RESUMO
BACKGROUND: We previously showed that pre-operative hemorrhagic shock and surgical hemorrhage were the major causes of life-threatening events in the operating room and subsequent fatality. We investigated the background of these events. METHODS: The Subcommittee on Surveillance of Anesthesia-Related Critical Incidents, Japanese Society of Anesthesiologist (JSA) sent confidential questionnaires to all JSA-certified training hospitals (n=862). The questionnaires were composed of two parts: one for examining all life-threatening events in the operating room and the other for examining the background of massive hemorrhage in the operating room. The number of patients registered between January 1, 2003 and December 31, 2003 was 1,367,790 from 782 hospitals. Life-threatening hemorrhagic events were reported in 1,011 patients, of whom 876 patients were available for further analysis of the background of the events. Fatality within 7 postoperative days following these events was 45.4%. RESULTS: In patients who developed life-threatening events due to hemorrhage, 35.2% had blood loss of more than 12 l x 60 kg(-1) of body weight, 44.9% had a maximal hemorrhagic speed of more than 240 ml x min(-1) x 60 kg(-1) of body weight, and 39.1% had a minimal hemoglobin concentration of less than 5 g x dl(-1). The main sources of hemorrhage were as follows: the abdominal aorta, 15.4%; the thoracic aorta, 14.0%; the liver, 12.6%; intra-cranium, 8.2%; the pelvic organs, 8.0%; celiac or mesenteric artery, 7.8%; the lung, 7.1%. Of patients who developed life-threatening events due to preoperative hemorrhagic shock, 18.3% underwent cardiac massage preoperatively, 50.0% lost consciousness, 58.5% were intubated, and 16.4% were retrospectively judged to have had no operative indications. Human factors also affected the life-threatening events due to preoperative hemorrhagic shock: delayed decision making concerning indications for surgical treatment, 15.6%; delayed admission to the operating room, 16.6%; delayed supply of blood products, 25.5%; problems in surgical management, 16.3%; problems in anesthetic management, 28.1%. These problems in anesthetic management included shortage of supportive anesthesiologists. This was partly explained by the time of their admission to the operating room: 67.0% of the patients admitted during the week end or at night. Of the patients who developed life-threatening events due to surgical hemorrhage, 58.0% were predicted preoperatively to develop massive hemorrhage by anesthesiologists, and 66.7% were informed of the risks of massive hemorrhage and associated complications. The main causes of surgical hemorrhage were as follows: adhesion or invasion, 44.7%; and problems in surgical judgments or techniques, 43.7%. Anesthetic management affected the development of life-threatening events in these patients: lack of infusion prior to hemorrhage, shortage of supportive anesthesiologists, delay in ordering additional blood products, delayed judgment to start blood transfusion, and shortage of rapid infusion/transfusion apparatus. Delay for hospitals in obtaining blood supply from blood banks was reported in 13.0% of cases, and delayed supply from inhospital blood transfusion service to the operating room in 16.0%. Despite massive hemorrhage, ABO cross-matching was omitted only in 13.4% of patients, and transfusion of ABO-compatible, instead of ABO-identical red blood cells, was performed only in 1.3%. CONCLUSIONS: To reduce life-threatening hemorrhagic events in the operating theater, reorganization of emergency medical service and blood supply, improvement of surgical techniques, improved triage of patients with hemorrhagic shock, flexible application of compatible blood products in emergency situations, and improvement of the quality and number of anesthesiologists should be considered.