Hockey Fans in Training (Hockey FIT): Rationale, design, and baseline characteristics from a cluster randomized controlled trial in men with overweight or obesity.

BACKGROUND: Previous research highlights the need for effective lifestyle interventions for men. Hockey Fans in Training (Hockey FIT) was developed as a pragmatic healthy lifestyle program tailored to men with overweight or obesity. This paper overviews the rationale, program details, and design of a recently completed cluster randomized controlled trial (RCT) of Hockey FIT. Participant engagement and baseline characteristics are also described. METHODS: The RCT evaluated the effectiveness, cost-effectiveness, and implementation of Hockey FIT. Forty-two sites in Canada and the United States were randomized to either the Hockey FIT intervention group or wait-list control group. Participants were men, aged 35-65 years, with a body mass index (BMI) ≥27 kg/m2. Hockey FIT is a group-based, off-ice, in-person healthy lifestyle program, including both a 3-month active phase and a 9-month minimally-supported phase. Outcomes were assessed at baseline, 3, and 12 months. The primary outcome was weight loss at 12 months. RESULTS: The design of the cluster RCT incorporates evaluations of participant health outcomes, program implementation, and broader healthcare system impact. In the RCT, 1397 participants were assessed for eligibility and 997 were enrolled. Most participants heard about the program through social media or hockey team emails. Participants averaged 49 years of age, had BMI values of 35.3 kg/m2, were predominately white, and had varying levels of education. CONCLUSION: The intended audience for Hockey FIT was recruited successfully, however, targeted recruitment to better engage diverse populations is warranted. This paper affords a useful outline for evaluating future lifestyle interventions tailored to men. This trial was registered on August 17, 2018 with ClinicalTrials.gov (identifier: NCT03636282).

Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Preventative Strategies for Acute Kidney Injury in Patients Undergoing Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm Repair.

BACKGOUND: To assess the effect of various preventative interventions for reducing the incidence of postoperative acute kidney injury (AKI) in patients undergoing elective abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) repair. METHODS: We included randomized controlled trials of 10 patients or more which tested a preventative intervention versus standard therapy or placebo in patients undergoing elective AAA repair using the open or endovascular approach. Studies including mixed patient populations such as those with aortic occlusive disease, thoracoabdominal aneurysms or ruptured aneurysms were ineligible for review. We searched Medline (1966-2019), EMBASE (1947-2019), CINAHL (1961-2019), Web of Science (1945-2019), Scopus (1966-2019), and The Cochrane Library (1996-2019) for trials available as published manuscripts in English. Study quality was assessed using the Cochrane Collaboration risk of bias tool. Where possible we pooled the results of similar interventions using random effects meta-analysis. RESULTS: We included 17 trials involving 1443 participants. Most trials were small, single-center studies, with varying definitions of AKI and a high or moderate risk of bias. The preventative strategies with possible protective effects were mannitol, a composite of antioxidant supplements, an open extraperitoneal approach, and human atrial natriuretic peptide (hANP). Curcumin, methylprednisolone, carbon dioxide contrast medium, hemodynamic monitoring and N-acetylcysteine were found to be ineffective. Six trials with a total of 355 participants reported on remote ischemic preconditioning (RIPC) and our meta-analysis showed no statistically significant difference between RIPC and standard treatment (OR 1.20, 95% CI 0.37, 3.89); although the results should be interpreted with caution due to considerable statistical heterogeneity (I2 = 70%). None of the interventions studied significantly reduced receipt of renal replacement therapy (RRT). CONCLUSIONS: Interventions that have shown some potential to reduce AKI after AAA repair include mannitol, a composite of antioxidant supplements, an open extraperitoneal approach and hANP. These conclusions are limited by the small size, high risk of bias and inconsistency of the included trials. Large, high quality, multi-center randomized trials will help determine which interventions are effective in reducing the incidence of postoperative AKI among patients undergoing elective AAA repair.

Does being a retired or employed caregiver affect the association between behaviours in Alzheimer's disease and caregivers' health-related quality-of-life?

OBJECTIVE: We examined whether caregivers' employment status (i.e., retired or employed) might modify the association between the behaviours of persons with Alzheimer's disease (PwAD) and caregivers' health-related quality-of-life (HRQoL). Data came from a cross-sectional study of the primary informal caregivers of 200 persons with mild or moderate Alzheimer's disease. Caregivers completed the EQ-5D-3L to rate their HRQoL and generate health utility scores, and the Dementia Behaviour Disturbance Scale (DBDS) to assess the degree to which PwAD exhibited each of 28 behaviours. Caregivers' health utility scores were regressed on overall DBDS scores, with caregiver employment status (retired, employed) treated as an effect modifier and confounder in separate regression models. We also controlled for age, sex, income, education, caregivers' relationship to the PwAD, and whether caregivers gave up paid employment/cut down working hours to care for PwAD. RESULTS: Effect modification by caregiver employment status is possible, with the inverse association between DBDS score and health utility score largely existing for retired versus employed caregivers. Research using larger samples and longitudinal data would further inform this area of inquiry.