Displaced humeral head after intramedullary nailing for proximal humeral fracture is associated with worse short-term outcomes-a multicenter TRON study.

Background: In recent years, complex and unstable proximal humeral fractures (PHFs) are treated with intramedullary nails (IMNs) in the elderly; however, the postoperative radiographic findings related to the clinical outcome are not clear. This study evaluated the association of clinical outcomes with the radiographic findings of PHFs treated with IMNs. Methods: We collected data of patients aged >60 years with PHFs treated with IMNs from 2015 to 2019 in 13 associated centers' database (named TRON). We excluded patients lost to follow-up of <6 months postoperatively (PO6M). We evaluated clinical outcomes with the University of California at Los Angeles (UCLA) score at PO6M and defined a score of <27 as poor. We assessed the radiographic findings on the anteroposterior view of the humeral head postoperatively, and each radiographic finding such as humeral head height (HHH), head shaft angle, and cranialization of the greater tuberosity was divided into two groups: poor and good. Factors associated with poor UCLA at PO6M were extracted by logistic regression analysis, and the factors were divided into two groups (poor and good) and matched for age, sex, and fracture type. The UCLA score at PO6M between the groups was examined by the Mann-Whitney U test, and the significance level was set at 0.05. The minimal clinical important difference in the UCLA score was set 2 points. Results: The study included 243 patients (mean age, 76 years; range, 60-95 years). The mean follow-up period was 12 months (range, 6-56 months). The correlation coefficients indicated that there was either no or only a weak correlation between HHH, head shaft angle, and cranialization of the greater tuberosity. A poor HHH (HHH <0 or >10 mm) was extracted as a factor associated with a poor UCLA score at PO6M by logistic regression analysis (odds ratio: 5.78, 95% confidence interval = 1.2-27.7, P = .0287). In matched pair analysis, the UCLA score at PO6M was significantly lower in the poor HHH group (26 [range: 9-33] vs. 24 [range: 10-35], P = .0458). Conclusion: We revealed that the HHH was an independent risk factor for poor short-term outcomes. There was a significant difference in the UCLA score between groups divided by the HHH in cases treated with IMNs. The HHH can be used intraoperatively or postoperatively as a reliable parameter to predict clinical outcomes in PHFs treated with IMNs.

Risk factors for fracture-related infection after open reduction and internal fixation of proximal humerus fractures: A multicenter retrospective study of 496 fractures (TRON group study).

INTRODUCTION: One of the complications of the surgical therapy for proximal humerus fractures is fracture-related infection (FRI). This multicenter study aimed to investigate the incidence of FRI and clarify the risk factors associated with FRI in patients receiving open reduction and internal fixation for proximal humerus fracture. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Among 684 patients diagnosed as having proximal humerus fracture and who were treated by surgical therapy in 13 institutions (named TRON group) from 2015 through 2020, 496 patients (men, n = 134, women, n = 362; mean [SD] age, 68.5 [14.5] years; mean [SD] body mass index [BMI], 23.0 [4.4] kg/m2) were included as subjects. Excluded were 188 patients due to less than 12 month's follow-up, patients who underwent osteosynthesis using neither plate nor nail and those with open fracture. We extracted the following as risk factors of FRI: sex, BMI, smoking status, diabetes, glenohumeral fracture dislocation, fracture classification, approach, implant, waiting period, type of anesthesia, operative time and blood loss during surgery. We conducted logistic regression analysis to investigate the risk factors of FRI using these extracted items as explanatory variables and the presence or absence of FRI as the response variable. RESULT: FRI occurred after surgery for proximal humerus fracture in 9 of the 496 patients (1.8%). The causative organism was methicillin-susceptible Staphylococcus aureus in 4 patients, Pseudomonas aeruginosa in one patient and Enterococcus faecalis in one patient. In the other 3 patients, causative organisms were not detected. The univariate analysis showed significant differences for present of glenohumeral fracture dislocation (p = 0.004). Logistic regression analysis showed glenohumeral fracture dislocation to be the significant explanatory factor for FRI (odds ratio 12.3, p = 0.0375). CONCLUSION: This study revealed an infection rate following open reduction and internal fixation of proximal humerus fracture of 1.8% (9 patients) and that Staphylococcus was the most frequent causative organism. Glenohumeral fracture dislocation is a significant risk for postoperative FRI.

Surgical fixation of ulnar coronoid process fractures via mesh plate: A case report.

Introduction: The coronoid process of the ulna is the primary stabilizer of the elbow joint. There has not yet been an accurate off-the-shelf dedicated implant because fragments of coronoid process fractures are often small and diverse. The variable angle locking compression mesh plate 2.4/2.7 (Depuy Synthes, West Chester, PA, USA) acts as a versatile, low-profile implant that can be cut to suit the specific fracture pattern and fits anatomically. Case presentations: We report two cases of Regan-Morrey type II ulnar coronoid process fractures in terrible triad elbow injuries. In both cases, persistent instability was fluoroscopically diagnosed after repair of the lateral structures. We performed osteosynthesis for the ulnar coronoid process fractures using a mesh plate, which we cut into a rhombus-like shape and used as a buttress plate. Here we report the good results obtained thereof. Conclusion: Considering our positive experience with using mesh plates, the mesh plate may be a good method of fixation for ulnar coronoid process fractures.

Plate fixation of acromion fracture using a mesh plate.

In several cases of treatment of acromion fractures of the scapula, plate fixation provides more rigidity to the fractured area. However, no specific plates are available for the acromion because of high interindividual variation in the shape of the acromion. We report two cases of acromion fractures operated using a mesh plate (Depuy Synthes, West Chester, PA, USA), which acts as a versatile, low-profile implant, being cut according to the specific fracture pattern and anatomical fitting. Our positive experiences with using a mesh plate may help to establish it as the operative procedure of choice in cases of acromion fracture.