Hybrid split-arc partial-field volumetric modulated arc therapy: an improved beam arrangement for linear accelerator-based hippocampal-avoidance whole brain radiation therapy.

Background: This technical note aims to verify the hippocampus and adjacent organs at risk (OARs) sparing ability of an improved beam arrangement, namely hybrid split-arc partial-field volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT) (Hsapf-VMAT) during whole brain radiation therapy (WBRT). Materials and methods: Computed tomography simulation images of 22 patients with brain metastases were retrieved in this retrospective planning study. The hippocampus was manually delineated according to the criterion of RTOG 0933. Plans delivering 30 Gy in 10 fractions were generated for each patient using split-arc partial-field VMAT (sapf-VMAT) and Hsapf-VMAT. The sapf-VMAT plans consisted of 4 arc fields of 179.9° each with reduced field size. The Hsapf-VMAT consisted of 4 arc fields similar to sapf-VMAT in addition to 2 lateral opposing static fields. Statistical comparisons between treatment plans of both techniques were performed using the paired t-test at 5% level significance. Results: The results demonstrated that Hsapf-VMAT can achieve superior dose sparing in hippocampus which is comparable to sapf-VMAT (p > 0.05). In both eyes, Hsapf-VMAT had significantly lower Dmean and Dmax compared to sapf-VMAT (p < 0.005). Decrease in Dmax of both lenses using Hsapf-VMAT (p < 0.005) were statistically significant when compared to sapf-VMAT. Hsapf-VMAT demonstrated significant reduction of Dmean and Dmedian to the optic nerves (p < 0.05). Whole brain planning target volume (PTV) coverage was not compromised in both techniques. Conclusion: The present study adopts a hybrid technique, namely Hsapf-VMAT, for hippocampal sparing WBRT. Hsapf-VMAT can achieve promising dose reduction to the hippocampus, both eyes and lenses. Therefore, Hsapf-VMAT can be considered an improved version of sapf-VMAT.

Implementation of web-based open-source radiotherapy delineation software (WORDS) in organs at risk contouring training for newly qualified radiotherapists: quantitative comparison with conventional one-to-one coaching approach.

BACKGROUND: Due to the role expansion of radiotherapists in dosimetric aspect, radiotherapists have taken up organs at risk (OARs) contouring work in many clinical settings. However, training of newly qualified radiotherapists in OARs contouring can be time consuming, it may also cause extra burden to experienced radiotherapists. As web-based open-source radiotherapy delineation software (WORDS) has become more readily available, it has provided a free and interactive alternative to conventional one-to-one coaching approach during OARs contouring training. The present study aims to evaluate the effectiveness of WORDS in training OARs contouring skills of newly qualified radiotherapists, compared to those trained by conventional one-to-one coaching approach. METHODS: Nine newly qualified radiotherapists (licensed in 2017 - 2018) were enrolled to the conventional one-to-one coaching group (control group), while 11 newly qualified radiotherapists (licensed in 2019 - 2021) were assigned to WORDS training group (measured group). Ten OARs were selected to be contoured in this 3-phases quantitative study. Participants were required to undergo phase 1 OARs contouring in the beginning of the training session. Afterwards, conventional one-to-one training or WORDS training session was provided to participants according to their assigned group. Then the participants did phase 2 and 3 OARs contouring which were separated 1 week apart. Phase 1 - 3 OARs contouring aimed to demonstrate participants' pre-training OARs contouring ability, post-training OARs contouring ability and knowledge retention after one-week interval respectively using either training approach. To prevent bias, the computed tomography dataset for OARs contouring in each phase were different. Variations in the contouring scores for the selected OARs were evaluated between 3 phases using Kruskal-Wallis tests with Dunn tests for pairwise comparisons. Variations in the contouring scores between control and measured group in phase 1 - 3 contouring were analyzed using Wilcoxon signed-rank test. A p-value < 0.05 was considered to be statistically significant. RESULTS: In both control group and measured group, significant improvement (p < 0.05) in phase 2 and 3 contouring scores have been observed comparing to phase 1 contouring scores. In comparison of contouring scores between control group and measured group, no significant differences (p > 0.05) were observed in all OARs between both groups. CONCLUSIONS: The results in this study have demonstrated that the outcome of OARs contouring training using WORDS is comparable to the conventional training approach. In addition, WORDS can offer flexibility to newly qualified radiotherapists to practice OARs contouring at will, as well as reduce staff training burden of experienced radiotherapists.

Volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT) for hippocampal-avoidance whole brain radiation therapy: planning comparison with Dual-arc and Split-arc partial-field techniques.

BACKGROUND: Although whole brain radiation therapy (WBRT) provides palliation and prophylaxis, reduces local recurrence probability and improves overall survival, it is evident that WBRT is associated with neurocognitive deficits due to radiation induced damage of the hippocampus. Therefore, minimizing hippocampal dose to the least possible level is of high clinical relevance. In dual-arc conventional volumetric modulated arc therapy (dac-VMAT), the large irradiation field for whole brain planned target volume (PTV) requires a wide jaw opening in which substantial low dose volume to the hippocampus may be produced due to suboptimal multi-leaf collimator (MLC) movements. The present study investigates the potential of a radiation therapy technique with split-arc and reduced field size, namely split-arc partial-field volumetric modulated arc therapy (sapf-VMAT) to spare the hippocampus during WBRT. METHODS: Computed tomography and magnetic resonance images of 20 patients with brain metastases were retrieved in this retrospective planning study. The hippocampus was manually delineated by single radiation oncologist strictly following the RTOG 0933 atlas definition. Plans delivering 30 Gy in 10 fractions were generated for each patient using dac-VMAT and sapf-VMAT. Dosimetric parameters from both techniques were compared by paired t-test. RESULTS: The results demonstrated that radiation dose to the hippocampus was significantly reduced using sapf-VMAT relative to dac-VMAT plans. sapf-VMAT (7.86Gy, p = 0.001) had significantly lowered average D100% compared to dac-VMAT (9.23 Gy). Decrease in hippocampus Dmax using sapf-VMAT (13.23 Gy, p = 0.001) was statistically significant when compared to dac-VMAT (16.33 Gy). The resulting mean dose to the hippocampus was 9.16 Gy for the for sapf-VMAT. Mean dose of sapf-VMAT was significantly lower than dac-VMAT (10.85 Gy, p < 0.05). In both eyes, sapf-VMAT demonstrated significantly lower Dmean compared to dac-VMAT (p < 0.05). Whole brain PTV coverage was not compromised in both techniques. CONCLUSION: sapf-VMAT has demonstrated significant dose reduction to the hippocampus and both eyes compared to dac-VMAT.