carbamazepine. Simulations were done for a typical patient receiving an 8-mg once-daily or a 4-mg twice-daily dose using the nonlinear mixed effects program, NONMEM v7.2, in conjunction with PDx-pop v5. RESULTS: Our results corroborate that given the pharmacokinetic characteristics of perampanel, a missed dose is unlikely to cause as much fluctuation in plasma concentration as would be expected for a drug with a short half-life. Importantly, simulations suggest that supplementing a missed dose 6-12h later, followed by continuation of the regular schedule, may not result in any significant "spikes" in perampanel plasma concentrations. Simulations demonstrated that twice-daily dosing offered little advantage in further flattening the concentration-time profile of perampanel in the adherent patient. However, fluctuations in plasma concentrations are minimized by twice-daily dosing in patients receiving concomitant EIAEDs. CONCLUSIONS: These pharmacokinetic simulations suggest that the long half-life of perampanel may be advantageous in conferring a relatively smooth concentration-time profile with a once-daily or twice-daily dosing, even in the presence of concomitant EIAEDs. However, the results of the present study suggest that perampanel replacement is recommended for patients taking an EIAED to mitigate the potential risks associated with reduced exposure. Confirmation of the ultimate clinical impact of these findings will require further study.

Population pharmacometric analyses of eribulin in patients with locally advanced or metastatic breast cancer previously treated with anthracyclines and taxanes.

Pharmacometric investigation of eribulin was undertaken in patients with metastatic breast cancer (MBC) and other advanced solid tumors. A population pharmacokinetic (PK) model used data combined from seven phase 1 studies (advanced solid tumors; n = 129), and one phase 2 (MBC; n = 211), and one phase 3 study (MBC; n = 173). Phase 3 data were also used in a PK/pharmacodynamic (PD) model of efficacy and tumor response (sum of longest diameters of target lesions). All analyses used NONMEM 7.2. Eribulin PK, described by a dose-independent, three-compartment model with allometric relationship for body weight, was similar for all tumor types. Inter-individual variability (IIV) was 52% for both exposure and clearance. Liver function markers (albumin, alkaline phosphatase, bilirubin) significantly influenced eribulin PK (7.3% of IIV in clearance). Tumor shrinkage correlated with eribulin exposure; a 36% decrease in tumor size from baseline was modeled at week 36. No patient/disease factors significantly predicted eribulin's effect on tumor size. At week 6, a decrease in tumor size was associated with longer survival than an increase (P = .0055), suggesting survival may relate indirectly to eribulin exposure. These pharmacometric analyses provide a detailed overview of eribulin exposure-efficacy relationships to inform physicians treating patients with MBC.

Concentration-effect relationships with perampanel in patients with pharmacoresistant partial-onset seizures.

PURPOSE: Although there is a general paucity of published pharmacokinetic (PK) data for new antiepileptic drugs (AEDs), PK analyses of pooled data from clinical studies of perampanel have recently been presented. We present PK/pharmacodynamic (PD) analyses of pooled data from phase III studies of perampanel describing efficacy and safety as a function of exposure, in order to determine whether a predictable concentration-effect relationship exists for perampanel efficacy and/or adverse events (AEs). The effects of concomitant enzyme-inducing AEDs (EIAEDs) and non-enzyme-inducing AEDs on the exposure, efficacy, and safety of perampanel are also considered. METHODS: Three multicenter, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled phase III studies investigated the efficacy and safety of perampanel 2-12 mg in patients with uncontrolled partial-onset seizures despite prior therapy with two or more AEDs. From baseline onward, patients also received ongoing treatment with stable doses of one to three approved concomitant AEDs. AEs were monitored throughout the studies. Changes from baseline in seizure frequency and 50% responder rates were evaluated. Exposure to perampanel was predicted based on the actual (last) dose using a previously established PK model. A population PK/PD model for the relationship between perampanel exposure and seizure frequency was estimated using nonlinear mixed-effect modeling with first-order conditional estimation, whereas logistic analyses for responder rate and AEs were performed using SAS analysis software. KEY FINDINGS: The PK/PD population included 1,109 patients. Seizure frequency decreased linearly as predicted perampanel average steady-state plasma concentrations increased. Concomitant EIAEDs (carbamazepine, oxcarbazepine, and phenytoin) reduced exposure to perampanel but had no effect on the slope of the PD model-predicted relationship between exposure and reduction in seizure frequency. The probability of patients achieving a response was predicted to increase as perampanel average plasma concentration at steady state increased. No demographic, AED, region, or study covariate had any effect on the probability of achieving a positive treatment response to perampanel or on the slope of the exposure-response curve. Across the phase III studies, there were reports of dizziness (32.9%), somnolence (21.7%), fatigue (13.9%), irritability (12.3%), gait disturbance (9.1%), weight increase (6.1%), dysarthria (4.5%), and euphoric mood (0.5%); the model-predicted probability of these AEs increased significantly at higher exposure to perampanel (all p < 0.001). There was no effect of demographic variables or region on the probability of experiencing any of the AEs analyzed. SIGNIFICANCE: PK and PD analyses have played a pivotal role in the clinical development of perampanel as an adjunctive treatment for pharmacoresistant partial-onset seizures. Phase III data suggest that a significant relationship exists between increases in perampanel plasma concentration (i.e., systemic exposure) and reductions in seizure frequency. In addition, increases in perampanel plasma concentration may potentially be associated with increases in AE rates. The model-predicted concentration-safety profile of perampanel does not appear to be affected by patient age, gender, or ethnicity. Although concomitant EIAEDs may influence perampanel PK, they do not appear to alter the relationship between perampanel plasma concentration and seizure frequency. Understanding these relationships between perampanel plasma concentration and clinical response will be valuable in utilizing this novel AED.

Structural identifiability analysis and reparameterisation (parameter reduction) of a cardiovascular feedback model.

Structural identifiability should be considered when developing mathematical models. A globally or at least locally identifiable model has to be obtained in order to have some chance of obtaining unique parameter estimates when real data are available. An indicator of structural unidentifiability may be that some unknown parameter estimates are found to be not well determined from parameter estimation of a model. An example is discussed in this paper to illustrate the procedures involved when such situations arise. Problems with parameter estimation were observed for a PKPD model for an α1A/1L-adrenoceptor partial agonist developed for the treatment of stress urinary incontinence The regulation of the side effects of the increased peripheral resistance, induced by the constriction of the blood vessels, was modelled by adapting a previous cardiovascular nonlinear PKPD model proposed by Franchetau and co-workers. Structural identifiability analysis confirmed that the model was unidentifiable. The model was then reparameterised (parameter list reduction) to obtain a globally identifiable model. Simulation studies confirm the superiority of the reduced parameterisation with respect to parameter estimation. The simulation study also confirms the models behave indistinguishably with respect to the input-output behaviour. The example demonstrates the importance of recognising an unidentifiable model and illustrates step by step identifiability analysis, reparameterisation and validation of reparameterised model against the original model.

Optimal design for multiresponse pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic models - dealing with unbalanced designs.

This paper addresses the problem of determining D-optimal designs for multiresponse pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic (PKPD) experiments where data on each response variable can be collected at different times. Most previous multiresponse model optimal design applications have considered the case where all response variables are measured at the same time points. However in practice it may not be possible to have all responses measured at the same sampling times. We propose an optimal design method to take into account the unbalanced nature of the problem. The method developed was applied to a PKPD problem that involved describing the time course of drug plasma concentrations, heart rate and mean arterial blood pressure for both a fixed effects and mixed effects regression model. Additionally a simulation study was carried out in NONMEM for one such population optimal design problem.

Pharmacokinetics and safety of ketorolac following single intranasal and intramuscular administration in healthy volunteers.

Ketorolac was administered to 15 healthy volunteers in a phase 1, single-dose, crossover, randomized study. Subjects received open-label randomized 15- and 30-mg intramuscular (i.m.) ketorolac and blinded randomized 15- and 30-mg intranasal (i.n.) ketorolac. The i.n. ketorolac was well tolerated; the only nasal symptoms were some instances of mild irritation. The i.n. ketorolac was rapidly and well absorbed (median tmax, 0.50-0.75 hours), and the half-life was approximately 5 to 6 hours, values that were similar to those following i.m. administration. Relative bioavailability of i.n. compared to i.m. administration at the same doses was approximately 67% to 75%. Dose proportionality was noted between the 15- and 30-mg i.n. and i.m. dose levels. Thus, i.n. ketorolac offers a therapeutic alternative to i.m. administration and may provide benefits in the clinical setting.

Retrospective population pharmacokinetics of levocetirizine in atopic children receiving cetirizine: the ETAC study.

AIMS: To evaluate the population pharmacokinetics of levocetirizine in young children receiving long-term treatment with cetirizine. METHODS: Data were available from a randomized, double-blind, parallel group and placebo-controlled study of cetirizine in 343 young children between 12 and 24 months of age at entry, who were at high risk of developing asthma, but were not yet affected (ETAC study). Infants received oral drops of cetirizine at 0.25 mg kg(-1) twice daily for 18 months. Plasma concentration of the active enantiomer levocetirizine was determined in blood samples collected at months 3, 12 and 18 (1-3 samples per child). A one-compartment open model was fitted to the data using nonlinear mixed effects modelling (NONMEM). The influence of weight, age, gender, BSA and other covariates on CL/F and V/F was evaluated. RESULTS: CL/F increased linearly with weight by 0.044 l h(-1) kg(-1) over an intercept of 0.244 l h(-1), and V/F increased linearly with weight by 0.639 l kg(-1). Population estimates in children with weights of 8 and 20 kg were 0.60 and 1.13 l h(-1) for CL/F, and 5.1 and 12.8 l for V/F, respectively, with interpatient variabilities of 24.4% and 14.7%. Weight-normalized estimates of CL/F and V/F were higher than in adults. The estimated relative bioavailability was 0.28 in 12% of instances of suspected noncompliance. Levocetirizine pharmacokinetics were not influenced by severe allergy or aeroallergen sensitization. Results on the effects of concomitant medications or diseases were inconclusive due to limited positive cases. AUC(ss), calculated in compliant subjects using posterior estimates of the final model, was 1952 (1227-3319) microg l(-1) h (mean, min-max), a value similar to that in adults after intake of 5 mg oral solution (2036 (1414-2827) microg l(-1) h. CONCLUSIONS: The model suggests that administration of levocetirizine 0.125 mg kg(-1) twice daily in children 12-48 months of age or weighing 8-20 kg yields the same exposure as in adults taking the recommended dose of 5 mg once daily.

Determination of total mycophenolic acid and its glucuronide metabolite using liquid chromatography with ultraviolet detection and unbound mycophenolic acid using tandem mass spectrometry.

Two simple, sensitive and reproducible methods for determination of total mycophenolic acid (MPA) and its glucuronide metabolite (MPAG) as well as unbound MPA (fMPA) was developed by the use of HPLC-UV and LC-MS/MS methods, respectively. For the total MPA/MPAG method, the analytes were extracted using Isolute C(2) solid-phase extraction (SPE) cartridges and analyzed at 254 nm over a Zorbax Rx C(8) column (150 mm x 4.6 mm, 5 microm). The mobile phase was a gradient mixture of methanol and water (containing 0.1% (v/v) phosphoric acid). The total run time was 18 min and the extraction recovery was 77% for MPA and 84% for MPAG. The method was precise and accurate with a lower limit of quantification (LLOQ) of 0.5 mg/l for MPA and 5.0 mg/l for MPAG. For the fMPA method, plasma was subjected to ultrafiltration followed by SPE using C(18) cartridges. Analytical column was the same as the HPLC-UV method and the mobile phase was a gradient composition of methanol:0.05% formic acid with a flow rate of 0.6 ml/min for the first 3 min and 0.7 ml for the last 4 min. The chromatographic method separated MPA from its metabolites MPAG and Acyl-MPAG. Mass transitions in negative ionization mode for MPA and the internal standard, indomethacin were m/z: 319-->190.9 and m/z: 356-->312.2, respectively. The assay was linear in the concentration range of 1-1000 microg/l for fMPA with a LLOQ of 1 microg/l and an accuracy of >95%. The two methods reported have an adequate degree of robustness and dynamic concentration range for the measurement of MPA, MPAG and fMPA for therapeutic drug monitoring purposes or pharmacokinetics investigations.

Retrospective population pharmacokinetic analysis of cetirizine in children aged 6 months to 12 years.

AIMS: To evaluate retrospectively the population pharmacokinetics of cetirizine, a second-generation antihistamine, in children. METHODS: Data were pooled from six clinical trials, in which cetirizine was administered orally in various formulations and in single and multiple dosage regimens. The population consisted of 112 children (33 female and 79 male) aged 6 months to 12 years. A one-compartment open model with first-order absorption and elimination was fitted to the plasma concentration-time profiles using nonlinear mixed effects modelling with first-order estimation. RESULTS: A linear association was found between apparent clearance (CL/F) and age with the former increasing by 0.12 l h(-1) per year. The intercept of the relationship was slightly lower for female children (0.59 vs. 0.77 l h(-1) in male). The population estimate of CL/F for an average age of 7 years was 1.61 and 1.43 l h(-1) for male and female children, respectively. A linear association was found between apparent volume of distribution (V/F) and age with the former increasing by 1.4 l year(-1), with an intercept of 4.0 l. The population estimate of V/F for an average age of 7 years was 13.9 l. The magnitudes of interpatient variability were 35.6% for CL/F and 19.7% for V/F. The magnitude of residual variability in cetirizine concentrations was 26.9%. CONCLUSIONS: Population analysis predicts a linear increase in cetirizine CL/F and V/F with age, with CL/F being slightly lower in female children, relative to males of the same age. However, this gender difference probably has no clinical consequences. Since V/F increased more rapidly with age than CL/F, a nonlinear increase in half-life was seen, from < 4 h in infants to near the adult value at 12 years of age. The current recommended dosing regimens that younger children should receive lower but more frequent doses, are confirmed by the present analysis.

Immunosuppression, eotaxin and the diagnostic changes in eosinophils that precede early acute heart allograft rejection.

Peripheral blood eosinophil counts (EOS) are undetectable in 40% blood samples sent for routine haematology at Papworth Hospital during the first 3 months after heart transplantation (HTx). Increases in EOS usually precede the development of allograft rejection by a median of 4 days. We compared the effects of cyclosporin (dose and total blood concentration), prednisolone (dose and both total and unbound plasma concentrations) and azathioprine, as well as plasma concentrations of the CCR-3 chemokines, eotaxin and RANTES, on changes in EOS in 47 consecutive HTx recipients, with a median follow-up of 90 (IQR 85-95) days. Multivariate analysis confirmed the independent association between both prednisolone dose (P<0.0001) and eotaxin (P<0.0001) and changes in EOS. The plasma eotaxin concentration was, in turn, most closely associated with the cyclosporin dose (P<0.001) and plasma prednisolone concentration (P=0.022). The blood cyclosporin concentration (P=0.028), EOS (P=0.012) and prednisolone dose (P=0.015) were all independently associated with the risk of treated acute rejection. When prednisolone pharmacokinetic parameters were substituted for the prednisolone dose in this multivariate model, only the pharmacokinetic parameter retained a significant association with the risk of rejection. Changes in EOS preceding cardiac allograft rejection are directly associated with plasma eotaxin concentrations and indirectly with prednisolone dosage. Cyclosporin may also indirectly influence these changes by inhibiting eotaxin production. EOS, prednisolone dose and blood cyclosporin concentrations were independently associated with the risk of acute rejection. The total and unbound fractions of prednisolone in plasma appear to be even more closely related to rejection but are difficult to measure. Monitoring EOS, as a surrogate measure of prednisolone immunosuppression, may be more cost-effective for controlling rejection than conventional cyclosporin monitoring in the first 6 weeks after HTx.

Population pharmacokinetics of artemether and dihydroartemisinin following single intramuscular dosing of artemether in African children with severe falciparum malaria.

AIMS: To determine the population pharmacokinetics of artemether and dihydroartemisinin in African children with severe malaria and acidosis associated with respiratory distress following an intramuscular injection of artemether. METHODS: Following a single intramuscular (i.m.) injection of 3.2 mg kg-1 artemether, blood samples were withdrawn at various times over 24 h after the dose. Plasma was assayed for artemether and dihydroartemisinin by gas chromatography-mass spectrometry. The software program NONMEM was used to fit the concentration-time data and investigate the influence of a range of clinical characteristics (respiratory distress and metabolic acidosis, demographic features and disease) on the pharmacokinetics of artemether and dihydroartemisinin. RESULTS: A total of 100 children with a median age of 36.4 (range 5-108) months were recruited into the study and data from 90 of these children (30 with respiratory distress and 60 with no respiratory distress) were used in the population pharmacokinetic analysis. The best model to describe the disposition of artemether was a one-compartment model with first-order absorption and elimination. The population estimate of clearance (clearance/bioavailability, CL/F) was 14.3 l h-1 with 53% intersubject variability and that of the terminal half-life was 18.5 h. If it was assumed that artemisin displays "flip-flop" kinetics, the elimination half-life was estimated to be 21 min and the corresponding volume of distribution was 8.44 l, with an intersubject variability of 104%. None of the covariates could be identified as having any influence on the disposition of artemether. The disposition of dihydroartemisinin was fitted separately using a one-compartment linear model in which the volume of distribution was fixed to the same value as that of artemether. Assuming that artemether is completely converted to dihydroartemisinin, the estimated value of CL/F for dihydroartemisinin was 93.5 l h-1, with an intersubject variability of 90.2%. The clearance of dihydroartemisinin was formation rate limited. CONCLUSIONS: Administration of a single 3.2 mg kg-1 i.m. dose of artemether to African children with severe malaria and acidosis is characterized by variable absorption kinetics, probably related to drug formulation characteristics rather than to pathophysiological factors. Use of i.m. artemether in such children needs to be reconsidered.